Way back in the day (ok, 3 weeks ago) the world was ending... there were so few buyers and the S&P 500 was in a vortex death spiral. Ah, the good ole days. Readers will remember I was pointing out the "rubber band" effect i.e. the farther from the 200 day moving average we got the closer we were setting up for a snap back of great magnitude. Traditionally when the index gets 25% below the 200 day moving average that is an extreme level, but in the past 1.5 years we've been breaking traditions left and right. At its worst in November 2008 (after horrific September, October, and most of November) we had crumbled to 38% below the 200 day moving average. So this was an order of magnitude over and abover "25%ish"... and apparently the most stretched we had ever been in history for that index. But not to worry, after a huge rebound and then rally on Obama hope in the first week of January 2009 we went out to best this rubber band stretch. When we fell to about 35%ish away from the 200 day moving average I started becoming quite constructive on a vicious rally, but in this downturns if you are even 1-2 days early you can lose 6-8% in a jiffy. So we fell to 38%.... and then almost to 40% variance; so we slightly exceeded the November 2008 rubber band in March. Yes folks, I said March... the same month we are in now. The same month which is the best monthly return since 1974.

So that was then, the rubber band was let go and woooooosh! we have been flying since. I expected a vicious rally but this has exceeded my expectations in terms of moving up without a break. Post November 2008, we literally gained roughly 20% from the intraday low within 2 sessions and then moved sideways in December before tagging on another move in late December, through the first few days of January 2009. We ended up in about a 27% rally, but 20% of it came immediately. This time, the first two days were not quite the same magnitude but we have had none of the basing action we saw in December 2008. Most of the action has been straight up.

We had looked for multiple resistance points - all of which have been dealt with easily with a little help from our friends (Uncle Sam)
- S&P 741: the November 2008 low - dealt with, without even a sneeze once Uncle Ben announced the US would go Banana Republic and literally buy our own debt
- S&P 780: A series of intraday highs during the February swoon, this initially provided resistance... which was broken after 1 test, but then we fell back last Friday. Problem? Nah - Uncle Geithner came in to hand away US taxpayers dollars to private firms in exchange for taking almost no risk stakes in toxic assets. The market roared 7% and S&P 780 was but a feint memory
- S&P 805: Pre PPIP (Geithner plan) this had provided the ceiling from which the index was rejected, but on the same day we blew through 780 the second time through we dismissed 805.
So a very powerful move, especially in breadth if not in volume. Almost every sector has been taken along and now we are seeing the speculative animal spirits jump in as gosh awful stocks in the $2-$5 range are rising 50% in a day on (fill in the blank). Now, when I thought we'd have a good chance to hit S&P 870 I thought this would take a lot longer to play out - modeling this more like the late November 2008 to early January 2009 move. History doesn't repeat but it rhymes.... but in this case it has been an absolutely relentless move. So the nature of the move is different than I thought after the first jump, but then again I did not plan on quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve or such a luxurious tax payer giveaway by the US Treasury.
So that's where we stand now - you'd THINK we'd have some back and filling but we've been thinking that at all these technical levels along the way, and each time we try another government induced goosing is announced. The way I play this is to keep moving up the "floor" on changing from "Kool Aid bull" back to bear... it was once S&P 741, then it went up to S&P 780, then S&P 805, and now S&P 825. That doesn't mean if we fall back to S&P 805, its time to turn bearish again, but now we have multiple levels of "support" that we can assess how the market reacts when/if we are ever allowed to go down again.
Between S&P 805 and 875 you can see a 5 week basing period in January to early February (we were actually doing more falling at that time, with intermittant rallies), and one would estimate we'd do a similar action now but in reverse (gaining with intermittant drops). I will say this has been a very technically "textbook" rally, each time we leg up through a resistance area - bulls are reassured and a flood of orders come in from the supercomputers across Wall Street, providing rocket fuel for another leg up. If bulls become even more comfortable we can expect a lot more speculative action in the low price stock arena, and reports of stocks moving 40,50% in a day based on... nothing. Heck, if things really get crazy even commercial real estate stocks could begin to explode higher.
Fundamentals? Price to earnings ratios? (or as Obama calls them Profits to Earnings ratios) I'll spare you - it's all about momentum, sentiment and charts. (oh yes, hope too) Fundamental investors have been summarily destroyed over the past 2 years, and the technicians have taken the mantel. We're trading textbook to their world and their toolbox, while fundamental investors are trying to explain "so and so" reason is the cause of these moves. Not buying it... have both toolkits on your belt and respect the dominant one.
This type of action will be setting us up for a VERY interesting employment report next Friday as well as earnings season that is to follow. I'll have more on this - along with the real sector (not financials, not technology) which has been the "go to man" on both the downside and now the upside - in the weekly summary out Sunday.
By the way, the 200 day moving average is now down to S&P 1020 (stockcharts data say 982, but the charting I use is 1020 so I'm going with that), so the index is now only 18% below ...versus almost 40% a few weeks ago - just like that.







10 comments:
Hi Mark: Thanks for your excellent commentary and efforts you put into your blog. Much apreciated. As for me, I'm a retired old guy, and a tiny investor, and for my little brain, this is just too good to be real. So, (maybe I made a mistake of my life) but I sold everything I had about a week ago = 100% cash now. And already left 10% on the table. Ah, well...
Thanks a lot, and best regards,
serge.
Thanks, looking for TNA today at $19.95 just after the bell.
I used and abused SSO yesterday and sold off some of the SRS which drubbed my winnings. That SRS is not the play today, mid lower 40's should be a better entry, my feeling.
Transports are the leader and Oscar and a few other chartists I follow say we go higher today.
our friend mr faber thinks 900, so you are in good company :)
THIS is why your blogs are my favorites. Clear, to the point, without pretending you can see the exact future, at the exact time. Thanks, Mark.
Fantastic 40,000 point of view. This takes me from fumbling around in the dark without a flashlight to having the lights on, and 75% of the map revealed. Now the other 25% can be figured out as time goes by.
Also, keep the humor - more of that is needed in life even if some people are reading it so literally.
Off the subject
Has anyone noticed how Heebner is lagging behind the market. He has not participated in the financial rally. Any clue on what he is into. Just wondering
I am not picking on him but you can ask UrbaneGorilla for confirmation - I said in late Feb/early March I believed Heebner had raised cash and starting putting a lot of money on short side since he was outperforming for a few big down days. Then of course we bottomed within a week :)
I have no idea what he is doing now as I have not been keeping track. If you have not been 100% invested long you have been lagging the past 3 weeks. Most fund managers can once again proclaim genius after these 3 weeks! :)
Urbane waited too long to sell CGMFX. Most of us had expected an earlier and larger rally that never arrived. So when we had our little up week. Goodbye!
This is not Heebner's market. I think he works better in a market with approaching strong trends. During the drop, he just seemed to be in all the wrong stocks for way too long. His present lineup seems prepped for a basic recovery, but in essence, so is almost any conservative index fund. Too bad. I normally like his style.
Thanks for your take, Jegan.
The paradox is he was unexplainably up 8% beating S & P by 1 1/2% just this past Monday. Since then he has underperformed S & P by 1/2%. Since December I thought he rotated into bio/health care because it has been market neutral until recently when it has been sold off fearing OBama's possible reforms.
Hoping Humble Student will reverse engineer him again. He still has insurance but may inflict the wrath if he sneaks back into banks again. LOL.
I'm a 20 year Heebner client so I can't complain.
Post a Comment