**** WE'VE MOVED TO A NEW HOME ****

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Obama's Speech Tomorrow - $300B More in Stimulus?

TweetThis
Due to the structural issues in the economy 'stimuli' is now becoming an annual event. We started with the Bush rebate checks of 2008.  Of course we had the mega stimulus ($900Bish) launched in spring 2009 that generally covered 2 years (apprx $450B a year).  That was topped off with a 2% payroll tax cut (I believe roughly $120B) beginning in Jan 2011.  Not to mention the extension of the Bush tax cuts late last year.  All put together, this has generated pretty flaccid GDP over the past few years.  But it's time to inject the patient with more steroids since the hollowed out economy no longer has the ability to function on its own.  (We won't even discuss never seen before monetary policy)

Reuters reports we'll be getting a $300B plan, with a resumption of the 2% payroll tax cut, along with more infrastructure plans (remember when all those companies surged in late 2008 and early 2009 on 'shovel ready projects'?) and more state aid similar to what we saw in the 09 plan.  At first I thought it sounded like '2009lite' in regards to the 2009 plan but that one was set to run over 2 years, and considering this is all supposed to go into 2012, its not that much less on an annual basis than the 09 mega stimulus.  Election year after all ...

"Of course" in the current environment this new spending will be offset by 'proposed' revenue measures - which I am sure the GOP will gladly go along with.  So in summary it will be more spending without any funding ;)  Or some far off (think 2019) 'cost neutral' nonsense offset.


  • President Barack Obama plans to propose some $300 billion in tax cuts and government spending, U.S. media reported.  The price tag of the proposed jobs package, to be announced by Obama in a nationally televised speech to Congress on Thursday, would be offset by other cuts that the president would outline, CNN reported, citing Democratic sources
  • Bloomberg News said the plan would inject more than $300 billion into the economy next year through tax cuts, spending on infrastructure, and aid to state and local governments.
  • Obama would offset those short-term costs by calling on Congress to raise tax revenues (this is where you laugh)  in a deficit-cutting proposal he will lay out next week, the news agency reported, without citing sources.
  • Bloomberg said nearly half the stimulus in Obama's plan would come from tax cuts, including an extension of a payroll tax cut paid by workers and a new decrease in the amount paid by employers. (and as we saw yesterday, the temporary payroll tax cut for employers will do nearly nothing...by the way arent these 6.2% payroll taxes supposed to be filling the [empty] social security lockbox??)
  • Direct aid to local governments will focus on stopping layoffs of teachers and first responders, Bloomberg said.

Let the circus begin:

  • "I have no doubt the president will propose many things on Thursday that, when looked at individually, sound pretty good, or that he'll call them all bipartisan. I'm equally certain that, taken as whole, they'll represent more of the same failed approach," said the top Senate Republican, Mitch McConnell.

Almost All the Way Back to Where We Were Before the Employment Data Friday Morning

TweetThis
What horrible employment data?  The federal government and Ben are coming to the rescue... buy buy buy. ;)  Well at least until S&P 1227.


EU Follows U.S. in "Hear No Evil, See No Evil" Solutions on Debt

TweetThis
The market is rallying quite strongly today on little news.  I am wondering if there was leakage of this plan that has hit Bloomberg about the EU looking the other way on admitting reality.  This is a lighter form (for now just a lot of kicking the can down the road) of what the U.S. did in April 2009 via FASB, banks are allowed to carry debt (in our case, mostly mortgage) at what they deem fair, rather than current market prices.  This "make believe" valuation method was credited, in part, for easing stress on banks, and you know what happened after that.  Until banks actually foreclose on properties they can claim whatever they 'believe' to be the value, so it allows for a relative small amount of losses to be 'admitted' each quarter.   This methodology also worked wonders for the REIT market.

Looks like the EU is learning well... and of course if you knew this information before other people did, it's quite an advantage in the market.  So in summary - as long you don't admit there is a problem, there is not a problem - at least in banking circles.   Greek debt at 100 cents on the dollar! Want some?

  • The European Union is delaying proposals for senior bondholders of failing banks to take losses because the measures may spook investors at a time of market turbulence and they need more work, according to two people familiar with the situation. 
  • Michel Barnier, the EU’s financial services commissioner, will unveil draft legislation on the measures in October at the earliest, said one of the people, who declined to be identified because negotiations on the proposals are continuing. The bondholder plans are part of broader proposals for orderly closure of failing lenders that the European Commission, the 27- nation EU’s executive arm, had intended to present this month.
  • “The pricing of bank debt spiked” in January when the commission published a preliminary version of its plans, the British Bankers’ Association said in a paper published on its website today. It is “uncertain” whether a move to a so-called bail-in regime in which senior bondholders would financially contribute to bank wind downs “has been fully priced in at this stage,” the BBA said.
  • The EU move “is part of a broader trend to soften or delay the imposition of regulatory measures in the face of mounting concerns about the ability of the financial sector to support growth,” Richard Reid, the International Centre for Financial Regulation’s director of research, said in an e-mail.

Mortgage Market Continues to Be Lost at Sea, Despite Record Low Rates

TweetThis
There were some interesting nuggets in this piece on the weekly mortgage data.  It appears despite the record low mortgage rates, people are more or less tapped out even in terms of refinancing - i.e. almost everyone who is able to refinance has done so the past few years.  I guess this is why Ben believes he needs to drive mortgage rates down from the low 4%s to (insert arbitrary non free market figure here).

On the purchase side?  It shows how silly it is when everyone claps like seals with this uptick in housing starts there, or that uptick in purchase applications there.  When you take a step back, we are at 1996 levels of mortgage originations, despite a much larger population.

Bottom line, we remain in a cold, dark winter in the housing market.  These meaningless upticks of 3-4% here or there are just bounces along a very long rocky path...

As for Operation Twist, frankly the market has already sniffed it out and already is driving the 10 year down.  By the time it is announced officially (probably latter September), I expect the market to have already done 90% of the work - very similar to what happened before QE2 was officially declared.

------------------------------

Here is some of the ugly - again the news on refinancing was probably the most startling

  • Demand for U.S. home loans fell for a third straight week last week although mortgage rates fell to or near record lows, an industry group said on Wednesday. The Mortgage Bankers Association's seasonally adjusted mortgage applications index, which includes both refinancing and home purchase demand, dropped 4.9 percent in the week ending September 2.
  • The MBA's seasonally adjusted refinancing application index fell 6.3 percent while its gauge of loan requests for home purchases climbed 0.2 percent.
  • Fixed 30-year mortgage rates averaged 4.23 percent, down from 4.32 percent the prior week and the second lowest rate since the group began its survey nearly 22 years ago.   The 30-year fixed rate loan hit its lowest rate of 4.21 percent, just 0.02 percentage point below the current rate, last October, the MBA said.
  • Fifteen-year loan rates averaged 3.41 percent, down from 3.49 percent a week ago to a new survey low.
  • "Despite these rates, refinance application volume fell for the third straight week and is more than 35 percent below levels at this time last year," Mike Fratantoni, MBA's vice president of research and economics, said in a statement.
  • "Purchase application volume remains relatively flat at extremely low levels, close to lows last seen in 1996," he said.
  • Many borrowers who could refinance at these low rates have already done so, several housing analysts said.

