Back in September I wrote about the outrageous pay packages flying from Merrill [Sep 17: Thain's Aides May Get $200M for Weeks of Work]
First, let me say running Merrill Lynch is difficult work and a stressful life, I am sure. Second, let me say working in a coal mine for a 10 hour shift sure isn't easy either. Third, I do realize the 2 Goldman Sachs executives Thain recruited gave up lucrative pay packages at Goldman to come to Merrill so you have to understand that when you read these numbers. But in the "heads I win, tails I win" culture of executive payouts these are some staggering numbers nonetheless.
Keep in mind Thain has been at Merrill for under a year. And his associates have been well under a year. In fact, Thomas Montag joined Merrill on August 4th. For his 6 weeks of hard work he is looking at a payday of $76 million. Peter Kraus joined Merrill last week and looks to make $95 million. That's good work for one week. (again it is replacing his Goldman package but it truly is jaw dropping if you think about it) This is why I don't harbor any ill will to athletes - what most of them make is nothing compared to what the top cheese in corporate America is. Stock goes down 60%? Not a problem - the payout is the same.
Keep in mind this is the same shop that paid out Stanley O'Neil $160M just to be fired [You're Fired! Now Here is $160M to Help Ease the Pain]
In the best spirit of Bob Nardelli, poor Stanley O'Neil was shown the exit (err, retired) but to make sure his family can eat he is being given $160 million to soothe the pain.But I digress! As a service to my readers I want to give you a gift - something you can hand to your boss to show that any potential lack of efficiency is due to your trashy surroundings... how can any human be made to work in a cubicle or in fact even a simple office. *THIS* is how you must live to make decisions on how to run our financial system into the ground.
- Sources confirm that O'Neal leaves with about $90 million in stock, $40 million in options and another $30 million in pension and other goodies. The finer points are still being worked out. And the values change with the company's share price.
- Not bad for years of alleged "underperformance." Makes you wonder what Merrill would pay for a really good CEO.
- A spokesman for Merrill said O'Neal gets no special severance package, but he does get to keep shares and options that had not yet vested.
- And he gets to say that he "retired" at 56. Sure. Kind of the way Julius Caesar "retired" as dictator of Rome.
- It's only been 21 months since the same board members were lavishing O'Neal with praise and a special $36 million bonus for doing such a good job.
- They gave him another $18.5 million cash bonus plus another $27 million in stock and $2 million in extra incentives just last January.
- In early 2008, just as Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain was preparing to slash expenses, cut thousands of jobs and exit businesses to fix the ailing securities firm, he was also spending company money on himself, senior people at the firm say.
- Thain spent $1.22 million of company money to refurbish his office at Merrill Lynch headquarters in lower Manhattan. The biggest piece of the spending spree: $800,000 to hire famed celebrity designer Michael Smith, who is currently redesigning the White House for the Obama family for just $100,000.
- The other big ticket items Thain purchased include: $87,000 for an area rug in Thain's conference room and another area rug for $44,000; a "mahogany pedestal table" for $25,000; a "19th Century Credenza" in Thain's office for $68,000; a sofa for $15,000; four pairs curtains for $28,000; a pair of guest chairs for $87,000.... (the list goes on and on and on)
- The documents also show that Thain signed off on the purchases personally. "Labor to relamp the six wall sconces" cost $3,000, and Thain authorized the payment of another $30,000 to pay the expenses Smith incurred in doing the work. Thain has hired Smith—whose celebrity client list includes Steven Spielberg, Michelle Pfeiffer, Cindy Crawford and Sir Evelyn de Rothschild—to design and decorate his private residences. They include a Manhattan apartment at 740 Park Avenue, and his 10-acre mansion in Rye, NY.
Go ahead and buy all the opulent stuff in your personal life - but when the company coffers are being raided like this - it's just another example of why corporate governance in America is a frightful joke. Even the folks on CNBC Europe say it... but dogma in the U.S. says "keep it the way it is! It's working great!"
- At the time, Thain was preaching the virtues of cost control, telling employees to reduce expenses including car services, entertainment and travel. In addition to the personal expenses on his office, documents show Thain paid his driver $230,000 for one year’s work, which included the driver's $85,000 salary and bonus of $18,000, and another $128,000 in over-time pay, documents show. Drivers of top executives are often paid about half that amount.
****************
If you ever have time this is a good article from February about how badly investment banks had been as investments for anyone but insiders since they have become public - and what was BEFORE Bear Stearns, Lehman and the like happened. [Feb 11, 2008: Investment Banks - Are you Dear Investor...the Sucker?]









