tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post2525518301271709812..comments2008-08-01T10:40:10.587-04:00TraderMarkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06241756200482130281noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-41652030972252878232008-08-01T10:40:00.000-04:002008-08-01T10:40:00.000-04:00The real growth will be 2009-2010<BR/><BR/>Bill, if statistics were reported with same criteria we used before 1990 we'd have a 10-12% unemployment rate with 11-13% inflation<BR/><BR/>The sheep feel it. But the sheep don't question their government.TraderMarkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06241756200482130281noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-34409759691213135052008-08-01T09:57:00.000-04:002008-08-01T09:57:00.000-04:00Off topic, but you're very right mark..if unemployment was reported like it was before 2001....it's 10.8%<BR/><BR/>http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htmsoccerbill8http://openid.aol.com/soccerbill8noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-20971570689163685292008-08-01T09:41:00.000-04:002008-08-01T09:41:00.000-04:00I have a stupid question: why do you keep saying that it is a 2009 story, not 2008?<BR/>The stock price action shows that the story has already begun. Why do you place this story specifically in 2009?Jameshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12148812332636319549noreply@blogger.com