PIMCO's Bill Gross September 2011 Letter: New-Fangled Love Songs

TweetThis
Always some interesting nuggets in Bill Gross' monthly investment letter.  This month he touches all the key regions of the world - the U.S., Europe, and Asia - but on completely different topics for each using 'marriage' as a proxy.  Some highlights:

In many ways the global economic crisis is like a marriage gone bad. As the Three Dog Night sang years ago, global economies have functioned harmoniously for many years, but suddenly the love songs have become strident and cacophonous, the policy coordination morphing into a war of the roses as opposed to a giving of them. Instead of three-part harmony we are now experiencing, at a minimum, tri-party disharmony, teetering on the brink of “divorce,” which in economic parlance means a possible “developed economy” recession – a downturn from which reconciliation may be difficult due to a lack of policy options and cooperation. But I get ahead of myself. Let’s first ring the wedding bells, then take you through an explanation of three separate global marriages and how each of the partners have grown apart.

Europe:

The marriage progressed to the point of a smaller monetary union sometime in 1999, but critically, without a common budget. Husband and Wife – Germany and Greece – decided to have a joint bank account, but with separate allowances and no oversight. Greece could issue bonds at nearly the same yield as could its Northern hard-working neighbors, but were free to spend it any way they chose. This was an economic version of an open marriage where one party gets to have all the fun and the other worked nine-to-five and came home too exhausted for whoopee. Well sometime last year, global lenders said enough is enough and soon the whole cheating European Union (EU) was at each other’s throats, hiring lawyers and threatening to break up. Calmer heads prevailed when the ECB decided to make nice and use its checkbook. Last week Angela Merkel and France’s Sarkozy sort of got engaged for at least the second time, nixing expanded funding for their Southern neighbors and placing the burden even more on the ECB. Who knows where it goes now, but let’s put it this way – Germany and France are sleeping in a king-size bed while the rest of its EU family are sleeping in separate bedrooms. As a result Euroland faces economic contraction.

U.S.:

This impending divorce in America is not about sex or sleeping around, but more about romancing the now stone-cold notion that anyone could be a millionaire in the good old U.S. of A. if only they worked hard enough. But this odd couple marriage of rich (and poor hoping to be rich), now seems on rather shaky ground. Instead of boundless opportunity, the nursery rhyme describing Jack Sprat – who could eat no fat – and his wife – who could eat no lean – appears to be the starker of the two realities. There are the poor and there are the very rich, with the shrinking middle class resembling Mr. Sprat rather than his wife.

During this country’s recent economic “recovery,” real corporate profits increased by four times the amount of working wages in dollar terms, and, as the chart below shows, are 50% higher than at the turn of the century while wages remain relatively unchanged, something that has not occurred since this country’s nuptials were concluded over three centuries ago. Is it any wonder that preliminary battlefield skirmishes in Wisconsin and Ohio between labor and capital promise to spread across every state of this land? (Not Texas!) Is it any wonder that Republican orthodoxies favoring tax cuts for the rich and Democratic orthodoxies promoting entitlements for the poor threaten to hamstring any constructive efforts to reduce unemployment over the foreseeable future? We are witnessing romantic love turning into a spiteful, bitter clash between partners in name only.


Asia:

Confucius say, “Can there be a love which does not make demands on its object?” While not a marriage, there has definitely been a love affair between Western consumers and their Chinese producer “objects” for several decades now. We loved them because they made cheap goods, but somehow they seemed to love us more as they slowly but surely put their people to work while ours were hitting the unemployment lines. Imperceptibly, the developed world’s manufacturing base was gradually eroding and being replaced by securitized finance that destroyed itself and nearly its economies in 2008.

China, meanwhile, calmly played its cards with a decades-long plan centered around capitalistic mercantilism, a game the United States claimed to play best but somehow forgot most of the rules. Even when holding the trump card of a reserve currency, mercantilistic domination depends on making something the rest of the world wants. We don’t and they do

In sum:

What to do when a love affair goes bad? How should you invest when Euroland is at each other’s throat, when a thinly disguised battle between labor and capital freezes policy action in the United States, when a mercantilistic partnership between developed and developing nations produces more questions than answers, more losers than winners? Increase the odds for a divorce, we’d suggest, which in investment markets means focusing on the return of your capital as opposed to the return on your capital. Of the three rocky relationships, Euroland has the most immediacy. Mohamed El-Erian is increasingly of the persuasion that one or more of the outer periphery (Greece, Ireland and Portugal) may be forced to vacate the premises. If so, technically destabilizing liquidity concerns may affect all peripheral bond markets unless the ECB counters the rush for the exits with an enlarged daily checkbook.

Potential Double Top in Gold.... and Europe Continues to Wag the Dog

TweetThis
Much like parts of 2009 and 2010 we are gapping up and down substantially each morning.  The difference is in those days we usually gapped in the same direction for many days in a row, whereas now its a roll of the dice which way we gap.  After a few gaps down in a row, today the direction is up as European markets rally from very oversold conditions and news that Germany's top court says bailouts are a good thing.
  • The Constitutional Court rejected a series of lawsuits aimed at blocking the participation of Europe's biggest economy in emergency loan packages but said the government must get approval from parliament's budget committee before granting such aid.  "This was a very tight decision. But it should not be mistakenly interpreted as a constitutional blank check authorizing further rescue measures," the judge told plaintiffs, government officials and members of parliament in the courtroom in Karlsruhe.
  • "Today's ruling should bring some relief to financial markets as a total chaos scenario has been avoided, but it should not lead to euphoria," said Carsten Brzeski at ING.  "The ruling confirms our view that the German piecemeal approach on the debt crisis is not likely to change but eventually the German parliament will vote in favor of a second Greek bailout package and the beefed-up EFSF (euro zone rescue fund)."

As we know 'free market capitalists' in the stock market love bailouts :)

Looks like we will open back above that S&P 1175 area - but again technical analysis is a lot less relevant when we're gapping up and down 1-2% each day on news flow.

-------

Very interesting action that seems counter intuitive.  I would have thought after yesterday's move by the Swiss National Bank to peg the currency, some money would have flowed out of the swiss franc and into gold.  That happened initially in the morning but then the yellow metal reversed to close down on the day.  This morning it's down 2%.   Looking at the chart one wonders if we have a double top?

[chart below does not reflect this morning's action]



No positions

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

NY Dealbook: The Fallacy Behind Tax Holidays

TweetThis
Great piece in NYDealbook by Sorkin on the hot wind blowing around D.C. the past few years.... and to return Thursday.   It's about the economy demand stupid!  If it was about absolute tax levels, by this point we should be creating 400K+ jobs a month with a 5%+ GDP! [May 6, 2011: US Tax Burden at Lowest Levels Since 1958]  The tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 should have set off a never before seen hiring binge - instead we got jobless recoveries (ex real estate bubble).  We continue to look for results from band aids at the margin (and expensive ones at that) instead of first admitting - and then addressing - our structural issues!

If there is a demand for a said product or service, in which they can hopefully generate a profit- employers will form companies and/or hire.  If not - they won't.   It's not that complicated.

