Friday, February 6, 2009

Pondering Signet Jewelers (SIG) as a Short

TweetThis
Since I missed Zale's (ZLC) journey to sub $1-ish [Jan 23: Where You Won't Shop in 2009], I am pondering Signet Jewelers (SIG) as a proxy. Very weird action today - it is up 14% based on a cost cutting report that happened yesterday - but the report happened in the morning. So the stock did not react yesterday but reacted today. (I assume short covering today)
  • Signet Jewelers (SIG.L), the Anglo-American jewellery retailer, reported on Thursday a sharp fall in fourth-quarter underlying sales and said it would outline plans to cut costs and generate more cash in March.
  • The 1,959-store group, which owns Kay and Jared in the United States and Ernest Jones and H Samuel in the United Kingdom, said sales at stores open more than one year fell 14.9 percent in the 13 weeks to Jan. 31, reflecting subdued sales of gold, diamonds and wristwatches. Same-store sales fell 16.1 percent in the United States and were down 9.2 percent in the UK. Total fourth-quarter sales fell 18.9 percent to $1.124 billion.
  • "On both sides of the Atlantic, we are reducing costs and focusing on cash generation," he said, adding that Signet would give more details on these areas when it published its full-year results on March 25.
  • Signet forecast last month that pretax profit for the year to the end of January 2009 would be $180 million to $195 million. It said it would not be paying a dividend as it focused on reducing its debt, which was expected to be between $470 million and $490 million at the year end.
  • The company also said it was in talks with its lenders about amending a banking covenant.
We have yet another "covenant" negotiation (seriously folks, if you follow any stock that has covenant negotiations please email me) and you know my take on the consumer. This is on my radar... but a bit wary because big day's like today usually end with a short squeeze at the end that wooshes into the close.

Technically the stock gapped up and is fast approaching the 20 day moving average; in a perfect world the stock jumps one more time to get to the 50 day moving average ($8.20s) which gives a much lower risk entry - however the stocks in trouble of late have not even been able to show that much strength...

On a related note - S&P warned of credit rating cuts on 6 more retailers yesterday (I have not looked at them individually but I am sure they are all flying higher today)
  • Macy’s Inc (M)., J.C. Penney Co.(JCP) and four other department-store chains may have their debt ratings cut by Standard & Poor’s as the U.S. recession worsens. Macy’s and J.C. Penney face being cut to non-investment grade, or junk, by S&P. Dillard’s Inc (DDS)., Neiman Marcus Group Inc., Sears Holdings Corp (SHLD). and Nordstrom Inc. (JWN) also might be downgraded, the firm said today in a statement.
  • The S&P decisions “reflect our deepening concern about the impact of the U.S. recession on the increasingly troubled department store sector,” analyst Diane Shand said in the statement. Higher unemployment, the housing market and ongoing financial-market turmoil make it likely that the recession will get worse through the first half of the year, S&P said.
No position


5 comments:

Robert said...

speaking of shorts, did you get stopped out of AMZN?

TraderMark said...

I took a bit off but still hold most. $66 is the big line in the sand, it's been hanging out there most of the day.

The market is moving so rapidly and technical analysis becomes useless when we get such huge moves in indexes. NASDAQ is outperforming to a huge degree here so its getting dangerous. Weird how NFLX is stalling but AMZN is loved... I just assume its one of the hedge fund names to run into on rallies along with the other 'horsemen'

Still suffering with about 80% of the position.

jegan said...

Keep shippers in mind, even though they had a big run up lately. I read an interview with the CEO of a lender that specialized in shipping... He said that they really didn't want to foreclose on any shipping companies, and that they would re-write their loans if they came due, but they would insist on terminating or at the very least markedly reducing the dividends. You only have to have watched the action on DRYS the day or two after their dividend drop to realize what a nice short opportunity that would be. (Then of course, you go long to catch the rebound.. Go figure!!!)

jegan

jegan said...

Just Googled covenant and shipping and look what came up:

----------------------------------------------------------
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (the "Company") (NASDAQ: SHIP) (NASDAQ: SHIPW) announced today that it has received a waiver on its market-value-to loan covenant. As part of the waiver, the Bank has put a temporary restriction on the Company's payment of dividends.

--------------------------------------------------
Not much on this shipper.. Was trading at $10 last year, dropped to a low of about $3.70 in November and is now up to about $5.00 (Recent trading range is about $4.50 to $5.00). Only one post on the Yahoo message board, no blogs or associated articles and this news was just posted yesterday. The Yahoo finance page is pretty much empty.. Lots of N/A's .. The only post on the message board is asking when the company will report earnings... Not a good sign. Dividend was 4.10 percent....

Probably not a good short candidate..Not followed well, dividend isn't extremely high, so the impact may not be a big issue. Anyone left in this stock after last years drop probably won't bail at this time. Shortsqueeze.com has no short of float info... So it doesn't seem that that would be a help either....

One thing that bugs me about Yahoo finance appears here again. It says:

% Held by Insiders1: 118.81%
% Held by Institutions1: 0.50%

There is no way you can have a greater than 100% stock holding. When asked, Yahoo referred me to the info suppliers, who have ignored my requests...

jegan

TraderMark said...

re: SHIP - holy lack of volume Batman!

Post a Comment

Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix