**** WE'VE MOVED TO A NEW HOME ****

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

We are Saved. Version 21,287

TweetThis
I am always surprised when news I thought everyone knew moves stocks. Financial stocks are happy after hours as details of the government's plan to overpay for bad assets with your grandchildren's money.... err, I'm sorry - as details of the government's plan to make excellent long term investments emerge... i.e. "the bad bank". Everyone knew this was coming but apparently it is setting hearts racing.

Remember, it's not the first 21,286 solutions that matter. It's the 21, 287th.

"We're saved! The Fed is cutting rates"
"We're saved! They rescued Bear"
"We're saved! Some sucker (BAC) bought Countrywide"
"We're saved! Fannie and Freddie taken over"
"We're saved! AIG solved"
"We're saved! Lehman now gone"
"We're saved! Merrill sold to Bank of America"
"We're saved! The Fed is backstopping commercial paper"
"We're saved! The Fed is backstopping money markets"
"We're saved! Wachovia sold to Wells Fargo"
"We're saved! TARP is passed"
"We're saved! Citigroup backstopped and given new loans"
"We're saved! Bank of America backstopped and given new loans"

I left out about 15 other instances, but you get the point. We rally on each one as the lemmings clap and nod their head - time to buy stock. Just add this to the list.

"Suckered the tax payer again!" Sincerely, Wall Street

Goldman Sachs (GS) is enjoying a nice splurge in after hours so it looks like my stop on the short position will be triggered tomorrow morning as Kool Aid overflows in the streets. You just can't invest normally when the not so invisible hand of the government means more than capitalism. So we'll eat a quick loss as the invisible hand slaps us across the face for daring to meddle with it.

CNBC reports...
  • The Obama administration is close to deciding on a plan to purchase bad—or non-performing and illiquid—assets from banks, according to industy sources. The plan could be announced early next week.
  • The so-called "bad bank" plan, would address the key problem of how to price the assets by using a model-pricing mechanism. The model would take account of the government's ability to hold onto assets, even to maturity, and pay for the them with cheap funding. Result: the government might end up paying more than current market prices for the securities.
  • On the other hand, if the government paid less than the value at which the asset is carried on the bank's books, the bank would issue common equity to the government.
  • The move toward a bad bank concept comes amid growing speculation that banks may need another government bailout. Goldman Sachs economist Jan Hatzius recently said global credit losses may approach $2.1 trillion. Of that total, banks worldwide have already absorbed about $975 billion in losses, he estimated in a research report, suggesting the worst is far from over.
  • FBR Capital Markets analysts said eight of the largest U.S. financial institutions need up to $1.2 trillion in new common equity and that "the government is the only entity that can provide bridge capital to get past the current credit crises."
Sure why not... it's only money. I don't think $1.2 Trillion will be enough myself. The hilarious thing is it's all a shell game - we're going to get equity from the banks? Banks that would be zero if not for the federal backstop? Meaning we are going to fund this with what would be worthless stock - if not for the government. See how circular it is? We just are too proud to use the word "nationalize" - that is anti American.

Anyhow, the "free marketers" that run Wall Street are absolutely joyful in glee, as they are each time the government has intervened. Remember, when we're drunk on Kool Aid, we don't want the government to bother us. They interfere, slow us down, and ruin our innovations. When we wake up the next morning to see what we did in our drunken stupor - then the government is welcome. As long as they make our doo doo go away. Then once they do that we will lobby them over the ensuing 5-7 years to make sure their regulations are slowly dismantled piece by piece. See ya in 2016 when we're back to "normal".

11 comments:

jegan said...

Re: "The move toward a bad bank concept comes amid growing speculation that banks may need another government bailout.".. Wasn't aware that this was speculation. I thought this was pretty much common knowledge and baked in.
jegan

TraderMark said...

me too. I guess most Wall Street traders don't read Wall Street Journal and live in front of CNBC?

Or maybe Goldman and PPT were buying to drive up perception this is an awesome thing when the dilution coming should be immense?
Who knows the games they play.

jegan said...

TM... Better cover all your shorts by next week... **Newsflash** from CNBC... "Bad Bank program to be announced next week!" (I'm not kidding!. This just came across the screen..)

jegan

Billman89 said...

Mark,

i know you like gaps and such with T/A

well there's one around 867-871...many are ready to sell once its filled and short this. It can happen with tomorrow's kool aid.

We're saved....the bad bank- "SHlTIBANK" is here. and obama!

TraderMark said...

jegan

the question can they rally it NEXT week on the same old news

I mean we rallied 3x on Geithner lol.

TraderMark said...

Bill, 860 was my "target" and 860 to 880 is a lot of resistance

I am hoping a lot of my "junk" target stocks can rally quite substantially to that area

unfortunately I'm going to take Goldman up the behind tomorrow.

jegan said...

'ShitiBank' huh? Are they associated with 'Bunk of America', 'Wells Gonefast', 'FleaTrade' and 'JP More-gone'?

jegan

jegan said...

TM.. I'm sure they will be able to rally again on the same old news. Lets face it, CNBC looks for **reasons** for a rally or drop. I mean, every 'options expiration Friday' seems to be such a surprise to them... "Stocks rallied on Mrs. Obama's new hair-do!" ... Nope! They rallied because too many shorts had to dump their stuff...

jegan

Guy M. Lerner said...

There it is again the old "breaking news" story; how many different ways can the market be kept afloat?

nullpointer said...

each act of government intervention has resulted in smaller and shorter rallies.

just saying.

additionally, you will all find this interesting...merrills chief economist came out yesterday and said we are in a depression.

its here

jegan said...

Re: "merrills chief economist came out yesterday and said we are in a depression." .. At least he didn't capitalize it, as in ** Depression**

Watched CNBC's Becky interview Peter Thiel. He seemed very level headed. Fielded a couple of questions from her about Facebook (????) and then got into what the future holds for the market. His take was that the market is in a reverse bubble, that the market will improve if the government programs work. We should expect a downturn if the programs are not successful. And that normally unemployment is a lagging indicator, but in this market he expects it to be a leading indicator.

While he was talking, Best Buy and Target's new layoff figures were streaming across the tape at the bottom of the screen... Still 'green' across the board with the SP500 at 859... jegan

Post a Comment

*

*
Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix