Saturday, September 20, 2008

US News and World Report: The End of the Shopaholic Nation?

TweetThis
Ideas we've been presenting since blog inception i.e. the Pooring of America - are starting to gain fame in the mainstream media. Again, gas dropping 50 cents is not going to fix the consumers problem. I don't care what the consumer stocks rally is "telling us" - that's just hedge funds running in and out of stocks to create a return so they can make their quarter.

You have a nation built on 25 years of easier and easier credit, and that credit is drying up by the day. Then in the past decade as the middle class loses its buying power and wages do not keep up with inflation it only exaggerated the problem. To stay afloat and or "live the American lifestyle" many resorted to pulling every lever they have. Now the bill will be coming due. I wrote a lengthy piece detailing this here[Due the Bottom 80% of Americans Stand a Chance?]

Our government is like a subprime mortgage customer (except they can create monopoly money as opposed to normal humans) - and many people in the country have either been reckless in spending and/or desperate and forced to borrow to keep going. It all adds together. It is all cumulative. There is no "one event" so it's not a sexy story like a bailout. But this is what is happening in the bottom 2/3rds of America slowly but surely. The erosion of the lifestyle - I do believe this will be the first generation who does not live as well as their parents. Again, to pay for our future obligations, services/spending will have to drop at both the federal and state levels OR taxes will need to go up across the board. And you know spending is almost never cut.... that will just be another impairment on Americas over the next 20 years.
  • When it comes to longevity, few royals can top America's King Consumer. For more than four decades, our shopaholic nation has shown an insatiable desire to spend until our credit cards melt. And throughout this era, consumer spending has, well, consumed a greater and greater share of our total economy.
  • Only twice since 1965, despite half a dozen recessions, have Americans spent less in a year than the previous one. Indeed, it often seems that we have defined ourselves by our ability to buy supersized everything, from McMansions to tricked-out SUVs to 60-inch flat-screen televisions -- all enabled by decades of cheap credit.
  • Yet today, America finds itself at a once-or-twice-a-century economic tipping point. A sharp slowdown, record-high gas prices, high consumer debt levels, a plunging real-estate market and the growing green movement all seem to be conspiring to dethrone King Consumer and transform the economy and the American way of life for years to come.
  • "The process of bringing our wants and our needs into realignment," says Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg, "is going to involve years of savings and frugality." Or, to put it more simply, "there is an anti-bling thing going on," says Marian Salzman, the chief marketing officer of Porter Novelli, a public-relations company.
  • Many consumers, of course, don't have much choice but to scale back. Total credit card debt has increased by more than 50% since 2000. The average American with a credit file is responsible for $16,635 in debt, excluding mortgages, according to Experian, and the personal savings rate has hovered close to zero for the past several years. High gas and food prices are causing real incomes to fall.
  • "We're shedding jobs, it's much harder to borrow, and what used to be capital gains are now capital losses," says Scott Hoyt, the senior director of consumer economics at Moody's Economy.com. "There's no source of funding for spending."
  • Consumer spending has risen to just more than 70% of the U.S. economy from a bit more than 60% in 1965.
  • In a recent survey, she found that 90% of respondents said they were considering options for "the simpler life," and 84% said they were inclined to buy "less stuff."
  • And because consumers often learn their lifetime shopping habits during their developmental years, Mandy Putnam, a vice president at TNS Retail Forward, a market research company, says members of Generation Y may be permanently shaped by today's lessons in austerity, much as their great-grandparents were by the Great Depression.
  • But what happens when budgets aren't so tight? Plenty of hardheaded economists say we'll go right back to our prodigal ways. Alan Blinder, an economics professor at Princeton University and a former Federal Reserve vice chairman, thinks that optimism and the drive to spend are hard-wired parts of America's cultural DNA. Blinder expects that even baby boomers will continue the spending spree that has defined most of their lives, buying medical care and golf vacations instead of new cars and larger homes.
  • "We're at a critical moment," says Benjamin Barber, the author of "Consumed: How Markets Corrupt Children, Infantilize Adults, and Swallow Citizens Whole." "In two or three years, we might say, 'We had a moment where the banks were broke, credit cards didn't have much credit left, when Americans were beginning to rethink consumerism, when we really could have turned the page,'" Barber says. "Or we might be saying, 'We talked ourselves back into the old fixes,'" such as rebate checks and even telling Americans directly to go out and spend, as President Bush did after 9/11.
  • With baby boomers' habits well-ingrained, it may instead be members of Generation X and Generation Y who decide to embrace a simpler, less wasteful lifestyle, rebelling against the conspicuous consumption that their parents helped make the American way of life. (or they might have no choice but to downgrade the lifestyle)
[Sep 7: Newsweek - Get Ready for the Pain of Paying]

Friday, September 19, 2008

Bookkeeping: 'Rising Tide' Performance Year 2, Week 7

TweetThis
Year 2, Week 7 performance of the mutual fund

Comments
: It was a quiet week as the indexes finishes pretty much where they started. Yep. Trust me. Not much happened except I was forced to watch CNBC live programming every night this week - remember Lehman Brothers (LEH) going bankrupt? That was way back at the beginning part of the week. Merrill (MER) getting snapped up by Bank of America (BAC) in desperation? Yawn - zzzzz. Boring. AIG (AIG) bailout? An afterthought. That was eons ago - like Tuesday or something.

But really does it matter how we get there? (yes) All I know is the taxpayers of this country are going to be paying through the nose so we could put on a 8% rally in 1 day (+1 hour). I just am too gobsmacked (that's a term to sound worldly) to process how the past week (or weeks, or is it months, of the past year) has changed things. I also know we'll still be paying the bill, when ... just like a few years after Enron/Worldcom the "lessons" will be forgotten and the calls to lighten regulation as its "impairing U.S. capitalism" will arise again. And those who pay for government, for the corporation, by the corporation get bill after bill passed in the still of the night to loosen this rule or loosen that one. And lo and behold in 2014-2016 we'll be having this same conversation in a different part of the economy. But this era will be a hard one to ever top.

Anyhow as the market has become more and more senseless the past few months we've abandoned fundamentals to focus on technicals. This week that was thrown out the window as emotion and random news flows and rumors dominated the action. So we adapt, and the market devolves... err, evolves. I am looking back at last week's post and I wrote "The S&P 500 with a bailout induced rally...." Really it is groundhog day around here.

For the fund we actually outperformed the market by a wide shot Monday - Wednesday, since we were hedged. But that hedging came back to haunt on Thursday. This is the problem with the current market - it's about market timing and trading - not picking good stocks anymore. So it's not my cup of tea. But in that spirit of market timing after the 2nd 4%+ down day in 1 week I lifted a lot of short exposure going into the close expecting the government to do "something" (but more on the Federal Reserve side) - when the market reacted poorly to the global central banks injections of liquidity Thursday morning I reversed course and got back my short exposure and cut back my housing/financial "bet" on the long side. That blew up in our face after the CNBC announcement of a mother of all bailouts, and we had to scramble. While we cut back all our short exposure heavily we were already down within minutes 10%+ on multiple positions, and it was enough of the portfolio (remember we have a lot of cash) that the long positions were not able to make up for it. While we did buy back our Lennar and Ultra Financial very late Thursday, it helped us on Friday not Thursday. We ended up flat on a +4% day Thursday and that killed our week. It remains a dangerous market -now even for shorts. Positions can reverse on you in an instant and any market you have to watch every millisecond is not a healthy market.

The S&P 500 managed to gain 0.3% this week and the Russell 1000 gained 0.4%. Rising Tide Growth due to a 4% variance versus the market on Thursday put in 1.3% loss. All things considered, and recognizing if we had not lifted our hedges on the short side drastically late Thursday it could of been an awful Friday - I'll take that. The one main benefit this week was the lack of volatility versus the markets: Monday we were down 1%, Tuesday up 0.5%, Wednesday down 3.9%, Thursday flat, and Friday up 3.1%. Many funds I track with 1 eye of similar ilk were up or down 5-7% every day but Tuesday this week. I suppose that matters more to hedge fund investors (lack of volatility) but it does make for easier nights of sleep.

It still remains nothing more than a daytraders market at this point. We continue to struggle to find a way to make money by "investing" and not trading. That said, from where we started last August 2007 we are barely down which is saying a lot in the most violent market many Wall Street veterans of 30, 40, 50 years have ever seen. So we're surviving to fight another day.

As always if interested in pledging an investment when fund is ready to launch (shooting for early 2009) please attach a comment here, or send me an email (need your state please). We are now at roughly $4 million pledged - thank you.

*** Year 1 Results here: +10.1% vs -14.0% S&P (+24.1%)

Year 2 Metrics


Price of Rising Tide Growth: $9.874
Year 2 Performance to date (vs Aug 1, 2008): -10.33%

Comparable S&P 500: 1255.1 (-0.42%)
Comparable Russell 1000: 685.4 (-0.72%)

Fund return vs S&P 500: -9.9%
Fund return vs Russell 1000: -9.6%

Last week's results here.

Since the market cap of the median stock in the Rising Tide Growth fund (median $7.1 Billion as of April 08) is significantly below the SP500 index (median $13.1 Billion as of September 07) but higher than the median market cap in the Russell 1000 (median market cap $5.8 Billion as of September 07), I am measuring the fund against both indexes. Click here to see all fund's holdings as of July 2008.

Basis for indexes for year 2 is closing price August 1st, 2008.
SP500 : 1,260.3
Russell 1000 : 690.3

Please click here: fund performance for previous updates

Amazing Stat of the Day

TweetThis
Last Friday the S&P closed 1251.7. Currently it is 1251.3

Last Friday the Russell 1000 closed at 682.8. Currently it is 682.4

So both are flat

A pretty boring week all things considering

(please note - we had a historic 4 days of 4%+ moves in between)

Just imagine if you went on vacation a week ago without internet access, and then came back home on Saturday (tomorrow) and peeked in on the market... didn't miss a thing!

It's almost like the government closed the stock market for a few days... I know, it sounds SOOO outrageous that would NEVER happen here.

Hell in a Hand Basket - The Rush of Stocks to be Protected Begins

TweetThis
Ah, unintended consequences - they always crop up when the not so invisible hand muddles into the stock market.

Now General Electric (GE) since it has a financing arm is going to be "protected" (is this like the endagered species act?) When the stock was battered it protested saying less and less of its business was financial - now it waves its financial arm in the air saying "hey save us too!"
  • General Electric is expected to be added to a list of financial stocks that can no longer be sold short, according to people familiar with the situation. The parent of CNBC and CNBC.com, makes about half its profit from its financial services unit, GE Capital.
  • Other companies with large financial services interests such as CIT also are petitioning the SEC to be added to the initial list of stocks released Friday morning.
Now every Tom Dick and Harry with >1% of business financial will be screaming at SEC to get them on the protected list too.

So why don't we just skip these steps and put everyone on the short protection list?

Now AIG (AIG) investors want to reverse the bailout!!! Because with the government eating the bad assets ... I mean with the government making a great investment that will work out in the long run... why should they suffer? What's next? Bear Stearns asking to be detached from JPMorgan? Lehman asking bankruptcy court to reverse their filing? WHY NOT?

Seriously folks - these events could not be sold as a work of fiction; no one would buy the premise. I liked this take from CBSMarketwatch.com - at least other socialistic countries admit it. What a joke this all is.
  • When Russia shut down its stock markets to avoid the global collapse sweeping the markets earlier this week, most of Wall Street shook its head. The move smacked of totalitarianism and artificial manipulation, such a brazen intervention wouldn't happen in a free market.
  • Well, the Russians are having a good chuckle after Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox, following the lead of the U.K.'s Financial Services Authority, initiated a ban in short selling for 799 U.S. financial institutions
  • The move smacks of irony on several fronts. For one, institutions such as Morgan and Goldman regularly practice short-selling as part of their proprietary trading strategies. These firms made billions in profits by running hedge funds or serving them through prime brokerage operations. They shrugged when companies complained that short sellers were ruining their companies.
  • Now, Morgan's John Mack and Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman not only won a ban of naked shorting, but of all shorting of their industry. They also have persuaded New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo to investigate short selling in the market place.
  • ...the SEC is doing exactly what claims to be against -- manipulating the markets and propping up ailing financial companies. They're doing it because the banks are essentially backed by taxpayers and have become politically important.
  • Our complaint through history about countries that try to influence their markets by changing the rules mid-game was that it was tantamount to cheating. For all of its faults, the U.S. markets were supposed to be the most level playing fields in the world. At least Russia shut everyone out of the game.
I wanted to begin today with a headline "The Death of Free Markets" but then I remembered I used that back in the fall when the Federal Reserve targetted shorts by announcing rate cuts or liquidity injections premarket at 8:30 AMs so that people who were positioned wrong were crushed at 9:30 AM. Or when I used it during the Bear Stearns fiasco. Or during the... well it's been long gone - I can't count the ways. This was just the icing on the cake for those who have not been paying attention. Disgusting but SO representative of how this country works. If you pay, you own the decision makers.

We are a disgrace. All of us. Because we vote these people in and we don't push back. So we are rolled over. What an era.

Bookkeeping: Closing Alpha Natural Resources (ANR)

TweetThis
Alpha Natural Resources (ANR) is my favorite coal stock based on 2009 earnings potential; we own 4. However it's stuck in a long drama with it's current merge (fighting a hedge fund to be allowed to merge of all things)

Due to the fact all 4 coal stocks basically trade together nowadays, there is no reason to own 4 unless a buyout offer happens. Since Alpha Natural Resources already has its buyout offer, obviously unless there is a second bid we are over that bridge with this name. I am surprised none of the other 3 names have had any M&A activity at these prices.

I really wish ANR had remained independent since the earnings power in 2009 will be explosive. If Harbinger Capital forces themselves in between the merger with Cleveland Cliffs (CLF) and breaks it up, I'll get back into ANR.

We've held this stock since April 08 and the leave the last 1.0% stake in the $66s with about a $9K profit. This was once a nearly $25K profit but that was back when coal stocks used to go up for more than 48 hours at a time. Those were the days...

No position

Bookkeeping: Starting Amazon.com (AMZN)

TweetThis
The consumer is back. Gasoline is heading to $1 so shipping costs will be lower. A second stimulus check is surely on the way because "We cannot bailout Wall Street without bailing out Main Street" and debt means nothing to the country. And Christmas season is around the corner.

Ok all those reasons are facetious. Amazon.com (AMZN) crossed over its 20/50/200 day moving averages all in 1 fell swoop. All are between $78.50 and $79.00. What a nice set up. As long as it stays above $78 we're in. If not, we're out (and in fact would short it). Away we go.

We're starting a 2.5% stake just above $80.

Long Amazon.com in fund; no personal position

Bookkeeping: Closing National Oilwell Varco (NOV)

TweetThis
As I said yesterday, how do you play the market when they keep changing the rules? I am very unnerved by the latest turns in events even though everyone promises me "It's good for me"... and have been cutting back a lot of positions into this rally.

I am closing National Oilwell Varco (NOV) in the "reduce commodity exposure since they are all the same stock" thesis. One less to worry about. We've held this name since day 1 of the fund Aug 6, 2007 and after the carnage it's taken over the past 2 months leave with a $200 loss. Thankfully we took a lot of profits along the way from 2007 and first half 2008. We're selling the last 1.1% stake here on the 13% spike to near $60. It could jump up to around $70 or so, and that's where it should be shorted until the chart improves.

If they still allow that sort of thing...

No position

Ultrashort Financial (SKF) Halted

TweetThis
Things like this make me wonder what country I am in.

I've received many emails and yes Ultrashort Financial (SKF) is halted and it looks like we are stuck with it until October 2nd. At which time the government can decide if the peons can trade it again. If not they can push out the short ban for 30 more days.

Which will take us to November 2nd.

Which I believe is election day.

How convenient.

EDIT: Reader says AMEX stopped SKF trading due to technical issues and it is back on now. So you are now free to sell at a 35% loss. I still think they'll keep the short selling ban until the election.

Long Ultrashort Financial in fund; no personal position

Trina Solar (TSL) Sees 2009 Sales Doubling

TweetThis
Trina Solar (TSL) has been our biggest dog by far since inception but I'm still holding out hope the market recognizes its value in 2009 and management will stop pulling surprises on the investor base. Analysts have been constantly burnt by management so Trina holds a "management discount" - even when it trades at 50% discount to peers it can rarely find anyone to upgrade it. Quite sad. An interesting story here that shows their internal projections are far higher than the Street.
  • Chinese solar product maker Trina Solar Ltd expects its revenue to double in 2009, reaching $1.7 billion to $1.8 billion as it ramps up capacity to meet strong demand for clean energy, its chief executive said on Thursday. (analysts at $1.3 billion)
  • Solar module shipments next year will surge to 450 megawatts (MW) from this year's 210 MW to 220 MW, as the firm plans to double its capacity to 700 MW by the end of 2009 and boost it further to 1,000 MW in 2010, Gao Jifan said in an interview from the firm's headquarters in Changzhou, near Shanghai.
  • To fuel the expansion, Trina Solar's capital expenditure is expected to rise to $250 million in 2009 from $200 million this year and reach $350 million in 2010, with funding coming mostly from internal resources, he said. "Our cash flow is enough to fund our expansion until 2009. I believe our operating cash flow will increase further in 2010, enough to supply our expansion needs," said Gao, who is also the firm's chairman. (this has been a source of constant consternation by analysts) He therefore did not expect the development plans of the New York-listed firm to be significantly constrained over the next two to three years by the U.S. credit crunch. (what credit crunch? problem "solved" as of late night)
  • Trina Solar's cash reserve at the end of this year is estimated at $100 million, with operating cash flow generated in 2009 seen between $150 million and $200 million, he added.
  • The firm has secured 70 percent of its sales target for 2009 and Gao expected to secure more orders, most likely in Europe, which now generates more than 90 percent of its total revenue.
  • Gao said he may consider building plants outside China in the future. (that's new)
  • Gao expected the company's profit margin, estimated at 23 to 25 percent this year, to improve in 2009, as it signed more long-term polysilicon supply contracts, with pricing levels significantly lower than in the spot market.
  • Gao said he believed his firm's share price was undervalued given the bright prospects of the solar industry, as more governments in developing countries such as China offer policy incentives to promote the development of solar power, following the lead of many European countries. "There is no doubt that our share price is undervalued," he said. "It should be more than double the current level."

