<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post1089914462713313399..comments</id><updated>2007-12-20T17:35:46.096-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Fund My Mutual Fund: Bookkeeping: LDK Solar (LDK) Hits Targets</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/feeds/1089914462713313399/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1089914462713313399/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2007/12/bookkeeping-ldk-solar-ldk-hits-targets.html'/><author><name>TraderMark</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06241756200482130281</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-6755239261780380866</id><published>2007-12-20T17:35:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-20T17:35:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>If I listened to analysts over the years I'd of dr...</title><content type='html'>If I listened to analysts over the years I'd of dropped out of the market years ago.  These are people downgrading the financials in the past 2-3 weeks.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Simple case for LDK - its an arms supplier to the PV panel makers.  Gross margns will probably end up in 25-27% range in near term, on a large revenue ramp and we have (a) accounting issue if not resolved put to bed (for now) (b) new guidance (c) another quarter in the bag (d) a better idea of the year ahead (e) Qcells one of the most influential companies in the industry is now in bed with LDK&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;ASPs should decline in 2008 for the PV makers but they will still need wafers.  Just like they will need JASO for cells.  It's not going away.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;LDK at $70 probably did not discount 30% or below margins. I was having a hard time getting on board they would keep those margins myself, but now we have a more reasonable assumption of 25-30%.  I expect that to be the range next 6 quarters and then it will uptick once they get the plant going.  Although people say plant will be ready by end of 2008 I wont count on it until mid 2009.  So until then you have a labor intensive industry with polysilicon prices higher than usual for next quarter in the spot market but 75% of supply for 2008 secured, and a new paradigm of 25-30% gross margins in a sector with unquenched demand.  I can live with that in the $40s and $50s.  I expect about $1.50 EPS in 2008 as the worst case, and if polysili prices fall in 2nd half of 2008, there should be good upside from there.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1089914462713313399/comments/default/6755239261780380866'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1089914462713313399/comments/default/6755239261780380866'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2007/12/bookkeeping-ldk-solar-ldk-hits-targets.html?showComment=1198190100000#c6755239261780380866' title=''/><author><name>TraderMark</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06241756200482130281</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='04843070423832044447'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2007/12/bookkeeping-ldk-solar-ldk-hits-targets.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-1089914462713313399' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/posts/default/1089914462713313399' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-3354575728248276992</id><published>2007-12-20T16:39:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-20T16:39:00.000-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Re: LDK.  Goldman placed it on the Conviction SELL...</title><content type='html'>Re: LDK.  Goldman placed it on the Conviction SELL list, and Piper downgraded it to Sell with a ~34 price target.  What are you seeing that they aren't?  Can you rehash a little bit on why you think its such a good buy here while analysts are so negative on it?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Piper: Downgrade details (66.11 ) -Update : Piper downgraded LDK to Sell from Neutral and maintains their $34.50 tgt following earnings. Firm says that uncertainties still exist with respect to LDK's low turns of 2.2x, unsubstantiated contract supply with 25% exposure to spot, high risk polysilicon ramp with targets they assess as overly aggressive, and numerous shareholder law suits.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Goldman: Goldman Sachs analyst Cheryl Tang added the stock to her Conviction Sell List, and held a price target of $33 per share.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1089914462713313399/comments/default/3354575728248276992'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/1089914462713313399/comments/default/3354575728248276992'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2007/12/bookkeeping-ldk-solar-ldk-hits-targets.html?showComment=1198186740000#c3354575728248276992' title=''/><author><name>sdk_IV</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06357215762477665878</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2007/12/bookkeeping-ldk-solar-ldk-hits-targets.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2335748440449035592.post-1089914462713313399' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2335748440449035592/posts/default/1089914462713313399' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>