In fact if this was just your garden variety type of recession, I'd say her move from Oppenheimer to strike it out on her own a few weeks back would be a sign of "jumping the shark" or "calling the bottom" ;) But this is not your daddy's recession.
[Mar 26, 2008: I'm on Meredith Whitney's Side]
[Aug 4, 2008: Meredith Whitney Continues to be Negative on Financials (and Housing)]
[Sep 23, 2008: Meredith Whitney and I Continue to Agree, Bailout or No Bailout]
[Jan 30, 2009: Meredith Whitney Joins Roubini & Soros in Smothering the Kool Aid]
Below are some clips from CNBC yesterday morning. (9 minutes and 5 minutes)
A surge in borrower defaults and unemployment pressures will make 2009 an even uglier year for banks than last year, analyst Meredith Whitney said.
She predicted "breakups and M&As on a grand scale" as the industry seeks to remake itself in the face of all its capital pressures.
"I don't think this year is going to look any better than last year," Whitney said in an interview Tuesday on CNBC. "In fact it will look worse because there's so much credit coming out of the system."
Whitney, a former analyst at Oppenheimer who recently opened her own firm, is renowned for calling out the problems with banks' toxic assets before the issue became widespread.
As some have been predicting the worst may be over for the banking sector, Whitney countered that many of the statements about some of the big banks showing profits ignore the burden that additional writedowns will pose through the year. In particular, she said Citigroup's statement that it had turned a profit the first two months of 2009 might came back to haunt it once a fuller picture was presented.
Consumers also will face pressure as unemployment grows and banks and credit card companies start calling in credit lines to avoid getting stuck with even more bad debt.
"The probability of more people going into default is higher, so the banks are going to have a tough time," she said.
As a solution to some of the banking system's woes, Whitney said the government should focus less on ever-changing rescue plans and instead start helping smaller institutions ramp up their community lending to local businesses and homeowners.
"You can re-energize the local lending scene and then supercharge those banks," she said. "You supercharge those so they're able to gain critical mass and start getting loans on a super-regional basis to businesses, to homeowners that qualify. At least that mitigates some of the capital that's surely going to come out of the market."The financial sector has been under pressure since the onset of the credit crisis last fall. But recently major banks like Citigroup, JPMorgan, Bank of America have said early results are showing signs of hope.A surge in borrower defaults and unemployment pressures will make 2009 an even uglier year for banks than last year, analyst Meredith Whitney said.
She predicted "breakups and M&As on a grand scale" as the industry seeks to remake itself in the face of all its capital pressures.
"I don't think this year is going to look any better than last year," Whitney said in an interview Tuesday on CNBC. "In fact it will look worse because there's so much credit coming out of the system."
Whitney, a former analyst at Oppenheimer who recently opened her own firm, is renowned for calling out the problems with banks' toxic assets before the issue became widespread.
As some have been predicting the worst may be over for the banking sector, Whitney countered that many of the statements about some of the big banks showing profits ignore the burden that additional writedowns will pose through the year. In particular, she said Citigroup's statement that it had turned a profit the first two months of 2009 might came back to haunt it once a fuller picture was presented.
Consumers also will face pressure as unemployment grows and banks and credit card companies start calling in credit lines to avoid getting stuck with even more bad debt.
"The probability of more people going into default is higher, so the banks are going to have a tough time," she said.
As a solution to some of the banking system's woes, Whitney said the government should focus less on ever-changing rescue plans and instead start helping smaller institutions ramp up their community lending to local businesses and homeowners.
"You can re-energize the local lending scene and then supercharge those banks," she said. "You supercharge those so they're able to gain critical mass and start getting loans on a super-regional basis to businesses, to homeowners that qualify. At least that mitigates some of the capital that's surely going to come out of the market."
The financial sector has been under pressure since the onset of the credit crisis last fall. But recently major banks like Citigroup JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America have said early results are showing signs of hope.
Whitney predicted that some of the largest institutions will be remade this year in a way not seen before. Those mergers and acquisitions will see companies come together to create unique syynergies--she used a blending of Citi and American Express as a hypothetical case where one business' strength could compensate for another's weakness."You're going to have some growth vehicles that come out of it but they're not going to look anything like today's version of these gobbledygook banks," she said.
In addition to the natural activity that will take place, Whitney said banks also will need help from Washginton. She urged policy makers above all to be consistent.
"Any game that you want to plan as a corporation, the rules are changing all the time," she said. "You can't function as a business operator if the rules are changing."
Displaying leadership and managing expectations will be the key.
"They need to show leadership by saying, 'OK, what's the world going to look like in five years?' and look backwards from that," Whitney said. "In five years you know that the big banks are going to have a lot less control and power than they have now. We have to disaggregate, dislodge that market share dominated by five main players."
"Let's invigorate and supercharge some of the smaller players to get them to a medium-enough size so they can start making loans and they can start moving the needle."
And she called on government leaders to harness the American spirit to rebuild the economy, similar to the way so many people come together to wear the color of the Irish on St. Patrick's Day.
"There's a spirit that can't be dislodge by the economic turmoil," she said. "Now is a great opportunity to capture that spirit as opposed to set expectations too high which is what (Treasury Secretary Timothy) Geithner did with the original plan and then just disappoint. People will give you the benefit of the doubt until you keep disappointing them."







5 comments:
The banks are finished.
Did you see the release from Fannie this morning? They are actually refinancing homes with mortgages up to 105% of the home's value!!
She just doesn't see the turn. The interesting news about C wasn't the mumbo jumbo about the pre-provision profits, but that it was the best since I believe Q3 of '07. Also, ETrade reported today a big drop in 30-89 day past due loans. She has some great ideas about providing capital to local banks and the issue with credit lines, but she seems so negative about the positives in the sector. She'll be on Tech Ticker in a few years with Blodget.
$AIG, $C, $FNM $FRE rocking Gestalt
You must not live in a socialist country.
Here is an interesting way to look at Meredith Whitney's appearance on CNBC, and why it might signal a bottom. (Personally, I don't think this is a new launch to a bull market.)
On Wall Street and CNBC certain folks gain notoriety for their market calls. Initially we don't believe them and these people are ignored, but when the call actually comes to past, these folks find themselves in the spotlight. The only problem is the market is now at the bottom and instead doing our own independent work, we listen to the guru who called it right many months ago only that this time they are wrong.
Louise Yamada's recent appearance on CNBC was a good example of this. She was given credit for making the call back in October, 2007 and now we go to her in March, 2009. She is even more bearish. Investors who should have listened to her back in October, 2007 now sit up and listen to this person who may have gotten lucky in 2007 --who knows. But now we all listen to her and she is touted as the expert who got it right.
But what a great way to mark a bottom with the expert who initially got it right but no one listened to her and now when we all listen, she gets it wrong.
With Whitney specifically I was not citing the TV appearance but instead her leaving to start her own firm. THat would actually be quite an awesome mark like a magazine cover calling the death of equities.
However, I don't believe its the ultimate bottom either :) We'll see
I am glad to see my tax dollars kicking behind today ... go AIG, FNM, FRE, and C!
(puke)
Post a Comment