I continue to believe the $4.43 estimate for 2009 is a complete mockery. There is a chance for nearly double that in 2009 but this is the sector of boogeymen. Analysts always find something to worry about.

It will be important to scale up quickly in this sector as there are a bevy of competitors and consolidation will rip through the industry over the next 5 years. Too early to tell if Trina will be one of the "eventual" winners but at 8x 2008 estimates it's discounting every worst case scenario known to man.

Long Trina Solar in fund; no personal position


Wow

TweetThis
I thought last week with Frannie and Freddie was historic. That now seems quaint.

The number of measures announced last night and this morning are too numerous to document - you can hit CBSMarketwatch.com or CNBC.com for a list of the multiple actions taken - just be assured that all risk is being taken away from the financial companies in America and given to the American taxpayer under the guise of "well there is a good chance the US taxpayer makes a profit!" Obviously no private party was willing to make that bet on profit but we are being asked to.

I think the final straw was the run on money market funds by institutions - you know the "calm" ones (I say that in regards to how the conventional wisdom is the small retail investor is the one that panics - look whose talking). I really am simply amazed at the past year, the past month, the past two weeks, the past week, and the past 24 hours. Jack Bogle, founder of Vanguard Funds, and in the business nearly 60 years was on CNBC this morning saying he has seen nothing like this. The only question I ask is "if things are so fine" as we were assured, why the historic actions? Obviously things were not fine, nor near fine.

Now after the euphoria runs out, will people ask "why" were these steps necessary? That's the same question I asked after the Bear Stearns bailout. Remember, we were assured "it cannot get worse than this" and "the bottom is in financials". That didn't work out so well.

However, this time we have taken it to another level. We won't be doing a RTC type of bailout in my mind because in that instrument we took over failing financial institutions. This is more similar to the 1932 version (that's Great Depression era action) where we have the banks offload their toxic items to the American taxpayer. But don't worry - as long as we hold it until "calmer" times we'll make a mint off this transaction. Nothing is free in life - there is a cost in the long run for our "stock market victories" in the short run. The potential obligations of the American taxpayer continue to skyrocket. But purely from a Wall Street view that does not matter - risk has been offloaded away from Wall Street and into another entity. So that's a very large net positive.

Looking at the S&P 500 open as we near S&P 1250, we have rallied 7.3% in 1 HOUR since 3 PM yesterday.

As I said yesterday, "they" went one step too far - you do not mess with Goldman Sachs. Period. President Paulson... err Treasury Secretary Paulson showed them. I can only imagine how this would of worked out if it were Secretary O'Neil or Secretary Snow at the helm today.

Historic times. Head shaking times.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Exasperating

TweetThis
Sometimes a few hours can make all the difference in the world

We entered the day today perfectly positioned for this rally - I had trimmed short exposure quite heavily since the mood was so dour, and went heavy into Ultra Financial, Lennar and Sequenom. The other reason was I was worried about a global central bank rate cut which would lift the spirits.

We got our bounce this AM but when I came back to the computer mid day it had failed. We were selling off.... I got back a lot of the short exposure as things were not looking good. I cut back on a failing Lennar wondering where did the housing rally go? I cut back on Ultra Financial dismayed by the lousy reaction today. Then we had the UK short selling ban news - but after that initial spike, especially in financials, it withered I held fast. After selling 3 positions here, I looked at my Ultra Financial in my personal account and said, "whatever". I sold it.

5 minutes later came the CNBC announcement. Perfectly positioned for it at 9:30 AM. Terribly positioned for it 5 minutes before the announcement.

I did quickly cut each and every Ultrashort ETF the minute I saw the news. But it was too late - some were -10% already. I scrambled back into the UYG and Lennar - too late - both were up 12%+ already.

The market, dependent on random news flow, continues to twist me into a pretzel and make me look idiotic. I just had to get that out there, before I run head first into the wall.

So that was my day. How was yours?

CNBC: Paulson Setting Up Plan to Set up Federal Facility to Take on Bad Debts

TweetThis
This "should" be a huge game changer as well. This was the end game we've been discussing for a year now. The government in the end will own the mortgages. (through the morgaged securities)
  • Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is working on setting up a government facility to take on bad debts from financial institutions to prevent a worsening of the global credit crisis, Wall Street sources have told CNBC.
  • The facility would be similar to the Resolution Trust Corporation, which was set up in the late 1980s to take on all the failed thrift assets during the savings and loan crisis, these sources said. (the difference was those were FDIC insured - whereas these monsters we are dealing with today are creations of greed and we have no obligation to take them over... well other than they have wrecked havoc of epic proportion on the financial system)

  • Meanwhile, Calpers, the nation's biggest pension fund, said it would no longer lend out Morgan Stanley [MS ]
    or Goldman Sachs [GS ] shares to short-sellers
    , who profit from stock declines, the Wall Street Journal said. Both stocks have been pummeled recently by heavy short-selling. (another wow in a series of wows)

While pathetic and a bailout for all the bad decision makers; the lack of regulation that allowed it to get to this point requires a solution or the whole financial system devolves globally, and I guess this is the best solution of the bunch. We'll trade years of potential obligations (and be sold "hey they made money on it when they did it in the 1990s so why not this time around?) in return for a positive few days in the market. :) Kick the can. Kick the can.

At this point everytime the market moves 1.5% in 10 minutes I just go to CNBC.com and see what the latest breaking news is. Whipsawed again.


Bookkeeping: Closing 3 Positions

TweetThis
This market is more than dangerous. When you can lose 40% in 1 hour due to a rumor it is simply not worth it.

I am cutting back even further. I am cutting 2 of the 3 positions in my "non solar alternative energy" bucket - we have 2 big losers and 1 big winner of these 3. I am keeping A-Power Energy (APWR) despite the horrific fall. I cannot believe it is 5x earnings for 2009, but I cannot believe many things I've seen the past 13 months.

Our big winner in this group was Fuel Systems Solutions (FSYS) - we have a $22.6K gain here in the stock we started on July 2nd. The company blew out earnings as we anticipated and the stock roared. Those were in the days when fundamentals "sorta" mattered. I've cut it back on the way up and have not been buying on the way down. One of their main plants is in Italy which is shut down for August and a few weeks in December - with high riding stocks like this people expect them to beat and do better than the quarter below. I've been hesitant to buy this in case they do a good quarter but not enough to satisfy heightened expectations. Obviously running a plant for 2 months of a quarter instead of 3 will cause sequential growth to not be so great. I don't think most investors in this name are expecting that. So I'm in a position where I like the fundamentals, but I don't want to add until at least after the next earnings so in this environment we might as well cut it; so we are here at $46.

One of our big losers has been American Superconductor (AMSC) - it is up 17% today as this is a short sellers favorite. It is up 17% today - coincidence I am sure. (p.s. APWR was up nicely this AM before reversing hard) I am going to take my $10.9K loss and call it a day. Without positive earnings until 2009 and a speculative bent to it, this is not the type of merchandise the market prefers. I still like it, but then again I like a lot of stocks I've been punting the past 6 weeks and the market has been mauling. We're closing the 1.0% stake today just over $20, and have held it since Jun 02.

Outside of this "basket" I created, I am selling Exactech (EXAC) which is a small medical equipment company I like. Since its earnings report it has not done much - just sort of floated downward. It is actually lower than where we entered the position post earnings (which I liked but the market didn't) but we are up $200 just from trading around the position. It broke below the 200 day moving average a week ago and has at least not gone into freefall. Since it is up 5% and making an attempt to challenge this resistance area I am going to sell while the selling is good - we only had a 0.1% stake remaining so it's one less position to look at. $200 in this market is like $20,000 in 2006.

We continue to shrink. Friends, if you can make heads or tails of this market you are a better man, woman, or computer than I. It is so random and since my methodology does not work (whose does?) in this market it is just dart throwing. This gives us no advantage - darts are a 50/50 probability. That's not my thing. You can't even step away from the computer for 1-2 hours anymore. (I don't have the ability to place stop orders which is another problem) So I continue to find this market dangerous and useless as a money making mechanism. I just saw the market spike up 1.5% in about 10 minutes out of the blue on no news. I just saw a few banks on my watch list Regions Financial (RF), Wells Fargo (WFC) and BB&T (BBT) make 12-20% spikes in 30 minutes. This makes no sense to me - whatever the quant funds are doing is boggling and moving stocks so violently my head is spinning. Nothing really is making sense so I continue to hide as much as possible.

EDIT 2:20 PM - a reader sent me this, I guess this explains the super spike in both the exchanges and the financial stocks. But again, if you are not watching this market every millisecond it can turn against you on any minor news item. Not worth it.
  • The UK Financial Services Authority imposed a temporary ban on short-selling financial stocks on Thursday, saying the measure was needed to prevent further instability in the financial sector.
  • "We have taken this decisive action, after careful consideration, to protect the fundamental integrity and quality of markets and to guard against further instability in the financial sector," FSA Chief Executive Hector Sants said in a statement.
  • The FSA said the ban will remain in force until Jan. 16 next year and will be subject to an initial review after thirty days.
  • In addition, investors with an existing short position of more than 0.25 percent of a financial company's share capital must disclose their holdings every day from Sept. 23, the FSA said. (sounds VERY similar to the SEC proposal we discussed this morning - obviously they have been talking)
Have I mentioned these are historic times?

Jeff Macke on Fast Money said it best last night - when you don't even know the rules, or they are changing them on you - how do you invest? You simply cannot.

Long A-Power Energy in fund and personal account

Friends Don't Let Friends Buy Stocks - Look at State Street (STT)

TweetThis

Wow, total panic out there. State Street (STT) is supposed to be a safe asset manager type of financial institution - it's down 40% - oh wait, it's rebounded to only down 30%. Now S&P can downgrade its debt, credit spreads can widen and we can take it to $0. Yippee. People were flocking into these type of financials as a port in the storm.


  • Shares of trust bank and asset manager State Street Corp (STT) slumped as much as 22.5 percent on Thursday on concerns of losses in its investment portfolio. (that was written at 11:48 AM - this market moves fast, it doubled that loss within 90 minutes)
  • "With the disruption in capital markets that we are seeing, there's a concern that State Street's investment portfolio may have greater mark-to-market issues than earlier anticipated," said Gerard Cassidy, analyst at RBC Capital.
  • "Additionally, there's going to probably have to be 'other-than-temporarily-impaired' charges on their investment portfolio in the quarter. Investors are taking the approach that shoot first, ask questions later. That's the reason the stock is off as much as it is today," Cassidy said.
This is Russian Roulette right now. Unless you are Wells Fargo (WFC) which apparently every mutual fund in America is buying hand over fist since it's impossible to make it fall.

Wait, as I type this now it is only down 15%... company statement
  • In response to questions received today from media and other sources, State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT - News) confirms that, as previously disclosed, it does not believe consolidation of its conduits is required. State Street confirms that even if it had to consolidate its conduits, it would remain well capitalized with ample sources of liquidity. The company raised $2.8 billion in equity capital in early June 2008 and does not currently have any plans to raise additional equity.
  • The net asset value (NAV) of State Street Global Advisors’ money market funds has never declined below $1, including in its Short Term Investment Fund (STIF), Government Short Term Investment Fund (GSTIF) and the Navigator Securities Lending Trust, a registered fund that is used in connection with collateral management for State Street securities lending program. These funds do not have any unsecured exposure to AIG, Lehman, Washington Mutual, Wachovia, Merrill Lynch or Morgan Stanley.
  • State Street for its own account does not hold any equity positions in unaffiliated financial institutions. The company is often reported to be an owner of many issuers because of its position as a large custodian and a large index fund manager.

I think denials and clarifications mean nothing in this market. People will say they are lying and it's obviously going to $0 as the credit default swaps are widening. It's a sick world.

Position: Do not let the women and children near this stock market. Or the men.


Can't Even Take a Lunch

TweetThis
Sheesh, I was away from the computer for 2 hours and this is the result. Simply not an investors market. Daytraders only.

A-Power Energy (APWR) now at 5x 2009 estimates. For 50%+ growth. Amazing. Apple (AAPL) in 2 weeks gave back the entire year's gain. Not worth buying anything in this market.

Views of the U.S. from Abroad

TweetThis
I wrote yesterday [An Ugly Close]

We're going to be in intensive care for a while. Thankfully, even at our reduced level of consumption the rest of the world still "needs" us, so they will hopefully continue to fund our consumption lifestyle (debt). But I can only imagine the amount of trust has fallen off the cliff as the onion is peeled back layer by layer.

Some pieces in the NYTimes in response to the world view of the current "safe" United States of Subprime. Keep in mind we lectured Asian countries throughout the late 90s when they went through their crisis moments "let the free market rule!" We are hypocrites. It does matter how we are viewed... because as debt addicts we need the world to buy our Treasuries each and every month so we can consume. Since we're technically broke.

We have a leadership deficit - all our decisions are based on 4-6 year election cycles. By 2 polarized parties. For the benefit of those who "pay" to get their way. As with all things the (bad) decisions are cummulative. We are distracted by talk of pigs and lipstick. Only in crisis do they even bother with the economy - after all it's not sensationalist and interesting to most. And so after year upon year of this situation - we finally get where we cannot kick the can much farther - see there is a wall up ahead.... we seem to be running head first into it. I say these things not out of spite but sadness and this is the direction we've chosen and no one seems to be willing to stand up to fix it...

Worried customers in Singapore lined up on Wednesday outside the offices of A.I.G.’s life insurance subsidiary in Southeast Asia, A.I.A.

In Asia, the Bloom is Off the U.S. Rose

  • Tremors from Wall Street are rattling Asian confidence, leading many investors to question the wisdom of being invested in the United States to the tune of trillions of dollars. Asian investors were starting to show hesitation even before the financial earthquake of the last week. Now, a wariness toward the United States is setting in that is unprecedented in recent memory, reaching from central banks to industrial corporations, from hedge funds to the individuals who lined up here to withdraw money from the American International Group on Wednesday.
  • Asia’s savings have, in essence, bankrolled American spending for decades, and an Asian loss of confidence in American financial institutions and assets would have dire consequences for both the United States government and American taxpayers.
  • The potential for panic is stoked by Asian news organizations, which tend to focus more on business and economics than on politics, which can be touchy here. (wow business & economics?? boring subjects! how do they sell their news there? Wait - I'd be a star in Asia!)
  • The nonstop deluge of bad publicity for American investments seems to be seeping into the consciousnesses of the rich and middle class across Asia. “I do not believe in U.S. financial institutions anymore; I don’t think any U.S. bank is safe anymore,” said Wang Xiao-ning, a Hong Kong homemaker. Even after the Federal Reserve had taken control of A.I.G., she waited in line with dozens of other anxious policyholders at one of the insurer’s customer service centers for the chance to close her investment account.
  • Little-noticed data released by the Treasury Department on Tuesday showed that a sharp shift in international capital movements began in July. Private investors pulled a net $92.9 billion out of the United States, after putting $46.8 billion into American securities in June.
  • Many investors in Asia think that Asian economies will bounce back from the current global economic downturn faster than the American economy, said Henry Lee, the managing director of the Hendale Group, a well-known Hong Kong investment advisory firm. So they are putting their money in Asian companies. (wait, I've been sold the fact that AMERICA will bounce back first - because... because... well "we're #1!!" - funny how when you stick your head outside the U.S. punditry you hear different things. I guess I agree with the Asians more than the Americans - again whose problems would you want? A 12% GDP in China that could "plummet" to 7% with huge savings rates? Or this financial calamity with huge debt and unmitigated greed and lack of regulation that hurts the masses - I know, I know - "we're #1")
  • If cash is king during the current global financial crisis, then Asian governments and financial institutions are emperors. China’s central bank alone has $1.8 trillion in foreign reserves. Those reserves grew $280.6 billion in the first half of this year — a pace of $64 million an hour.
Really this is no different than our oil addiction. When you are an addict, whether it be money or oil - you are hostage to your dealers. Many speculate Paulson took action on Freddie and Fannie based on pressure from foreign governments who were getting worried, especially the Chinese
  • Foreign central banks cut back sharply on their purchases of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities in July, a development that helped spur the U.S. government's bailout of the mortgage giants
  • The episode is a potent reminder of the United States' dependence on foreign investors to fund its trade deficit, analysts said, and reflects a pivotal shift from previous government interventions.
  • The report also showed that foreign central banks and private investors dumped $50 billion in securities issued by Fannie, Freddie and other housing agencies, such as the government-owned Ginnie Mae. Central banks in China and Russia in particular cut back on their purchases, analysts said.
  • Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson confirmed after the bailout that foreign investors' concerns were among the factors that prompted his actions.
  • The People's Bank of China, for example, holds roughly $440 billion in housing agency debt, according to some estimates, which makes up a significant portion of its $1.8 trillion in foreign reserves. (think about that for a moment)
Jim Jubak has a lengthy analysis in this article 'Feds Bailed out China, not US' - it is worth the read if you are into these things (i.e. things like selling your soul so you can pay your creditors)

Let's head over to Europe shall we? You know, that place sold to us as a backwater of socialism that treats its workers to cost of living wage increases that keep up with inflation (how shameful a practice! how do you maximize profits and shovel as much to the CEO suite with that sort of thinking?)

Abroad, Bailout is Seen as Free Market Detour
  • Is the United States no longer the global beacon of unfettered, free-market capitalism? In extending a last-minute $85 billion lifeline to A.I.G., the troubled insurer, Washington has not only turned away from decades of rhetoric about the virtues of the free market and the dangers of government intervention, it has also likely undercut future American efforts to promote such policies abroad.
  • I fear the government has passed the point of no return,” said Ron Chernow, a leading American financial historian. “We have the irony of a free-market administration doing things that the most liberal Democratic administration would never have been doing in its wildest dreams.” (again I think both parties are terrible and not very different from each other anymore, but can you imagine the uproar if a Democratic administration was doing these steps? Oh my gosh - we'd never hear the end of this for generations - how the Democrats turned America into a communist/socialist nation - thankfully its "small government" Republicans at the helm!)
  • ... has stunned even European policy makers accustomed to government intervention in the economy. “For opponents of free markets in Europe and elsewhere, this is a wonderful opportunity to invoke the American example,” said Mario Monti, the former antitrust chief at the European Commission. “They will say that even the standard-bearer of the market economy, the United States negates its fundamental principles in its behavior.”
  • In France, where the government has long supported the creation of national champions and worked actively to protect select companies from the threat of foreign takeover, politicians were quick to point out the paradox of what is essentially the nationalization of the largest American insurance company. “Today the actions of American policy makers illustrate the need for economic patriotism,” said Bernard Carayon, a lawmaker of President Nicolas Sarkozy’s center-right governing party, UMP. “I congratulate them.” (wow - just wow) For the “evangelists of the market this is a painful lesson,” he added. (I'd say)
  • In Asia, the Washington-led bailouts have stirred bitter memories of the very different approach the United States government and the International Monetary Fund pushed during the economic crises there a decade ago. When the I.M.F. pledged $20 billion to help South Korea survive the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s, one of the conditions it imposed was that the Korean government allow ailing banks and other companies to collapse rather than bail them out ("it's good enough for you, but not good enough for us" policy) “Washington is following a different script this time.”
  • “This was an insurance company that wasn’t federally regulated,” said Gary Gensler, who served as a top official in the Treasury Department during the Clinton administration. “We’re in new territory,” Mr. Gensler added. “This is a paradigm shift.
Historic times. As your grandkids muddle through their 80% tax rate, they will be reading books about this era.

SEC Considering Forcing Hedge Funds to Disclose Short Positions

TweetThis
I honestly think the hedge funds did a brilliant job of their sole purpose - maximize profits - in this era. Even if some of their tactics are disgusting. They played the game to perfection. They know the ratings agencies after taking so much heat now shoot first, ask questions later. They know the rating agencies recently begun taking stock price into consideration of their ratings (which is ludicrous - so that means ABC.com in 1999 deserves an AAA rating?) They know by buying up CDSs they can create a panic, which drives down the stock price, which causes the rating agency to downgrade, which leads to a death spiral.

They found the loopholes. But I think they took it one step too far. You simply do not attack Goldman Sachs (GS). Goldman has too many people placed in government. CNBC said this morning, Morgan Stanley (MS) CEO was livid yesterday and had the ears of people in various arms of the government (he was once considered for SEC commissioner) - essentially if Morgan Stanley goes down, this is blood on your hands. In the end it still comes down to who you know. And I think the government is now fully engaged. Again, I think some weak companies (i.e. Franron - I stole this term but I love it - that would be Freddie/Fannie/Enron for newbies) should go to zero but when stock price action clearly has disassociated from fundamentals you no longer have a "fair" market. And this was finally registering by those who matter and can change the rules. Again the irony is the traders at these investment bank firms have benefited from the rules for a long time - only when their Frankenstein partners turned on them did they realize the other side of the trade.

The SEC has been a total disaster but they finally are enforcing a rule on naked short selling they have had on the books since 04 I believe. It's a disgrace what has been done to small company after small company by hedgies who can attack them relentlessly and they are too small to defend themselves. But now that they've targeted the big fish - Goldman - it's going to change. Another thing you might hear a lot is bring back the "uptick rule" - this was taken away a year ago... it was "stress tested" in a bull market - duh. Basically this means you need to wait at least for a "tick up" in the stock price before you can reshort. Frankly I think in this era of quant hedge funds and computer trading the uptick rule is now rendered useless. Let's say I want to short the stock into the ground - these super computer (I am being serious) can put in thousands of trades a minute - all it takes is an alternating system of sell short, then buy 1 share on the upside, sell short, buy 1 share on the upside. Etc. These are some of the brightest minds on earth many with PhDs in the sciences - they can figure it out. So that's a non starter.

However, there are potential game changers on the horizon. This would be a huge one and in fact I am blown away they would consider it. The whole idea of hedge funds is secrecy and being hidden away from regulation. They have to file their positions quarterly like a mutual fund. But only their long positions - I've always wondered why not their short positions? That was a major issue. But even then, in this current era - if you were attacking a stock in a pack - all you would have to do is lift your shorts by the end of day 4 PM on March 31, June 30th, Sep 30th and Dec 31st and no one would know what you were doing (those are your end of quarter dates) But now the pendulum has swung so far - again this is amazing - the SEC is considering rules that hedge funds over $100M in size have to release their short positions DAILY. That's simply a seismic shift if it happens. Because this takes away the entire idea of the secrecy of positions.

Once more - don't mess with Goldman Sachs. They simply are too intertwined with US government. As with all things, in the pursuit of greed - people crack the golden egg. If this rule passes, it simply changes the game.
  • The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission may require hedge funds to disclose their short-sale positions and plans to subpoena the funds' communication records in an effort to stem turmoil in stock markets.
  • Hedge funds and investors managing more than $100 million in securities would be ``required to promptly begin public reporting of their daily short positions,'' Chairman Christopher Cox said in a statement late yesterday. The agency will obtain ``disclosure from significant hedge funds'' regarding ``past trading positions in specific securities,'' Cox said.
  • Lawmakers including U.S. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd and executives such as Morgan Stanley Chief Executive Officer John Mack say short sellers may have contributed to the market crisis by spreading false information and using abusive tactics to attack companies. Hedge funds argue that poor business strategies are to blame, not short sellers.

  • ``A lot of hedge funds don't like being forced to disclose their long portfolios, so they're really not going to like this,'' said Sean O'Malley, a former SEC lawyer and now a partner at Goodwin Procter LLP in New York. ``There is going to be some push back from hedge funds, but they may not get any sympathy in the current market environment.''

Folks, this is going to be very interesting to watch play out and I can bet you a lot of people are quaking in their boots in NYC and Connecticut. I've said someone is going to go down for this in the past - they will find people - those in cahoots and working together to bring down the Lehmans, Bears, Fannie, Freddies - they will find someone not named Martha Stewart.


MidAmerican Energy to Buy Constellation Energy (CEG) for $4.7B

TweetThis
Well that is unfortunate - we are going to lose 10% or so as Constellation Energy (CEG) was forced to sell out ... and only got $26.50. Congrats to short sellers for nailing another company. This was a $65 stock a week ago - looks like MidAmerican got a steal since Constellation was desperate as the S&P rating agency was forcing its hand. Once they downgrade the debt, a death spiral ensues in this market.

  • MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. has reached a deal to buy Constellation Energy Group for $4.7 billion. Des Moines, Iowa-based MidAmerican will pay $26.50 per share for Baltimore-based Constellation. The two companies plan to sign a definitive merger agreement by the end of business Friday.
  • The deal was unanimously approved by both companies' boards, but still requires approval from shareholders and governmental officials and is expected to close within nine months.

I am debating whether to sell this AM or wait a few days to see if there is a counterbid. On the plus side MidAmerican is not a public company so the shorts cannot drive it down for daring to buy such a damaged property.

EDIT: Looks like Buffet is behind MidAmerican. Yes - he is a genius and knows how to pick the bottom barrel.

Long Constellation Energy in fund and personal account

A Short Opportunity in One of Our Holdings we Nailed

TweetThis
Well we nailed this call on Tuesday when we cut Alliance Data Systems (ADS) from 1.8% to 0.1% of portfolio

Actually that looks like a double top just north of $66 which is might be very ominous. I'm cutting back to 0.1% stake until further notice. Here is another easy short entry - short at $60, stop out at $62, cover at $52. Go long at $52? Hmmm... we'll check back in the days to come

Within 24 hours, i.e. yesterday, it went to $52.11 for the low of the day. Once more, these are the type of short opportunities I cannot take advantage of in the current environment but it would of provided us (we sold out at $60) a 13% gain in 1 day. This is part of the frustration ... one arm is tied behind the back in this sort of market. All these nice shorts we've called out over the past year+ would of buffered us very nicely in terms of performance.

This is why I am now typing out the thought process so you can at least see what we "could do" in a real fund versus now. But now that this gap is filled, I'm interested in buying.

Long Alliance Data Systems in fund; no personal position

Short Marketocracy.com for not allowing shorting of individual equities in long only accounts



An Interesting Take on Short Selling & CDSs

TweetThis
Just an interesting fact
  • "The SEC is really flapping its gums here -- it's really not doing anything different," says Robert Ellis, senior vice president of wealth management at Celent. "They missed another opportunity to bring back the uptick rule. I guess lobbyists and hedge funds don't want them to bring it back." (I've said the same - hedge fund political contributions have shot through the roof - and in America those who pay, get to play)
  • Nearly 30 billion shares were sold short in the market in late August, a sixfold increase over the last decade, according to ShortSqueeze.com. (wow - especially considering the S&P 500 is essentially at the same spot as it was a decade ago i.e. the market has not gotten "bigger")
  • Ellis says that trend has effectively transferred wealth from retirement accounts, which are unable to short stocks, into hedge funds. He notes that brokerages can profit on both ends, because the collect fees on both the long and short positions, and don't necessarily have to tell clients that they are lending out the stock. (ah the great transfer of wealth - one of my favorite topics)
  • Since the restrictions on short selling on 19 financial firms were lifted... four of the firms in question have essentially gone under. (another wow)
I wrote a piece about a year ago that at some point the unregulated pools of capital would get so big they would create havoc is some parts of the system. (can't find the entry now!) That was at oil in the $70s - so we can see the havoc being brought on (both to upside and downside) - again they don't have the "most" money but as the marginal customer with the most velocity of money, they move markets. They manage 1% of the world's assets (maybe 3% with leverage) but account for anywhere from 25-60% of all trading. This is why I focus on their footprint constantly.

John Mack, CEO of Morgan Stanley is getting peeved. Both he and the CEO of Goldman are now in close contact with Mr. Cox from the SEC (and lo and behold - the rules get changed now)
  • Morgan Stanley Chief Executive John Mack lashed out at short sellers Wednesday after watching his firm's shares plunge as much as 42 percent and seeing prices for its debt-default insurance soar into distressed territory.
  • A day after Morgan Stanley announced better-than-expected third-quarter earnings and delivered greater profit and revenue than its larger rival Goldman Sachs Group, investors pushed its stock to a 10-year low and traded some of its bonds as if the No. 2 investment bank were near default.
  • In a memo, Mack told employees there was no "rational" reason for the movement in its stock or credit default swaps, which serve as insurance policies for debt. "What's happening out there? It's very clear to me -- we're in the midst of a market controlled by fear and rumors, and short sellers are driving our stock down," Mack said in a memo obtained by Reuters.
  • Mack also said he spoke with federal officials to enlist their help and spoke with clients and counterparties to assure them Morgan's financial health was sound. "We have talked to (U.S. Treasury) Secretary Paulson and the Treasury. We have talked to Chairman (Christopher) Cox and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Like Morgan, Goldman contends that a 14 percent drop in its share price and widening CDS spreads were driven by speculation. He also confirmed that Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein received a call from Cox. The two discussed the market moves and concerns about potentially improper short selling activity.
I honestly think the credit default swaps issue is the main thing here. People are taking illiquid instruments and treating them as gospel. I've come to that conclusion myself after realizing how much of this oil move from $70 to $150 was levered hedge funds able to "affect" a market in pack mentality.... but saw it on some CNBC articles yesterday.
  • Are credit markets accurately reflecting conditions? That's the heart of an angry debate going on on the NYSE floor and on trading desks all over.
  • Bears say the are accurately reflecting conditions, and in fact they have been accurately reflecting conditions all year. This is the main argument for bears: the most bearish positions--as reflected in the credit markets--have been the most correct positions this year.
  • Bulls are just as adamant, saying the credit default swaps market are thinly traded and may be subject to manipulation
  • Morgan Stanley is the battleground here: supporters insist that the conference call went well, that Morgan has strong capital and liquidity positions, have reduced bad asset exposures, and have prefunded their issuing needs for the next 6 months. Stay tuned!
And another where an analyst has come to the same conclusion I have
  • UBS's Glenn Schorr is the first one I have seen to directly address the cause of the selloff, the increasing cost of credit default swaps to guarantee the company's debt: "we find it disconcerting that the illiquid CDS market (or the rating agencies) can have so much influence on the fate of these companies and alter the landscape of the brokerage industry."
  • He notes both Morgan and Goldman have strong capital and liquidity positions, have reduced bad asset exposures, and have prefunded their issuing needs for the next 6 months
So it's sort of a smoke screen - people who traditionally use such measures of insurance to measure "danger" are being manipulated into thinking something is far worse than it is (on indiviudal stocks) - as hedgies can create the illusion of "danger" by buying these instruments in packs, driving up their price - which sends the signal to the markets that "something is wrong". So rational longs are using their normal thinking and selling these stocks due to the swaps.... which feeds right into the hands of the hedgies with the heavy short positions.

Again, due to the political contributions I don't know if this will ever be investigated but maybe if they take down the entire financial system someone will say "hey maybe we need to investigate it - lobbyist or not".
  • (2007) American hedge funds have increased their political donations by more than two thirds in the past four years and the figure is set to rise considerably in the run-up to the 2008 presidential election.
  • James Lacier, a senior Washington research analyst at Prudential Securities, said: “Hedge funds are becoming more active, in large part because there are regulatory issues hanging over their heads. “It was the same with tobacco and casino companies in the mid1990s when the Democrats started going after the tobacco industry and the debate on gambling on Indian reservations was in full force.”
  • Matthew Bernstein, of the lobbying firm DLA Piper, estimated that hedge funds had quadrupled their lobbying expenditure — which is separate from political donations and has not been quantified — in the past three years. At the same time, key players in the hedge fund industry are taking important roles helping to raise money for candidates.
This is just my theory but I think it's quite reasonable - these companies business models are not degrading this fast. When you see it done to companies that just reported positive earnings, it really begins to stink of something amiss. When bad companies go bankrupt that is one thing, but forcing others into bankruptcies, or marriages they don't want, or causing them not to be able to raise money - those are distortions of the market. All so some guys can buy another yacht.

I wonder who lobbied to get rid of the uptick rule - something that was in place for eons? Was it that urgent to get rid of it? I've yet to see one explanation other than "it's an old fashioned rule". Huh? Again the loss of this item was not a "cause" of current issues - there are true fundamental causes for the drops we see - but it is like dead wood around a fire... easy tinder. It's all tied together - there are no coincidences. Granted the market has gotten so whacky it's even causing great harm to SOME hedge funds - but great wealth to others.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

FT.com: Electricite de France Eyes Constellation Energy (CEG) Bid

TweetThis
Well this news might keep the stock up for at least 10 minutes before short sellers attack by buying up credit swaps and signaling "this means the potential bid is a hoax!" Ok, I'm a little bitter... ;) Remember, EDF already owns nearly 10% of Constellation. Now the question is IF it did happen, how long would it take to go through regulators and in the time the bid was outstanding could shorts create enough panic to bankrupt the company ;) (yes, I said bitter)
  • EDF is considering a bid for Constellation Energy (NYSE:CEG) , its US partner, even as it prepares finally to set the seal on a sweetened £12bn (€15bn) offer for British Energy, the UK's nuclear operator.
  • Meanwhile, the French group's board met in Paris yesterday to discuss the group's options for further investment in the US, where a crisis of confidence has sent its US partner's shares crashing in the past few weeks. EDF earlier this month doubled its stake to 9.51 per cent in Constellation, which was to have been its entry into the potentially lucrative US nuclear relaunch.
  • People close to the situation said EDF had not yet decided whether to bid for the group, which has an estimated enterprise value of $10bn (€6.9bn). Constellation yesterday confirmed that it was in advanced talks with a potential buyer, and an announcement on a takeover or asset sale could be imminent.
Will US regulators go for it?
  • State utility regulators will have the final say over a sale of Constellation Energy Group, Gov. Martin O’Malley’s office said Wednesday.
  • The potential sale — disclosed by Standard & Poor’s, a major credit rating agency, earlier in the day — could jeopardize more than 5,000 local jobs and, analysts say, potentially drive up electricity costs. Customers of Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., a subsidiary of Constellation, already have seen energy costs jump more than 70 percent in less than three years. (we don't count that in our official inflation reports - remember, stick to the story inflation is 1.2% for GDP purposes)
  • A public company, Constellation (NYSE: CEG) isn’t regulated by the state. But BGE, which serves 1.2 million electric customers and 640,000 gas customers in Maryland, falls under the regulatory thumb of the Maryland Public Service Commission.
  • O’Malley spoke with Constellation CEO Mayo Shattuck III Wednesday morning by phone, said Rick Abbruzzese, an O’Malley spokesman. The governor was not ready to judge the merits of any possible deal for Constellation, Abbruzzese said, but did express concern over consumer anxiety about rising energy costs and the company’s role as one of Maryland’s biggest employers.
Maybe rates will be cheaper if the company can be driven into bankruptcy despite owning some minor assets... such as nuclear plants.

Obviously this deal must of already been in the works if it is coming together so quickly.

Evening News

TweetThis
I'm going to need to hire someone to handle the evening shift around here. The pay is nonexistent but you get to blab to a worldwide audience about financial distress from 5 PM to 5 AM. Apply within!

Two companies getting pole axed (20%+ for each today) Wachovia (WB) and Morgan Stanley (MS) consider a marriage. My open question - will that stop the shorts? Won't they just buy up the debt protection of Wachovia and say "now you are taking on your own risk plus Morgan Stanley's?" and cause more panic? I don't know. I mean if you can incite panic in each individually - why not together? Then S&P can downgrade on the "signals the credit swaps are sending us" and they can go to $0 together in 1? Or is this just making it easier for the government to bail them out - instead of 2 Sundays they can do them together in 1 Sunday? And instead of 2 bailouts to send to Congress, it is only 1? Genius.
  • Morgan Stanley, one of the two last major American investment banks, is considering a merger with the Wachovia Corporation or another bank, according to people briefed on the discussions.
  • Morgan Stanley's [MS 21.75 -6.95 (-24.22%) ] chief executive, John J. Mack, received a telephone call on Wednesday from Wachovia [WB 9.12 -2.39 (-20.76%) ] expressing interest in the Wall Street bank. Morgan Stanley is considering other options as well. Other banks have also expressed interest in Morgan Stanley.
Washington Mutual is up for sale via auction (and you can bet Uncle Hank was in there arm twisting this one).
  • Washington Mutual, the struggling savings and loan, has put itself up for auction, people briefed on the matter said Wednesday.
  • Goldman Sachs [GS 114.50 -18.51 (-13.92%) ], which Washington Mutual has hired, started the auction several days ago, these people said. Among the potential bidders that Goldman has talked to are Wells Fargo [WFC 33.43 -1.50 (-4.29%) ], JPMorgan Chase [JPM 35.77 -4.97 (-12.2%)] and HSBC.
  • TPG, the private equity firm that led a $7 billion cash injection into Washington Mutual [WM 2.01 -0.31 (-13.36%) ] in April, said Wednesday afternoon that it would waive its right to be compensated if the bank sold more shares to raise capital. “Our goal is to maximize the bank’s flexibility in this difficult market environment,” TPG said in a statement (Uncle Hank made a call on this one too) The April deal gave the investing group roughly 822 million new shares, diluting existing shareholders by nearly 50 percent. TPG bought shares for roughly $8.75 each. Those shares have since fallen to $2.14 a share, meaning that the value of the investor group’s holdings at Tuesday’s close had declined 75.5 percent.
You see where this is heading right? We are going to combine our top 50 entities into 5 super companies - and then when the short buy huge amounts of credit swaps, causing panic - the government will be forced to nationalize all 5 as "too big to fail". But instead of 50 bailouts it is only 5 more. Ah, the master plan revealed.

