I also see Uncle Ben joined Uncle Hank Paulson (must of been drinking from the same barrel of Kool Aid) with almost identical terminology. Hank told us in April 2007 "subprime is contained" - and really, considering he was the head of Goldman Sachs (GS) when the era of CDOs (full of subprime loans) was moving from child to teenager to adult, who would know better? Apparently - not the former head of Goldman Sachs. Nor the 'top regulator in the land'.
Thankfully having a good forecasting record has nothing to do with securing the top economist job in the world.
To reiterate my beef is not as much with Uncle Ben as the institution - one that has gone rogue and out of control and being used as a crutch for a country who cannot face reality. Keep in mind as Ben talks about the "confidence" he has in bank regulators, that the FED is the #1 "master regulator" of the country. Then again, our regulators are captured agencies, under the thumb of our oligarchs.
Last note - I did get a kick seeing all the US index stock prices in the 2005 videos higher than they are today; of course only oil is higher today (The Fed is competent at one thing - creating inflation)
Via Mises.org: Ben Bernanke was Incredibly, Uncannily Wrong
We now have the diametrical opposite of the famous "Peter Schiff Was Right" video (a compilation of 2006 and 2007 clips in which Schiff, a financial expert who subscribes to Austrian economics, predicted the deep recession that would follow the bursting of the housing bubble).
The new, opposite video is a compilation of the 2005–2007 prognostications of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. In it, Bernanke is shown to have been just as embarrassingly wrong as Schiff was uncannily right. Could their differences in economic understanding have anything to do with this remarkable dichotomy?