Via NYDealbook:

  • As President Obama confronts the nation’s dismal unemployment problem — stubbornly stuck at 9.1 percent with, shockingly, zero net jobs created in August — Wall Street and corporate America are working behind the scenes in Washington to push for a series of temporary tax breaks, which they insist will help create jobs.
  • Consider it a form of horse trading — tax cuts for jobs. There is only one small problem with this strategy: temporary tax cuts rarely result in new jobs and always result in less tax revenue.
  • “Tax policy is not a great lever for adjusting short-term growth,” explained Howard Gleckman, a resident fellow at the Tax Policy Center , who has reviewed dozens of studies on the subject. Most temporary tax holidays “reward people for what they are going to do anyway,” he said, adding that “the bang for the buck is very low — you’re subsidizing companies that were already going to hire.”
  • A seminal study by John H. Bishop and Mark Montgomery that looked at the Targeted Jobs Tax Credit bill from 1977, which was aimed at temporarily giving employers an incentive to hire disadvantaged workers, showed that “at least 70 percent of the tax credits were claimed for hiring workers who would have been hired even in the absence of the tax credit.” Companies claimed more than $4.5 billion in credits as a result.
  • That is not to suggest that tax policy cannot help with long-term growth — virtually every academic study says it absolutely can — but that tax policy is a lousy way to stimulate the economy on a temporary basis.
  • Let’s be honest, even if it is an uncomfortable truth: The jobs crisis is not really a function of tax policy; it is a function of economics. Right now, there is too little demand for products.
  • R. David McLean, a visiting assistant professor of finance at the MIT Sloan School of Management, published a new study last week that showed companies were sitting on trillion-dollar piles of cash, not because they are hoarders or greedy, but because they are worried about the economy and that their businesses might not be as strong as they hope in the future.
  • Devising short-term tax incentives is the antithesis of creating long-term certainty — sticking to the rules of the game. Indeed, such holidays can create perverse incentives. The debate over a tax break for companies to repatriate cash from overseas, for example, has already created a new moral hazard of sorts. When Congress provided a one-time tax break in 2004 for this purpose, it said such a holiday should never be repeated.  “If Congress enacts a second tax holiday, rational corporate executives will conclude that more tax holidays are likely in the future,” Chuck Marr and Brian Highsmith of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities recently wrote. “That will make corporations more inclined to shift income into tax havens and less likely to make investments in the United States.”  (and bingo was his name-o!)
  • One of the other ideas floating around is a temporary break on payroll taxes for employers — in addition to extending the current payroll tax holiday for employees past Jan. 1. The tax holiday for employees may make some sense: it provides extra cash directly to workers, who may put it back into the economy by spending it. A payroll tax holiday for employers is a different story. It would lower the 6.2 percent tax they pay on the wages of every worker they employ, in the hope that this would give them an incentive to hire workers.
  • But again, there is that little problem with demand. “Every C.E.O. and C.F.O. will tell you they will only hire when they are confident they can get sales,” Mr. Gleckman said. “They say to themselves, ‘How much can we sell with the workers we have?’ But there’s nothing a C.E.O. hates more than not being able to fill an order. Only then will they hire.”


[May 1, 2011: Will Repatriation of Foreign Earnings at Ultra Low Tax Rates Create U.S. Jobs? Not if 2004 is an Example]

NYT: Postal Office Nearing Default as Losses Mount

TweetThis
I thought this issue would come to a head a few years ago but like almost everything on this globe the ability to kick the can is amazing. [Mar 26, 2009: Postal Office in Need of Bailout?]  Well now it's really serious as a $5.5 Billion payment due this month has no source of funding.

After I read the background situation of the post office it reminded me a lot of the auto industry a few years back - declining market share, too high of a cost basis for labor, too many locations (in the auto world akin to plants), and an excessive benefit structure compares to the 'regular world'.  Essentially an infrastructure built for a different time - 80% of costs are labor, simply unfeasible.  We know what happened in that industry a few years ago to force a 'right size', so let's see how it plays out here.

Via NYT:

  • The United States Postal Service has long lived on the financial edge, but it has never been as close to the precipice as it is today: the agency is so low on cash that it will not be able to make a $5.5 billion payment due this month and may have to shut down entirely this winter unless Congress takes emergency action to stabilize its finances.  “Our situation is extremely serious,” the postmaster general, Patrick R. Donahoe, said in an interview. “If Congress doesn’t act, we will default.”
  • In recent weeks, Mr. Donahoe has been pushing a series of painful cost-cutting measures to erase the agency’s deficit, which will reach $9.2 billion this fiscal year. They include eliminating Saturday mail delivery, closing up to 3,700 postal locations and laying off 120,000 workers — nearly one-fifth of the agency’s work force — despite a no-layoffs clause in the unions’ contracts.
  • The post office’s problems stem from one hard reality: it is being squeezed on both revenue and costs. As any computer user knows, the Internet revolution has led to people and businesses sending far less conventional mail.  At the same time, decades of contractual promises made to unionized workers, including no-layoff clauses, are increasing the post office’s costs. Labor represents 80 percent of the agency’s expenses, compared with 53 percent at United Parcel Service and 32 percent at FedEx, its two biggest private competitors. Postal workers also receive more generous health benefits than most other federal employees.
  • So far, feuding Democrats and Republicans in Congress, still smarting from the brawl over the federal debt ceiling, have failed to agree on any solutions. It doesn’t help that many of the options for saving the postal service are politically unpalatable. 
[click to enlarge]




  • Missing the $5.5 billion payment due on Sept. 30, intended to finance retirees’ future health care, won’t cause immediate disaster. But sometime early next year, the agency will run out of money to pay its employees and gas up its trucks, officials warn, forcing it to stop delivering the roughly three billion pieces of mail it handles weekly.
  • Mail volume has plummeted with the rise of e-mail, electronic bill-paying and a Web that makes everything from fashion catalogs to news instantly available. The system will handle an estimated 167 billion pieces of mail this fiscal year, down 22 percent from five years ago.
  • The law also prevents the post office from raising postage fees faster than inflation.
  • Meanwhile, the agency has had a tough time cutting its costs to match the revenue drop, with a history of labor contracts offering good health and pension benefits, underused post offices, and laws that restrict its ability to make basic business decisions, like reducing the frequency of deliveries.
Here is one 'fix' - do what many states have done and stop contributing to healthcare or pension obligations ... and by 'fix' my tongue is firmly in cheek.
  • They add that a major factor for the post office’s $20 billion in losses over the past four years is a 2006 law requiring the postal service to pay an average of $5.5 billion annually for 10 years to finance retiree health costs for the next 75 years.



Here are some interesting revenue ideas:
  • ....the agency is considering ideas, like gaining the right to deliver wine and beer, (seriously how awesome would that be? junk mail and merlot together!) allowing commercial advertisements on postal trucks and in post offices, doing more “last-mile” deliveries for FedEx and U.P.S. and offering special hand-delivery services for correspondence and transactions for which e-mail is not considered secure enough.  
Ideas on the expense side:
  • Mr. Donahoe’s hope is to cut $20 billion of the $75 billion in annual costs by 2015. To do that, he wants to close many post offices and slash the number of sorting facilities to 200 from 500 and trim the agency’s work force by 220,000 people, from its current 653,000. (A decade ago, the agency employed nearly 900,000.)