November 29, 2008

Dear Congress,
We know we promised there would be no more. We know we said the bailouts would end. But the guys at SEC are still asleep and the guys at S&P insist on downgrading stocks based on credit default swaps that are rigged by short hedge funds, but we digress. We now have a problem with "The National Bank of Wachovia Morgan Comerica BB&T and Wells Fargo Trust" After the 5 way mergers of the late September period - we thought the problems were over. We were wrong. Since we are down to only 5 such banks in America we ask you for 1 last bailout. The combined cost will only be $800 billion and we plan to fund this through selling more Treasuries. Yes there are always new suckers to buy our debt. So this will leave us with 4 banks left in America. I realize this will balloon our budget deficit but I believe we usually put these transactions in the 'special accounting book' since they are temporary in nature and hence that $800 million does not count. If I can only get to Jan 1, 2009 I can be out of here and the next guy who takes this job can deal with the remaining 4 mega banks we created. So please... one last time - for old times sake - a bailout for the Gipper?

S
incerely,
Hank Paulson

An Ugly Close

TweetThis
Well there was some hope there for about 30 minutes, but the close is ugly. Very ugly. About as bad as it can get in fact.

This is two 4%+ drops in 1 week - a slow motion crash. We're down 8%ish in 3 days.

Worse yet - we have to be subject to another 4 hours of CNBC 'special programming' tonight full of pundits who missed "this" in the summer of 2007, and scoffed at the few who were warning about the situation. Instead of getting to watch 'Deal or No Deal'. Insult to injury.

On the plus side as we take a step back and look at the broader picture there are incredible values in companies getting punished relentlessly that have nothing to do with financials, and will do fine with a grinding US economy. Until fear recedes it won't matter much.

On the flip side, credit is the lifeblood of this economy and the past year's events have set the stage for years of issues ahead as credit availability is impaired. Strewn on top of the structural issues many US consumers of the bottom 2/3rds of America already faced, it does not point to a rosy outcome for a sustained period of time.

Again, I want to reiterate - the conventional wisdom is the U.S. will lead the world out of this mess. Brought to you by the same pundits who told you housing could never fall nationally. Subprime was contained in spring of 2007. And there was no chance of recession in the fall of 2007 (some even today insist this to be true!). We are in denial as a nation and it appears only the strongest of slaps across the face will wake us up - old arrogance also rears its head: "We are so strong, and so rich (rich? we are the poorest country if you count debt) we will lead the world back!"

I disagree - it will be the opposite. Let me ask you - which governments were calling which governments/sovereign wealth funds today for emergency capital and help? Which government was selling Treasuries at a furious rate to replace its depleted capital?

After the shocks to the world system from the #1 consumer on Earth falling off the wagon, there will be a rebound - but it won't be led by those who fell off the wagon. We're going to be in intensive care for a while. Thankfully, even at our reduced level of consumption the rest of the world still "needs" us, so they will hopefully continue to fund our consumption lifestyle (debt). But I can only imagine the amount of trust has fallen off the cliff as the onion is peeled back layer by layer. Oh well, we're better than Russia still - at least we kept our stock market open. (ahem)

However, between now and "the recovery of the globe" stage it will a tricky environment as people will flee to 'safety' and they still consider the U.S. safe. After watching what has happened here the past 2 weeks, I don't understand that thesis, but old habits are hard to break. Right now we'd love to "only" have the problems China or even a Germany faces. The leadership is slowly moving from West to East; old ideas (and ideals) take much longer to change.

Since I posted our performance Monday

to be consistent I'll show you today's results... well, we "beat the market" at least (considering our top long position going into the day lost 20%+ I guess that's not all bad)



Bookkeeping: Adding to Sequenom (SQNM) Lennar (LEN) and Ultra Financial (UYG)

TweetThis
I almost bought an airline here, but they are nothing more than anti oil trades - when oil is down they go up, and vice versa. I find commodities so hated here, as I wrote yesterday in the Monsanto (MON) piece, I'm actually bullish on that group (for a trade) at this point. So airlines might suffer a bit here if we get any oversold bounce in oil/nat gas. As for fertilizer - it has so disconnected (stocks down/fundamentals steady) from reality it is jaw dropping. Hopefully the hedge fund liquidations are near over in these names and the stock action has been constructive the past week, considering how bad the market is. Again, makes me bullish.
  • North American
    potash producers were left with a record low inventory of
    825,000 tonnes of the fertilizer at the end of August, an RBC
    Capital Markets analyst said on Tuesday.
  • The month-end inventory was down 21 percent from the end of
    July and 33 percent below last year's level, said Fai Lee in a
    research note, quoting industry data.
  • "Given tight potash supply conditions and strong
    agricultural fundamentals, we expect potash prices to remain at
    elevated levels," Lee wrote.
  • "The latest inventory data is consistent with industry
    reports that recent visitors to the Port of Vancouver have
    indicated the potash warehouses were 'effectively empty'," Lee
    wrote.

But for now, US homebuilders are the new fertilizer - so I'm adding to Lennar (LEN) just under $13 to make this a 5.5% position. Remember this is just a trading vehicle - we have no belief in any imminent housing rebound but the market still does. Basically it's my "airline and homebuilder and the consumer is back" trade in one stock.


Sequenom (SQNM) has the first stage results of its large scale Down Syndrome's test next week and I expect it to be very bullish - it has pulled back to its 50 day moving average of $20. I'm buy right above it and taking this to a 3.8% stake

I almost bought PNC Financial (PNC) as a proxy on banks (great chart) Wells Fargo (WFC) is also now the "golden child" and the chart is unbreakable- instead I am adding to Ultra Financial (UYG) as a trade. Believe it or not, some commercial banks have among the best charts out there. I don't usually break out the hedge ETFs as trades but since this will be a very large contrary buy I am listing it here. It is now a 5.2% stake up from 0.6%.

I've cut back my short exposure materially (for now). I'll add it back if we go below S&P 1165. We're ping ponging back and forth 1165 to 1175 all day. It must break one way or the other soon.

Remember, I've cut back the number of positions significantly over the past month, with a selling climax last week - this way it is easier to manage and I can make the positions I keep of larger size. This is a trading environment not an investing environment, so everything is now a trade. Easier to do with a lot less positions on the book. If the market collapses here, it is a lot easier to get out of a handful of positions than 15. But considering I want to turn off the computer and not look anymore, that strikes me as contrary - so I'm buying. (cognizant I can be wrong and have to reverse course quickly - admitting defeat is key in this market)

Long all names mentioned in fund; long Ultra Financial, Sequenom in personal account

Rebound or Crash

TweetThis
The mood is so poor and real fear everywhere you have to either think we stage a rebound here (95% chance), or a crash (5%)

The ability to hold S&P 500 level 1165 through thick and thin is a testament to the Plunge Protection Team. Remember, if that breaks it's a straight shot to 1140 as the next support. Then below 1100. That naked short selling lift tomorrow has me wanting to be positive here...

Can 1165 hold?


Government... err the Free Marker is Trying to Find a Buyer for Washington Mutual (WM)

TweetThis
This just in! The invisible hand of free markets (err Hank Paulson) is trying to get Washington Mutual (WM) sold. Because we don't want to see bank lines forming across the nation in an election season. If you want to see a human panic...

That darn S&P is downgrading everything now causing issues. Considering they did nothing the past 5 years (yes of course that mortgage backed security is "AAA"!), perhaps we should abolish them along with the naked shorting. Because now they are just creating panic since they want to be seen as "ahead of the curve".
  • The U.S. government has been reaching out to large banks in an effort to organize a buyout of the beleaguered Washington Mutual Inc., according to a person briefed on the talks between regulators and banks.
  • The obstacle, however, is that "no one knows what's in their books," the person said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. There could be, he said, "a minimum amount of value there."
  • A New York Post report Wednesday citing unnamed sources said regulators have reached out to Wells Fargo & Co., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and HSBC Holdings PLC, among other institutions.
  • Rating agency Standard & Poor's downgrade of the thrift to "junk" status, "is likely to add more impetus to Washington Mutual to act quickly," Bruce, who lowered his price target on the stock to $1 from $3, said.
One day we'll look back at these past 2 weeks and say "I was there". Right now I wish I was not "there" :)

I can only imagine the scenario where the ex CEO of Goldman Sachs (Uncle Hank Paulson), is leading the bailout of the current CEO of Goldman Sachs. How surreal would that be?

The hits keep coming. Onward.

Harry Reed: No One Knows What to Do

TweetThis
Well, that's comforting. I'm much rather prefer the current administration's "everything is fine - the fundamentals of this economy are strong - this is just a small pothole" ;)
  • The U.S. Congress is unlikely to pass new legislation to overhaul financial regulations this year because ``no one knows what to do,'' Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said today.
  • ``We are in new territory. This is a different game,'' Reid said at a briefing in Washington. Neither Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke nor Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson ``know what to do but they are trying to come up with ideas,'' Reid said. (well at least someone speaks the truth)
  • Bernanke, speaking to lawmakers last night, called for a review of government regulations to address the current financial crisis, according to those who attended the meeting.
  • White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said today the Bush administration is willing to consider a suggestion in Congress to have the U.S. buy distressed mortgages, (aha, my call that this would be the eventual action a year ago is coming closer to truth by the day)
  • Congress is planning to adjourn Sept. 26 and other Democratic leaders have said they hope to avoid a session after the Nov. 4 presidential election. Reid said that Paulson ``recognizes that nothing is going to be done this year.'' ``It is a multitrillion dollar issue that's facing America and we can't do it on some timeline that is unrealistic,'' Reid said. (translation: gosh darnit we will not work past Sept 26th - we have districts to get back to and re-election campaigns to focus on. We don't care if the US financial system is crumbling! I need to get re-elected and that's job #1 - I have lobbyists families to feed!)
  • Reed also called for a second economic stimulus package this year, saying if the federal government can put up billions to help companies such as AIG, it can afford to help out struggling Americans. (but we do have time to steal more money from your grandchildren)
So your government now owns Fannie, it owns Freddie, it owns AIG, it now is taking equities as collateral from banks in return to Treasuries (I wonder how that worked out this week) and last it will own mortgages directly instead of through the veil of Fannie/Freddie.

But other than that, the economy is fundamentally sound (never mind the inflation figures we've been distorting, the GDP figures we've been distorting, and the employment figures we've been distorting)

Yes... regulation is evil. It slows down the free market. Greedy human beings are best left to police themselves. :)

It's a fine mess we've gotten into.

As for the market, 1170 remains the break point on the S&P500. Below that level, it could be free fall. As we discussed yesterday that level provided the bounce. And it's providing multiple bounces today. But we sit in 1165-1175 range for hours. With the "enforcement" of naked short rules tomorrow it will be another interesting day in the "no rules" corral. I wonder if we'll have any investment banks by the weekend.

Constellation Energy (CEG) now in Freefall

TweetThis
Looks like I found my personal Lehman Brothers - down from $38 to $18 in just 2 hours. Amazing. S&P, which has been a useless credit agency which missed the entire subprime debacle, is now in shoot first ask questions later mode - simply on the chance it might change the rating the market is fleeing the stock. I had to cut some at a loss just to avoid carnage but what an amazing turnaround.
  • Standard & Poor's on Wednesday said it may change its credit ratings on Constellation Energy Group (CEG) amid concerns over the power supplier and utility owner's access to credit.
  • S&P placed Constellation's ratings on watch "developing," indicating they may be raised, lowered or left unchanged at "BBB," the second lowest investment grade.
  • "The CreditWatch placement reflects the increased urgency for the company to execute on its recently announced asset divestment plan and to complete other credit supportive strategic initiatives to shore up its balance sheet in the face of a broad loss of market confidence," S&P said in a statement.
  • Options being considered by Constellation include selling the company, and management has told the rating agency talks on this are at an advanced stage, S&P said.
  • S&P said it confirmed that Constellation's credit lines are in place, adding "Constellation is facing an acute crisis of confidence that has resulted in a decline in its stock price and a widening in its five-year CDS spreads.
  • "I don't think they need to be bought totally, they may just need a partner for the trading book," said Dot Matthews, analyst with CreditSights. "The trading book has been providing all these great earnings but it requires so much collateral," she said. (I'd agree in a sane market. This is not a sane market)
  • French energy group EDF SA recently doubled its stake in Constellation to 9.51 percent, under an agreement that limited the French company's purchases to 9.9 percent of company.
This is why this market is completely scary right now. It is at the discretion of buyers of the credit spreads swaps. And you can create a run on a stock just by buying a large swathe of these. So to reiterate - S&P is going to possibly downgrade due to an acute crisis of confidence. Caused by a decline in stock price. Caused by an increase in credit swap spreads.

Do you see how its circular? The dropping stock price, caused by the jump in "insurance" (the CDS spreads) is causing a crisis in confidence, which leads to lower stock prices, and higher prices for the insurance, which leads to... well you can see the same pattern over and over - first the financials, now we are in 6 degrees of financials. No one that needs access to credit for operations can be safe from this ploy.

The one positive is the advanced talks to sell the company but much like Merrill Lynch this is the hedgies forcing the hands of management. Again. See Morgan Stanley today. This weekend they were one of the "strong"players meeting with the Fed and Treasury trying to find a solution to Lehman. 3 days later they have become the victim and most likely need to sell themself to stave off the attacks.

Brutal. It is just not safe out there.

Long Constellation Energy in fund and personal account

The Federal Reserve is Running Out of Money & Resolution Trust Plan now Floated

TweetThis
Some of the end games are quickly approaching

Per Tony Crescenzi on Realmoney.com

The Fed had close to $800 billion of Treasuries at the start of the year. Last week the Fed had $479 billion in Treasuries, of which $200 billion was pledged to the term securities lending facility, the facility whereby the Fed lends its Treasuries to dealers in exchange for agencies, mortgage-backed securities and other non-Treasury collateral.

If the Fed lends $85 billion to AIG (AIG - commentary - Cramer's Take), the Fed's Treasury holdings will be down to $195 billion. The tally is so low that it is becoming imperative for the Fed to take actions to enlarge its balance sheet.

So how do you enlarge the balance sheet? You do emergency auctions of Treasuries
  • The U.S. Treasury said it will sell bills to allow the Federal Reserve to expand its balance sheet, a day after the government agreed to take over American International Group Inc.
  • ``The Treasury Department announced today the initiation of a temporary Supplementary Financing Program at the request of the Federal Reserve,'' the department said in a statement today. ``The program will consist of a series of Treasury bills, apart from Treasury's current borrowing program.'' The new bill program ``will provide cash for use in the Federal Reserve initiatives,'' the Treasury said.
Gold is finally reacting, up 6%. But if this due to the printing presses working 24/7 in America or the "Armageddon" scenario, who knows. Pathetically the dollar is barely down. As we print more by the minute. Open question - what happens if Citigroup (C) fails? Morgan Stanley (MS) - down 35% today? Wachovia (WB) - down 25% today? All are "too big to fail" - where will the money come from? I think the market is starting to finally figure out there are not enough fingers to plug the springing links throughout the system. Bush should be on the phone with every country in the world who actually has cash and be on his knees asking for them to send their sovereign wealth funds in to help save the system. This is what debtors due when the bills finally come in - beg. Only this debtor has the power to print, print, print money out of thin air.

Folks if you think this is bad, just wait until our Medicare obligations begin to overwhelm the system in about 15 years. This is why I keep bringing those up. This is all coming to a head now after years of neglect, greed, lack of regulation, and "kicking the can down the road". But this is just a preview of what is going to happen to America as a whole as our Medicare (Social Security is just a tiny issue in comparison) eats up a larger and larger part of the GDP. We are repeating the same mistakes there that we did here. But since today's politicians mostly won't be around when that hits the wall, no one even talks about it. We are too busy talking about lipstick. Check back in 15 years.

