<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post1654176398977136514..comments</id><updated>2008-05-28T13:03:12.450-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Fund My Mutual Fund: Bookkeeping: Cutting 4 Names on Technical Worries</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/feeds/1654176398977136514/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1654176398977136514/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2008/05/bookkeeping-cutting-4-names-on.html'/><author><name>TraderMark</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06241756200482130281</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-2437735729453860345</id><published>2008-05-28T13:03:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-28T13:03:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Hi RustenThings are always tricky around a key mov...</title><content type='html'>Hi Rusten&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Things are always tricky around a key moving average like this.  You have to be prepared to change course - as I wrote in the post ; i.e. if they reversed quickly, so would I. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The S&amp;P 500 was a great example - last Monday it broke through the 200 day moving average mid day - that would be a "key signal" to bring in more buys.  Then within hours it reversed, sold off, and we have lost 3.5% by the end of the week.  Mother market is ironic like that.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;You see that in a lot of individual charts; technical analysis is not science, more art.  They are looking solid today but not enough to make me change my decision.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;A lot of times the same happens on the way up...  a stock is below a key resistance area - than snuggles up to that line - so you might sell, expecting a sell off.  Then it surprises you and blasts though - well you just buy back as the condition improved.  You lose on transactions costs and you pay maybe 2-3% higher but that is the "insurance" cost you pay for what would normally be a selloff that happens at that point.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Or you can just tuck under pillow and come back in a year, I do believe $200 is still very viable.  But that doesnt mean it cannot go to $105 first ;) (MOS)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Main thing is to be flexible.  And charts don't always work.  Nothing does :)  But finding things that work 70% puts the odds in your favor.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1654176398977136514/comments/default/2437735729453860345'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1654176398977136514/comments/default/2437735729453860345'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2008/05/bookkeeping-cutting-4-names-on.html?showComment=1211994180000#c2437735729453860345' title=''/><author><name>TraderMark</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06241756200482130281</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='04843070423832044447'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2008/05/bookkeeping-cutting-4-names-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-1654176398977136514' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/posts/default/1654176398977136514' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-7874534817421260272</id><published>2008-05-28T12:45:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-28T12:45:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Funny, I purchased a decent amount of MOS yesterda...</title><content type='html'>Funny, I purchased a decent amount of MOS yesterday right before I read this and was kicking myself when I got home last night.  Then it rockets up today.  I suppose with the everyone and their mom in the Potashes this type of volatility is to be expected but we're down and up almost 5% on back-to-back days without a catalyst in sight.  I've been trying to trade around a core position in MOS and POT and I guess I got lucky with the timing yesterday but I think I'm going to give up and try to hold for 6 months or so.  I agree with your core premise of a $200 target price for MOS but with such volatilty I'm afraid to try and guess the right entry and exit points -- the chart doesn't seem to be necessarily helpful . . . &lt;BR/&gt;-Rusten</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1654176398977136514/comments/default/7874534817421260272'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1654176398977136514/comments/default/7874534817421260272'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2008/05/bookkeeping-cutting-4-names-on.html?showComment=1211993100000#c7874534817421260272' title=''/><author><name>Rusten</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12866879479201117670</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2008/05/bookkeeping-cutting-4-names-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-1654176398977136514' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/posts/default/1654176398977136514' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>