But it's not so easy...
  • The agency’s labor contracts have long guaranteed no layoffs to the vast majority of its workers, and management agreed to a new no layoff-clause in a major union contract last May.
  • But now, faced with what postal officials call “the equivalent of Chapter 11 bankruptcy,” the agency is asking Congress to enact legislation that would overturn the job protections and let it lay off 120,000 workers in addition to trimming 100,000 jobs through attrition.
  • The postal service is also asking Congress for permission to end Saturday delivery.

ISM Non Manufacturing Solid All Things Considered

TweetThis
This morning's ISM Non Manufacturing came in quite decent at 53.3 vs 52.7 in July and expectations at 50.5 51?ish.  New orders rose, employment fell (to the lowest level since September 2010, showing QE2 did wonders in creating jobs), and strangely prices rocketed up 7.7 points.  This has helped stabilize the market to some degree it appears.

Full report here.
WHAT RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING ...
  • "Overall prices paid are increasing, while sales are still slightly behind projections." (Public Administration)
  • "This month we have seen a downward trend in sales activities due to weather and economic conditions." (Construction)
  • "Customer traffic is trending lower, but spending per person continues to increase. Labor cost savings realized through attrition, as fewer replacements are hired. The outlook for the remainder of 2011 is cautiously optimistic, with increased investment in marketing. 'Sticky prices' are keeping operating expenses elevated even as commodity supply eases." (Arts, Entertainment & Recreation)
  • "We had a good first half. Starting to see inflation in many of our input costs. Consumer demand is flat." (Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting)
  • "Business is holding, but looking weaker toward fourth quarter." (Professional, Scientific & Technical Services)
  • "Business climate uncertainty is increasing." (Management of Companies & Support Services)
ISM NON-MANUFACTURING SURVEY RESULTS AT A GLANCE
COMPARISON OF ISM NON-MANUFACTURING AND ISM MANUFACTURING SURVEYS*
AUGUST 2011
Non-Manufacturing Manufacturing
Index Series
Index
Aug
Series
Index
Jul
Percent
Point
Change
Direction Rate
of
Change
Trend**
(Months)
Series
Index
Aug
Series
Index
Jul
Percent
Point
Change
NMI/PMI 53.3 52.7 +0.6 Growing Faster 21 50.6 50.9 -0.3
Business Activity/Production 55.6 56.1 -0.5 Growing Slower 25 48.6 52.3 -3.7
New Orders 52.8 51.7 +1.1 Growing Faster 25 49.6 49.2 +0.4
Employment 51.6 52.5 -0.9 Growing Slower 12 51.8 53.5 -1.7
Supplier Deliveries 53.0 50.5 +2.5 Slowing Faster 17 50.6 50.4 +0.2
Inventories 53.5 56.5 -3.0 Growing Slower 7 52.3 49.3 +3.0
Prices 64.2 56.6 +7.6 Increasing Faster 25 55.5 59.0 -3.5
Backlog of Orders 47.5 44.0 +3.5 Contracting Slower 3 46.0 45.0 +1.0
New Export Orders 56.5 49.0 +7.5 Growing From Contracting 1 50.5 54.0 -3.5
Imports 53.5 47.5 +6.0 Growing From Contracting 1 55.5 53.5 +2.0
Inventory Sentiment 56.0 59.5 -3.5 Too High Slower 171 N/A N/A N/A
Customers' Inventories N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 46.5 44.0 +2.5
* Non-Manufacturing ISM Rep

Another Rough Morning

TweetThis
European markets had some form of a dead cat bounce earlier today, generally up in the 1% range but have given much of it back.  U.S. futures have been all over the place but generally wavering between a 1 and 2% loss the past 12 hours.  As of this writing it appears the S&P 500 will be opening somewhere in the 1140s, so obviously that line in the sand at 1175 which has been a big pivot point the past month will be broken.  Technical analysis takes a back seat when headlines dominate which is the current case.



The ultimate lows to test are S&P 1120ish (give or take a few points) which held many times the past month - I count 6 episodes.  Than below that the intraday low on Fed decision day of 1100.

Ten year yields on U.S. Treasuries are at sixty year lows in the 1.90s - a form of safe haven buying along with forecasting recession ahead.



Lost in the shuffle is ISM non manufacturing this morning at 10 AM.  Consensus is for a decrease to 50.5 vs 52.7 in July.  (low bar)  Remember, the U.S. economy is dominated by services so this report actually is more important than the much more widely lauded manufacturing report we saw last week.  (I'll be out of pocket until after 11 AM, so won't report ISM until an hour after)

Other than that not much in the way of market moving economic data - I see Bernanke speaks 1:30 PM Thursday and then Obama rides on his white horse and gives us an "infrastructure 2.0 - and this time I mean it!" stimulus speech Thursday evening.  One thing I am proud of in terms of calls, is I said when the payroll tax was announced late 2010, than the economy would be in such a weak position 12 months down the road, there is no way this would be a 1 year thing.  Indeed, we are going to get another year - and I will say now we will get another extension late in 2012 as the economy will still be weak.  The only question is if employers get a matching 2% cut.

So essentially we sit here waiting for more intervention of both a Fed and federal government kind, not to mention actions in Europe.  Greece remains a mess, and it appears Italy - now that the ECB rode in to the rescue and pledged to buy their debt - has lost urgency to do any real reforms.  Which of course is peeving off the ECB.

As an interesting side note - the Swiss National Bank has pledged to buy foreign currencies in unlimited quantities to set a minimum exchange rate of 1.20 francs per euro.  Essentially what has happened to the Swiss franc, is its being treated as one of the few safe havens, since they have their house in (relative) fiscal order, and have not been punishing their fiat currency as the U.S., Japanese, and lesser extent British and Euro zone have.  By not being part of the global race to the bottom in fiat currencies, investors have flooded into the franc.  Now it's rallied so much it is hurting their export sector - hence the move today.

That leaves gold - already back to highs from a few weeks ago, despite the big margin requirement hikes, as a place to not be devalued.

Monday, September 5, 2011

Nouriel Roubini: Is Capitalism Doomed?

TweetThis
Pretty interesting piece below coming on Labor Day:

Nouriel Roubini has the most read story over at Project Syndicate titled 'Is Capitalism Doomed?'  This is the second major voice (Bill Gross being the other) in the past week, who I've seen take a lot of direct strikes at 'capitalism'.  Unfortunately they use the U.S. as a basis for capitalism ... aside from EBAY and perhaps the restaurant business and a few other niche sectors, there is not a lot of capitalism going on in this country anymore.  Perhaps 1965 USA would have been a better example.

Rather than 'capitalism', we're in what I call corporate socialism - and you really only can partake if your one of the bog boys (small business does not make enough donations to political coffers). [Oct 7, 2009: Dylan Ratigan - America Being Subjected to "Corporate Communism"]  It's a country dominated by the oligarchy of the highest end business class in cahoots with the politicos whose campaigns they have paid for.  Anti trust has gotten to be such a joke that this recent move by the government to block AT&T and T-Mobile from joining forces is a shock.  After all, having a handful of dominant giants in every major industry is great for 'competition'.





Anyhow the bigger point is the power between capital and labor has swung dramatically to capital.  I don't have the link in front of me but the % of corp profits going to shareholders/capital vs wages is at historic lows in the U.S.  While this has been a trend for many years, as 'pleasing Wall Street' has become the end all, and be all for corporations we've now reached the point where many in the labor force cannot support a level of purchases to support those same corporations without yearly annual stimulu/tax cuts.  (While still of course demanding a high level of benefits - which the country needs to borrow to pay for).  Ironically this is the exact opposite of the Henry Ford plan from early in the century; he purposely drove UP wages so his workers could afford the product they produced.  (and attract a higher class of worker)  Ironically here we are a century late, in a hyper competitive global market, where many in the middle and lower class are being driven in the exact opposite direction.

in 1914, Henry Ford added to his long list of industrial accomplishments when he announced that all worthy Ford Motor Company employees would receive a minimum wage of $5 a day. This was more than double the standard base pay of $2.34.

Here are some snippets from Roubini's piece:

  • The massive volatility and sharp equity-price correction now hitting global financial markets signal that most advanced economies are on the brink of a double-dip recession. A financial and economic crisis caused by too much private-sector debt and leverage led to a massive re-leveraging of the public sector in order to prevent Great Depression 2.0. But the subsequent recovery has been anemic and sub-par in most advanced economies given painful deleveraging.
  • Until last year, policymakers could always produce a new rabbit from their hat to reflate asset prices and trigger economic recovery. Fiscal stimulus, near-zero interest rates, two rounds of “quantitative easing,” ring-fencing of bad debt, and trillions of dollars in bailouts and liquidity provision for banks and financial institutions: officials tried them all. Now they have run out of rabbits.
  • Another round of bank bailouts is politically unacceptable and economically unfeasible: most governments, especially in Europe, are so distressed that bailouts are unaffordable; indeed, their sovereign risk is actually fueling concern about the health of Europe’s banks, which hold most of the increasingly shaky government paper.
  • Currency depreciation is not a feasible option for all advanced economies: they all need a weaker currency and better trade balance to restore growth, but they all cannot have it at the same time. So relying on exchange rates to influence trade balances is a zero-sum game. Currency wars are thus on the horizon, with Japan and Switzerland engaging in early battles to weaken their exchange rates. Others will soon follow.
  • Meanwhile, in the eurozone, Italy and Spain are now at risk of losing market access, with financial pressures now mounting on France, too. But Italy and Spain are both too big to fail and too big to be bailed out. For now, the European Central Bank will purchase some of their bonds as a bridge to the eurozone’s new European Financial Stabilization Facility. But, if Italy and/or Spain lose market access, the EFSF’s €440 billion ($627 billion) war chest could be depleted by the end of this year or early 2012.
  • Then, unless the EFSF pot were  tripled – a move that Germany would resist  – the only option left would become an orderly but coercive restructuring of Italian and Spanish debt, as has happened in Greece. Coercive restructuring of insolvent banks’ unsecured debt would be next. So, although the process of deleveraging has barely started, debt reductions will become necessary if countries cannot grow or save or inflate themselves out of their debt problems.
  • So Karl Marx, it seems, was partly right in arguing that globalization, financial intermediation run amok, and redistribution of income and wealth from labor to capital could lead capitalism to self-destruct (though his view that socialism would be better has proven wrong). Firms are cutting jobs because there is not enough final demand. But cutting jobs reduces labor income, increases inequality and reduces final demand. 
  • Recent popular demonstrations, from the Middle East to Israel to the UK, and rising popular anger in China – and soon enough in other advanced economies and emerging markets – are all driven by the same issues and tensions: growing inequality, poverty, unemployment, and hopelessness. Even the world’s middle classes are feeling the squeeze of falling incomes and opportunities.
  • To enable market-oriented economies to operate as they should and can, we need to return to the right balance between markets and provision of public goods. That means moving away from both the Anglo-Saxon model of laissez-faire and voodoo economics and the continental European model of deficit-driven welfare states. Both are broken.

So that is the issue - here are Roubini's solutions
  • The right balance today requires creating jobs partly through additional fiscal stimulus aimed at productive infrastructure investment. It also requires more progressive taxation; more short-term fiscal stimulus with medium- and long-term fiscal discipline; lender-of-last-resort support by monetary authorities to prevent ruinous runs on banks; reduction of the debt burden for insolvent households and other distressed economic agents; and stricter supervision and regulation of a financial system run amok; breaking up too-big-to-fail banks and oligopolistic trusts.
  • Over time, advanced economies will need to invest in human capital, skills and social safety nets to increase productivity and enable workers to compete, be flexible and thrive in a globalized economy. The alternative is – like in the 1930s - unending stagnation, depression, currency and trade wars, capital controls, financial crisis, sovereign insolvencies, and massive social and political instability.

German DAX Crushed to the Tune of 5% as CEO of Deutsche Bank Offers Truth on Banks

TweetThis
European shares are being blistered today as the continent returns from 'August vacation'.  As I have been writing the past few weeks it is always bemusing how Europe gets pushed aside from time to time, as if its issues don't matter... and then suddenly they do again.  It's just difficult to catch when issues (that never went away) matter to the markets.

Germany is down some 5%ish.



I am not sure why Germany is being so impacted, over and above, other countries.  It could be the market forecasting (a) a big slowdown in manufacturing/exports which has been Germany's lifeblood or (b) it could be forecasting a huge bill coming to Germany to pay for countless other countries largesse or (c) it could simlpy be that Germany has not instituted short selling bans and hence this is the proxy to short Europe at large.

France is down 4.4%, and Britain 3.4%.

----------------

CEO Joseph Ackermann of German giant Deutsche Bank did not help things by actually admitting the truth at a conference today - cmon man, don't you know the game plan, deny deny deny!

  • Europe's sovereign debt crisis will stunt bank profits for years and could kill off the weakest, Deutsche Bank Chief Executive Josef Ackermann warned industry bosses on Monday amid intense scrutiny of the sector's finances.  "Prospects for the financial sector overall are rather limited," the CEO of Germany's top bank said. "The outlook for the future growth of revenues is limited by both the current situation and structurally." 
  • Shares in the banks that hold much of that debt dropped on Monday towards the two-year lows they reached in August. 
  • Despite his gloomy outlook for profits, Ackermann rejected calls for urgent recapitalization.  A forcible recapitalisation would "threaten to send the signal that politics has lost faith in the ability of existing measures to succeed," said the boss of Germany's biggest lender. 
  • Ackermann also warned that many European banks could go under if they had to accept the "haircut" on their sovereign debt holdings that has been proposed in some quarters."It's stating the obvious that many European banks would not survive having to revalue sovereign debt held on the banking book at market levels," he said.

Translation - if European banks had to admit the true worth of what is on their balance sheet, many would be done. Hence, let's stick to fantasy.

That thinking worked wonders in the USA in April 2009, when FASB (the U.S. accounting rules board) changed to "mark to myth" accounting and we all clapped hands and said no more problems!

Sunday, September 4, 2011

[Video] Tom Friedman Nails It on Meet the Press

TweetThis
A pretty interesting roundtable this morning on NBC's Meet the Press, but the opening salvo by Tom Friedman was excellent - amazing when smart people who are not partisan really look under the surface and ask what has changed structurally.  He nails it on so many angles, especially the point so many people are missing - our issues did not start in 2007-2008 with subprime, they have been building in the wings for decades.

This is a 21 minute video, but if you only have 2-3 minutes, skip to minute 1:30 and absorb the opening statement by Friedman.  Looks like he has a new book out which addresses 'how we got here' in further detail.  The only thing I think he missed was the role of automation.