Also just as an aside the federal deficit numbers are far worse then they are letting on. Why? Because the war costs are "off balance sheet" - meaning they are not part of the budget. Further, in the last week we've decided we are going to keep Fannie and Freddie off the balance sheet as well. Because the obligations are "only temporary". How sad. The war is only temporary too, so no need to count the costs there either. So this is like you buying 50 cars, on credit, and saying they don't count because you are not writing them into your official budget. That's what our government is doing.
  • The director of the White House Budget Office on Friday said that operations of mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac seized by the government last week should not be treated as part of the federal budget.
  • "While the GSEs (government-sponsored enterprises) will not be included in the budget at this time, I will continue to monitor closely the implementation of the government's arrangement ...and may revisit their budgetary status in the future, if conditions change," Office of Management and Budget director Jim Nussle said.
  • On Tuesday, two days after the takeover, officials at the Congressional Budget Office announced that the deal had bound the government so tightly to the firms that their business operations, assets and liabilities should be included in the government's balance sheets. (this was ignored)

The next end game is the Resolution Trust... it is now being floated. Basically the U.S. will end up buying the toxic assets from the banking system in a more comprehensive way then we've ALREADY been doing.
  • Staring down the worst financial crisis in decades, U.S. lawmakers are strongly considering whether they need to dust off a 1980s-era plan to help save the banking industry and stabilize the economy more broadly. Both Democrats and Republicans have shown interest over the past two days in the idea of creating a government corporation to help deal with the toxic assets that have already brought down financial behemoths Bear Stearns Cos. and Lehman Bros., and forced the government to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
  • "I think we need to create an institution or a mechanism of a super-trustee to handle incredibly large institutions which may be allowed to fail and how those assets get managed and handled in an expeditious way so that it doesn't further exacerbate the economic ramifications of failure," said Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D., Pa.). "If we don't do that, we'll just go from one failure to another, and keep blossoming."
  • Mr. Kanjorski's comments came the day after House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D., Mass.) suggested that lawmakers need to consider creating a government entity akin to the Resolution Trust Corporation, which was formed amid the savings and loan crisis in the 1980s. The RTC, as it was known, resolved and liquidated the assets of 747 thrifts with total assets of $394 billion.
As an aside, this was nowhere to be found in yesterday's news while the punditry cried for AIG bailout. A small country by the name of Russia halted its stock market. Remember folks - to Americans, if it does not happen in the United States of Subprime, it does not matter. Until it does. We had a world emergency in 1997 due to the Thai Bhat of all things (Thai currency)
  • Sept. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Russia poured $44 billion into its three largest banks and halted stock trading for a second day in a bid to stem the worst financial crisis since the devaluation and default a decade ago.
  • The benchmark Micex stock index plunged as much as 10 percent, bringing its three-day decline to 25 percent.
  • ``The bond market remains effectively closed and banks are reluctant to lend to one another,'' said Julian Rimmer, head of sales trading at UralSib Financial Corp. in London. ``The problems experienced by KIT Finance have heightened counterparty risk and reduced liquidity further.'' (sound familiar?)
Historic times. Things many have warned for a long time but were ignored as "silly sky is falling types" are falling like dominoes.

Again, what is happening now is nothing compared to when the U.S. will eventually default on its debt due to Medicare. That will be the epic. [Jul 28: US Budget Deficit to Half a Trillion] [Mar 26: Annual Spring Entitlement Warning Falls on Deaf Ears] [May 23: David Walker on CNCB this Morning]

Bookkeeping: Cutting Back Millipore (MIL)

TweetThis
For identical reasons I cut Alliance Data Systems (ADS) yesterday (200 day moving average being breached) I am cutting Millipore (MIL) to the bone. I guess there is no safety even in healthcare. I know hedge funds own a ton of this one, and just like ADS it had held up until this week. Perhaps after they've blown out all their commodity stocks they now are moving to their next group of holdings as the deleverage game continues into hedgie land.

Reducing Millipore from a 2.2% stake to 0.1% stake by selling in the mid $70s.

This is an easy set up. There appears to be support around $64, and a ton of resistance here in the low $70s. So until north of $74 or down to $64 it is in no man's land. Again, we don't ask questions in this environment because in other holdings we have seen, once a stock breaks support, it can be part 1 of a very long leg downward. If we're wrong - so be it - all we lose is some upside. If we are right - we protect from a lot of pain to the downside.

[Aug 15: Initiating Millipore Position]

Long both names mentioned in fund; no personal position


Constellation Energy (CEG) Responds to Rumors

TweetThis
I really wonder where this ends and where the SEC is? Now it looks like the pack animals (locusts) will attack Morgan Stanley (MS) no matter if they have solid earnings - and the same tricks can now be used on any sector. Buy up credit swaps, create a "fear", short the stock, spread a rumor about something is amiss, longs get worried, sell into the fear, and you have the cascading effect down. It is now plain in sight but no one cares. They did it to Constellation Energy (CEG) the past 48 hours, now the companies have to issue press releases denying rumors but the shareholders, 401k participants at these companies and the like are suffering major damage. An unbelievable environment.
  • Constellation Energy (NYSE: CEG - News) today announced that the sponsoring banks have confirmed that the firm, underwritten commitment for an additional $2 billion credit facility announced on Aug. 27, 2008, remains in effect. (the rumor was spread that this $2 billion would be pulled)
  • Constellation Energy also confirmed that it has retained Morgan Stanley and UBS to act in an advisory capacity to evaluate strategic alternatives. The company and its advisors are in active discussions with potential strategic partners. (which means worst case scenario you are forcing us to sell ourselves even there is no reason for us to do so, other than rumors and hedgies buying the credit swaps in bulk to create an assumption "something is very wrong" - while spreading rumors to back it up)
  • Constellation Energy also reinforced that its credit exposure to financial institutions is limited. As of Sept. 15, 2008, Constellation Energy had net credit exposure to 14 financial institutions. The company's estimated aggregate credit exposure, net of collateral, to these financial institutions was approximately $120 million, with no single financial institution representing more than $28 million of net credit risk exposure.
  • Constellation Energy reaffirmed its third quarter 2008 outlook of $0.83 to $0.99 per share and full-year 2008 earnings guidance of $5.25 to $5.75 per share.

So on the positive side it is good management is proactive and addressing the "rumors" making the rounds. On the other side, the damage has been done to the stock, a lot of rumor mongers made a lot of money, and the fact this is an acceptable environment is an indictment of the current US financial system. It's a casino and circus into one. The regulators remain asleep.

Long Constellation Energy in fund and personal account


Bloomberg: Merrill's Thain. Aides May Get $200M for Year & People Know Something is Wrong but Don't know What

TweetThis
First, let me say running Merrill Lynch is difficult work and a stressful life, I am sure. Second, let me say working in a coal mine for a 10 hour shift sure isn't easy either. Third, I do realize the 2 Goldman Sachs executives Thain recruited gave up lucrative pay packages at Goldman to come to Merrill so you have to understand that when you read these numbers. But in the "heads I win, tails I win" culture of executive payouts these are some staggering numbers nonetheless.

Keep in mind Thain has been at Merrill for under a year. And his associates have been well under a year. In fact, Thomas Montag joined Merrill on August 4th. For his 6 weeks of hard work he is looking at a payday of $76 million. Peter Kraus joined Merrill last week and looks to make $95 million. That's good work for one week. (again it is replacing his Goldman package but it truly is jaw dropping if you think about it) This is why I don't harbor any ill will to athletes - what most of them make is nothing compared to what the top cheese in corporate America is. Stock goes down 60%? Not a problem - the payout is the same.

At least we are not paying the bill for this one...
  • Merrill Lynch & Co. Chief Executive Officer John Thain and two former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. colleagues he recruited may reap almost $200 million for their year running Merrill if they leave or are given lesser roles after Bank of America Corp. buys the brokerage.
  • Thain, who got a $15 million bonus when hired in December, stands to get an additional $11 million in accelerated stock payouts if he doesn't stay after the deal, compensation consultant Graef Crystal said.
  • Trading chief Thomas Montag, who joined in August, may get $76 million including bonus and accelerated awards.
  • Strategy head Peter Kraus was given $95 million including bonus and stock awards to replace a Goldman package he had to forfeit, people familiar with the matter said.
  • Merrill's stock returned more than 13 percent a year from 2000 through 2006. Since Dec. 1 of last year, Thain's first day, the shares have fallen more than 60 percent Thain earned the moniker ``Mr. Fixit'' for his stewardship of the New York Stock Exchange for four years beginning in January 2004. Before that, he was president and chief operating officer at New York-based Goldman, where he served under then- CEO Henry Paulson. Now U.S. Treasury secretary, Paulson helped to lead a weekend of discussions during which Bank of America initially weighed a bid for Lehman. (remember this is Goldman Sachs world - we just live in it)
  • ``I doubt Thain understood the magnitude of risk and exposure on Merrill's balance sheet,'' Bove said. ``I don't think anyone could have done a whole lot.''
  • In January, Thain began recruiting Montag, who agreed in April to join as head of trading and sales with a start date of Aug. 4. In addition to a $39 million guaranteed 2008 bonus to be paid in January, Montag got 1.05 million shares subject to vesting over three years, according to regulatory filings, awarded to replace stock grants from his prior employer that he forfeited by joining Merrill. Those, worth $30 million at $29 a share, may vest in a change of control. Montag, 51, also has 10-year options on 2.4 million shares of Merrill Lynch stock carrying a strike price of $26.40, Crystal said. Those options, which would fully vest if he left the combined company, would be worth a minimum of $6.4 million at the $29 per share price, according to Crystal, and could be worth far more.
  • Kraus, 56, joined Merrill last week and spent the past weekend helping to negotiate the Bank of America deal. Merrill's contract with Kraus, who worked at Goldman for 22 years before leaving in March, includes restricted stock and options to compensate him for the forfeited Goldman package, said two people familiar with the matter, who declined to be identified because Merrill hasn't disclosed it. That package was valued at $65 million in May, when his hiring was announced, the people said. He also got a guaranteed 2008 bonus of $30 million, one person familiar with the award said.
Meanwhile as a side note - one of my pet peeves - the financial illiteracy of the country's populace. It is much easier to fleece the sheep when the sheep just have a general sense of "something is wrong" but don't know enough to actually know what it is. I was watching an interview on one of the news channels and the pundit was dismayed that there was not outrage at the Fannie/Freddie bailout by taxpayers. When they went out and asked said taxpayers what they thought of the bailout the #1 response was "Will this lower my mortgage payment?" And that folks, says it all. Bloomberg has a piece here...
  • Wall Street had Daniel Palladino rattled. He couldn't put his finger on why. ``I'm trying to absorb all this,'' said Palladino, 48, a television writer, as he had coffee yesterday at the Farmer's Market in Los Angeles and read newspaper accounts of the demise of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (at least he reads the paper - a lost art it appears) The significance of the 158-year-old New York firm's bankruptcy filing eluded him, he said. ``I don't know more than anyone else, financially,'' he said. ``A bank to me is an ATM and a checking account.''
  • Like many Americans interviewed yesterday, Palladino wasn't clear how or even whether the turmoil on Wall Street would affect him.
  • Linda Burke, 57, a customer service consultant with AT&T Inc. in Atlanta, said she figured her retirement savings would take a hit and added that she was angry, though she wasn't sure at whom. (sorry this statement, just made me giggle - "I'm mad as hell! I'm not going to take it anymore! I'm going to march right up the steps of the ... wait, where do I go to file my complaint? And whom to?") ``If I knew more,'' she said, ``I could find someone to blame.'' (aha! always a wrinkle in the game plan - perhaps an hour invested in reading would help? or maybe a weekend on a certain blog?)
  • The reshaping of the U.S. financial industry is bewildering to ``folks who don't live and breathe this stuff,'' said Jim Behrens, president of Ralls County State Bank in New London, Missouri. (this is true - even well educated people who don't follow this stuff day in and day out, won't realize what is being done to the federal balance sheet)
  • Because of the credit crunch, ``banks are becoming more conservative,'' he said. ``For the man on the street, that means money and favorable terms are harder to get.''
  • The impact yesterday was clear for Jan Ziebell, 66, a retired probation agency employee from Pewaukee, Wisconsin - ``We're watching our nest egg for retirement shrink,'' Ziebell said.
  • Jay Leslie, 60, of East Brunswick, New Jersey, said he may not be able to retire as planned in five years. (recommendation - ask Thain for a retirement package? He is handing out money like it's nobody's business) ``I may have to work longer,'' said Leslie, who sells women's clothes. He said he blamed Washington, not Wall Street. ``The government didn't have any idea how serious this was,'' he said.
  • That wasn't the view of Gary Jones, 67, an Atlanta retiree who said he was ``so concerned I stayed up the last two nights moving my money into T-bills and other safe havens.'' (does Bloomberg only talk to the 60+ crowd? I can only imagine what responses they found in the 20-35 year old demographic) ``We ought to sue the heck out of every board of director for the last 10 years,'' he said. (Mr. Jones - I like your way of thinking - but most boards are just hand picked foxes watching the henhouse)
  • For Chaz Harris, the developments didn't convince him that the U.S. was in any trouble. ``The economy's pretty bad, but people are still spending money on what they want,'' said Harris, 20, an unemployed warehouse worker who lives with his parents in Weehawken, New Jersey. Referring to the Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. video game, he said, ``I mean, `Grand Theft Auto' did half a billion in seven days. So the economy's not that bad.'' (aha, they *did* find a 20 - 35 year old: and we can only ask him where he gets him money for his video games?)
So just thinking out loud at all these large cap mutual funds that dominate people's accounts - full of "safe" haven stocks such as Citigroup, Washington Mutual, Fannie, Freddie, Lehman, Bear, AIG... et al. Can't be too good for the proletariat; but no matter what the outcome the executives and their boards always cross "GO" with their cash in hand. Heckuva job Brownie(s)!

Speaking of boards - the fuss is growing louder over Lehman's
  • As Lehman’s stock continued to spiral downward to close on Friday at $3.60 — a level the company has not seen for over a decade — more investors started to ask the question that always seems to pop up when a company is on the brink: Where is the board of directors who were supposed to be guarding our interests? As usual, the answer appears to be: supporting the company’s CEO, instead of pushing him to make difficult decisions before the firm’s back is against the wall.
  • The research firm was especially concerned that Lehman's fossilic board of directors had just awarded Fuld a sum a that put him in the ranks of the top 2% of American CEOs: $71.9 million.
  • The Corporate Library's main beef about the board was that about half of Lehman’s 11 directors are over the age of 70, according to the firm’s proxy. Each of them has been a member of Lehman’s board for almost 15 years on average.
  • Our board is a joke,” says one Lehman executive who asks not to be named.
And...
  • Nine of them are retired. Four of them are over 75 years old. One is a theater producer, another a former Navy admiral. Only two have direct experience in the financial-services industry. Meet the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. external board directors, a group of 10 people who, perhaps unknowingly, carried the health of the world’s financial system on their shoulders the past 18 months.
  • How much was Lehman’s board monitoring the company’s on-going risk as it began accumulating its portfolio of real-estate assets and securities? In both 2006 and 2007, the risk committee of Lehman’s board met twice each year, according to Lehman’s SEC filings. (I'm too lazy to look up how much they made for those 2 meetings but I'm sure a pretty penny)

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Bloomberg: Federal Reserve Considering "Loan Package" to AIG (AIG)

TweetThis
Ever feel like you are standing in front of a leaky dam? A damn with 30,40,50 leaks? And you realize you only have 10 fingers? Welcome to the Jungle. My gosh, I keep using words unprecedented, and historic ... every day is a soap opera now.
  • The Federal Reserve is considering extending a ``loan package'' to American International Group Inc., the insurer facing a cash shortage, according to a person familiar with the negotiations.
  • The stance by federal regulators is a reversal from a position they held as late as last night, and people with knowledge of the talks are ``cautiously optimistic,'' said the person, who declined to be identified because negotiations are confidential.
  • The person gave no timetable for reaching an agreement or estimate on how much money New York-based AIG would need. New York Fed spokesman Andrew Williams declined to comment and AIG spokesman Nicholas Ashooh didn't immediately return a call seeking comment. Treasury spokeswoman Jennifer Zuccarelli had no immediate comment.
  • AIG is searching for capital to stave off a collapse after its credit ratings were cut late yesterday. AIG's fight to stay afloat is the latest tremor to shake the global financial industry, less than a day after Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and Merrill Lynch & Co. sold itself to Bank of America Corp.
  • Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were working with AIG to determine how much the insurer needs, said two people familiar with the talks yesterday. Goldman has helped the Fed appreciate the effects that an AIG collapse would have on financial institutions, the first person said.
Shaking head in amazement at this era

Bookkeeping: Buying Constellation Energy (CEG) for a Trade Only

TweetThis
There is a massive dislocation happening in Constellation Energy (CEG) right now. This is a 5 year low and down 40%+ as I type this. I'm labeling this "when hedge funds attack"

The company has a $6.1 Billion credit facility from a consortium of banks, of which $150M is from Lehman. That would be under 2.5% exposure to Lehman on the debt side. That appears to be enough to drive the stock down 60% and have it halted at 2 PM. This is the legacy of no uptick rule, computer dominated trading dominance, and unrelenting selling pressure. This is no different than financials - buy a bunch of credit default swaps, while shorting the stock - point everyone to the huge jump in credit default cost and say "game over" and everyone jumps in with you in the "shoot first, ask questions never" market. Now it can be done in any industry it appears - even boring utilities - as long as you know someone needs to liquidate a position. Just another day in the office for the hedgies. Lehman owned a 5.4% stake in the company and hedgies knowing they have to liquidate it can target at will. What a joke this market has become... I can only imagine what the poor workers and 401k holders of company stock must be going through right now - stocks are just playthings nowadays.
  • Constellation, Baltimore’s corporate cornerstone, saw its stock plummet as much as 63 percent despite its move to quell fears that its financial ties to Lehman Brothers would not have a negative impact on the company. Constellation revealed in an SEC filing Monday that it has $6.13 billion in a credit facility from a consortium of banks, with $150 million of that total coming from Lehman Brothers Bank. The company said the Lehman bankruptcy would have no material impact on its operations
  • In a Securities & Exchange filing dated Monday, Constellation Energy Group said it did not see a "material effect" from Lehman exposure. Constellation Commodities is a counterparty with two Lehman Brothers subsidiaries that deal in commodities transactions. The obligations of Lehman Commodity Services and Eagle Energy are guaranteed by Lehman, and the Lehman bankruptcy filing gives Constellation Commodities the right to terminate the transactions, according to the filing.
For a trade only I am buying a 3.1% stake in the upper $28s. We'll sell hopefully in the $40s or $50s.

Long Constellation Energy in fund and personal account


Bookkeeping: Cutting Alliance Data Systems (ADS) in Half

TweetThis
Wow. I am completely flabbergasted that even stocks undertaking a massive share repurchase program, in completely boring business lines that have nothing to do with commodities or financials, cannot hold a bid. I thought Alliance Data Systems (ADS) would be a port in the storm. [Aug 29: Starting New Position: Alliance Data Systems]

Well we have to stick to our guns - we see a chart where the stock broke key support and regardless of fundamentals or backdrop we have to begin to cut back to avoid risking major damage if this is part of a new trend down. We're cutting our ADS exposure in half from 1.8% to 0.9% of the portfolio, here at $60. We'll re-enter if the stock gets back above $62. Unbelievable - even buying back 30% of your shares does not provide you the benefit of the doubt. Just last week I was so happy in the performance - the stock never wavered. So much for that. Well there is a gap back there at $52 so maybe that's the future. So $52 or $62 - whichever comes first is where we'll buy.

EDIT: Actually that looks like a double top just north of $66 which is might be very ominous. I'm cutting back to 0.1% stake until further notice. Here is another easy short entry - short at $60, stop out at $62, cover at $52. Go long at $52? Hmmm... we'll check back in the days to come. On a fundamental basis it makes little sense - but what has?

Long Alliance Data Systems in fund; no personal position

Bookkeeping: New Position #2 - AeroVironment (AVAV)

TweetThis
Second new position is AeroVironment (AVAV) which is a name I have been watching for about a month. This company benefits from one of America's growth industries - war. (not a political statement - just the facts)

AeroVironment, Inc. engages in the design, development, and production of unmanned aircraft systems and energy technologies for various industries and governmental agencies. The company offers small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, including tracking, combat assessment, and geographic data to the small tactical unit or individual war fighter.

They also have a clean energy group - our buddy over at Marketfolly wrote a nice piece in June (which I frankly glossed over) but when it crossed my screens I took a second look. Now if we were talking 120 days ago we'd be interested in this name for the clean energy angle since crude oil is clearly going to $200; nowadays we like it for the defense angle as crude oil is clearly going to $30. (notice the overreaction in both directions? human fear v greed) The fact is when energy comes into favor you can have a company with its hand in both cookie jars. So it's interesting from that perspective, but the foundation of the company are the unmanned drones which is 80%+ of revenue - 15% is from their "efficient energy" technologies.

Here is a link to their company overview presentation from July 08.

Let's look at the chart - another solid year to date performance running from $24s to the mid $35s. When it crossed my radar it was in the $30-$31 range. While I was watching the company reported earnings last Tuesday evening (remember that was the huge down day following Bailout Monday) so the stock was in the mid $29s - it opened the next morning in the mid $33s and then jumped to mid $35s. So instead of chasing it there we waited. This is a market where almost all gains are given back, and many in short order. So by remaining patient we got the pullback today to the 50 day moving average of mid $31s. We bought just above that. Again our favorite type of chart, but one you need to be careful of because a break of support could lead to bad things. A close below $31 would have us cutting back out of respect for the danger in this market.


Here is a link to the full report of last earnings for the non HAL9000 types. AP summary here.
  • Shares of AeroVironment Inc. surged Wednesday after the maker of unmanned aircraft systems reported strong fiscal first-quarter earnings and several analysts raised their price targets and earnings estimates on the California company.
  • Shares jumped $4.49, or 15.3 percent, to $33.88 in midday trading. Earlier in the session the stock traded at $35.63, its highest point since going public in January 2007.
  • For the three months ended Aug. 2, profit rose to $4.8 million, or 22 cents per share, from $3.8 million, or 18 cents per share, in the year-earlier period. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected, on average, 18 cents per share.
  • The Monrovia, Calif.-based company said continued progress in its liquid hydrogen-powered unmanned aircraft business lifted revenue by 9 percent to $53.6 million from $49.2 million.
  • Both SunTrust Robinson Humphrey analyst Chris Donaghey and Stifel Nicolaus analyst Troy J. Lahr raised their fiscal 2009 earnings per share estimate to $1.20 from $1.18. Friedman, Billings, Ramsey analyst Patrick McCarthy raised his profit estimate to $1.16 per share from $1.13.
  • Donaghey raised his price target to $36 from $32, Friedman, Billings, Ramsey's McCarthy reiterated his $37 price target and Goldman Sachs analyst Richard Safran increased his price target to $27 from $25.
One thing I liked in the earnings report was the continued growth in backlog
  • As of August 2, 2008, funded backlog (unfilled firm orders for which funding is currently appropriated to us under a customer contract) was $108.9 million compared to $82.0 million as of April 30, 2008.
Conservative Guidance
  • For fiscal year 2009 the company maintains its guidance of revenue growth of between 20% and 25% over fiscal year 2008, with an operating income margin of between 12% and 14%.
The company has a non typical year end of April, so it's 2008 year ends April 09; based on current estimates it has a forward PE of 28. Since I have global growth stocks with forward P/Es of 5-7 that no one wants to own, I guess we have to pay near 30 for the current market favorites.

There is a lot of competition in this space from defense contractors but AeroVironment is a specialist instead of a generalist (i.e. they focus on this unmanned aircraft segment) and as an example just from the "ooh ahh" perspective is this piece from Motley Fool.
Perhaps the most startling news contained in AV's release this week concerned its recent DARPA-award to develop a "hover/perch and stare" UAV. This miniature airplane can fly to a target location, land there, and keep an eye on things from a perched position. When it's done, it can take off from its perch and fly back to base. (my comment: whoa - cool)

As you may recall, AV only announced its win on this contract three weeks ago. Now CEO Tim Conver tells us: "we are developing and have now demonstrated a new aircraft based on our one-pound Wasp that can perform vertical take-off and landing, hobbler, perch and steer machines in a very stealthy manner" [emphasis added].
Ok, I don't buy stocks on sex appeal but having a drone that can act like a bird is pretty darn sweet. ;) To top if off, Investors Business Daily has a piece on the defense industry with a focus on AeroVironment last Friday
  • AeroVironment showed investors once again last week how some military contractors are in a growth mode. The company -- which makes unmanned aircraft for the U.S. Army, among others -- saw shares jump 18% to 34.73 on Sept. 10, a day after reporting impressive first-quarter results.
  • Earnings per share for the quarter that ended Aug. 8 climbed 22% from the year-ago period to 22 cents, well over analysts' forecasts of 18 cents per share. Revenue shot up 9% to $53.6 million, topping estimates by 7%. Its funded backlog of orders climbed 33% to $108.9 million from the previous quarter.
  • It's one of the key stocks in IBD's military electronics group, which as of Friday ranked No. 3 out of 197 industry clusters. (hello - growth industry) Many of the stocks in the group focus on cutting-edge military systems that help improve military intelligence and surveillance. The products include thermal-imaging gear for spotting combatants, unmanned planes equipped with high-powered cameras, and technology that helps gather wireless communications from enemies.
  • With the war in Iraq showing more signs of success, some might think military contractors are heading for the bunker. Hardly. The U.S. military is preparing for a future beyond Iraq, and it's tapping a myriad of companies to do it.
  • AeroVironment has made its name building airplanes small enough to carry into battle and launch by hand. Despite its size, the plane also comes with enough camera and communications equipment to let a soldier see what the enemy is doing behind a ridge or in the next valley.
  • The companies tend to keep their contracts if the military likes their performance, even if a rival bids lower, Lewis says. Once a contractor has proven itself, it will try to win contracts for more advanced or larger orders.
  • "The U.S. has the largest defense budget in the world." (growth industry) The U.S. defense budget has been on the upswing during the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. The Congressional Budget Office reports the military budget has grown from $364 billion in fiscal 2001 to $622 billion in 2007. (did I mention growth industry?)
  • AeroVironment is trying to up the ante with what it calls the "Switchable," which can not only provide pictures to soldiers, but identify targets and fly into them, Kamikaze-style.
We started this position with a 1.3% stake in the upper $31s.

Long AeroVironment in fund; no personal position

Bookkeeping: New Position #1 - Luminex (LMNX)

TweetThis
I'm starting 2 new positions - these have both been found over the past 4-8 weeks as I've been looking for stocks strong on technicals. Then I've been parsing that group into stocks that (a) have strong fundamentals (b) are not in the tug of war between financials and commodities and (c) are too small for hedge funds to own too much and thus won't be too exposed to the "forced selling" effect as HAL9000 is forced to puke up positions. I have a list of about 15-20 ranked in order of interest, and 2 of them fell to a key support level this morning so I began starter positions in each.

First is Luminex (LMNX) who continues our trend into healthcare stocks. (website here) Luminex is like a baby Illumina which was one of our big winners that we recently exited as the chart weakened. Corporate fact sheet here. At today's prices it is worth exactly $1 Billion in market cap.

Luminex Corporation develops, manufactures, and sells proprietary biological testing technologies and products for applications in the life sciences industry. It offers xMAP technology, an open architecture and multiplexing technology, which allows simultaneous analysis of up to 100 bioassays. The company's technology is used in various segments of the life sciences industry, which includes the fields of drug discovery and development, clinical diagnostics, genetic analysis, bio-defense, protein analysis, and biomedical research.

So, similar to Illumina it's an assay and consumables type of company [Dec 20: Nice Write up on Illumina] but a much smaller company in terms of profitability and size. While fundamentals matter little in this market, we'll focus on the chart. Luminex has had a great year, running from $16 to as high as upper $26s year to date. I've been waiting for a pullback, but it is frankly higher than where I first started watching it as it has had a relentless run despite the market turmoil. Finally the past 5 sessions did it begin to pullback. The 50 day moving average is $23.75 and stock fell to $24 both yesterday and this morning. This is my favorite type of chart to buy - strong stock on pullback, but it is also a dangerous chart because either we (a) bounce or (b) breakdown. You never know in advance. So a break into the lower $23s would be a signal to cut back (or out) but we anticipate a bounce from this setup.

For the old fashioned types who still think fundamentals matter here is the last earnings report and a summary
  • The Austin, Texas, company said it lost $959,000, or 3 cents per share, in the second quarter. A year ago, Luminex took a loss of $12.1 million, or 34 cents per share. Revenue jumped 39 percent, to $24.3 million from $17.5 million, as the technology business became profitable and the assay group took a smaller loss.
  • Luminex also backed its full-year revenue forecast of $95 million to $105 million.
  • Analysts had expected a deficit of 3 cents per share on $23.4 million in revenue, according to Thomson Financial. They forecast $99.5 million in revenue for 2008.
  • Revenue for the technology group climbed to $20.3 million from $13.6 million. Assay revenue increased to $4.1 million from just under $4 million.
  • System shipments of 203 resulting in cumulative shipments to date of 5,402, up 19.4 percent from a year ago; representing the seventh consecutive quarter of system shipments of 200 or more
  • In a client note, Thomas Weisel analyst Peter Lawson raised his revenue estimate and predicted a smaller full-year loss for Luminex because of the improvement in sales and margins. He now expects a loss of 4 cents per share on $100.3 million in revenue, up from a loss of 8 cents per share and $98.5 million in sales. Lawson also boosted his price target to $23.50 per share from $21.
2009 should be the first year Luminex turned profitable. Gross margins are a solid 68% as of last quarter. Again I really like this models - you sell the equipment and then have a reoccuring stream of revenue from the consumables - we have this in Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) or China Medical (CMED) as companies who have similar "razor" and "blade" models.

We began Luminex as a 1.7% stake in the mid $24s range.

Long Luminex in fund, no personal position

Market Reverses ....

TweetThis
Call me a cynic but I bet it was leaked to the "people in the know" (i.e. Goldman Sachs) that a government bailout of AIG is coming ;)

I've lightened up on short exposure across the board.

This is the problem with this market - it has nothing to do with fundamentals - just bailouts, government actions, secret meetings, and which people "in the know" will be told about this before the rest of us know.

We did retest that S&P 1170 as mentioned this morning, here is the bounce. From here it can go either way. The risk is too high either way. Since I cannot watch this every moment I'm going to move the short exposure in large part to cash and then wait for the bailout news... ;)

I bought 2 new positions of names I've been watching for quite a while which I'll write out later in the day.

EDIT 11:40 AM: And here we go, more of our tax dollars at work
  • With a private sector solution looking increasingly unlikely, the government is once again considering providing American International Group with some sort of financial support, according to investment banking sources involved in the meeting.
  • The New York Federal Reserve is currently meeting to discuss the fate of the troubled insurance giant, these people say. Sources close to the situation said a private sector solution to AIG's situation is definitively dead.
  • "It's in our national interest that AIG survive," said Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, a former AIG chairman and a major investor in the insurer. He told CNBC there could be "systemic risks" if AIG's trading partners try to get out of their contracts.
We "promise" this is the last time that your tax dollars will be used to prop up the system. Trust us. I know we said that a week ago. But we mean it this time. Yep.

Monsanto (MON) Raises Guidance (Again)

TweetThis
While the chart is relatively poor, all things considered Monsanto (MON) has held up relatively well compared to its peers in the "commodity" space. I continue to be a bull on the long term market for potash fertilizer and seeds and once the hedge funds are done blowing themselves up we are going to have quite the rally in this group. In fact, while I usually lighten up ahead of earnings, due to the pole axed nature of this group I will actually have quite high exposure going into earnings as I expect a positive news flow and unlike the past 5-6 quarters this group is now hated as opposed to love. That strikes a chord with my contrary eyes.

To that end, Monsanto (MON) raises guidance today. This is another in a series of raises over the past 2 years. The companies in this sector continue to be cash flow monsters. Cash is king, in the end - and it allows you to buyback stock to protect against short sellers. Monsanto north of $114 would strike me as a very positive development; I've stayed away from this name due to valuation but I'd be a buyer on that sort of breakout now that we've culled the portfolio of so many names. Or I'd be interested on a drop to about $90. It's still not "cheap" but if it won't get much "cheaper" in this environment of delevering and angst about all things commodities, it appears it will never get "cheap" - it is a relatively unique company.
  • Monsanto Company (NYSE: MON - News) raised its fiscal year 2008 ongoing earnings per share (EPS) guidance to a range of $3.58 to $3.60, and revised its reported EPS guidance to a range of $3.49 to $3.51, compared with its previously announced EPS guidance of $3.37 on an ongoing basis, and $3.63 on an as reported basis The change in ongoing earnings reflected higher-than-expected sales and gross profit in the company's seeds and traits business and its Roundup® and other glyphosate- based herbicide business.
  • The change in as reported guidance for the year now reflects the effect of income from discontinued operations, the Solutia settlement and in process research and development from the De Ruiter acquisition. The ongoing EPS represents approximately 80 percent growth over last year's ongoing EPS of $1.99, and last year's reported EPS of $1.79 had even greater growth.
  • Monsanto now expects its seeds and genomics segment will generate above $3.8 billion in gross profit for its 2008 fiscal year, up from the earlier expectation of $3.7 billion, representing a growth rate of more than 25 percent compared with 2007 gross profit. The increased expectation for segment gross profit reflects higher than expected sales from the company's corn, soybean and vegetable platforms. Crews will indicate that Monsanto's Roundup® and other glyphosate-based herbicides business is on track to be above $1.9 billion of gross profit for the 2008 fiscal year, ahead of the previous forecast.

  • "The fundamentals of agriculture and our businesses are strong and getting stronger," Crews said. "We continue to see strong adoption of our branded seed products, growing use of our trait technologies globally and remain focused on introducing new game-changing technologies for farmers that can increase yields and improve their productivity. We are committed to delivering innovative tools that can deliver value to farmers."

  • Crews will also note that for the 2008 fiscal year, the company's corn business should exceed $2 billion in gross-profit generation for the first time. For 2009, Crews will reiterate that Monsanto expects the corn business to grow by 25-30 percent, propelling the company's expanding seeds-and-traits opportunity.

  • During Crews's presentation, he will also announce that Monsanto's guidance for free cash for fiscal year 2008 is now at approximately $750 million, compared with previous guidance of $550 million. Higher collections from accounts receivable and customer prepayments contributed to the increase in free cash flow.


No position


3 Years Lost

TweetThis
People buying the S&P 500 have now officially lost just under 3 years of gains. The last time we were at 1170 was the lows of October 2005. If this level breaks, the next support is April 2005 at 1140. If that breaks October 2004 comes into play at 1100 or so.

As you can see, October is not a very good month. Nor is September historically :) As we said with S&P 1215 yesterday we should see a "bounce" off the 1170 level at least on the first try as this is historical support. What the market does after the reflective bounce is of more importance.

We won't be catching the bottom since we are not buying anything, but we want to see a full fledged panic much like we saw yesterday with stock after stock dropping 10-15%. And very high volume. This can create an "exhaustion" type of bottom. It will be interesting to see if there is any "solution" to AIG (AIG) which could also turn this market, at least for a short time. But unfortunately the financial issues are simply un"fixable" by conventional means - aside from time, time, and more time - and more capital (which no one has) - there is no easy solution for their problems. This was true 1 month ago, 3 months ago, 6 months ago but sometimes the market lives in denial. Now it has moved from "hope" to fear.

Again in the end (the ultimate solultion) I expect the federal government to 'create' capital out of thin air (printing press) as things degrade. That is terrible for the dollar but the dollar bulls have not figured it out yet. They have already begun buying mortgage securities outright, something unthinkable (except for a few bloggers who said this would be the end game) a year ago.

Awful Reaction to Goldman Sachs (GS)

TweetThis
As always it's never the news, but the reaction to the news which is what matters. Goldman Sachs (GS) had "ok" earnings - poor for them, but great compared to anything their peers have put out - but the stock is down double digits in premarket. To make money at all in this environment is a victory but the market is in fear mode - not logic mode.
  • Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE:GS - News) said third-quarter earnings plunged 70 percent as one of the market's worst slumps ever sapped revenue in almost every business while fueling investment and credit losses.
  • The largest U.S. investment bank reported net income of $845 million, or $1.81 a share, for the quarter ended August 29, down from $2.85 billion, or $6.13 a share, a year earlier. Net revenue fell by half to $6.04 billion from $12.3 billion. The earnings beat analysts' sharply reduced expectations of $1.75 a share, but revenue fell short of the consensus forecast of $6.3 billion, according to Reuters Estimates.
  • As expected, Goldman Sachs' investment banking revenue dropped 40 percent amid a dearth of deal activity. Fixed-income trading revenue plummeted by two-thirds, reflecting weak credit and mortgage trading results, while equities trading revenue fell by half.

  • The quarter also included $1.1 billion of losses on financing for junk rated companies, residential mortgages and commercial mortgages. "This was a challenging quarter as we saw a marked decrease in client activity and declining asset valuations," Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman's chief executive, said in a statement.

  • Moreover, Goldman, the most aggressive investment bank in betting its own money, recorded a net loss of $453 million from principal investments. (this is why we sold the stock - we were worried about this - Goldman usually always makes money from their own trading as they have a lot of "advantages" of information) Asset management revenue fell 6 percent, reflecting lower fees, falling market prices and a $7 billion net outflow of assets. (scary to see net outflows out of even Goldman)

  • "This is a heroic effort," said Mike Holland, chairman of investment firm Holland & Co in New York. "I think we have probably not seen a more challenging environment than the one that we are going through right now."