16 comments:
"A Chinese court on Thursday sentenced two men to death for their role in the production and sale of melamine-tainted milk". We got to have that kind laws here in US for five years.
O'Neal cared more about his golf game than this company going under. Now this guy spends 1.22mil for a cushy office? This gregarious mentality is disgusting.
I thought AIG was bad. I think Merrill's lack of interest in their customer's welfare comes from the top down in that company. Glad I pulled my money out of there years ago.
Where is the Russian mafia when you need them? Maybe we should all throw some bucks together and arrange a hit.
Blue, I hope to one day win your business. I promise all area rugs in my cushy office will be under $87,000. I won't go a red cent over $75,000.
bettyblue.. We had a heavy presence of Russian Mafia here in California... But they all went home. Apparently, even with the problem with the Ruble, Putin and Medvedev, they feel there are more opportunities in Russia that here in the heavily indebted 'Golden State'.... Soon to be rechristened 'The Tarnished State'.
On a positive note though, I bought a high grade carpet sample and cut out two foot shaped pieces. Slip 'em in your shoes and you cannot tell you aren't walking barefoot on a $200,000 rug...
It seems that the wealthy are just 'entitled'... Speaking of special treatment for the entitled.. What ever happened to Ted Kennedy's war against wind-generators off Martha's Vineyard.
jegan
Jegan: Maybe we can hand over California to Russia? That would save us a bailout. I am sure Putin and Schwarzenegger would get along well, walking shirtless through the Russian tundra and hunting blond deers.
dear lord that is insane...
*sigh*
bettyblue.... Sure why not give it to the Russians. Clearly Putin's handling of Chechnya, Georgia and the Ukraine beats what we've done in Afghanistan and Iraq. And even with their collapsing economy that we aren't doing a worse job of it.. After all, California's governor is an ego-maniacal Austrian body-builder.... Could it get much worse?? Welcome to Kah-li-for-neah! Comrade! (OH! Please take off your shoes and wiggle your toes in our carpet!!)
jegan
God Bless America!
ok... I am a big fan of your blog and especially like the sarcasm. But I am going to be the bad guy here and say a few things from the perpective of a non-american living in this country.
Firstly, this type of corporate leadership culture has been going on for decades. No one objected to it till until recently. Infact these things were supposed to great "motivators" for people to try to work harder and reach the top echelons of this country, unlike the so called "socialist" culture found in rest of the world.
Secondly, sure, John Thain spent 1.2 M in his office, but he also saved billions of dollars of shareholder money by cannily selling it off (while hiding potential future losses) to BoA. Agreed, he spends a lot on himself but that is dwarfed in comparison to his ability to be able to bring in billions of dollars for a faliure like Merrill. Isn't that why he is paid the big bucks for? To that end, I think he did his job very well.
Finally, I think the corporate leadership culture in America (the heads we win tails we win) was always lacking accountability. Its amazing how only now everyone realizes that this kind of disparity exists and how this culture is unsustainable. But that accountabilty needed to be ingrained before these people took on their jobs as top executives. It will surely come about now because of what happened, but folks like Thain and O'Neal have just madeoff using the holes in the system. Nothing we can do about that now except try to changes the system for better and move on... But really do we want to make this the country where the govt. decides how much CEOs get paid? where bright minds feel lack of motivation to aspire to make it big?
NW... I think your comment about our merit based economy is similar to Winston Churchill's statement about Democracy: "It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried." .. Still, at my level, if you can;t afford teh carpet, all you can really do is gripe!
Also. I'm sure it's a slip, but you say: "but folks like Thain and O'Neal have just **madeoff** using the holes in the system." I think that's either spelled 'made off', or 'Madoff'. Not really sure which way you intended...
jegan ;-)
NW,
You make some good points so don't feel like a bad guy. I will agree in this country as long as the little guy is participating in bubbles, he doesn't care if the big guys basically steal from the company.
I am not someone who started complaining about this 12 months ago - I have only had a blog for 18 months. I've been watching this stuff since I've been in the market - its always gone on. For every Thain we see exposed there are 50 Thain's we do not hear about. In America it's "ok" to do this as long as everyone is "winning" - i.e. as long as investor with his $10K Ameritrade account makes 14% a year he is cool with companies being run to transfer wealth from many to few.
I have been complaining about a ton of things trust me - the repricing of options is another one I simply hate.
I think there is a lot of dogma in this country - dogma pushed forward by the leadership class that do not want to see the system changed since it benefits them. Our society as a whole is not that curious - and they are very inert. Many are followers.
Did Thain do the right thing for Merrill shareholders? One could say that - but who paid in the end. The US taxpayer via BofA. So he fleeced the US taxpayer. I won't celebrate that. But yes I suppose in a cruel cold way you could say "he did his job".
The whole oversight system with board of directors populated by cronies is broken. C-level executives from 1 company sit on board of other companies. Many Chairman's of Board are also CEOs. Shareholders are in the dark - so much info is buried deep in SEC documents or not disclosed at all. Some changes in 2007 on SEC disclosures that were better but for many years a lot of this stuff is hidden in dark rooms.
Simple rule - make the CEO pay 50x the median worker. or 100x. It would dwarf any other country in the world. And trust me, if this was the rule - the greedy capitalists at the top would PUSH UP the median wage for their workers just so they can benefit more in their own compensation. Then we all win, don't we?
But a lot of this is "morals" - capitalism is not just about extracting from the system every red cent at the expense of the corporation. But that is what the current viewpoint is. Everything is short sighted - run company for 90 days (a quarter) in the public world. Investors also push companies down this road so everyone can be blamed. If you miss by 1 cent in a 90 day period you can lose 40% of market value. It's a silly gambling culture that has nothing to do with long term value creation.
But I will agree the "masses" only complain in bad times - some of us however have been complaining constantly (we are a minority)
I'll toss another idea on the heap:
Most people really do not know the 'behind the scenes' issues. I doubt that until recently most investors/populace/politicians/et al, really had any idea there was a problem with our banking system. Nor do they really realize that companies are not honest in their presentation or practice. That doesn't make it right, just expedient. My favorite quotes from two past supervisors are :"Worry about today and let tomorrow worry about itself" and "Perception is everything". That pretty much sums up what is fed to the public; "smoke and mirrors."
Kind of makes you wonder if Madoff really was a "thief", or if he became too wrapped up in his own perception and figured he'd cover everything later when times improved. An accidental crook, so to speak.... (Talk about timely, CNBC just flashed a newsie: "Six Californians have been charged with a Ponzie scheme for bilking investors out of $52 Million...)
I'll also second TM's comment "but who paid in the end. The US taxpayer via BofA. So he fleeced the US taxpayer."
jegan
Agreed. And just to make myself clear, I was talking about the masses and not TM or his blog or anybody else in particular
How about the regulators and govt. officials. Haven't they been sleeping at the wheel all this time? I mean what was the SEC really doing while all this was going on.
One thing that has always intrigued me is the derivatives/options/swaps department. I mean aren't these vehicles of hedging like insurance? Then why should you allow anyone to buy or sell insurance for something that they don't have a stake in?
Only farmers and ag-related companies need to use derivatives to insure themselves against a possible crop failure. Financials that provide credit need to use swaps to protect against defaults and people need to use options against specific companies/indexes to protect themselves. When people start buying and selling such derivatives without having an underlying position of some sort, I think the system goes haywire. There are rumors spread to bring down companies. And why not. Imagine you buying a life insurance policy on someone else. Wouldn't you hope that person dies as quickly as possible?
NW - you have to understand the dogma - we've just come from 8 years (and in fact 20 if you include Greenspan era) where regulation is evil and "the market will police itself" - that's dogma at it's best. I mean humans left to their own devices will be fair and civilized. I always say to those people- if the market should be left to itself why do we have policemen? Let the "free market" take care of itself.
Further on the CDs we mentioned that all summer - basically its like taking life insurance out on your neighbor or some random person on the street. There would be a lot more "accidents" happening.
But thats another UNREGULATED area - I mean who needs regulation. It just stifles innovation! I've been mocking that since 2007.
NW.. You raise very valid points that have been noted in the last year. In particular your question "why should you allow anyone to buy or sell insurance for something that they don't have a stake in? " As a 21 year veteran of the insurance claims business, I'll agree. I have denied claims in the past when it was found that the claimant had no 'real' interest in the property, which nullified the policy.
As to the SEC, even John McCain was going to 'fire' Chris Cox... (Of course he really wouldn't have had the authority to do so anyway..But that's quibbling.) And Paulson... Well, he was the CEO of Goldman Sachs and personally appeared in front of Congress to beg for relaxed rules regarding the float necessary to back up lending. Ironic isn't it that he had to try to resolve the very issue he had a hand in creating. Of course he 'fixed' it by handing out cash to his old buddies..
Sorry if I seem cynical... Been round the block a few times... jegan ;-)
Post a Comment