Most Stock Mutual Funds Lagging their Benchmarks Thus Far in 2011 - Setting Up a Late Year Rally?

TweetThis
Interesting statistic via InvestmentNews - looks like a mass of underperformance versus benchmarks in the mutual fund world this year.  A bit surprising since the 'long only, cash is trash' ideal worked wonders January thru April and I would assume in that environment, a lot of people did fine -  but I guess the more recent downturn hit individual funds much harder than the indexes. 

Keep in mind with correlations at record highs [Aug 25, 2011: Student Body Left, Student Body Right Trading Returns as Correlations Surpass that of Even 2009, 2010], it becomes very difficult to truly detach too far from the indexes (esp on the equity side) - hence I am surprised a bit more funds are not at least more or less keeping pace with the overall market.

  • Stock mutual funds are having their worst year since 1998 relative to their benchmarks, as higher volatility makes it harder to pick stocks, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).  Among 2,806 funds tracked by the brokerage, 47 percent underperformed their benchmarks by more than 2.5 percentage points this year, the most since the 55 percent recorded in 1998. 
  • Only 13 percent of the funds beat the market by the same margin. The underperformance accelerated last month, with the proportion of trailing funds almost doubling from July, according to JPMorgan data.
  • “The turbulence of markets in August caused a rapid deterioration of active manager performance,” Thomas J. Lee, JPMorgan's chief U.S. equity strategist, wrote in the report dated yesterday.
Mr. Lee likes to track underperformance of funds and generally believes when that happens, managers reach for more risk and therefore we should expect a rally.  (I've seen similar thoughts from him in the past). 
  • The trailing funds are likely to increase holdings in companies that move the most relative to the benchmark, known as high-beta stocks, to boost performance, Lee said. That preference may result in a year-end rally, he said.
  • “When active managers trail, there is a tendency for markets to rise into” the end of the year, Lee wrote. “Intuitively, when there are more trailing, there will be logically an attempt to outperform, which should be driven by risk-taking.”
Pretty interesting track record - 2008 obviously was an anomaly due to world events, but then again with Europe a mess, 2011 might be considered one as well.
  • Since 1995, there had been nine years when more funds trailed than those that beat from Jan. 1 through Aug. 31. The market rallied in the last four months of a year in all but 2008, with the S&P 500 rising 8.5 percent on average, JPMorgan data showed.


Goldman Sachs (GS) "End of Days" Report

TweetThis
A reader highlighted this report (from Aug 16) in comments late last week, and I've seen it in the blogosphere this weekend, so if you want to some weekend reading here is a fun report from Goldman Sachs on how the end of days approach, but how we can get rich off it.  I attached a video discussion of it, via Marketwatch, below the embed.

Original WSJ story can be found here.

In a 54-page report sent to hundreds of Goldman's institutional clients dated Aug. 16, Alan Brazil—a Goldman strategist who sits on the firm's trading desk—argued that as much as $1 trillion in capital may be needed to shore up European banks; that small businesses in the U.S., a past driver of job production, are still languishing; and that China's growth may not be sustainable.


Full report here:


GS_StateOf the Markets



Video discussion (6 minutes, email readers will need to come to site to view) below







Friday, September 2, 2011

Starz Walks Away from Netflix (NFLX)

TweetThis
Remember when Netflix (NFLX) never went down?  Once these things reverse it can get ugly.   While Netflix bounced with the rest of the market the past few weeks, it certainly was not the leadership stock it was for much of the past few years.  Last evening Starz decided to take its movies and go home, taking away 8%ish of Netflix's revenue stream.  We'll see over the next half year if this is a negotiating ploy to squeaze more juice out of Netflix.



Via AP:

  • Netflix's negotiations to keep a key piece of its Internet video library have collapsed, dealing a major blow to the largest U.S. video subscription service as it raises the prices for most of its 25 million customers.  Starz Entertainment delivered the bad news Thursday in a terse statement announcing that it won't renew a contract that allows Netflix to show a lineup of recently released movies and TV shows over high-speed Internet connections.
  • That means Starz content will be removed from Netflix's streaming service starting in March. Starz' library includes movies from Walt Disney Co.'s assorted studios and, until recently, Sony Corp.
  • The talks fell apart after the two sides disagreed over the value of the Starz content and how it should be sold to Netflix subscribers, according to people familiar with the negotiations.  The content from Starz' cable TV channel played an instrumental role in increasing usage of Netflix's Internet service and helped Netflix add nearly 17 million subscribers since the deal was signed in October 2008.  
  • That growth probably wouldn't have happened without the boost that the Starz deal gave to Netflix streaming, said Janney Montgomery Scott analyst Tony Wible.  "What created (Netflix's success in streaming) is frankly, initially getting Starz, getting that content, which got you more subscribers, which allowed you to buy more content," Wible said. "The virtuous cycle that has made Netflix what it is could work against it. If you lose content, you lose subscribers; ... it could be a downward spiral from here."
  • Netflix had been expected to work out a new contract with Starz, although at a much higher price than the estimated $30 million a year that it had been paying under the current agreement. Netflix CEO Reed Hastings acknowledged earlier this year that the company might have to pay as much as $250 million a year to retain the Starz rights when the current contract expires in February. (now that's inflation)  But those hopes were dashed, if not blown up completely, with Thursday's bombshell dropped by Starz CEO Chris Albrecht.
  • The timing of the announcement was seen a way to kick Netflix in the shins at a particularly vulnerable time. It came on the first day of a new Netflix pricing system that will hit U.S. subscribers with price increase of as much as 60 percent if they want to continue to get DVD rentals through the mail along with unlimited streaming of Internet video. The new pricing system has incensed a large group of Netflix subscribers who have threatened to cancel their accounts, a backlash that could intensify if it looks like Netflix's streaming library is becoming less attractive.
  • The contract renewal talks broke down when Netflix refused to meet demands that could have driven up the annual licensing rights to $300 million or more, according to one person familiar with the negotiations.
  • A major sticking point arose when Starz insisted its content be corralled on a higher-price tier, another person said. Instead of making their content available to any Netflix subscriber paying just $8 per month, Starz executives wanted viewership limited to people paying at least $16 per month for a package that bundles DVD rentals with Internet video.  That stipulation was seen as a way to preserve Starz' relationship with cable and satellite TV distributors, who include Starz in channel packages that cost far more than the $8 monthly fee for Netflix streaming.
  • In June, Sony also stopped allowing its movies, which include "Easy A" and "Grown Ups," to part of Starz streaming in June. Those factors have reduced Starz's share of Netflix streaming viewership in the U.S. to 8 percent, according to Netflix.
  • Starz's decision to end the talks with Netflix underscores the escalating tensions with pay-TV services that view Netflix's popularity as a competitive threat. Time Warner Inc.'s HBO has consistently refused to license its shows for Netflix streaming, and Showtime recently has declined to make some of its top series, including "Dexter" and "Californication" available to the service.
  • Morningstar analyst Michael Corty said he thinks Netflix can salvage the Starz deal, given there is still six months before the current contract expires. To do that, Netflix will likely have to pay even more than it intended because Starz appears to have more negotiating leverage, Corty said. Although Albrecht's statement made it sound as if there is little chance of a new deal, Netflix left the door open.


No position

Debase Me Baby - Gold Continues to Run Despite Margin Requirement Hikes

TweetThis
Central banker attacks on the saver class > margin requirement hikes.

As Britney would say - hit me one more time.

The only downside at this point in gold, is continued margin requirement hikes.  The path forward is clear - and nothing different than what has been done repeatedly (failing) in the past.



As for the market, we've broken the weak support of the 20 day moving average, and now approach a key pivot point the past 3 weeks - S&P 1175.  That was the 'top' from three weeks ago, as well as the level we bounced off of early this week.



Nouriel Roubini - 60% Chance of U.S. Recession & We Are in a "Worse Situation" Than 2008

TweetThis
Some interesting comments on the chances of recession from Nouriel Roubini this morning - the man of course made his name on his calls heading into the 2007-2008 mess. [Aug 20, 2008: Roubini - "Told You So"]  (these calls were not much different than mine, but I am not on TV) :)  With that said, I think it depends where you are on the economic scale in America to declare recession or not - the aggregate numbers (somewhat fudged by statistical adjustments) can say one thing, the reality on Main Street for many is another.  Many never left the Great Recession.

I will disagree with Roubini that we are in a worse situation than in 2008, because back then the type of intervention we saw by central banks and governments was unheard of.  So we were going in blind.  This time around it is old hat, so they won't have any issue throwing the taxpayer under the bus.  See the discussion of QE3... QE1 was a brand new adventure and now we talk about QE as if its an annual must have for the economy.

The talking points on why rescues, interventions, et al are necessary are already old hat - unlike 08.  Essentially the U.S. will continue to debase its currency from here to infinity so it pays back its creditors in much less valuable dollars, and the EU will eventually force the ECB to do the same (notice how Italy and Spain no longer are a 'problem' as long as the ECB buys their bonds) and/or go to Eurobonds.  Or create a mega ESFS I suppose - but its much easier to have the ECB print money down the road since no one politician needs to be responsible for that. Then every major economic power save China will be printing and devaluing - hence the case for gold to the moon.

So worse than 2008?  Only if you like fiat currencies, are responsible and/or are a saver.  But if you fall into any of those categories you've already been treated like trash the past 3-4 years, so what else is new.

-----------------------------------

Looks like there was a video on CNBC but in a bid to monetize traffic you have to be a subscriber to get certain content. Boo & hiss.  Hence here is a summary.

  • The world’s developed economies are trapped at the “stall speed” of low growth and need to have greater fiscal stimulus and less austerity to kick-start growh, leading economist Nouriel Roubini told CNBC Friday.
  • Speaking at the Ambrosetti Forum on the shores of Lake Como, near Milan, Roubini said in an interview: “We are in a worse situation than we were in 2008. This time around we have fiscal austerity and banks that are being cautious.”
  • Roubini, known for his bearish views on the world economy, thinks that there is a 60 percent chance of a second recession imminently.  Recent surveys point to slumping business and consumer confidence across the developed world.  Asked if there was still a chance the developed economies could avoid recession, Roubini said: "That’s very optimistic if you look at the data."
  • "The hard economic data (which has come out recently) is all relevant to July while the soft data which has come out is for the future and that’s all moving in the wrong direction," he added. He also believes that a third round of quantitative easing in the US may not have the desired long-term effects, and that further fiscal stimulus across Europe and the US will be needed.
  • The market may rally but unless the real economic data moves with asset prices, then eventually asset prices are going to go," he said. "Last year the economic data was already improving when QE2 was introduced."
  • Europe has come into increasing focus in recent weeks, with some even questioning whether the single currency can survive this crisisRoubini believes there will eventually be an enlargement of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) or a common euro zone bond.
  • He thinks that the euro zone governments should try to weaken the value of the euro. The strength of the currency is worrying some economists because of the potential effect on exports from the euro region. "Unless there is economic growth there will be this problem again,” said Roubini. “Fiscal austerity is negative for growth… (Governments) should work on denominated GDP not just on austerity."
  • He was pessimistic about the UK’s immediate economic future, and believes the British economy is "on the verge of a double dip."



Yikes. 0 Job Growth, as Unemployment Rate Stays Steady at 9.1%

TweetThis
Another ugly report - not sure why we are not ripping higher in futures as this guarantees more Fed assistance!  Aren't we happy?

Despite what I am sure will be another hefty gain in via the fantasy land of the birth death model [Jan 27, 2008: Birth Death Model], there was zero job creation in Cramerica in August.  Unemployment rate stayed steady at 9.1% - I will have to dig in a bit to find the employment participation figure.

EDIT 8:45 AM: Birth death came in at +87,000 jobs. ;)  Translated - the government is translating small business is booming across America, creating a hefty near 100K jobs while the rest of the country was essentially zero.  Seems reasonable (cough).

June and July were revised DOWN 58,000 - shocker right?  Always seems like the government revised data downward after Wall Street reacts to it.

Average hourly earnings fell 3 cents. Average hourly workweek dropped from 34.3 to 34.2 (that is important as it is akin to losing a few hundred K jobs).

Some anomalies - the Verizon strike was counted as 45,000 jobs lost.  That was offset by a return of Minnesota state workers to the tune of 22,000.  That nets to +23,000 jobs created if you wish.  Expectations were just below 70K.  As always we need 125K minimum just to keep up with population growth.

U6 rate (marginally attached + discouraged): 16.2%

EDIT 8:55 AM - Labor force participation rate shockingly increased 0.1% to 64.0%.  Way below the trend of 66-67% still.

Roubini is tweeting another 165,000 Americans left the workforce - which is why the unemployment rate did not go higher.  Again if we had a normal work force participation rate, we'd have unemploymen trates 2% higher than currently being reported.

The laser like focus on these figures are silly when they get revised every which way down the road.  The reality is this economy needs to be producing 250-350K type of jobs a month to get us out of the hole.  We have never done that this entire 'recovery'.

Full report here.





Thursday, September 1, 2011

Positive News - U.S. States' Q2 Tax Revenue Up 11.4%

TweetThis
Looks like some good news for the states - although I wish we could break this data down to see the effects of tax increases/new levies/et al vs pure organic tax growth. While revenue is still amazingly nearly 8% lower than it was three YEARS ago, we have seen a nice year over year uptick of over 11% this past quarter.  I would assume some of the tax shortfall is a decrease in property taxes ...

  • U.S. state tax revenue grew at its fastest pace in six years in the second quarter, led by personal and corporate levies, as governments begin to recover from the longest recession since World War II.
  • Revenue rose 11.4 percent from the same three months a year earlier, according to a report today by the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, which collected preliminary data from 46 states. Revenue is still 7.8 percent lower than the April-June period three years ago, the report said.
  • The gains were aided by temporary tax increases, one-time fees and a low collection rate from which to improve, said Lucy Dadayan, an analyst at the Albany, New York-based institute.  “Fiscal pressures are easing,” she said in a telephone interview. “But the long-term challenges are still there since most states took temporary solutions during the recession to generate revenue.
  • U.S. states, which closed combined projected budget deficits of $430 billion over the past three years, face an additional $103 billion gap this year, according to a June 17 report from the Washington-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
  • Cuts in state and local government spending reduced U.S. growth by 0.34 percentage point in the second quarter, after slowing expansion by 0.23 percentage point in 2010 and 0.11 percentage point in 2009, the Commerce Department said in its most recent estimate of second-quarter growth.
  • Second-quarter personal-income and corporate-tax revenue rose by 16.5 percent each, while sales taxes rose 5.9 percent, the Rockefeller report said. 