Even more concerning is the jump in credit default swaps which a week ago no one even considered as an afterthought for a firm like Goldman.
  • The cost of insuring the debt of Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) against default rose on Tuesday after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers (LEH) fanned worries about the health of other investment banks. Five-year credit default swaps on Goldman jumped by 165 basis points to about 500 basis points, while Morgan Stanley 5-year CDS jumped by 275 basis points to 750 basis points, according to data from Phoenix Partners Group.
In basic English credit swaps are basically "insurance" if you will against the equity - as there is more fear about the stock the insurance rates go up. Now, people are speculating that shorts are driving up the price for default swaps to "create" an atmosphere of fear, which in turn drives down the stock price (which they can short), which drives up the value 0f default swaps and its a feedback loop. Could be - but with the SEC asleep at the wheel we'll never know. Or if we do it will be 10 years from now. The speculation now is that the 2 remaining independent investment banks will now need to attach themselves to a commercial bank so they have a ready source of funds. Their old model relied on them raising funds from borrowing in the open market but with the fears out there - the push is now to have a ready source of funds from deposits - basically what Merrill Lynch (MER) gets with Bank of America (BAC). The initial reads are that Goldman Sachs will buy a bank, and Morgan Stanley will need to be acquired by a bank. We are running out of banks that could acquire investment banks - maybe a Wells Fargo (WFC) or a foreign bank. But this all goes back to the basic model of financials - unlike widget companies these are companies that rely on the faith and trust of investors and customers. Since they are levered, if every client came and asked for their money at once, they would not have it - that is the basic business model. Which works 99.9% of the time. But this is the other 0.1% of the time.

Now the scary thing is when we last saw Morgan Stanley (MS) earnings they were very poor and outside of gains made from selling off one of their units overseas would of gone from very poor to horrible. So that worries me for tomorrow, when they report.

We owned both Morgan and Goldman but thankfully sold both - the stock performance is frightening and in this market the shorts see a lot of red meat - what can be a $40 stock price today can be $10 in just a few days. Markets are about emotions - fear and greed. We are in fear mode and prices have nothing to do with fundamentals in some cases so it's best to just step aside and let the fear play out.

No positions

Monday, September 15, 2008

Roubini with a Series of Videos on Yahoo Tech Ticker

TweetThis
We've been big fans of Nouriel Roubini [Aug 20: Nouriel Roubini: "Told you So"] and shared most of his thoughts along the way - so we've been in the small crowd that has been proven correct. You can find them here [Jul 14: Reviewing December 2007's Roadmap & Views] Although being correct from an economic standpoint has been a lot easier than a stock picking standpoint, as the market participants ping pong from denial to reality and then back to denial (each denial stage we usually take a big hit). Honestly if we could trade futures on my economic calls we'd be up 30-40% the past few months ;) Unfortunately we have to deal with the actual market. To be blunt, what has me worried are our economic views have been nearly dead on the past year plus as "famous" pundits lived in denial; so if my calls for continued degradation are as accurate as my older calls - I just have a hard time having much faith in this market. Outside of the "hope phases".

Here are a series of videos from Yahoo Tech Ticker shot today. Each clip is of the 3-5 minute variety - it is very important to understand the impliations of all that is changing by the day, hour, or minute.

#1 Top Economist: Americans Should Worry About Bank Deposits if Congress Doesn't Act

With the "financial storm of the century" hitting financial institutions, many Americans are worried about the safety of their bank deposits. While the FDIC insures individual accounts up to $100,000, the reaction to IndyMac's failure this summer -- lines outside retail branches -- shows Americans have limited faith in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which guarantees individual accounts up to $100,000.

Such concerns are justified, says Nouriel Roubini, of NYU's Stern School and RGE Monitor, who notes there is already a "slow-motion run on retail banks" occurring nationwide.

That "run" could accelerate as people realize the FDIC fund has about $50 billion to "insure" about $1 trillion in assets at the nation's financial institutions, says Roubini. "They're going to run out of money" unless Congress acts soon to recapitalize the FDIC.

In addition, the recent spike in number of banks on the FDIC's "troubled list" is only through June, meaning even that inflated number understates the problem.

The intent here isn't to add to people's anxieties, but Roubini is one of the few market watchers to correctly predict the severity of this ongoing credit crisis. If nothing else, he says people with accounts exceeding $100,000 in value should spread their money - and the risk - among different firms



#2 Big Risk: Surging Debt Makes U.S. More Dependent on China, Russia, Gulf States

The demise of Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and Bear Stearns this year has investors contemplating the long-term outlook for other once-venerable institutions, including Dow members Citigroup, AIG and Bank of America.

But there's an even bigger financial institution with greater debt and an increasing level of bad loans on its books: The U.S. government.

Given the actions already taken, from the Housing Bill to the nationalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the U.S. deficit could double to $800 billion in two years, says Nouriel Roubini, of NYU's Stern School and RGE Monitor. (Even worse, the official government deficit figures exclude the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the unfunded liabilities of Social Security and Medicare.)

The big risk is that foreign holders of Treasuries will no longer accept low interest rates to help fund U.S. debt spending, says Roubini, noting countries like China, Russia and oil-producing nations in the Middle East have becoming increasingly important holders of Treasuries. Should they demand higher rates to hold U.S. debt or, worse, dump their holdings, it could have profound ramifications on the U.S. economy and the value of the dollar.

Roubini further notes the Federal Reserve has put its balance sheet -- and independence -- at risk via its intimate involvement in thus-far failed attempts to stem the crisis.

It's tempting to dismiss the notion of a "run" on the U.S. government as unthinkable and some bears have been warning for years, even decades, about such a worst-case scenario. But after the events of this weekend, much less the past six months, it's clear that (almost) anything is possible and no scenario too "outrageous" to seriously contemplate



#3 Feds Right to Let Lehman Fail, But It's a 'Dangerous, Risky' Path, Roubini Says

After the nationalization of Fannie and Freddie last week and the government's role in JPMorgan's purchase of Bear Stearns in March, the notion of America as "bailout nation" has taken hold. This weekend, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson sought to put an end to that way of thinking by declining to backstop a deal for Lehman Brothers.

The government was right to not intervene and bailout another distressed financial institution, says Nouriel Roubini, of NYU's Stern School and RGE Monitor.

But the government has already started down a "dangerous and risky" policy road, which resumed this weekend as the Federal Reserve announced "enhancements" to existing liquidity facilities that were created in response to the ongoing crisis.

The announced changes include:

  • Broadening of the types of securities Wall Street firms can use as collateral when borrowing from the Fed to include lower-grade debt securities and equities.
  • Stepped up schedule of so-called TSLF auctions to a weekly vs. bi-weekly basis.
  • Removal of restrictions on how much commercial banks can lend to their brokerage units.

This final point means that banks are using Federally insured deposits to support their brokerage units, which puts even greater risk on the Fed and (potentially) the FDIC, Roubini says.

Also joining Henry and me is NY Post Wall Street reporter Mark DeCambre, who notes the Fed and Treasury are faced with a tremendous number of simultaneous crises for which there is no magic bullet.



#4 Crisis on Wall Street: Roubini Predicts Another 20 Percent Stock Drop, Sale of Goldman, Morgan

After failing to find a buyer this weekend, Lehman Brothers filed for the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history while Merrill Lynch agreed to be acquired by Bank of America for $50 billion. Such extraordinary events set the stage for a wild Monday on Wall Street, and most likely beyond.

These incredible, once unthinkable developments have caught a lot of people off guard, but not Nouriel Roubini, of NYU's Stern School and RGE Monitor, whose alarming predictions about the housing market and finanical system have been coming to pass with alarming frequqency.

This morning, Roubini forecast another 20% drop in stock prices, and reiterated a prior view that there will be no major independent broker/dealers standing before this crisis ends. In other words, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley should be seeking suitors today, or face a similar fate as Lehman later.


Looks like Panic Selling - S&P 1200 here we are

TweetThis
We are now back to the depths of the July carnage - S&P 1200. If this does not hold, it would be very worrisome. Again, you can bet "they" will defend it like they did successfully on the first few tries this morning at 1215.

I said earlier that if Merrill (MER) goes it will be interesting to see what they do to Morgan Stanley (MS)... well right now it's not pretty. Even Goldman Sachs (GS) is being destroyed. Those are the 2 last independent investment banks. Both report in next 2 days and along with the Federal Reserve meeting - anything can happen. We could be up 3% or down 3% tomorrow. The action continues to be dangerous as I've been saying week after week.

Goldman Sachs (GS) is before the bell tomorrow so something positive there, along with hopes for a Fed rate cut could turn this market on a dime. Or not. Such binary action - quite amazing.

Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs were both down around 14-16% before "rallying out of thin air" to only be down 7-11% -- hmm, how curious ;) Again I would not be surprised to see a number from Goldman that "they" can use as an excuse to rally this market up 3% tomorrow. It happened just a week ago - up 3% on Fannie/Freddie bailout, and then lost it all the very next day. Curious forces are at work behind the scenes.

We do indeed live in interesting times.

EDIT @ 4:10 PM : that was a very weak defense. We had one bounce there @ 3:30 PM right at 1200 and then just a tailspin into the close. That bodes very ill. If not for Goldman possibly providing some knee jerk bounce tomorrow I'd be extremely negative. We'll see what they have up their multiple sleeves. p.s. could someone tell me why financial stocks rallied from July 15th forward? Also can one pundit who showed up a week ago today telling us the bottom was in due to bailout of Fannie/Freddie please show his face and say "oops"? Just one?

Here is today's action

p.s.s. we've had a rough time of it of late as we've been high in cash levels, hedged in areas the market is running up on "thesis" instead of fact, and our long positions have not been treated very well in this market of "buy financials because the worst is behind us" and "buy consumer discretionary because everything will be fine in 6 months - but only in the USA as the rest of the world crumbles - so sell global growth stocks". So we lost some money today but I'm confidant compared to most funds readers might own we outperformed just about any equity fund out there. Small victories I suppose.

Now the danger is tomorrow could be a complete reversal of today, as this market has no memory from day to day, and the market could be up 3% and we look like a laggard again. Or it could be down another 3%. Who knows. VIX crossed over 30 at least (volatility index) - over 30 has usually signaled fear is high and we are close to an intermediate bottom.

SEC Finally to Get Around to Addressing Naked Short Selling?

TweetThis
Well it's taken catastrophe and carnage across Wall Street but maybe, just maybe the SEC plans on doing it's job. There appear to be plans to strengthen action against naked short selling - sadly there are already regulations against this on the books but they appear to be so loose and very few respect it. There are entire lists of stocks on each exchange filled with stocks that are targets of this ploy, but nothing is done about it. We'll see if there is any teeth to this new plan - but without regulation rules are meaningless.

Again, short selling is fine, dandy and fair. Naked short selling is supposed to be against the rules, but on Wall Street the rules are bent often. Only when it appears to bring down the system do "regulators" wake up.
  • U.S. securities regulators plan to take action on abusive short selling of stock before the end of the week, a source briefed on the matter said on Monday.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission will likely adopt proposals to strengthen its short-selling rule, including one that deems it fraudulent for customers to deceive broker-dealers about their intention or ability to deliver securities in time for settlement.
  • The SEC will also move forward with a plan that would shorten the time in which traders must buy back stock if they fail to deliver a security by the settlement date.
  • A "naked" short sale occurs when an investor sells stock that has not yet been borrowed. Broker-dealers will sometimes accidentally fail to deliver stock to investors who have arranged to borrow it. If this is done intentionally, it is illegal. (it's amazing how many "accidents" happen on a daily basis over millions of shares)
WSJ take
  • Securities and Exchange Commission Christopher Cox assured Wall Street chiefs amid a series of frantic weekend meetings over the fate of Lehman Brother Holdings Inc. that the SEC would institute protections soon, this person said.
  • The SEC is expected to move up the timeline for finalizing two rules as soon as this week, up from late September. The rules, which require the approval of the SEC commission would stiffen requirements on certain players involved in short-sales and make it illegal for a trader to mislead his broker about locating stock to short and then failing to deliver it within three business days, this person said.
  • The idea behind the rules is to rein in traders who borrow stock to short and then are late or never return it. Market participants say that can have a cascading effect on a company's stock.
  • Many traders want the SEC to institute a rule that allows traders to short only on an uptick in the stock's price. The SEC removed that rule recently and traders blame it for recent volatility and record levels of shorting.
Again, if you are just a no name small cap stock who is being relentlessly naked short sold in this market - we don't care. But if you are a financial, you have the ear of every government official in D.C. - when you are targeted the same way.... then it matters. But even then, only after much of the damage has been done. The government at it's normal finest.

Doug Kass: Under-Regulated, Overcompensated

TweetThis
Here is a take from Doug Kass which is free over at TheStreet.com so I'm reprinting it. (Kass being noted hedge fund manager, short oriented in most cases) Long time readers of the blog will see Kass has has used a bevy of terms/themes we've used over the past year....
  1. "heads I win, tails I win system" especially in executive management
  2. "performance all based on 1 year time frames instead of over longer periods of time
  3. "the free market will regulate itself - not"
  4. we are now just working through the financial dislocations - after that will come the real effects on the "main street" economy - i.e. the stock market has been mostly dealing with the financials issues and denying the credit contraction and recession upon us.
I did not see one CNBC pundit come on and say "I was wrong. I woefully underestimated the scope of this. I'm sorry." Nope. They are sticking to their game plan - "yet another wonderful buying opportunity - good times ahead". There appears to be no shame on financial TV.

I continue to forecast very difficult times for the foreseeable future. At some point the problems in the real economy will take the baton from the problems of the financial economy. But in America they are so intertwined it is hard to separate them - without credit, and loads of it, much of the US system is incredibly impaired. We live on credit.

*********************** Kass below

At the core of financial system's current breakdown is the fact that there remains too little, not too much, financial industry regulation. Too many regulations serve little or no purpose (similar to the pages of silly and lengthy disclosures in Wall Street research reports that few read and even fewer rely on). Regulatory enforcement is arbitrary and, at times, unpredictable -- a system that values form over substance.

Over the past decade Wall Street's compensation was no longer calculated on multiple years of contribution/performance but rather became a short-term (meritocracy) calculation based on a one-year profit and loss statement. The extraordinary compensation at hedge funds, private equity, and in the investment and commercial banks became a "heads I win, tails I win" proposition as a star system emerged that was based on contributions calculated within reduced time frames rather than an assessment of the value-added contributions over lengthy periods of time (subject to high water marks and claw backs).

Importantly, supporting my view of a "heads I win, tails I win" structure, outsized annual compensations were typically not retained but rather were allowed to exit Wall Street every year -- in part, helping to explain the appreciation in home prices between 1995 and 2005 on the East and West Coasts.

A general lack of regulatory scrutiny and enforcement, the absence of risk controls and a continuum of reckless management decisions at the world's leading financial institutions (banks, brokers, hedge funds, private equity, etc.) have combined to create a Black Swan event, which has resulted in a credit market gone amok and a shadow banking system often under the radar of regulators.

Stated simply, allowing investment banks to be levered over 30-1, private equity deals to be levered at 20-1 and hedge funds to be levered over 5-1 is, as a friend mentioned to me over the weekend, "the financial equivalent of playing Russian roulette with five of the six chambers of a loaded gun."

Laissez faire policy has failed. And since the markets have grossly failed to impose the type of discipline that was necessary to protect the system from the accumulated buildup in credit (and the current contraction), regulators will now step in. Unfortunately, it is now too late as once again the regulators will prove to be reactive, not proactive.

For now, the rescue packages will dominate the day.

But for tomorrow, the effect of a credit market running amok will be felt hard by the real economy.

I have long written that the impact of deleveraging was the equivalent of a broad monetary tightening, and with the Lehman Brothers (LEH Quote - Cramer on LEH - Stock Picks)/American International Group (AIG Quote - Cramer on AIG - Stock Picks) news over the weekend, the extent of the economic damage to the real economy, though still unknown, will be widely felt.

Memo to investment strategists/economists and their economic and corporate profit forecasts: Get real.

Memo to investors/traders: Continue to err on the side of conservatism.


Wilbur Ross: Possibly a Thousand Banks to Go

TweetThis
I'm watching this regional bank rally with a lot of head scratching. As if they are not exposed to commercial loans, mortgages, and general economic malaise? They are impervious to the forces affecting the rest of the system? Wilbur Ross says possibly 1000 banks to go. I don't have a number in my head, but it is a far darker picture than the government is "assuring" us. Remember, they did not even have IndyMac Bank (one of the largest bank failures in history) on their "troubled bank" list, the quarter before it went under. [Aug 26: FDIC Troubled Bank List] They don't have Washington Mutual (WM) which looks destined to be delivered to JPMorgan (JPM) in a "arm twisting" by government on their troubled bank list. So whose to believe anything coming out of these same folks who told us "subprime is contained" in spring 2007. I don't know whether they have been ignorant or deceitful over the past 18 months; and frankly I don't know which scares me more.

Myself, I'm sticking with billionaires and insiders. Still no massive insider buying at these "bargain" prices by banking executives and no signs of Buffet swooping it to take advantage of the "bargains". Sure the stocks can be run up, but the stock market has a mind of its own.

Again, I expect "emergency fund requests" for the FDIC (federal deposit insurance) as the situation devolves.

******************

In an exclusive interview with CNBC.com, Wilbur Ross, chairman and CEO of WL Ross & Co., says he sees possibly as many as a thousand bank closures in the coming months. And this will create opportunities for investors.

"I do think a lot of the regional ones will (close), just as they did in the last savings and loan crisis in the 1990s," Ross said.

Ross says he will be looking to pick up smaller distressed institutions. "There will be opportunities, but we will need federal assistance in them, because what we're mainly looking for is stable sources of deposits, not so much the loan portfolio."

Ross feels that there will be too many people willing to provide capital to the large financials, which makes them less of a bargain than smaller banks.


Quite a Reversal in China - Central Bank Cuts Interest Rates

TweetThis
Very interesting reversal overnight in Asia. After fighting inflation and trying to slow runaway growth for years, the central bank of China cut rates for the first time in 6 years. This should be a net positive for the "global growth" stocks - but not today. If oil could fall to $80 or so, perhaps Europe will join in and then when the US cuts rates we can have an "easy money" world again.... wait, wasn't that the nexis of this current fractured bubble? Nevermind that - we can deal with the problems this will cause in 2014. For now we cheer rate cuts (CNBC cheerleaders already talking about 50 basis point cut "needed") :)
  • China cut interest rates for the first time in six years and allowed most banks to set aside smaller reserves as worsening credit-market turmoil and weakening export demand dimmed the outlook for economic growth.
  • The People's Bank of China reduced the one-year lending rate to 7.20 percent from 7.47 percent, effective tomorrow, and lowered the reserve ratio at the nation's smaller banks by 1 percentage point.
  • The slowest inflation in 14 months has given China room to cut borrowing costs and protect jobs in the world's fourth- largest economy.
  • ``Policy makers see the probability of a recession in the U.S. is higher now, so the outlook for Chinese exports has deteriorated,'' said Darius Kowalczyk, chief investment strategist at CFC Seymour Ltd. in Hong Kong. ``This is the beginning of an easing cycle in China.''
  • Inflation cooled to 4.9 percent in August, export growth slowed and industrial production expanded by the least in six years, according to data released last week. China's economy expanded 10.1 percent in the three months to June 30 from a year earlier, the fourth straight quarter of slower growth.
  • The property market could be headed for a ``meltdown'' as home prices and sales decline, Morgan Stanley said Sept. 12.
  • China's policy makers have already loosened loan quotas -- restrictions on how much banks can lend -- and raised export-tax rebates for garments and textiles to help exporters and small businesses.
Remember, China is a 30+ year bull market - which will have serious pullbacks along the way. This is one of them, but if you have a 10 year horizon valuations are now getting interesting - as opposed to the mania we saw last fall. It will be interesting to see if India joins in over the coming months.

What's Holding Up Today

TweetThis
One of my favorite screens to run is to see what is holding up during bad tapes - I'm a relative strength guy at heart, so strong stocks in a bad market are always interesting to me because it shows either new buying or a steadfast investor base. Below are the list of today's winners - using our normal weekly criteria, and a market cap of $1.25 Billion or higher. Here are 54 stocks up 2% or more - most are plays on falling oil (airlines/transport stocks), some regional financials (strange), and retail (remember, the consumer is back at $3.79 gas)

(as an aside remember there are 2 key areas the PPT will be protecting: S&P 1215 which was the closing low on July 15th and S&P 1200 which was the intraday low/psychological support as a "big round number" - if we close below 1200 we have to get more bearish - but until then we assume every drop will be followed by bounces. 1215 has been defended very well by the power that be.)

Symbol Company Name % Price Change Today
MER Merrill Lynch & Co Inc 25.8
AMR AMR Corp 8.8
UAUA UAL Corp 8.4
CAL Continental Airlines Inc 7.4
GHL Greenhill & Co Inc 6.7
PNRA Panera Bread Co 6.3
LDG Longs Drug Stores Corp 5.9
AMLN Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc 5.0
ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line Inc 4.6
BLK Blackrock Inc 4.6
ACE ACE Ltd 4.4
REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.4
EXPD Expeditors International of Washington 4.1
FAF First American Corp 4.0
KNX Knight Transportation Inc 3.9
FFH Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd 3.8
ORLY O'Reilly Automotive Inc 3.8
LSTR Landstar System Inc 3.8
ITG Investment Technology Group Inc 3.7
WERN Werner Enterprises Inc 3.6
RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd 3.5
JBHT JB Hunt Transport Services Inc 3.4
NATI National Instruments Corp (Texas) 3.4
BX Blackstone Group LP 3.4
ZION Zions Bancorp 3.2
RE Everest Re Group Ltd 3.0
JEF Jefferies Group Inc 3.0
STZ Constellation Brands Inc 3.0
COLM Columbia Sportswear Co 2.9
CB Chubb Corp 2.8
WU Western Union Co 2.7
TRV Travelers Companies Inc 2.7
LIHR Lihir Gold Sponsored ADR 2.7
SIGI Selective Insurance Group Inc 2.7
NWA Northwest Airlines Corp 2.6
CPRT Copart Inc 2.6
FNF Fidelity National Financial Inc 2.5
ASBC Associated Banc-Corp 2.5
BKE Buckle Inc 2.5
AEM Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd 2.4
COH Coach Inc 2.4
VR Validus Holdings Ltd 2.3
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corp 2.3
CCL Carnival Corp 2.3
NYB New York Community Bancorp Inc 2.3
HTLD Heartland Express Inc 2.3
CREE Cree Inc 2.2
AHL Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd 2.2
PTP Platinum Underwriters Holdings Ltd 2.1
WABC Westamerica Bancorp 2.1
MRH Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd 2.1
NTY NBTY Inc 2.0
DLTR Dollar Tree Inc 2.0
NFLX Netflix Inc 2.0

Bookkeeping: Adding to Blackrock (BLK) on Merrill Lynch (MER) Buyout

TweetThis
One of my fears with Blackrock (BLK) was once shorts jumped on the Merrill Lynch bandwagon to make it the next Lehman, it would be forced to sell it's stake in Blackrock. This speculation caused a lot of damage to Blackrock earlier in the year [Jul 17: Blackrock Earnings Excellent as Usual; Merrill Won't Be Selling]

Now it might seem strange to buy one of the few stocks "up" in a bad open, but since my timeline is longer than 48 hours (most people buying the damaged stocks will "flip" them out in a few hours and are just daytraders at this point), I think this is now a huge positive and Blackrock can continue it's business of being a dominant financial. I would not be surprised to see the government giving it much of Lehman's balance sheet to liquidate as it has been doing with Bear Stearns.

I'm upping the stake from 0.6% to 1.2%

Long Blackrock in fund; no personal position


Foster Wheeler CEO on Mad Money

TweetThis
Is is too bad the CEO is retiring - everytime I hear him talk it inspires a lot of confidence - much like Blackrock's Fink or Potash's Doyle. Full story here. It is truly sad to watch this stock get pole axed while not one thing has changed for the business. HAL9000 hates Foster Wheeler (FWLT)

********************

Infrastructure giant Foster Wheeler in 2006 reported record earnings. The next year the company doubled that. Now, two quarters into 2008, earnings are up another 35%. But still, the stock has been cut in half.

Apparently, Wall Street’s afraid that falling energy prices have either prompted project cancellations or are holding back new business. That’s why Foster Wheeler [FWLT 40.37 -1.95 (-4.61%) ] CEO Ray Milchovich today announced a $750 million buyback, an amount equal to about one-eighth of the company’s total capitalization right now. As a result, the stock rose $4.02 in Friday trading, or 10.5%.

Milchovich called the move “prudent” given that FWLT, despite having virtually no corporate debt and $1.3 billion cash at the end of the second quarter (this is company with a $6 billion market cap), is being treated like it was a financial stock. At one point this week, FLWT was trading at just 6.5 times earnings.

That’s beyond cheap for a firm that’s experiencing no project delays or cancellations despite falling energy prices. Foster Wheeler builds infrastructure for energy, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and power companies, and the CEO said that business is going strong. If anything, Milchovich said, the only issue is the Foster Wheeler doesn’t have all the capacity it needs to meet the market demand.

Besides, Foster Wheeler’s business is most successful in parts of the world where energy is most abundant. The company does well in Australia, parts of Asia and the Middle East. And these countries have pre-sold the energy they’re producing, Milchovich said, “so it’s impractical for these projects to be cancelled.”

Still, there are doubters who believe that, while Foster Wheeler isn’t experiencing cancellations, the declining energy prices are preventing the company from booking new projects. But Milchovich denied this was the case, saying that business orders start at a proposal stage. So there are a few months between first offer and contract. And the CEO has seen no “material change” whatsoever in either the proposals or the eventual orders.

“Our long-term outlook is very, very, very robust,” Milchovich said. “And if it weren’t, we wouldn’t have announced the buyback program this morning.”

Foster Wheeler is just one of the many commodity-related stocks that Cramer has said is being hurt by hedge funds. Funds desperate to raise cash for client redemptions are dumping millions of shares at a time into the open market, bringing down FWLT even further. But this new buyback now gives these hedge funds “a place to go,” Cramer said, saving the stock from more damage.

Cramer thinks Foster Wheeler goes higher.

Historic Times

TweetThis
What can I say - we are simply living through times that books will be written about in the future. My jaw was on the floor during 3 hours of Sunday night CNBC as announcement after announcement came through the the wire.

The Plunge Protection Team is working overtime to hold S&P 1200. We will hear how amazing it is the market can absorb all this bad news and not take a big loss. Let me tell you - in a week's span we've had
  1. Fannie, Freddie bailout
  2. Lehman bankruptcy
  3. Forced marriage of Merrill and Bank of America
  4. AIG crumbling
  5. A series of initiates by the Federal Reserve over and above everything they've done in the past
And the stock market is flat from where it was before all this happened.

I'm not rooting for shorts, but this is truly not a free market. How the market can be "flat" in all this is hilarious. I truly would not be surprised if the market is up by tomorrow or in a few days as your tax dollars go hard to work buying S&P futures by the bushel behind the scenes. If you are not familiar with the Plunge Protection Team and their "workings" I recommend reading this [Jul 14: Our Gospel is Spreading - Jim Cramer References "The Hand"]

I cannot even begin to go through all the "changes" made in the system Sunday night. I will tell you the most alarming is the change in collateral that the Federal Reserve is now exchanging for Treasuries. Back in the early spring during the last round of dislocations the Federal Reserve said we'd widen what we accept from "AAA rated safe" type of product to credit card debt, auto debt, student debt, etc - AND they lengthened the time they'd exchange this with the banks - up to 84 days (in the "old days" it used to be an overnight loan). They said it's just a temporary measure, until credit markets improve. I said "yeh right". Now we've gotten to the point they will accept EQUITIES (stocks!!!) in exchange for US Treasuries. So what happens if stocks plummet in those 84 days? Are you kidding me? We now are letting banks offload their stock holdings into the balance sheet of America?? This was one of multiple jaw dropping moments.
  • The Federal Reserve widened the collateral it accepts for loans to securities firms to include stocks in an effort to help Wall Street weather Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s plans for bankruptcy.
  • The Fed will now accept equities in the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, its program for lending cash directly to securities firms, in addition to investment-grade debt. Collateral for the Term Securities Lending Facility, which auctions loans of Treasuries, will now include all investment- grade debt securities.
  • The Fed also granted an exemption on a rule that limits banks' transactions with their brokerage subsidiaries, a move that provides securities dealers with another source of funding if they need it for market making this week
I keep using the word historic. It keeps becoming even more surreal.

[Jul 30: Federal Reserve Continues its Historic Actions]
[Jul 11: More Historic Actions (Potentially) by the Fed]
[May 4: Moral Hazard Run Amuck]
[Mar 22: A Historic 9 Days for the Federal Reserve]
[Mar 16: Fed Races to Rescue Bear Stearns]

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Bookkeeping: Weekly Changes to Fund Positions Year 2, Week 6

TweetThis
Year 2, Week 6 Major Position Changes

Fund positions of 1.0% or greater can be found each week in the right margin of the blog, under the label cloud and recent comments areas; I highlight weekly the larger position changes.

Being a long only fund, via Marketocracy rules, the only hedges to the downside I have are cash or buying short ETFs. I cannot short individual equities.

To see historic weekly fund changes click here OR the label at the bottom of this entry entitled 'fund positions'.

Cash (1 position [SHV] + cash): 34.9% (vs 24.3% last week)
39 long bias: 47.5% (vs 65.7% last week)
7 short bias: 17.6% (vs 10.0% last week)

46 positions (vs 63 last week)
Additions: MFA Mortgage Investments (MFA)
Removals: Illumina (ILMN), Gafisa (GFA), Baidu.com (BIDU), Millicom International Cellular (MICC), Perfect World (PWRD), Sohu.com (SOHU), iPath DJ Livestock ETN (COW), Cleveland Cliffs (CLF), Atwood Oceanics (ATW), Apple (AAPL), Research in Motion (RIMM), China Medical (CMED), Energy Conversion Devices (ENER), Cummins Engine (CMI), Flowserve (FLS), Ultrashort Technology (REW), Ultrshort Consumer Services (SCC), DB Agriculture Double Long (DAG)

Top 10 positions = 25.2% of fund (vs 27.3% last week)
38 of the 46 positions are at least 1% of the fund's overall holdings (70%)

Major changes and weekly thoughts
Sign of the times, both CNBC and FOX Business have special 8 PM Sunday night live editions - free market capitalism works 7 days a week in the new era. Impossible to gauge anything in this market where outside forces mean more than fundamentals so there is not much to say. Now we are hearing stories that instead of Lehman, Bank of America (BAC) is in to save Merrill Lynch (MER) because people know that's the next place the shorts will show up - so a "preemptive move" to draw a line in the sand seems to be the plan to keep the financial system intact.

For the fund, we shrank shrank shrank. And then shrank some more. In past weeks we cut back to high levels of cash but kept a lot of positions at the bottom of the portfolio but this week we cut the vast majority of those out (many were at 0.1% allocations). Just a tough market to make consistent money on the long side, and the days many of these stocks go down the losses are far greater than days they go up. Further, in this "one stock is the same as others" in the same sector, owning multiple names and deciphering the differences between each seems to not be a worthy cause at this time. The market looks to me as something very dangerous right now as there still appears to be mountains of denial, and people are looking for the government to bail them out instead of assessing companies on fundamentals. We can't short individual names although we've named names - so in the current situation cash or broad based ETF shorts (which reverse every 48 hours it seems, as opposed to some individual names which are down consistently) are the only alternatives.

Again, hard to give any sort of forecast or thoughts since everything seems to news driven and so reactionary. Worldwide futures look terrible but hey, that could reverse 180 degrees by Monday morning, or if not Monday we'll completely reverse Monday's huge fall with a huge rally Tuesday for some made up rationale.

I don't know about your local market but I'm wondering how the "consumer is coming back" trade works when gasoline is (temporarily) back up to $4.19+. Maybe he will take a few weeks off before his buying splurge of the past 6 weeks (when gas was $3.69-$3.89) returns. Now if you excuse me, I have to go watch the best drama on TV - the U.S. government and financial markets aka Dancing with the Bureaucrats.

The larger weekly changes (chronologically) to the fund below:
  1. Monday, homebuilder Lennar (LEN) jumped to $16, we cut the stake from 1.7% to 0.1%, near $15 confidant that this market with no memory, and only catering to daytraders would punish the name soon enough and we could get the stock back lower. Sure enough the traders abandonded the trade to move to something else to play for 4-5 hours and the stock went into freefall - we were able to buy back the shares we sold near $13 within 24 hours. And that pretty much sums up the stock market these days.
  2. We reduced EZCORP (EZPW) as the stock spiked up on news of a new acquisition, and locked in some gains.
  3. We continued the liquidation of smaller positions that we started Friday of the previous week - we sold Illumina (ILMN), Gafisa (GFA), Millicom International Cellular (MICC), Baidu.com (BIDU), and Perfect World (PWRD) - I continue to like these names but the charts have been showing poor performance. We'll consider buying some of these back either on sustained strength or a washout type of panic bottom. Some of these seem oversold and could have some bounces at least but are below all technical levels so would be considered shorts on their bounces.
  4. Tuesday, we closed 3 more positions - Sohu.com (SOHU), Cleveland Cliffs (CLF), and iPath DJ Livestock (COW) - the latter 2 being commodity stocks which at this point we can get the exact same return by holding other instruments since the market is treating them all as one stock.
  5. One stock doing well for us has been retailer Buckle (BKE) - it's had a 20% run in 2 weeks so we locked in those gains - unfortunately it was only a 1.6% stake so not a huge effect on the fund. We reduced it to 0.6%.
  6. We closed Atwood Oceanics (ATW) - again nothing company specific but they might as well rename the company Atwood Crude Oil, Atwood Iron, or Atwood Fertilizer.
  7. Wednesday we continued the pattern - 5 more names out the door: Apple (AAPL), Research in Motion (RIMM), China Medical (CMED), Energy Conversion Devices (ENER), Cummins Engine (CMI). The former 2 are really acting poorly even on up days for the market which I continue to find very troubling as they are the "tech leaders" - I can only assume some liquidations are being forced upon these positions. I suspected in the blog entry that ENER could bounce, but we partook in the bounce with our other solar exposure.
  8. We saw a dramatic 2 day drop in Sequenom (SQNM) - at this point I just assume everything is a hedge fund seeing redemptions or being forced to reduce leverage. The stock dropped below the 50 day moving average on heavy volume which worried me, so I cut it by 2/3rds. Later in the week the stock bounced back to close above the 50 day - so this one could go either way now on a technical basis. I bought back a bit later in the week a bit higher than where I sold out - but have this one on a short leash.
  9. We restarted a position in MFA Mortgage Investments (MFA) after a huge bounce post Fannie/Freddie bailout, and then a retracement to fill the gap in the chart. This is just a play on the spread between money borrowed and the yield on instruements. Those instruments just went from implicitly guaranteed by the US government, to explicitly.
  10. Thursday, we closed Flowserve (FLS) - I wish they'd announce a buyback because right now they might as well be Jacobs Engineering Group (JEC), Fluor (FLR), or Cummins Engine (CMI) - the market treats them all as one.
  11. We closed 2 Ultrashorts as 9 was too many to manage in this market where you have to trade in and out of positions every 48 hours or else they completely reverse on you and take away the previous 48 hour gains. Ultrashort Consumer Services (SCC) we had doubts from the beginning since its top 2 holdings are some of our favorite stocks, Walmart (WMT) & McDonalds (MCD), and Ultrashort Technology (REW) is more or less an overlap with the general market - when the fall, so does REW by just about the same amount. So it's not really value added.
  12. Friday, same thesis as the trend of the week - closed DB Agriculture Double Long (DAG)
  13. There was weakness to close the week in retail, which was the strength in the early part of the week. This is part of the 24-48-72 hour rotations - consumers were frowned upon after a "reality check" report of consumer spending was announced. However, memories are short and just like job loss reports are forgotten by the following Monday, this report will be forgotten and the consumer wil "be back" by sometime next week, driving these stocks up. After which they will be driven down a few days after. After which they will be driven up as the consumer comes back. Anyhow we added back to some Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD) as one of our proxies for the "consumer" after a big down day Friday.
  14. Commodities/global growth rallied for nearly 2 days, which is a "long term" move, in the current market - so I took some off the table across the board late Friday.
The above do not include the majority of my trades in my Ultrashorts which I am trading quite often as the market ebbs and flows