The Power of a Very Low Bar - ISM Manufacturing Comes in at 50.6 v 48.5

TweetThis
I wrote early in the week that the bar for both ISM Manufacturing and Employment data was very low.

Interestingly the ISM Manufacturing expectation is for contraction at 48.5? That's down from 50.9 in July.  Speaking of low bars.

Today we see that power in action - despite reporting a barely expansionary figure of 50.6 the market flew higher from a loss of 0.3% on the S&P 500 to a gain of 0.7% on the announcement.  It is definitely a have your cake, and eat it too market right now.  Minor good news is celebrated, and bad news means intervention.

This was the worst reading since July 2009, confirming what we saw overnight from Europe and China.

Under the surface, new orders were up marginally from last month but employment down. Prices continue to fall...

-------------------

Full report here.

"The PMI registered 50.6 percent, a decrease of 0.3 percentage point from July, indicating expansion in the manufacturing sector for the 25th consecutive month, at a slightly slower rate. The Production Index registered 48.6 percent, indicating contraction for the first time since May of 2009, when it registered 45 percent. The New Orders and Backlog of Orders Indexes edged up slightly from July, but both indexes are indicating contraction in August at slower rates than in July. The rate of increase in prices slowed for the fourth consecutive month, dropping another 3.5 percentage points in August to 55.5 percent. The overall sentiment is one of concern and caution over the domestic and international economic environment, which is affecting customers' confidence and willingness to place orders, at least in the short term."

WHAT RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING...
  • "Earlier chemical price increases are beginning to soften." (Chemical Products)
  • "Business is soft, confidence is down, and we are cutting inventory and expenses." (Machinery)
  • "Exports continue to be strong — domestic weak." (Computer & Electronic Products)
  • "Domestic sales are showing small improvements. International sales are showing larger improvements." (Fabricated Metal Products)
  • "Demand remains constant and strong." (Paper Products)
  • "Current headwinds in the national and international economic environment have increased uncertainty, and are affecting our customers' willingness to commit to high-dollar equipment purchases." (Transportation Equipment)
  • "We continue to post solid numbers, but the situation seems tenuous." (Plastics & Rubber Products)
  • "Automotive business (represents 52 percent of our sales portfolio) continues to be strong. Core business has pulled back slightly." (Apparel, Leather & Allied Products)
  • "Sales continue to be sluggish." (Furniture & Related Products)
MANUFACTURING AT A GLANCE
AUGUST 2011


Index
Series
Index
Aug
Series
Index
Jul
Percentage
Point
Change


Direction
Rate
of
Change

Trend*
(Months)
PMI 50.6 50.9 -0.3 Growing Slower 25
New Orders 49.6 49.2 +0.4 Contracting Slower 2
Production 48.6 52.3 -3.7 Contracting From Growing 1
Employment 51.8 53.5 -1.7 Growing Slower 23
Supplier Deliveries 50.6 50.4 +0.2 Slowing Faster 27
Inventories 52.3 49.3 +3.0 Growing From Contracting 1
Customers' Inventories 46.5 44.0 +2.5 Too Low Slower 29
Prices 55.5 59.0 -3.5 Increasing Slower 26
Backlog of Orders 46.0 45.0 +1.0 Contracting Slower 3
Exports 50.5 54.0 -3.5 Growing Slower 26
Imports 55.5 53.5 +2.0 Growing Faster 24
OVERALL ECONOMY Growing Slower 27
Manufacturing Sector Growing Slower 25
*Number of months moving in current direction.




World Roundup: Euro Region PMI Contracts for First Time in 2 Years, British Manufacturing Drops at Steepest Pace in 2 Years, Chinese PMI Increases Slightly, while Brazil Surprisingly Cuts Interest Rates

TweetThis
A bevy of news this morning across the globe.  Much of it remains quite poor, but at this point I suppose we are cheering poor news (as speculators, not as people of Main Street) as it means more intervention into markets.

Certainly all those claiming transitory slowdown, including our ever so accurate Fed chief, 4-5 months ago, look a bit wrong again.  U.S. Manufacturing ISM is out at 10 AM - and expectations are very low at

First to the Euro Zone, where we had a preliminary figure last week of 49.7 in PMI; it came in quite a bit worse in the final.  This is the first contraction since latter 2009.  Even Germany is barely expansionary.
  • Markit’s Euro-zone Manufacturing P.M.I. fell to 49.0 in August from 50.4 in July, revised down from a preliminary 49.7. It was the first time since September 2009 that the index for the sector, which drove a large part of the bloc’s recovery, has fallen below the 50 mark that divides growth from contraction. 
  • Markit said new orders fell across all 17 countries in the bloc, while job creation grew at its slowest rate for almost a year.
  • New orders fell for the third straight month. The sub-index fell to 46.0, down from the preliminary 46.9 reading and much lower than July's 47.6.
  • Germany's manufacturing sector was the strongest in the eurozone at 50.9, while Greece's was the weakest, at 43.3.  The French, Italian and Spanish manufacturing sectors all contracted

Britain continues to struggle:
  • A gauge by Markit Economics and the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply fell to 49, the lowest in 26 months, from 49.4 in July.  New orders fell the most in almost 2 1/2 years. Manufacturers said the drop in demand was due to weaker domestic and export sales and “rising global economic uncertainty.”

China had already turned negative but showed some rebound, although essentially their PMI figure it right at the break even between expansion and contraction.  (Remember, Chines has 2 PMI figures, one public sector and one via HSBC)
  • While HSBC’s China P.M.I. rose to 49.9 last month, it still pointed to contraction.  China’s new export orders index dropped to 48.3 from July’s 50.4 and Beijing pinned the blame at least partly on the debt crises in advanced economies. 
The public sector figures, which are more focused on state 'assisted' companies were marginally expansive:
  • China’s official Purchasing Managers’ Index rose to 50.9 in August, up from July’s 50.7, and was roughly in line with expectations for a reading of 51.  The result marked the first increase in activity since March. 
  • New export orders, however, were on the weaker side, easing to 48.3 from 50.4 in July. 
  • “This set of PMI data is slightly better than expected, but does not change the main trend of slowing investment and weakening exports,” wrote Credit Suisse analyst Dong Tao in a note following the release of the manufacturing surveys.


    Even while Brazil has an inflation problem, it seems its central bank is concerned about the slowdown as interest rates were cut by half a percent.  Or at least its politicians demanded a cut...
    • Brazil's central bank has unexpectedly cut the country's key interest rate to 12% from 12.5%, citing a "substantial deterioration" in the outlook for the global economyIt had raised rates five times this year in order to combat rising prices.
    • The surprise cut has raised questions about the independence of the central bank, after a number of politicians called for a rate cut in recent days.  
    • A number of analysts were baffled by its decision to cut rates. "I think it's a huge mistake," said Tony Volpon at Nomura Securities. "They gave in to political pressure. The costs will likely be much higher inflation and a deterioration of central bank credibility... It has damaged the inflation-targeting regime."

    *

    *
    Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
    This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


    Site by codeeo
    Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix