Saturday, July 5, 2008

Top Performing Stocks of the Past Quarter

TweetThis
Usually we do a weekly top performer list but let's save the trouble this week - it looks almost identical to last week - loaded with gold stocks with a few natural gas stocks thrown in. Nothing else was really working despite a relatively benign fall in the market indexes. I was relatively accurate when 2 Saturdays I wrote in the top performers list:

I've lowered the % gain threshold this week to 7%, but its still a sparse group (understandably considering the bad week in the markets) - what can I say - fertilizer, coal, and natural gas (and/or oil exploration) continue to dominate. This is not a bipolar market.... this is plainly an incredibly narrow market where you have to be in teeny slivers of subsectors to make any money. It's harsh out there.

My gut (just a hunch) tells me this could be one of the last (if not last) weeks these same groups will be on this list ... if the 'rotational' selloff does in fact continue per previous patterns. Some of these stocks in the "blessed sectors" are nowhere near even minor support levels, so there are some major "air pockets" below if they do begin to sell off.

We have been moving away from these 'blessed' groups for a few weeks (too early, as we left some upside on the table, but you can never nail the tops or bottoms) and just this week we kept fleeing [Jul 1: Cutting Some Generals] but even the remaining exposure to said generals whacked us this week. This is why I fear going "long oil" right now. Because when it reverses I think it's going to make some of the moves we saw this week in coal, fertilizer and the like look like child's play. But I could always be wrong.

Anyhow, we've looked at the top performers for the year a few weeks ago, so let's look at something a little longer than a week but shorter than the year to date time frame. To review, after a horrid March, the markets suddenly turned up without looking back (literally) on April 1st - rallied well for nearly 2 months on hopes of the '2nd half recovery', and then had the worst June since the Great Depression - wiping out all those gains. So let's see what stood out during that period. I just used an arbitrary 20% gain for the quarter as a cut off - this returned a solid 127 names; but dominated by a few sectors. Sectors thankfully we were in. (fertilizer, oil, coal, natural gas)

However, by being cautious about the economy as a whole and thinking surely this nearly 2 month rally (April, May) cannot continue on Kool Aid alone - I retarded our performance somewhat as we owned some of the biggest winners in large % of holdings (coal) but we cut them back to smaller holdings after realizing very good gains, only to watch them go on to stupendous gains. Frankly it is always harder to sell than to buy in my opinion... momentum takes stocks far further than you ever imagine. I thought coal was a 2009 story so the stocks would begin to react later in 2008, so to see this thesis already working out surprised me. On the other hand, don't want to beat ourselves up too much because we made the flip to Alpha Natural Resources (ANR) (+110%) from Peabody Energy (BTU) (+48%) and that doubled our gain in that 1 portion of the fund. [Apr 8: Changing Coal Allocation - Peabody Energy Out - Alpha Natural Resources In]

Criteria as always
  1. Market capitalization $2B+
  2. Average trading volume 100K+
  3. Stock price $10+
Green we own, blue we have owned or discuss in the blog. (note - ENER & WLT are marked green but we did not own them during the quarter - although we highlighted both in early May. Ouch.) Considering we generally own 50-55 issues on the long side, and we owned roughly 15 of this top 127 throughout the quarter - it shows just how bad the rest of the market was since it still was like pulling teeth to make money. A lot of former holdings we have since sold off did great this quarter as well - PCX, FFIV, BTU, SGP, CNX, BRCM, NIHD, FTI, CAM


SymbolCompany Name% Price Change Last Qtr.
PCXPatriot Coal Corp176.3
GDPGoodrich Petro Ord Shs168.9
HKPetrohawk Energy Corp142.1
CLRContinental Resources Inc118.1
ANRAlpha Natural Resources Inc110.0
CRKComstock Resources Inc105.5
MEEMassey Energy Co98.3
ENEREnergy Conversion Devices Inc97.9
XCOEXCO Resources Inc93.1
EACEncore Acquisition Co82.6
WLLWhiting Petroleum Corp71.0
SDSandRidge Energy Ord Shs68.9
JBLJabil Circuit Inc66.7
ESIITT Educational Services Inc65.9
ELNElan Depository Receipt65.4
WTIW&T Offshore Inc65.0
FFIVF5 Networks Inc60.7
PVAPenn Virginia Corp60.2
AGUAGRIUM INC59.0
SQMSociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile57.7
SMSt Mary Land & Exploration Co57.5
FCLFoundation Coal Holdings Inc57.4
CPXComplete Production Services Inc54.4
MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd51.1
SAFSafeco Corp49.9
CHKChesapeake Energy Ord Shs48.6
BTUPeabody Energy Corp48.5
FDGFORDING INC48.3
UNTUnit Corp47.5
PXDPioneer Natural Resources Co47.4
SOHUSohu.com Inc47.1
HPHelmerich & Payne Inc45.1
GTIGrafTech International Ltd44.3
CLFCleveland Cliffs Ord Shs43.9
NBRNabors Industries Ltd43.0
ACIArch Coal Inc42.6
CNQCanadian Natuaral Resources41.2
CXOConcho Resources Inc41.0
BZPBPZ Resources Inc40.9
SGPSchering-Plough Ord Shs40.5
APPXAPP Pharmaceuticals Ord Shs40.4
FSTForest Oil Corp40.0
BIGBig Lots Inc39.9
EDSElectr Data Ord Shs39.7
HEROHercules Offshre Ord Shs39.3
WLTWalter Industries Inc38.3
TSTenaris ADR38.1
FLIRFLIR Systems Inc37.8
NOVNational Oilwell Varco Inc37.5
VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc37.2
CNXCONSOL Energy Inc36.7
EWEdwards Lifesciences Corp36.0
FROFrontline Ltd35.8
CFCF Industries Holdings Inc35.6
GGBGerdau SA Depository Receipt35.5
WHQW-H Energy Services Inc34.7
OCROmnicare Ord Shs34.4
GDIGardner Denver Inc34.4
MDUMDU Resources Group Ord Shs34.3
KEGKey Energy Services Inc34.2
SWNSouthwestern Energy Co34.1
DRSDRS Technologies Inc33.3
MEMariner Energy Ord Shs33.3
BRCMBroadcom Class A Ord Shs33.1
OISOil States International Inc32.8
SCHNSchnitzer Steel Industries Inc32.3
POTPotash Corp31.9
STRAStrayer Education Inc31.9
HALHalliburton Ord Shs31.8
DVDeVry Inc31.8
PTENPatterson-UTI Energy Inc31.5
CTVCommScope Inc31.4
NIHDNII Holdings Inc30.4
MOSMosaic Co30.2
MYGNMyriad Genetics Inc29.4
CPOCorn Products International Inc29.0
HESHess Corp28.5
SPNSuperior Energy Services Inc27.7
EPEl Paso Corp Ord Shs27.5
VVisa Inc27.4
BUDAnheuser-Busch Companies Inc27.2
PXPPlains Exploration & Production Co27.1
TETECO Energy Inc26.9
PWRQuanta Services Inc26.6
VMWVMware Inc25.9
NXYNEXEN INC25.9
COSWFCanadian Oil Sands Trust25.5
FTIFMC Technologies Inc25.2
FMCFMC Corp25.1
HLXHelix Energy Solutions Group Inc25.1
DRCDresser-Rand Group Inc25.1
TRATerra Industries Ord Shs24.9
CAMCameron International Corp24.7
CCUClear Channel Communications Inc24.5
APOLApollo Group Inc24.5
WDCWestern Digital Corp24.3
WWYWM Wrigley Jr Ord Shs24.1
FLSFlowserve Corp23.8
CEDCCentral European Distribution Corp23.8
PBRPetroleo Brasileiro ADR Reptg 2 Ord Shs23.7
BUCYBucyrus International Inc23.7
ONXXOnyx Pharmaceuticals Inc23.7
ATWAtwood Oceanics Inc23.5
COGCabot Oil & Gas Corp23.4
CIGCompanhia Energetica Minas Gerais 23.3
CXGCNX Gas Ord Shs23.3
NBLNoble Energy Inc22.9
SGMSScientific Games Corp22.7
CMICummins Inc22.6
CCJCameco Ord Shs22.5
TRMBTrimble Navigation Ltd22.4
STRQuestar Corp22.2
WFTWeatherford International Ltd22.1
NENoble Corp22.0
NFGNational Fuel Gas Co21.9
NDSNNordson Corp21.9
CMPCompass Minerals International Inc21.1
PCZPETRO-CANADA21.0
PSYSPsychiatric Solutions Inc21.0
SESpectra Energy Corp20.9
FLRFluor Corp20.9
PDEPride International Inc20.7
DRQDril-Quip, Inc20.5
EGNEnergen Corp20.4
MRMindray Medical International Ltd20.2
ESVENSCO International Inc20.1
EQIXEquinix Inc20.1

Some Parts of the Economy are Booming - Like Yacht Building

TweetThis
Since I don't want to make the blog a place of constant sour news I'm always on the look out for slivers of good news.... we've been talking for a long time about the weakness in discretionary spending and just hit recently on the troubles of those (normal folk) who buy normal boats for normal fun [Jun 30: Listen to the Companies, Not the Government Reports - Brunswick Corp (BC) and Smithfield Foods (SFD)] However, there is always a bull market somewhere! Such as the nuevo rich [Jun 27: Global Millionaires - the Shift from West to East] and the booming market for super yachts. Our global gilded age continues - the gap between rich and middle class will widen. (poor - non starter unfortunately - falling farther and farther behind). I look forward from writing this blog from my super yacht a decade from now ;)

While writing this piece, my research let me to such fascinating sites as The International Superyacht Society, Superyacht.com, and Superyacht Times.com. In case you are in the market here are some for sale. Follow Me 4 caught my eye as a potential purchase... in 2028. (grin) If any Super Yacht owners find my blog, have I mentioned I'm looking for pledges for my future mutual fund? ;)
  • Fuel prices are soaring and credit markets tightening, but the super-rich are still lining up to pay tens of millions of dollars for mega yachts. The well-heeled buyers of the floating mansions are increasingly coming from emerging economies — in the Middle East, Russia and South America. The source of their wealth runs the gamut — technology, venture capitalism, new industries. And, yes, oil.
  • These days, the biggest problem at Trinity's shipbuilding yards is having enough workers to handle the 24 custom contracts the company currently is working for the luxury vessels.
  • "Nobody is buying these yachts because they need them," said William S. Smith III, Trinity's vice president. "They're buying them because they want them."
  • Another builder, YCO Deuxil PLC, has nine yachts under construction — more than double from last year. Sales for the first five months exceeded the entire amount for 2007, the London-based company said.
  • There are about 3,800 yachts over 80 feet in service around the world now. About 1,800 of those have been built since 2000. The study predicts that that by 2010, there will be 5,000 such yachts on the water.
  • "There's not enough supply," said Ed Slack, editor of International Boat Industry. "It takes two years to build some of these yachts and the demand hasn't slowed down."
  • So far, Trinity's largest vessel has been a 192-foot yacht that would carry a replacement price of $60 million to $65 million. The company is working a 242-footer that will have a price tag in excess of $90 million.
  • Francois van Well, chief executive of Feadship America, said about 50 percent of his company's business comes from the United States, but more buyers are coming the rest of the world.
  • And it's not old family money. "Most of our clients have earned their wealth in one generation," van Well said.
  • And these vessels don't depreciate in price. "We have one owner and this is his fourth boat and he's never taken delivery," Dane said. "Rich people don't want to wait on a boat and they'll pay a premium. This owner has taken that premium and moved to the back of the line."

Bloomberg: Teens Skip $50 Jeans in Squeeze of Gas, Job Shortage

TweetThis
In all the excitement this week I skimped on some fundamental/economic stories to focus more on the market and transactions. So we have some catching up to do.

I said long ago as the economy weakens the last things to go would be teenagers and their Abercrombie (ANF) $100 jeans, and video games/gadgets. Well it appears all we have left now are the video games/gadgets. You know Americans are "pooring" when they won't even splurge on their kids. (Note to Bloomberg reporters - $50 jeans? In what Abercrombie store did you not visit to file your report?) (Note to Wall Street pundits - what will it take for you to admit we are in recession?)
  • The financial pressures of adults are finally catching up with American teenagers. Since summer jobs dried up, gasoline prices topped $4 a gallon and parents ran out of spare cash, teens have had to cool it on spending for clothes.
  • ``I've had to cut down on a bunch of stuff because I don't like spending my own money,'' said 14-year-old Haley McClelland from Waldwick, New Jersey, who was shopping at the nearby Paramus Park mall. She said her parents are ``more careful'' about what they give her.
  • Teens like Haley are among the last American consumers to cut back. Even as adults trimmed purchases, the kids managed to prop up revenue for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and American Eagle Outfitters Inc. because of handouts from parents and part-time jobs, said Adrienne Tennant, an analyst at Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co. in Arlington, Virginia.
  • Retailers dependent on that group are feeling the pinch. First-quarter net income at American Eagle plunged 44 percent because of discounting, and the retailer may post its first annual profit drop in five years. Same-store sales have fallen for the past two quarters. At Gap Inc.'s Old Navy chain, sales in May were off 25 percent from a year earlier. Abercrombie's same- store sales dropped in five of the past six quarters.
  • Looking forward, U.S. teen spring fashion budgets may be reaching the lowest level in seven years, based on results of a survey of 5,000 youngsters by Piper Jaffray Cos. in Minneapolis. Teenagers said in April they would spend $1,183 on fashion this year, 19 percent less than last year and down 23 percent from 2006
  • ``Gas is the main thing right now,'' said Pete McCullough, a 19-year-old from Oradell, New Jersey, who can't afford the designer clothing he favors. ``Just coming to the mall costs $4.'' McCullough said he earns what he spends, juggling school with construction work.
  • Add to that the biggest jump in joblessness among youths in at least 60 years, according to the U.S. Labor Department. Unemployment among those between the ages of 16 and 19 soared to 18.7 percent in May from 15.4 percent in April, the government said. It was the biggest one-month increase since Labor began collecting statistics in 1948. (this is because their parents are forced to "downsize" into the jobs the teens normally would be taking, as their own adult jobs are eliminated)
  • Hurt by sliding home values and rising food and energy costs, parents said they would spend 28 percent less on their teens this year, Piper Jaffray's survey showed. Klinefelter estimates that heads of middle-income households provide as much as half of teen spending money.
  • With prices 20 percent to 30 percent cheaper than American Eagle's, Aeropostale has improved the quality and fashion of its clothes, said Christine Chen, a retail analyst at Needham & Co. in San Francisco. (Aeropostale (ARO) has actually been doing very well considering their sector and niche within the sector)

Washinton Post: Vital Part of Housing Bill is Brainchild of Banks

TweetThis
We've touched on these subjects in the past, but as we get many new readers I like to revisit them and add new data. Back in April [Apr 4: Congress is Rushing to Help Homeowners Out!! (Not)] I pointed out how the wonderfully cute and fuzzy "Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008" - which sounds like a wonderful thing for consumers - was in large part simply a program that mostly benefited banks and homebuilders; two of the top 10 lobbyist groups on the Hill. Think Washington D.C. is a broken model that can't get anything passed? Think again - the homebuilder lobby basically said we are going to suspend contributing to campaign coffers and not more than 60 days later they received their gift - the new bill. And ta-da, the spigot of campaign contributions suddenly turned back on. And that kids, is how a bill gets passed in this country.

Now let's move on to the latest handout... err bill. Well as the Washington Post reports, it's basically built on the back of a proposal by Credit Suisse and then Bank of America. Completely unbiased sources of course. I've typed in the past about how much risk is being thrown onto the back of Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) (who are now absorbing about 70% of the country's mortgages, up from 40%ish in the past) and as the banks offload risk to the Federal Reserve and these 2 entities (which are pseudo government arms), the "socialization of risk" away from the banks and onto your backs grows. Because if these fail, that means your money is going to pay for it. While the banks laugh about it in the corner. [Apr 15: Could the USA Lose its Triple A Rating?] How are those 2 entities doing? Just fine thanks for asking.
  • In a sign of continuing trouble in the housing market, mortgage delinquency rates doubled over a 12-month period at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two industry giants reported yesterday.
  • Neither company's figures fully captured the problems borrowers have had making payments, because they excluded loans for which payment terms had been relaxed.
  • After years of hand-wringing about the risks that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's rapid growth might pose to the financial system, the government has loosened restraints on the companies in the stated hope that they will help prop up the housing market.
But back to "how dysfunctional government works"
  • A key provision of the housing bill now awaiting action in the Senate -- and widely touted as offering a lifeline to distressed homeowners -- was initially suggested to Congress by lobbyists for major banks facing their own huge losses from the subprime mortgage crisis, according to congressional staff members and bank officials.
  • Credit Suisse, a large investment bank heavily invested in mortgage-backed securities, proposed allowing hundreds of thousands of homeowners to refinance their mortgages with lower-cost government-insured loans, relieving financial institutions of the troubled debt. After the bank proposed this to Congress in January, it became known as the "Credit Suisse plan" among congressional staffers and lobbyists. It later formed the basis of housing provisions in both the House and Senate.
  • Bank of America, which is acquiring Countrywide Financial, the country's largest mortgage lender, followed with a similar and more detailed proposal, principal negotiators on the legislation said.
  • But the measures would allow financial institutions to get cash out of foreclosed properties that would otherwise sit on their books as dead weight.
  • Since the new loans would be guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), taxpayers would ultimately pay for defaults. The Congressional Budget Office projected that this could cost $1.7 billon over five years.
  • Still, critics expressed disappointment that banks were given such a large hand in writing legislation designed to ease a foreclosure problem they helped create.
  • "It is ironic that Congress, responding to a crisis that was created in large part by irresponsible lending, would produce a bill, the main beneficiaries of which are likely to be those lenders," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a liberal research group. "There are aspects that work hugely to the banks' advantage." (yes "ironic" isn't it?)
Cramerica. For the corporation; by the corporation. We're only along for the ride.

Friday, July 4, 2008

Readers with Blogs

TweetThis
Just a quick administrative note - any bloggers out there who read the site on a consistent basis and have a blog/website devoted to economics/markets/stocks etc please give me a heads up on your blog. I am going to create a new section in the left side of the blog "Our Readers' Websites" and hopefully help you get some traffic.

We've been fortunate to grow very quickly in under 1 year, and it always helps other people's traffic to be linked to other sites with solid traffic, so hopefully this will help blog writer/readers draw some (new) readers to their sites and build up their statistics.

So far off top of my head I have Zach, BD, J.Folly, RM Jeff, Guy, John (not sure if he visits often), Doug... (Zen)Rob I think you might have a site as well. Anyone else feel free to drop a comment onto this entry or email me with site url. (if you're relatively active around here)

Probably by the end of 2008 if/when we launch for real, we'll be shutting down this site and moving to new digs - where we'll need to start over to rebuild traffic statistics, but we'll always have memories of fundmymutualfund.com - you never forget your first (site) ;)

Have a good holiday and for everything wrong at the "top" in the country, it's still the Land of Opportunity where no name bloggers can build up a virtual client base and follow their dreams of launching an investment business. :) Where else can you do that???


Back to our normally scheduled griping tomorrow...

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Bookkeeping: 'Rising Tide' Performance Week 48

TweetThis
Week 48 performance of the mutual fund

Comments: The market continued to degrade this week, albeit at a slower pace than the previous 2 weeks of back to back 3% losses. Luckily the market closed early today because it felt in the last hour like a football team with a 1 point lead and we were just trying to run out of the clock before the bears made a comeback... in stock market parlance we were hoping the market would not fall back below S&P 1260 at the close and make a new low. We held... by inches. But a lot of individual names took a lot more pain, than what the indexes showed this week.

Oil just continues to go up in unrelenting fashion. The economic news continues to be poor but at some point "some of it" must start getting priced into the market. While we did stave off S&P 1260 there at the end, we still remain in a very dangerous position as a break below should/could/would set off more selling. On the "positive side" we can finally name a few things turning "better" (a) everything I read is negative now on other sites (b) the worst of breed (financials, retail, but not homebuilders yet) have begun to perk up the past 2 sessions - which has been typical of the bottoming process the last few times around as people flee out of global growth.... and (c) the last "positive"- our friend to the right finally found his way to our type of holdings and hence no hiding places are left in the market. Fertilizer was slapped around early in the week, coal was dismembered Wednesday and this morning, and natural gas finally took a hit very late Wednesday and today. We knew this day was coming, as we've avoided "him" all during the month of June while the rest of the market melted down. I wrote last week in the weekly summary

At some point the grim reaper will be coming for us and exact it's toll - perhaps next week; we can't hide forever. But we've built up a huge cushion so we are ok with that.

(Note to self: I wish I were wrong more often on my predictions) Truth be told it never feels very good when it actually happens, but it is part of the process. It happens every correction so we'll just continue doing what we've done in the past - layer into our favorite positions as they crumble and make our weekly performance stink, take the near term hits, and realize in a few months down the road the purchases we make during the worst part of the market are the ones that generate the best gains. It is very easy to look at a chart 2 months from now and say "wow if I had just bought at that low, I could of made a mint" but 2 months later you are not remembering the situation/mood that you do in real time. So hopefully we are making purchases that in 2 months from now we'll look back on and say - yep, some good buys near to the bottom.

Since we hold a concentrated portfolio there is not much we can do to avoid periods when the long positions are attacked for 20%-25%+ losses (in 1 day in some cases) but since we saw this day coming we cut these 3-4-5% of portfolio type of positions down to 1-2%, so the damage was not as bad as previous corrections (so far). However, if the past is any indication usually this period of pain in our type of holdings lasts more than 1 week, so next week could be not so fun as well. While we are hedged, most of our Ultrashorts (this week) were going up 2-4% while some of the longs were taking 10-15% hits (Wednesday some were near 20% in 1 session) so while it is better to have these hedges over nothing, it's not going to quite do the job of saving our bacon. These are weeks I'd really love to have ability to short individual names - look at how "great" some of our favorite Pooring of America stocks have performed...





So we can only watch that happen and not benefit.... but we'll work with what we have so all we can do is soak up good merchandise as it falls and try to offset it with some of the Ultrashorts. One more week of this and I think I can call myself bullish because usually we begin to feel the real pain within the last 2 weeks of previous corrections. I'll call this week 1. According to our proprietary poll 17% of readers are already on the "puke train", and another 48% would probably join in with a bit more of this action. The other 35% are smug and confident and in fact enjoying this! :)

After a long string of outperforming (why? I could not tell) the smaller caps (more tied to the US economy) lagged the large caps again this week. The S&P 500 fell 1.2%, while the Russell 1000 was hit to the tune of 1.7%. Rising Tide Growth asked "can we go back to June when we avoided all the mess?" and meandered to a lowly 5.1% loss. One bright item of news - I'm finally catching up to Mr. Heebner - CGM Focus (CGMFX) lost 5.9% yesterday alone. (ok I'm searching hard for silver linings here - hah) Again, if the past is any indication, we generally take the big hits towards the very tail end of a correction and it lasts 2 weeks, so hopefully only 1 more week like this for us. It's been a bad week but a great year relative to the market - 4 more weeks to close our year 1.

As always if interested in pledging an investment when fund is ready to launch (shooting for late 2008) please attach a comment here, or send me an email (need your state please). We have now breached >$3 million pledged - great news and thank you.

Price of Rising Tide Growth: $11.517
Lifetime Performance to date (vs Aug 3, 2007): +15.17%

Comparable S&P 500: 1262.9 (-13.81%)
Comparable Russell 1000: 690.9 (-13.22%)

Fund return vs S&P 500: +29.0%
Fund return vs Russell 1000: +28.4%

Last week's results here.

Since the market cap of the median stock in the Rising Tide Growth fund (median $7.1 Billion as of April 08) is significantly below the SP500 index (median $13.1 Billion as of September 07) but higher than the median market cap in the Russell 1000 (median market cap $5.8 Billion as of September 07), I am measuring the fund against both indexes. Click here to see all fund's holdings as of May 2008.

Basis for indexes is 5 day weighted average of closing prices Aug 3-9
SP500 : 1,465.2
Russell 1000 : 796.2

To see why I use the 5 day weighted average of the first 5 trading days to smooth out the volatility of the indexes as the fund launched, see here.

Please click here: fund performance for previous updates

A Quick Word about the Unemployment Report

TweetThis
I don't like to waste space talking about the fictitious monthly report because by the time I read through the details I am generally laughing too hard to make a cogent posting, and why recreate the wheel when Mish does a full blown analysis but I do want to point out some of the funnier things this month (by funny, I mean pathetic/sad)

First, if you are a newer reader head over to [May 2: Employment Report and More Fed Actions] and read points 1 and 2 so you have an inkling of what the following means.

So as Mish points out even "if" you believe in the accuracy of these numbers (remember it is a survey, not some huge database of information - and it gets revised by very large amounts a year into the future) but let's say you do believe the data... (Mish data in brown below)

Highlights
  • 43,000 construction jobs were lost
  • 33,000 manufacturing jobs were lost
  • 8,000 retail trade jobs were lost
  • 51,000 professional and business services jobs were lost
  • 7,000 service providing jobs were added
  • 24,000 leisure and hospitality jobs were added
  • 29,000 government jobs were added
A total of 69,000 goods producing jobs were lost (higher paying jobs), and for the second consecutive month service providing jobs were weak. Government, the last pace one wants to see jobs, added 29,000 jobs or the service sector would have contracted. Last month education and health services added 54,000 jobs, this month 29,000.

So once again my beef is the only places we are really creating jobs are healthcare and government - the two places we LEAST want to add jobs because they are becoming a tax burden on all of us. But so it continues. (and the city/state government jobs will soon be cut back as budgets are busted - all that will be left are federal government jobs increasing)

Now on to my favorite part the Birth/Death Model aka "the part we make up figures out of the blue" or the official explanation "it is very hard to survey small businesses that are newly created so we're guessing"

Here is how it looks

(click to enlarge)


In fact, don't bother to look - let me tell you YET again the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) has found in in their heart to find 29,000 NEW construction jobs. 22,000 NEW professional jobs as the entire real estate industry shrinks and realtors, mortgage brokers, and the like go out of business. 86,000 NEW hospitality and leisure jobs (hello, staycations?) and in total 177,000 new jobs out of thin air. In a recessionary economy (ex natural resources) Got it.

Last piece of fun is what I call the underemployment rate - all the people who want jobs but have given up, all the people in part time jobs but wish to have full time jobs - even the governments skewed numbers show a 9.9% rate. I think it's higher than that myself since the government undershoots everything, but certainly the reality is a lot higher than 5.5% unemployment rate espoused on tonight's nightly news.

Why do we keep mentioning this stuff? So when people scratch their head and say why do people feel so uncertain and why are they cutting back on their shopping, when unemployment is historically low and inflation is benign and all the data show things are just fine thank you - well those media folk are using government reports. Which have been altered over the years to the point they are becoming plain useless. So any comparisons to "how great everything is compared to the 1970s when people REALLY had things to complain about" is a poor argument as we have completely different ways of creating our numbers in the '00s.

Bookkeeping: Cutting Some Strong Positions to Raise Cash

TweetThis
Since we are running low on cash I am looking at a few names that have held up in this abyss (shuffling money from the strong to the weak), to help raise some cash. In a real mutual fund I would hope to open the mail and see a whole slew of new cash coming in as investors see this is a "great buying opportunity" to get shares of Rising Tide Growth on the cheap ;) but since this is a closed system once I am low on cash I need to find more cash by selling something. Or if I got a slew of panic stricken calls saying get me out of this market I'd need some cash to send to you. So I'd rather have it on hand then be forced to sell something into a downturn.

We obviously did a slew of buying this week. Until we get back north of S&P 1275 the bounce is still suspect. These 2 names seem to have help up the best in the past month.

Selling 100 of 150 shares in Illumina (ILMN) here in the $89s. The stock has been incredible and maybe there is more upside to go but I could not ask for more from this name, and we'll harvest some of these gains to raise cash. ILMN is down to a 0.4% stake, from 1.2%.



Selling 250 of 850 shares in DB Agriculture Double Long ETN (DAG) in the upper $28s. Let me make clear my thesis here has not changed, it simply has been acting like a nice money market for us - holding up while the rest of the market crumbled, so I am liquidating some of the position and if we get more of a selloff I at least have some cash to work with to buy other merchandise. DAG is down to a 1.4% stake from 2.1%.



Long both names in fund; no personal position

"Invisible Hand" Video

TweetThis
Hah - thanks to a reader for sending this to me. I love the comment about "who actually executes these orders". The answer is not surprising for blog readers - we just talked about them yesterday - it is their market, they just allow us peons into the sandbox. ;)

(click on the small photo for a 3-4 minute video)

Plunge Protection?
Plunge Protection?


[Jan 9: An Amazing Blunt Commentary on the Plunge Protection Team]

I was a bit taken aback to see this quite blunt commentary about the Plunge Protection team in the UK Telegraph (you see me source articles from them quite a bit since they have a different view than most stateside papers - a more pragmatic view I'd say). The American press never really talks about this group - or at least I have not found a lot of articles (try googling for it), most of my stories about them come through the British press. Interesting....

I half sarcastically discuss this group as the "invisible hand", and a lot of things you see over time (especially the last 6 months) seem to be more and more blatant attempts at 'propping things up'. But the more you see of it, the less conspiracy theorist it sounds and the more grounded in reality it becomes.

Bookkeeping: Trading Position in James River Coal (JRCC)

TweetThis
I am adding a new coal name here but unlike the others this one will (I think) only be a shorter term trade: James River Coal (JRCC) has dropped from $60 to $41 in 2 sessions, or about a 32% loss for people buying 2 days ago. This is a much more speculative smaller cap coal name unlike the type I hold in the fund for "investments". It is unprofitable this year but should show a massive amount of profits next year as it is very unhedged in its pricing for 2009. At a $1 Billion market cap it is also a buyout candidate. Maybe I am convincing myself to keep it longer, as I type this :)

One complaint I had with the hot sectors like coal is the stock prices were nowhere near any support. Well, within 36 hours some of these have gone from nowhere near support all the way to the 50 day moving average. Now that's a correction.

For now I began with a 1.8% stake with purchase in the mid $41s.

Long James River Coal in fund and personal account


1260 Broken on S&P 500

TweetThis
Could be the day we have the panic; current S&P 500 1253. Natural gas finally breaking down - Ultrashort Oil & Gas (DUG) finally working, etc. Generals being hammered everywhere. Good things to finally form a bottom. It will be ugly if this continues but the type of cleansing we have been waiting for.... have puke bags at the ready.

Financials ARE holding up (relatively speaking) as are retailers in general - so this is classic repeat action of previous "rotation" corrections. So a swoosh does not necessarily need to happen for market as whole since we are smoking out all the "hiding place" sectors, one by one.

However, a nice swoosh to S&P 1225 would do the body good at this point. Seeing some "dislocations" (stocks dropping 8-12% out of the blue) which were seen at other panic points. Then we could have a nice 3 day weekend to hear about Black Monday, et al. ;) All fun stuff.

Continuing to look for merchandise into the abyss... current strategy is to apply CASH (entered the week with 20%) but KEEP short exposure to help offset (a little) the long side pain. Once the smoke clears - empty out short exposure and be a Kool Aid toting long.

Bookkeeping: Buying into the Abyss

TweetThis
Some purchases this AM
  1. Alpha Natural Resources (ANR) at 50 day moving average $80s (down 7% today)
  2. Fuel Systems Solutions (FSYS) at 50 day moving average $28s (down 12% today)
  3. Gafisa (GFA) all support broken - buying near January 2008 lows in $29s (down 5% today)
  4. Intrepid Potash (IPI) - chart too new to find clear support near $53 (down 9% today)
  5. Foster Wheeler (FWLT) - all support broken - buying near May lows in $63s (down 8% today)
  6. McDermott (MDR) - approaching 200 day moving average in $55s - buying in low $56s (down 8% today)
  7. Potash (POT) - below 50 day moving average of $210 - threw some in at $203 but expecting (hoping) for lower (down 4% today)
  8. Mosaic (MOS) - see Potash, 50 day support broken - threw a bit in at $125, hoping for lower (down 4% today)
  9. A-Power Generation Systems (APWR) - broke through 50 day moving average in $22s, added near $21 (down 6% today)
  10. Canadian Solar (CSIQ) - no great support level of note - added in $31s (missed the bottom, too busy buying other stuff) (down 3% today)
I'll update this entry as the day goes by...

Bookkeeping: New Position in Energy Conversion Devices (ENER)

TweetThis
I am adding yet another name to the solar mix - Energy Conversion Devices (ENER). The stock has now dropped from $83s to $59s in 2 weeks or about 30%. I deemed it too expensive (it is still expensive but it is all relative) at that point [Jun 17: Energy Conversion Devices (ENER) Now Trades on Par with First Solar (FSLR)] so we'll start here with a beginner stake and see if we can get lower prices. If not, at least we have a toehold - this is our 5th solar name in our solar basket and enough for me in terms of "number of names". I'll simply add or subtract exposure by buying or selling shares in the names we already own.

325 shares just under $60 or a 1.8% stake. ENER is one of the most expensive names in the sector but one of the current "favored" sons.

[May 8: Energy Conversion Devices - Is the Turnaround Finally Here?]

Long Energy Conversion Devices in fund and personal account


Nvidia (NVDA) - Ouch

TweetThis
Nvidia (NVDA) is a name a few readers have nominated as we looked for some new names in the tech space - the stock was approaching a triple bottom in the $18s after starting the year in mid $30s (50% drop). However, last night after the bell we had some uninspiring news and the stock is down an additional 28% to near $13. And just like that someone can lose 2/3rds of their money in 7 months. But remember, "tech is safe" because it has no exposure to oil. This is a trecherous market - the indexes as bad as they are, are masking some of the carnage in individual names. [Jun 28: How are the Dow Components Doing This Year?]
  • Two analysts on Thursday slashed their price targets for Nvidia Corp., saying they are concerned about the company's margins, after the graphics chip maker lowered its second-quarter revenue outlook.
  • The Santa Clara, Calif., company now sees sales for the quarter ending July 27 of $875 million to $950 million, below the $1.1 billion in sales that analysts polled by Thomson Financial expect, on average. That represents a 17% to 23% sequential drop in sales.
  • The company blamed the worse-than-expected results on weak global demand, and delays in ramping its new integrated graphics chip.
  • Nvidia also disclosed Wednesday that certain of its graphics processors designed for notebook PCs were failing at higher-than-normal rates due to what it described as "weak die/packaging materials." As a result, Nvidia will take a charge between $150 million and $200 million to cover anticipated customer warranty, repair and replacement costs.
  • Goldman Sachs analyst James Schneider... cut his fiscal second-quarter gross margin forecast to 40 percent from about 46 percent, citing near-term pricing pressure.
So again, "tech is safe" because it has no exposure to oil, yet it has exposure to producers and consumers which are slowing. But that's Wall Street logic for you.

No position

(note, chart does not show the carnage coming in about 15 minutes)

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

Not Good

TweetThis
That was not the right way to follow up a reversal day (yesterday). To open with strength and close at the low of the day, completely erasing yesterday's reversal (which was in itself bullish) - not a good thing. That said, as I've been saying We Need Fear, and perhaps the first hints of it are arriving (would coal stocks losing 1/5th of their value in 1 session be a good indicator?)

So we're back here at S&P 1260 where we miraculously rallied off yesterday (out of the blue) - of course the market being the wicked thing she is - I was positioned much better for a fall through that level yesterday before the out of the blue rally. So she is being at her most wicked self at this point with reversals left and right. I am reading a lot of frustrated investors/traders on multiple sites so if you are feeling that way, you are not alone. I haven't seen so many headfakes since the Barry Sanders years.

Anyhow, back to yesterday's comments [Could be Panic Time] - if we break that S&P 1260 level, unfortunately the most logical path is a move down to 1225 which would be levels last seen in 2006. The last move down in a selloff is usually the most traumatic so in case we go there be prepared. On the positive side the generals are finally being shot, group by group. Even Ultrashort Oil - Gas (DUG) was working there in the last hour of the day. That is the last group that needs to fall.



For those of you who joined the market in the past year or so, it is not usually like this - in fact anyone who got in between 2003 and early 2007 was saying "this is so easy".... it is never really easy. But this period with five corrections in under 12 months has been especially tough. On the positive side by experiencing this you can chide that newbie investor who shows up in 2010, throws money at anything, makes 20% and claims "this market thing is so easy" etc etc. :) That's how I felt listening to all the new guys who started post 2000-2002. Always a silver lining.

I am introducing a new Rising Tide Growth proprietary indicator which we'll drag out from time to time when the markets crumble. For all you folks who just read via email you will have to actually show up to the site and vote in our newest poll. It's a rough day in what's been a rough week - but only half a day left to go. The harder we fall, the more bullish I am actually getting - but losing money during the (tail?) end of the downfall is never fun. Thankfully we've avoided much of the carnage in June so we're just giving back some gains and buying merchandise that should serve us well this fall and winter.

EDIT 7 PM: Today's post on mystery stock of the alternative energy mini basket is now updated.

Long Ultrashort Oil & Gas in fund; no personal position

Bookkeeping: Adding to Cleveland Cliffs (CLF)

TweetThis
I had a feeling this would be a very busy week for us....

We added a touch of this name this AM since we had cut it back so severely, but I am adding another layer here in the $96-$97 range (in larger scale as it falls) - it is now down 16% today alone. Cleveland Cliffs (CLF) now up to 1.7% stake. It just scraped its 50 day moving average at $96. Amazingly, despite the carnage - this really only takes names like this back to where they were 3 weeks ago. Stocks definitely fall a lot faster than they usually rise.

I have a whole subset of stocks I am willing to make into 4-6% type of positions - I am just waiting to see if they fall to prices that would make me more content. Whoever falls first of this small group will get those slots... this would be one of those "best of class" names. If we can get a move down to the $70s or $80s I'd be moving it up the food chain in terms of position in portfolio.

[Jun 24: Cleveland Cliffs - a Man Among Boys]

Long Cleveland Cliffs in fund and personal account


Bookkeeping: Adding to Goldman Sachs (GS) & some Strategy

TweetThis
Continuing yesterday's theme of "last stages of correction means junk sectors in, good sectors out", I am adding to Goldman Sachs (GS) in the $180 range. Up to 2.6% of portfolio. I am feeling even better about this switcheroo into financials yesterday after watching the relative out performance of the group today. [Bookkeeping: Starting Ultra Financial (UYG)] In fact as I take a swig of my Kool Aid, I am thinking of unicorns, mermaids and unemployment rate falling from 5.5% to 5.3% to offset last month's huge increase - and the stampede of CNBC pundits rushing over me to buy stocks tomorrow AM. ;)

As we all know, Goldman Sachs (GS) rules the world, they just allow us to live in it - sort of like the Matrix. The company has broken through the 50 day moving average which it's been hovering around the past few weeks (sometimes above, sometimes below). The 200 day moving average is not far away in the low $190s and then from there, it is off to the races.



If... I need to stress IF... we can hold this 1260-1275 on the S&P 500 and we are able to have our correction sector by sector (the last piece of it), this may mark a (shorter term) turning point. Or it could simply be the Kool Aid talking. We've talked about the playbook that has played out time after time in our series of corrections since last summer - first goes the junk (financials, retailers, housing), then goes the middle of the pack stuff (technology, solar, some industrials), all the while the generals of the market at that time (usually some portion of the commodity sector) holds out... then as everyone rushes into that 1 subsector as a safe haven, as the rest of the market crumbles... we get that rotation - and the junk begins to ascend from the ashes, and the best of breed commodities gets hit. This "seems" to be where we are now - coal finally was beaten with the ugly stick today and fertilizer was taken down to their 50 day moving averages yesterday. All that remains is natural gas. Ultrashort Basic Material (SMN) after hammering us for weeks on end, finally acted as a proper insurance, increasing by as much as 10% today.

Not every correction is identical - but this one has thus far been eerily similar to November 2007 - no huge spike in VIX - just erosion day after day after day. The generals have not been slashed to pieces like they were in August 2007, January 2008 and March 2008, but it's been much more similar to the November 2007 era (so far) I still would like to see natural gas stocks bludgeoned to feel safe(r), along with another week or so of commodity weakness. But I'm playing the playbook and saying the rotation continues for now. Even though we are taking some tough losses this week (we were WAY overdue), it is far better than what we endured the last few times we had this rotational correction since we have some benefit from the small end of our barbell this time around (non global growth stories). However, this might just be scene 1 of the final Act so too early to call any victories.

Again my general thought process is some sort of oversold bounce here - maybe 3 to 5%ish, and then a potential return to retest the levels we just bounced off of. If we cannot even perform any bounce off a 10% down month, that would be incredibly troubling. 8:30 AM tomorrow will hold our near term fate. Red or Black? Who said this is not just a big casino?

Long Goldman Sachs, Ultra Financial, Ultrashort Basic Materials in fund; long Ultra Financial, Ultrashort Basic Materials in personal account

Cook County - Chicago --> Highest Taxes in the Nation: 10.25%

TweetThis
Let me preface this by saying, any readers from Cook County - I feel for you. But to the greater populace of Americans reading the blog we've spoken at length on how the entitlement problem is going to make the (insert - energy, credit, mortgage, Katrina, crumbling infrastructure, Iraq) problems look like a piece of cake. If you really want to see what the politicians should be talking about (but they won't because the solutions would be wildly unpopular) see

[May 23: David Walker on CNCB this Morning] & [Mar 26: Annual Spring Entitlement Warning Falls on Deaf Ears]

But since we only deal with the crisis directly ahead of us in America (or actually, directly BEHIND us) all the fuss will now be about energy. Now, another point I've made that is getting almost no interest or attention now because it's "down the road" (i.e. any crisis more than 60 days out does not matter) is the city/state funding crisis. Our new fiscal year in most cities /states just started yesterday - and with the loss of tax revenue both from housing values faltering and a general slowdown in the economy (sales tax revenue), many cities and states are going to be in big trouble. Then layer in the energy costs and rampant medical cost inflation and a very bad problem is going to become a crisis situation. So as I've outlined in the past there are 2 main solutions - cut backs in services (read city/state jobs) or increase in revenue. How do you increase revenue? More taxes! Cook County is showing us the way with a whopping 10.25% tax on it's residents (keep in part much of this is a state tax from Illinois as well) But for many of you dear folks, this is your future. As the school year approaches I expect to hear crisis after crisis as shortfalls for things such as school buses and general funding appear. Just the first cockroaches coming out to see the light now... once again our whole economic system is based on (inflated) home prices and (inflated) consumerism. Now we are losing both. This will be the next big wave, both this fiscal year (summer 08 to summer 09) and especially next year (summer 09 to summer 10)

Somewhere in there will be an "economic recovery" per pundits on CNBC ;)
  • Chicago's no Second City, at least not when it comes to sales taxes. A boost in the Cook County sales tax that took effect on Tuesday means people shopping in Chicago now pay a cumulative 10.25 percent levy -- the highest of any major U.S. city.
  • A $300 purchase of say, a couch, in Chicago would now carry a sales tax of $30.75. By comparison, New Yorkers pay about 8.4 percent while residents of Los Angeles pay 8.25 percent.
  • County Board President Todd Stroger pushed through a 1 percent increase this year to help close a more than $200 million shortfall in the county's $3 billion budget, saying new money would go toward rescuing public health care services.
  • While Stroger has been a favorite target of disgruntled taxpayers, his office notes that Cook County still only accounts for 1.75 percent of the sales tax paid by Chicagoans, with the largest chunk -- 6.25 percent -- levied by the state of Illinois.
  • "The sales tax will kill us," said Lorri Burke, manager at the Second Chance thrift store in Steger, located just inside Cook County on 34th Street.
  • Annoyance about the tax runs deep. Nearly 76 percent of respondents in a recent Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce poll said the higher sales tax rate would lead them to change their buying habits, including by traveling outside the county.
  • The taxes may hurt Chicago's market competitiveness and create hardships for businesses already struggling amid an economic downturn
Our total inability to reign in medical costs will be the ruin of us. But since it's incremental and not as sexy as crude oil doubling in a year - it won't be noticed or dealt with - until it's catastrophic. As with all things here in our fine land.

Expect many more "Cook Counties" in the next 2 years.

Does Valuation Matter?

TweetThis
I always wonder about this valuation thing - at times it simply seems all that matters is what people want to buy (relative strength) and valuation means nothing. Case in point, I'd like to show you two stocks.

#1 is a fund holding we've had for a long time - Illumina (ILMN). I never have it as a major position - it usually sits around 0.5% to 1.25% of the portfolio because I always think it's "too expensive". I rarely talk about it other than around earnings. I've been watching it act incredibly well during this correction - living in its own universe. It's not sexy and it never makes our "top gainers for the week" but the chart over the long run is fantastic. Valuation? Ridiculous. Forward P/E ratio of 75 on $1.20 of 2008 full year estimated earnings. That doesn't matter - all it does is go up. [Dec 20: Nice Writeup on Illumina]



#2 is a tech stock I've tried to short multiple times in my personal life over the years (and lost money every time I am sure) as it's always traded at 100x+ forward estimates! Yet it always stays at some amazingly nonsensical (to these eyes) valuation - Salesforce.com (CRM). Valuation? Ridiculous. Forward P/E ratio of 200.



When I was looking for a new tech stock to add to the portfolio this was far and away the best chart but being a "growth at reasonable value" guy at heart, every other name I considered was trading at a PE multiple BELOW it's growth rate. Yet CRM has outperformed every other one I considered. And this folks is why the market will pummel every rational brain cell from your body the longer you stick around. :)

I do realize these are somewhat unique companies but gosh - those are some steep valuations. But at times it simply pays to stay onboard as long as the whales keep wanting to eat this type of fare.

Long Illumina in fund; no personal position

Bookkeeping: Buying Fuel Systems Solutions (FSYS) for the 3rd Piece of my Alternative Energy Basket

TweetThis
Finally Fuel Systems Solutions (FSYS) has fallen to its 20 day moving average - sheesh. I've missed a huge move in this one, waiting for a pullback that never came. It's finally down to the $34 area where I'm adding it to the portfolio as the final piece of my 3 stock basket of (non solar) alternative energy plays. [Jun 27: New Position in A-Power Energy Generation Systems (APWR) to Create Alternative Energy Mini Basket]

Actual purchases were 3 lots in the $32s and $33s, and I've created a 1.8% stake. My hope is a fall to $28 range which is the 50 day moving average; but with the stock down mid teens % today it was time to begin the stake. This stock has had among the best relative strengths of anything in the market that is not coal or natural gas related - but aha, it is natural gas realted, sort of.

Here is a company description via the corporate website

Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc. is the holding entity for BRC S.r.L., based in Cherasco, Italy, and IMPCO Technologies, based in Santa Ana, California.

Both entities are engaged in designing, manufacturing, marketing and supplying advanced products and systems to enable internal combustion engines to run on clean burning gaseous fuels such as natural gas and propane. BRC is a recognized leader in the light duty and automobile alternative fuel sectors. Additional information is available at http://www.brc.it. IMPCO Technologies is a leader in the heavy duty, industrial, power generation and stationary engines sectors. Additional information is available at www.impcotechnologies.com.

So we have 2 business lines - what I'll label transportation and industrial; but I only care about one - the transporation. The last earnings report shows why:

  • Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc. (NasdaqGM:FSYS - News) today announced record results for its first quarter ended March 31, 2008, supported by strong demand for its systems and components that enable internal combustion engines to operate on gaseous fuels.
  • Revenue for the first quarter jumped to a record $94.6 million from $54.8 million a year earlier.
  • Operating income for the same period climbed to $13.4 million from $3.8 million in the 2007 first quarter.
  • Net income for the same period of 2008 climbed sharply to $6.2 million, or $0.40 per diluted share, from $1.0 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, a year ago.
  • ``Results for the 2008 first quarter reflect a $38.3 million, or 118 percent, increase in revenue contributions derived from the company's transportation business, and a 6.6 percent increase in revenues derived from our industrial business, representing additional contributions of $1.5 million, on a year-over-year basis,'' said Mariano Costamagna, chief executive officer.
Where's the growth coming from (in English?)
  • He noted that the company's transportation business for the first quarter of 2008 benefited from a more than 50 percent increase in unit volume output from the previous quarter derived from its delayed original equipment manufacturing conversion operation -- enabling vehicles to operate on compressed natural gas (CNG) or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Costamagna added that aftermarket conversions of internal combustion engines to gaseous fuel operation still represent the largest percentage of business in the industry today, with automotive original equipment factory conversions relatively low in output volume.
Expansion plans for 2008
  • He highlighted the company's recent announcement regarding the expansion of its Italian delayed automotive original equipment manufacturing operation in Livorno, Italy. This facility, combined with the company's current operation in Cherasco, Italy, will enable Fuel Systems Solutions to more than double its 2007 delayed original equipment output. The new facility in Livorno serves original equipment automobile manufacturers such as Hyundai-Kia and Great Wall, while the operation in Cherasco supports automobile companies such as Chevrolet, Subaru and Citroen.
Financial Outlook
  • Based on its current assessment of near-term market trends, the company is increasing its full year 2008 consolidated revenue guidance to $320 million and maintaining its gross profit margin of approximately 24 percent and operating margin of approximately nine percent.
Now before this earnings report I had never heard of the company... but this got my attention. The stock jumped from sub $20 to $23s, then within a week spiked to near $30. Surely I could wait and get a pullback... err, umm the "pullback" was $29 to $27 from which it has made a month long run to $40. All the while I've gritted my teeth. So finally today we were able to start a position in the $32s/$33s and I hope lower as weak hands get shook out. Today's horrific fall only took the stock price back 3 weeks...



At a price of near $40 where it traded way back.... this morning, the stock traded at 40x forward estimates. Pricey. Now it trades at 32x forward earnings; cheaper but not exactly something found in the bargain bin. That said, I do believe this is the type of company in the right place, at the right time with the right product, even if crude retreats to $100. I also like the expansion plans which should allow 2009 estimates of $1.25 to be surpassed as long as the customer demand is there - which it appears to be in droves based on the past 2 quarters. This is yet another (what I consider) small cap, or certainly smaller than our normal fare at $500M in market cap, so I am putting it into my 3 stock basket of "non solar alternative energy" names an considering it as 1 'position', if you will. How the 3 individual pieces will do, will be interesting.

Now I certainly wished I had found this name back when this gentlemen did in mid April (per Seeking Alpha) and in fact, said writer put out a "sell" on the name at what appears to be timed perfectly (today). I still would not of added this type of high risk, smallish name (in April before earnings) without more proof of improving results, but it would of been nice to have had it on the radar and a familiarity with it so when it first spiked post earnings I'd be willing to jump in with no consternation.

So again, instead of recreating the wheel let's see his original thesis (which I agree with) and his sell call at today's peak price (obviously I sort of agreed with that as well, as I was unwilling to pay up after such a huge move)

Original piece
  • Fuel Systems Solutions's (FSYS) business model is based on crude at $40 a barrell, and at oil almost triple that amount, the company is reaping the dividends. FSYS is a alternative fuel supplier that produces products that enable gasoline and diesel engines to be converted to cleaner burning liquified petroleul gas [LPG] or compressed natural gas [CNG].
  • The conversion provides advantages; cost savings versus gasoline could be as much as 40% and the cleaner burning effects comply better with increasing environmental clean air demands.
  • The shares have seen a massive selloff within the last two years, trading as high as $24 before settling down to the $10 range. The company appears to have solid fundamentals, but their poor accounting controls continue to plague them. Last year the company launched a stock option investigation that prevented them from filing any financial statements for almost nine months resulting in a negative restatement of past earnings and just last month, FSYS said its 4th quarter results would be postponed due to its need to restate foreign subsidiary inventory costs. The good news is that the restatement will have a positive impact on past earnings. The company also announced it was increasing revenue guidance for 2007 from $255 million to $266 million. (my note: since then that has been pushed up to $320 million)
  • Broadpoint Capital recently added FSYS to its research coverage with a buy rating and a $14.50 target price. The analyst, Ron Oster, is impressed with FSYS's growth prospects and its new mangement team and stressed to me that his earnings estimates are on the conservative side.
  • Fidelty Magellan has noticed FSYS on its radar screen and has taken a 10% stake becoming its second largest shareholder behind Mariano Costamagna, FSYS's new CEO with a 12% ownership position (my note: so both good insider ownership by a new CEO AND Fidelity's staff have enough confidence in the name to take a major position - obviously if Magellan chooses to exit the stock it will cause some pain in terms of price)
  • Management inherited the accounting problems from the previous regime and is determined to quickly put these problems behind them in their quest to improve profitabilty.
  • Future prospects appear bright as FSYS has recently received certification from GM (GM) on its new 6.0 liter engine as well as Ford's (F) F150 to provide aftermarket conversion kits. Australlia has seen its useage of conversion kits triple within the past three years as its government has been offering $1800 grants for each vehicle conversion in order to promote cleaner air standards. (my note: would the US government ever offer such a thing? Nah - we sue OPEC)
On to today's "downgrade" if you will
  • The shares have nearly quadrupled in less than three months and are due for a correction, They have simply gone up too far in too short of a time frame.
  • Trading at 38 times 2008 earnings estimates and nearly four times book value of $9.70, the stock is vulnerable to some hefty selling if FSYS fails to execute its business plan flawlessly, as this equity is priced to perfection and beyond.
  • Both Broadpoint Capital and Canaccord Adams each lowered their opinions from buy to hold, while Lazard Capital still maintains a hold rating. Broadpoint and Canaccord share one year $28 price targets. I think their $28 target could be on the high side and see a more realistic target of $24, as it's often typical for stocks to retrace 50% of their gains. (my note: say it ain't so Mark - $28 is my target; to buy)
  • The shares have been running up a lot on pure emotion as momentum traders try and ride FSYS as an instrument to mirror the rise in crude prices. The company was added to the Russell 2000 index Monday creating even further demand. (my note: true that)
  • Three Mutual funds, Invesco, FMR and Wilderhill Powershares each own about 9% , totaling 27% of FSYS's outstanding shares. They all have substantial gains that they may potentially want to book by actively selling shares. This added supply of shares hitting the market could put a big dent in the share price. Mariano Costamagna, the CEO and largest single shareholder with a 11% stake, may also be tempted to "cash in" on the company's windfall. (my note: good points that I hinted about above)
  • Management might decide to take advantage of the spike in the share price by issuing a secondary offering to raise capital. The additional shares printed will cause dilution as well as flood the market with a much larger supply of shares creating downward pressure.
All good potential points and investors should always weigh the pros and cons to each investment. Myself, I'm willing to see a very large potential market opportunity here and look past some of the valuation issues - after all we've pointed out just today a few names that the market is looking past valuation as the stocks continue an ever upward climb up [Do Valuations Matter?] and we've seen the same in certain solar names such as First Solar (FSLR) and Energy Conversion Devices (ENER). I also would like to quote one of the comments on one of the Seeking Alpha posts - as we do tend to be US centric thinkers.
Most American investors do not have a clue as to how LPG conversions are going gangbusters around the world. Thailand is increasing it's LPG imports 5 fold to fill demand. They also have a shortage of gas cylinders for vehicles and are starting 4 new cylinder manufacturing plants. Indonesia has started converting 436 Taxis a month. Manila is now converting all public transportation and 20% of government vehicles to natural gas. There is a scramble on in Malaysia as the government has ended petrol subsidies. Petronas is going to construct an additional 200 natural gas stations there. Venezuela plans to have 500,000 NGV's by the end of 2009. Iran is manufacturing 250,000 cng cars this year. Peru is converting 50 to 60 cars a day. Enquiries for conversion are up 10 fold in England. There is a waiting list in Australia for LPG conversion. India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are into it big. Russia is planning to build natural gas filling stations across Europe.
Take it for what it's worth but we do have to realize the rest of the world is moving on, with or without us.

The last thing I do like is the small amount of shares outstanding (15.6M) which all things being equal mean as net income flows through the Profit and Loss Statement, they are divided over a smaller denominator (shares outstanding) leading to a larger Earnings PER share.

Long Fuel Systems Solutions in fund and personal account

3 Musketeers of 'Pooring of America' Retail

TweetThis
We've discussed all these names in the past [Dec 16: Target Shoppers Turning into Walmart Shoppers] - the 3 Musketeers of the weakening US consumer - Walmart (WMT), Big Lots (BIG), and Costco (COST), but it is helpful to review them after the destruction that has just occurred in the retail space - and see how well they held up. Total anecdotal story - I've never been to a Big Lots but I drove by one in the middle of the day, on a weekday 2 weeks ago and every (I mean every) parking spot was taken. During the workday - when most retailers are nearly empty. That opened my eyes.

In January this space was literally obliterated as it dawned on NYC traders that the rest of America doesn't make $400-$600K+ a year, and that the economy was weakening. I posted an entry showing a chart of almost every major subsector in retail and how 1 chart stood among all the rest - Walmart (WMT) [Jan 15: Will There Be Anywhere Left to Shop in 2010?]

Things are looking quite similar now, but instead of showing you 15 charts that look identical I'll just pick JCPenney (JCP) randomly as it is representative. By seeing this, you can compare to what the 3 Muskateers are doing. All charts will show the three 2008 corrections (January, March, and June) As I've written - retail will be the next financial - actually it has ALREADY BEEN the next financial - but it will continue to be. The consumer won't be 'recovering' anytime soon - this rebate check is hiding a lot of the reality. As the JCP chart - these stocks are lovely shorts on every short covering PLUS "a recovery is not far off fairy tale" rally. So we'll get another one of those soon enough, and it will create a fantastic shorting opportunity - again.



So as opposed to the 90% of retail charts that look identical to JCP, if you did not know better - you would barely realize there is a correction when you look at the 3 Musketeers. But to be in these stocks you'd have to realize the American consumer is fleeing his normal shops (moving downstream) and that indeed the economy is poor - unlike what you'd hear from various government officials and their shoddy reports. Charts don't lie - people do. See below.







I've debated adding any of these 3 over the past few months (I'd probably choose Big Lots at this point if I added here) - part of the barbell strategy (i.e. have things completely outside the "global growth" part of the portfolio) And if we do get that type of "sector rotation" that usually comes every so often - it might soon be time for these to shine further (although their absolute strength in market adversity is shine enough for me) Tough sector (the tide is definitely NOT rising) - but as a very shy financial TV pundit likes to say "there is always a bull market somewhere".

No positions

Bookkeeping: Restarting LDK Solar (LDK)

TweetThis
They are just taking the hammer to the solar names right now. As I wrote yesterday in my Canadian Solar (CSIQ) purchase (already down nearly 10% in a snap) the action in this group is so random so my new strategy is simply to devote a portion of the portfolio to "solar" and stuff multiple names inside and the market will decide which ones to favor. One of the other 2 names I was considering yesterday was LDK Solar (LDK) and with THAT name now down 8% I am adding this back to the portfolio at $32. 500 shares - creating a 1.35% stake. I last sold this name out at $36 (and missed the move immediately after, but now am buying 11% lower than where I sold) Folks, this is not a buy and hold market.

There is no chart support for LDK Solar other than a base it built in April - but it is not a stock near any moving averages and frankly this is the one group where buying stocks as they break above moving averages hasn't worked too well. You simply have to buy them when they look like they are all going to zero, knowing at some point in the future when karma is back in the group - they can skyrocket out of the blue. So once again - I am spreading my "bets" across this sector. Once Obama wins I believe this group will have a huge move in the fall.

I also added to Canadian Solar (down 10%) and Yingli Green Energy (YGE) "only" down 4% today but absolutely destroyed the past 3 weeks. Where these things bottom is unknoweable so we'll keep layering in as they plummet. Many are down 40%+ in the past month now. As a whole I have this 4 stock basket of solar now up to 5-6% of portfolio. This *is* one group that is making me get the puke factor...

As an aside there are some rumblings out of Spain about limitations about subsidies but we go through that dog and pony show every 5-6 weeks in this sector; if it is not one country it's another - at this point it's white noise and just a reason to cause a selloff. This type of action, again, is making me somewhat bullish because while the indexes are not being pummeled (today) - certain sectors are being shown the woodshed - all part of the cleansing process.

Long all names mentioned in fund; no personal position


Bookkeeping: Starting Walter Industries (WLT)

TweetThis
Finally a medium sized coal correction. Names across the board down 10%ish. We've been waiting for this "rotation" out of the best and into the junk (financials, retailers, et al)

I am starting a position I should of started a long time ago - Walter Industries (WLT) with a 250 share purchase in the $95s. This creates a 2.1% stake. I am going to scale in because this might just be day 1 of a multi day rotation (if past is prologue). If not, and "this" is the correction - at least we have something. [May 1: Walters Industries - the Most Amazing Company]

I also added to Alpha Natural Resources (ANR), Massey Energy (MEE) and Arch Coal (ACI) replacing what I sold yesterday [Bookkeeping: Cutting the Generals] plus a bit more - these names are down 9, 11, and 8% respectively. I am hoping for a few more days of this action and seeing if we can get these guys nearer to the 50 day moving averages, but some are close or at that spot already. I'll stagger the next purchases when/if these stocks fall another 5-10% and increase the size each step of the way down.

I also added to Cleveland Cliffs (CLF) - iron/metallurgical coal - here at the 20 day moving average of $107. I own very little so need to add some exposure even if it's early.

Seeing this sort of action, which we've been waiting for - is making me incrementally more bullish. (key word incrementally) When there is nowhere left to hide, and everyone has taken some pain - that usually means a bottom should be forming. Last to go appears to be natural gas... when (if) that gets hammered I'll feel comfortable we probably have reached a near term bottom. However, without the ability to predict the future we'll simply begin layering into our favorite long term stories as they take these hits.

Long all names mentioned in fund; long Alpha Natural Resources in personal account


Petrohawk Energy (HK) and Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Flying on Haynesville Shale News

TweetThis
Petrohawk Energy (HK) and Chesapeake Energy (CHK) both are ripping up 9-11% in early action - right now anything associated with the Haynesville Shale is gold in this sector - not that the other natural gas players aren't doing great as well. [Jun 18: Will Encore Acquisition (EAC) be Bought Out?] Another name I've seen continuously on my top weekly performer list for 2 months now but have not been pulling the trigger (waiting the never surfacing "pullback") is Goodrich Petroleum (GDP). Chesapeake announced a new partnership last night and Petrohawk has a nice upgrade this AM.
  • Shares of Petrohawk Energy Corp. advanced in premarket trading on Wednesday after an analyst hiked his price target on the oil and gas producer, saying its oil fields are increasingly more valuable.
  • Friedman, Billings, Ramsey analyst Rehan Rashid raised his price target on Petrohawk to $60 from $45 in a note to investors early Wednesday. The new target represents a 25 percent rate of return on the stock over Tuesday's close of $48.
  • Rashid said the recent purchase by Plains Exploration & Production Co. of a portion of land owned by Chesapeake Energy Corp. in northwest Louisiana implies Petrohawk's portion of the same oil field is more valuable than originally expected.
  • Late Tuesday, Chesapeake said Plains agreed to buy 110,000 acres of its Haynesville Shale tract in northwest Louisiana. By Rashid's calculation, that purchase came to a price tag of $25,600 per acre.
  • Based on the transaction, he says Petrohawk's own share of Haynesville Shale can now be assumed to be worth $7.4 billion, which in turn makes Petrohawk stock significantly more valuable.
  • Rashid said many oil companies with a presence at Haynesville Shale have seen their shares climb sharply in recent months as companies seek to buy up the land, and reiterated his "Outperform" rating on Houston-based Petrohawk.
Motley Fool has an article on the subject just out as well... "The Haynesville is Hot"
  • It seems that not a day goes by without some news out of the smoking-hot Haynesville shale. The news flow is downright torrid for such an early-stage natural gas play. Of course, few investors had heard of companies like Goodrich Petroleum (NYSE: GDP) or GMX Resources (Nasdaq: GMXR) before Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK) blew the story wide open back in March. You can hardly blame these companies for flaunting their stuff.
  • On Monday, Petrohawk Energy (NYSE: HK) also updated its ever-growing leasehold. Land that's prospective for the Haynesville/Bossier (two gas-rich shale layers stacked on top of one another in the same region) now stands at a hearty 275,000 net acres. This renders Petrohawk highly levered to the Haynesville -- much more than larger companies like Chesapeake or Hunt-happy XTO Energy (NYSE: XTO). This looks like a positive thing, judging by the company's latest well result.
  • Petrohawk just completed and production-tested its very first horizontal Haynesville well. With a horizontal well, you drill horizontally to hit the gas contained in a laterally extensive formation. Petrohawk drilled this particular well down 11,000 feet, and then nearly 4,000 feet laterally. To better coax the gas out of the rock, the company also induced fractures at eleven separate intervals.
[June 27: Natural Gas 75% Gain Speeds Horizontal Drilling at Devon Energy, Range Resources]

I've mentioned one small sliver of positive of this oil/gas boom is that it is creating overnight millionaires for people who just happen to own land in the right places in Texas, Pennsylvania and now it appears North Dakota of all places.
  • Oscar Stohler was raised in a sod house in western North Dakota and ranched there for nearly seven decades. He never gave much thought to what lay below the grass that fattened his cattle. When oilmen wanted to drill there last year, Stohler, 83, doubted oil would be found two miles underground on his property.
  • In less than a year, Stohler and his wife, Lorene, 82, have become millionaires from the production of one well on their land near Dunn Center, a mile or so from the sod home where Oscar grew up. A second well has begun producing on their property and another is being drilled — all aimed at the Bakken shale formation, a rich deposit that the U.S. Geological Survey calls the largest continuous oil accumulation it has ever assessed.
  • Some of their neighbors in the town of about 120, from bar tenders to Tupperware salespeople, have become "overnight millionaires" from oil royalty payments.
  • State and industry officials say North Dakota is on pace to set a state oil-production record this year, surpassing the 52.6 million barrels produced in 1984. A record number of drill rigs are piercing the prairie and North Dakota has nearly 4,000 active oil wells.
  • "I have heard, anecdotally, that there is a millionaire a day being created in North Dakota," said Ron Ness, president of the North Dakota Petroleum Council.
  • The number of taxpayers reporting adjusted gross income of more than $1 million in North Dakota rose from 266 in 2005 to 388 in 2006, Strombeck said. The 2007 numbers won't be known until October, she said.
Good times! :) Now these people can feel 1/100000th of what it feels like to be a Saudi Sheikh which from nothing but good luck of sitting on oodles of dead dinosaurs are now among the most rich and powerful on Earth.

No position in names in this story but own a 4 stock natural gas basket






Starbucks (SBUX) Tells Walmart (WMT): "Here you Take Them!"

TweetThis
More great news from our wonderful service economy - a new slew of 12,000 potential Walmart (WMT) workers have just been borne. Lucky us. Of course these people will disappear into the ether of the "new jobs" created by the birth/death model in our monthly BS, err BLS unemployment report. (newest chapter of this fiction available tomorrow - hot off the presses) Within that report these people will be shown as newly employed in contruction trades, finance, or services - some of our hottest groups for job creation ;) [no, I am serious - the government has been showing in their estimates growth in construction and finance]

As always folks, I do not comment on this monthly report other than realizing it will create lemming like behavior by the hedge fund computers and NYC traders. Every 30 days I just point new readers to this [May 2: Employment Report] Read point #1 and point #2 in that blog post, and then ignore the spiel that gets spit out every 30 days. As always, listen to the companies - not the government. Let's hear what Starbucks (SBUX) is saying.
  • Starbucks Corp (NasdaqGS:SBUX - News) said on Tuesday it plans to close another 500 underperforming stores and eliminate as many as 12,000 full- and part-time positions, lifting shares nearly 6 percent. (if you are new to the market this might sound perverse but all the market cares about is lower costs. Less people = lower costs. That's as simple as I can make it.)
  • The company, which now plans to close a total of 600 underperforming stores versus its previous estimate of 100, said the majority of the stores will be closed by the end of March 2009.
  • The job losses would represent about 7 percent of the company's global work force.
Frankly I cannot keep track of all the announced job losses anymore - whatever the aggregate amount is. It really doesn't matter - I'll just rely on what the government says and call it even. Works for everyone else ;)

In a greater sense and speaking to one of our long held themes - pooring of America - once again I ask you to please avoid any company (other than the oversold bounces that should be coming soon in retailers as overstuffed shorts are finally forced to cover and book their huge gains) directly relying on the bottom 80% of US consumers overspending of the past 15 years - i.e. $4 lattes.

[Apr 23: Consumers Fleeing Starbucks; Still Love Chipotle (CMG)]
[Jan 8: Is Starbucks (SBUX) a Buy?]
[Sep 5: Starbucks Warns on Higher Commodity Costs - this time Dairy]

No positions


Tuesday, July 1, 2008

What a Crazy Day

TweetThis
It is always amusing to see the end of the day gain or loss in the indexes, and how it sometimes hides the wild action of the day. Today was one of those days - we gapped down (bearish), rallied from what appeared to be a test of support (bullish), gave that all up and tested new lows - 1260 (bearish), and then reversed and rallied to the highs of the day (bullish). For all that action and headache, it just took us back to right near where we closed yesterday. But it scared and/or emboldened traders multiple times, in completely different directions. Absolutely nuts - as they say in bear markets neither bulls nor bears have an easy time making money (the strongest rallies are usually contained within bear markets, but they are sudden and out of the blue).

Here is a 2 day chart



As I revisit my sales today, they all look shrewd at 11 AM, wonderful at 1 PM as we started into the abyss, and putrid at 3 PM. Ah the market, she humbles us all - often on a daily basis. Today was one of those days - hopefully you had an easier time of it than me. Back at it tomorrow.

Bookkeeping: Beginning Canadian Solar (CSIQ)

TweetThis
Continuing the theme of avoiding the stronger sectors and buying some weaker areas, I had almost bought Canadian Solar (CSIQ) just a few weeks ago in the mid $30s - it ramped to low $50s, and a missed opportunity went by the wayside. [Jun 17: Canadian Solar (CSIQ) Raises Guidance]

It has now pulled back 30% from its high of $52 two weeks ago, and this appears to the be the market's current favorite - the only chart I can find in the sector where the stock has not broken the 50 day moving average. This is not my favorite name in the sector fundamentally - a huge amount of their last earnings were nothing more than currency gains - but the market doesn't peek beneath the hood to realize that, so we'll go with the market. And frankly, all that I've gained from buying the names I liked fundamentally are very large losses. So in this one sector, it appears momentum and favoritism mean far more than trying to squirrel out the best values - so you have to buy the "popular kid". Ask Meena Polar (TSL). (it shall not be referred to by it's official name until management begins to act like they care about their investors) That said, when last I checked a few weeks ago Canadian Solar was still the 2nd cheapest in the group (that could of changed since then since many names in this group have lost 30-40% of value)

So with that said, and my style of trying to pick the best fundamentals SLASH value - NOT working in this sector, I'm adopting a "buy a much bigger basket and put less into each name". The other two I've considered are Solarfun Power (SOLF) and LDK Solar (LDK) to add to this basket.

I'm still keeping my 2 very unpopular kids in this sector (added a touch to each in fact as they have been demolished the past few weeks) but simply am going to have a target in mind as to what % of the overall portfolio I want in solar - and stuff multiple companies into that piece of the portfolio. Perhaps I am recreating the wheel and I should just buy the solar ETF but what fun would that be. [Apr 16: A One Stop Shop for Solar - get TAN] Personally I am finding it amusing that with oil at record prices, the solar stocks are being decimated - but I do realize the type of investors who own these names are not really "strong hands". Which is why, while I was tempted to buy them last week, I waited.

Canadian Solar (CSIQ) is sitting just above its 50 day moving average @ $37 which is a similar area to where it has dropped in the past month, multiple times. While I would hope it would hold this level, if the market weakens, it surely won't - as it's the last survivor in the group clinging to this support level. CSIQ is a 1.6% stake in the fund, and the 3 amigos in this group are now 4.1% of the portfolio as a whole (I am considering them "one stock" if you will, not knowing which the market will bless with a 30% move and which will get trashed in the months to come). I still think Meena Polar (TSL) is the best value in the group but apparently I am the only one in America and the portfolio has suffered for it.

Long Canadian Solar, the artist formely known as Trina Solar in fund; long the artist formerly known as Trina Solar in personal account


Bookkeeping: Starting Ultra Financial (UYG)

TweetThis
Impressive bounce off that 1260 level on the S&P. Like a magnet the market bounced to S&P 1275.... (thanks PPT) and away we go to 1280s. Reader Shax is happy and smug somewhere in Asia with his 100% long exposure. I just cannot see a break through that 1260 on the first attempt with all the King's Horses and all the King's Men here to socialize the market, all over again. They have charts too and realize how important this level is. It's going to take repeated attempts I believe, to break through their purchasing power.

Frankly at this point we have 2 outcomes (a) crash i.e. a 10% drop in the markets (June) followed by even more rampant selling layered on top or (b) an oversold bounce.

I wrote last week I was done for now with Ultrashort Financial (SKF) as the risk/reward started pushing towards risk (of reversal). [Jun 26: Cutting Ultrashort Financial to Nearly 0] And I still believe that, short of a crash scenario. I did not catch the top as we sold the last piece at $146 and today we're at $155 - that's ok, we probably were buying it when everyone believed the "2nd half recovery" story and it was trading in the $90s.

I also wrote in that piece

For a short term trade only (I reserve up to about 10% of the fund for shorter term actions) I'm eying Ultra (long) Financial (UYG) - but not yet.

At the time UYG was north of $22 and now its near $20. So I'm going to take a gander into this one and begin a stake here just north of that $20. This will obviously be a trade and not long term hold, but perhaps we can get a $23-$24 range if we get a VERY overdue oversold rally. Or at the very least that rotation from best of breed to junk that happens every 6-10 weeks. We are also VERY overdue in that department - granted it is hard to buy items simply on "they are due to have shorts cover their positions" and that's all this trade really is. This is the proverbial falling knife with zero support but I actually believe the risk/reward is more on my side - at this point I am not sure who is left to sell financials... and when they bounce there will be a lot of short covering to help them along. Ultra Financial (UYG) is a 3.7% stake.

We'll switch back to SKF exposure on any meaningful bounce....

Again a "crash" would make any long position moot, but that's an outlier probability - not something to count on, so hard to build a portfolio based on an assumption something that happens every 15-20 years is going to happen this or next week. But I do think Thursday's unemployment report will push us strongly either up or down - so we'll either have a potential crack through that support we've been bouncing along the past few days or our oversold bounce...

Long Ultra Financial, Ultrashort Finanical in fund; long Ultra Financial in personal account


For Sale by Owner: 2000 Sq Foot Home in Florida - Owner thrown In as Bonus

TweetThis
Wonders never cease in this very tough real estate market ;)
  • She's tried night clubs and online dating sites, but now a 42-year-old single mother is looking for love where everyone else's heart is breaking — the real estate market.
  • After a year of trying to sell her four-bedroom home and eight years of singledom, Deven Trabosh is offering her South Florida home and a shot at marrying her on the Internet.
  • "I figured let's combine the ad because I'm looking for love and I'm looking to sell the house," said Trabosh, a Barbie-esque blonde who teeters around the nearly 2,000 square-foot house in patent leather heels.
  • "Marry a Princess Lost in America," Trabosh wrote in the ads she posted on eBay and Craigslist last week. She describes a life of romance and travel and a home decorated with vaulted ceilings, upgraded tile and a soaking tub in a gated community with a pool and tennis courts.
  • "I'm struggling...I don't want to lose my house and I want to find somebody," said Trabosh, who changed her name in the ad to Traboscia to keep people from finding her in the phone book. "So I came up with this dream plan because I've always dreamt about being a fairytale princess."
  • She listed the home for $340,000 on a sell-it-yourself web site, but upped the price, adding a $500,000 shipping fee to include her companionship on eBay. (I always wondered what the price of love was - apparently half a million)
  • Trabosh hasn't received any serious offers, but says she's had nearly 500 responses, mostly positive, including one from Ottie of Surrey, England, who e-mailed to say, "You are offering the perfect life with the perfect American princess."
  • "I'm not selling myself. I'm selling love...to meet that true love," Trabosh says. "Of course, it's gonna take more chemistry and connection. It's not going to be instantaneous that I'm just going to be automatically for sale...it's a package deal for true love."
  • Ideally, Trabosh hopes a European man will close the deal and says she's willing to move overseas. (see the power of the strong Euro? - oh I could not resist the pun)

Could be Panic Time

TweetThis
Oh what a treacherous beast this market - teasing the "it's so oversold, there must be a bounce" crowd into buying this morning and then laying the hammer down. Remember a week ago we said this could be the near term fate for commodities... they are FINALLY showing signs of breaking down.

Anyhow the puke indicators should be starting soon enough. What is the puke indicator? When you want to puke when you look at your portfolio. Perhaps I should start a poll and when we get 50 "yes, I feel like puking" votes it's time to get bullish. ;)

Strap on the crash helmets, remember we want to simply survive these type of things and not end up like this fella ->. Below S&P 1260 takes out that March "Bear Stearns" morning low (1275 is the main low, but the panic selling took us 15 points lower). That's where we are now and SHOULD have at least a cursory bounce from there. So that provides the last morsel of support quite a while.

After that? March 2006 lows - S&P 1225. Nearly 2.5 years of gains wasted away. (1170 -> October 2005 is next)


As GM Goes, So Goes the Nation

TweetThis
I know no one cares about the automakers anymore - I mean that only affects people in Michigan and Ohio - who needs em! I mean we got rid of 95% of our steel industry in the 70s and 80s and that's turned out awesome! What's another old fashioned industry. More bars, more restaurants, more hospitals, more empty homes, more government jobs, more Abercrombie's (ANF)! That's what we need for a thriving economy!

The damage below is startling - let me show you a 1 year chart of General Motors (GM) and Ford (F) - they look like they have been issuing subprime loans the past 5 years.





Let me tell you General Motors (GM) has now lost 90% of its value in under a decade.

Let me be the first not to defend management (lack of vision) or the unions (lack of flexibility), but ask you what it means when in the past we said "As GM Goes, So Goes the Nation" but today we see Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) has a higher market valuation (by $1 Billion) than General Motors. In our "new age" service economy based on American over consuming and the Federal Reserve printing more dollars to create the appearance of "wealth" - that tells you everything you need to know about the direction of the country.

Interesting times indeed.

EDIT: You know things are bad when even Toyota (TM) is reporting 21% year over year drops in monthly sales. Not to worry though the government reports show no recession and the American consumer is fine - remember that huge 1.8% spike in spending last week (all stolen from your grandchildren via rebate checks?) All fine - nothing to see here, move along - second half recovery starts today.

No positions

Bookkeeping: Cutting Apple (AAPL)

TweetThis
This is purely a technical trade. Also I believe too many people are clinging to technology stocks as a 'safer' haven since they do not have exposure to oil. But they have exposure to the consumer and producer who has exposure to oil. Duh.

Apple (AAPL) - bouncing here to $173 range which is the 50 day moving average. We'd like to buy if it can break through that level, of if it pulls back substantially (to where it was this morning - wow down to $164, quite a bounce) Cutting this position in half down to 0.7% of holdings.



That chart of Google (GOOG) still strikes me as ominous and Google *is* tech nowadays. There is about a $60 gap that looks to be filled there - again I think this could be a wonderful short (I can't do it but I would if I could) Set that stop loss over $540 and a wonderful low risk trade awaits - current price is $530.



This is one of those times, franky, I have no feel for where the market could go. 50/50 either way. I took a quick glance at some sites I read and almost everyone is anticipating an oversold bounce. That makes me nervous - when everyone assumes something is happening, generally the market will go the other way. We shall see. Unfortunately no matter what happens between now and Thursday 8:30 AM, it will be sort of a sideshow to the knee jerk reaction the unemployment rate will cause. So placing serious bets either way is akin go going to Vegas. I'd rather err on the side of caution, and lose some potential upside for now.

Long Apple in fund; no personal positions

Bookkeeping: Cutting some Generals

TweetThis
I've been so far incorrect about any serious weakness in the generals, but I still will cling to the belief until proven otherwise that in a full blown correction, no one can feel safe. Including those hiding in the generals - namely coal and fertilizer and natural gas. So far each time I have cut back on these anticipating such a selloff, the institutions have been loading up. So I've been on the wrong side of the trade. But I'm going to try it once again and cut back exposure a bit (obviously yesterday morning when they spiked would of been a better time) but with the S&P 500 now below 1275, and still no real fear in the market I am worried they will find their time in the woodshed - but again, I've been wrong on this for the past few weeks.
  1. Fertilizer: Mosaic (MOS) down to 1.6% stake, Potash (POT) down to 1.5% stake, CF Industries (CF) down to 1.2% stake, Intrepid Potash (IPI) down to 0.7%
  2. Coal: Alpha Natural Resources (ANR) down to 1.5% stake, Massey Energy (MEE) down to 1.3% stake, Arch Coal (ACI) down to 1.1% stake
  3. Atwood Oceanics (ATW) - great chart - but simply worried about the market - down to 1.3% stake
  4. Natural Gas: Encore Acquisition (EAC) which we started last week and have a quick near 10% gain, down to 1.0% stake, Cabot Oil & Gas (COG) down to 0.6% stake
I've increased short exposure across the board.

I will assume this is a great fake out, and the people will jump back into the generals on this minor selloff, and I'll be wrong (again) - selling off some of my most favorite names sort of flies into the face of logic, but with some of these companies nowhere near any chart support and yet to face any adversity during a month the markets sold down nearly 10%, I am being cautious. Just showing you what I'm doing, and why - and we'll monitor from there. As I type this of course the market is drifting back up to 1276... (see it did not take long for that head fake to play out) Tricky market right now. Very tricky. I can make a case for a nice oversold 5% bounce here or a traumatic selloff - so it is very difficult to have any game plan for the near term since these are completely different outcomes and both are probable.

Long all names mentioned in fund; long Mosaic, Alpha Natural Resources in personal account

Reuters: Factories Hit Worldwide as Commodity Prices Soar

TweetThis
As always, inflation is a tax on all things - producers and consumers. [Jun 24: Dow Chemical (DOW) CEO Raises Prices for 2nd Time in 2 Months]

As always, until the United States powers that be recognize that their reports are complete trash and that indeed inflation is surging at far greater levels than their reports indicate, we will still be in denial.

As always, the facts refute everything the powers that be say.
  • Soaring commodity costs are denting manufacturing activity in Asia and Europe and the outlook looks bleak as new orders drop off in the face of rising prices, surveys showed on Tuesday.
  • Manufacturing activity in the euro zone contracted in June for the first time in three years while business confidence in Asia's largest export markets is buckling and output has likely contracted further in the United States.
  • Factories worldwide have struggled in the face of soaring raw material and energy costs -- oil hit over $143 a barrel on Monday.
  • Meanwhile, the Bank of Japan's tankan corporate index of big manufacturers' sentiment dropped to plus 5, from 11 in March, showing their mood has not been darker since 2003. Even Japanese manufacturers, which have long struggled to pass on costs, pushed up prices in the last quarter, although not fast enough to offset a rise in costs and to keep profits growing, the tankan showed. "That could indicate more inflationary pressures in the pipeline," said Magnus Prim, chief Asia currency strategist at SEB in Singapore. "They're getting squeezed on the profit side and see no alternative but to pass on price increases."
  • The picture of slowing growth and spiraling prices applied to Britain too. The UK's manufacturing sector saw output and new orders fall at their fastest rate in almost a decade. But there was no let-up in inflationary pressures with input costs and output prices both rising at the fastest rate since the series began.
  • China and India are battling their fastest inflation this decade. (long predicted in the blog)
  • Chinese firms warned they were passing rising costs on to consumers, which could hurt domestic demand, and struggling to export because of weak global markets, two PMI surveys showed. The measure for input prices paid by China's manufacturers rose to its highest since the PMI survey was launched in 2005. Domestic and export orders fell to their lowest since January.
  • A separately published PMI from brokerage CLSA showed output prices rose at their fastest pace in four years.
Remember, it is all about China. In the first weeks of the blog, I was typing about this situation that would be upon us [Aug 19: Interesting Chinese Article] I wrote:

Interesting to see this inflation scenario literally exploding across the country. I always find the story of China interesting because it is poised to be a world superpower on demographics alone. However, I read even 2 years ago that China is starting to become 'expensive' for manufacturers, and now companies are looking for the next cheapest place, i.e. Vietnam. Which is quite amazing. I remember all the NAFTA talk in the 90s and how companies were moving to Mexico en masse for low cost labor - $2.50 or so in US wages. Within a decade much of those factory towns are now ghost towns, as that capital moved to Asia. Can we imagine a time in 15 years when China is too expensive? It could happen. Especially with the need to add more layers of safety, what with toothpaste, dog food, lead in toys, etc etc etc.

So this has been coming to pass the past half years. The Wall Street Journal spoke about it yesterday. I've teased many times the world's multinationals will soon find Chinese making 60 cents an hour (up from 20 cents an hour) as unreasonable and run off to the next place to exploit labor - be it Vietnam, Indonesia or wherever. Aside from the strengthening yuan, minor things like "safety" or "quality control" (dog food anyone?) are obvious culprits that would force prices for Chinese goods to go up, from the time when it was a Wild Wild West atmosphere and things like safety/quality control mattered little.


  • But the economy of sweater town is unraveling, providing an early sign that China's manufacturing sector may be entering middle age. At the industry's height in recent years, more than half of Honghe's 100,000 residents worked in 100 factories and 8,000 shops that knitted, dyed, packaged and shipped some 200 million sweaters a year. The local government says the enterprises brought in $650 million a year in revenue.
  • Now many exporters and workshops here have shut their doors. Others, their work floors partly idle, are cutting costs. Some of the migrant workers who came here for jobs are returning home.
  • Manufacturers say their profits have dwindled as they pay out more for raw materials and energy. China's strengthening currency has made Honghe's products more expensive for important markets such as the U.S., where the price of Chinese goods surged a record 4.6% in May from the previous year, according to the U.S. Commerce Department.
  • Beijing, too, has contributed to the squeeze: Companies say the government's tougher protection for workers and the environment has made it more expensive to do business.
  • Manufacturers of low-cost products have been a key engine of China's economic miracle, helping to turn the country into the world's No. 2 exporter after Germany. For years, these companies continued to grow by expanding their volumes and trimming margins to undercut the competition. As material and labor costs rise and China's currency strengthens, these manufacturers are among the least able to absorb the costs.
  • The transformation is most apparent in the boomtowns that tied their fortunes to making one product cheaply, from Guangdong province in the south to Honghe's environs in the Yangtze River Delta. Many of these manufacturing centers have seen hundreds if not thousands of factories and workshops close in recent months, industry executives say. (that can't be a good thing for the "China miracle")
  • While painful, such difficulties could usher in a more mature phase of China's economic development. The country's sweater industry, like many others, is arguably overbuilt: Honghe is one of at least six Chinese cities claiming to produce more than 100 million sweaters annually. In such low-cost sectors, analysts predict a coming wave of consolidation that could boost efficiency. They say companies will also be forced to innovate so they can compete on factors other than price.
  • China, of course, is sure to remain an export powerhouse for many years. Export figures from China remain strong because the country also supplies industrial machinery and other higher-value products that are less vulnerable to factors such as rising wages. Plus, the country's roads and ports, and its spectrum of suppliers and businesses that support manufacturers, are a draw that few other developing countries can match.
  • But with rising costs weakening China's appeal as a manufacturing location, some 17% said they would shift at least some operations to other low-cost countries, like India and Vietnam.
This is a very long story in the WSJ and I encourage you to read the rest. As an American, what matters most to you is what we've been pointing out each month in the monthly import report - prices are skyrocketing. [Jun 12: Import Prices Continue to Breech New Records] China used to be the great deflationary blanket - but as they progress up the world food chain that has changed. Most people are missing this.

[February 28: China Raising Minimum Wage]
[February 21: Rising Factory Costs Erode China's Edge]
[February 3: China's Inflation Hits American Price Tags]

Monthly Performance

TweetThis
Some readers have asked to start updating performance data on a monthly basis in addition to the yearly/weekly data we normally post. So I've started doing this the past 2 months. Updated results below

(click to enlarge)



RTG = Rising Tide Growth

LATimes: Life at $200 Oil

TweetThis
An interesting story in the LATimes regarding life with oil $200 (I've already described many of these shifts happening within the blog - as always, we are early) Note - stories like this get me even more bearish on the near term for "energy". While I do believe the longer term trend is up, I would expect a quite sizeable correction in the coming quarter(s) - once oil really turns, all parabolic type reversals generally do not end well. (see Japan 1980s, see NASDAQ, see housing, see China) If however, I am wrong (never happens!) here are some possibilities.... I do believe for those of us who live in the Midwest and Northeast who went through that massive electricity outage for a few days in the middle of the decade - we won't really realize how dependent we are on something until it is taken away (or in this case, we're in many ways priced out of it)

Stories such as this are where I form some longer term macro views - if not for the fact we've already thought about just of all of it already ;)
  • The more expensive oil gets, the more Katherine Carver's life shrinks. She's given up RV trips. She stays home most weekends. She's scrapped her twice-a-month volunteer stint at a Malibu wildlife refuge -- the trek from her home in Palmdale just got too expensive.
  • How much higher would fuel prices have to go before she quit her job? Already, the 170-mile round-trip commute to her job with Los Angeles County Child Support Services in Commerce is costing her close to $1,000 a month -- a fifth of her salary.
  • "You'd have massive changes going on throughout the economy," said Robert Wescott, president of Keybridge Research, a Washington economic analysis firm. "Some activities are just plain going to be shut down."
  • $200 oil would drive up the price of a broad spectrum of products: Insecticides and hand lotions, cosmetics and food preservatives, shaving cream and rubber cement, plastic bottles and crayons -- all have ingredients derived from oil.
Consumers
  • With every penny hike in the price of gas costing American consumers about $1 billion a year, sharply higher pump prices would lead to "significant bankruptcies and store closings,"
  • If any retailers would benefit, it would be those on the Internet. (Amazon.com (AMZN))?
  • Restaurant operators such as Brinker International, which owns the Chili's and Romano's Macaroni Grill chains, are suffering and are likely to struggle even more as consumers look for ways to reduce spending. Fast-food chains wouldn't be immune, experts say, although they might fare better as families downscale their dining choices. (we were on this thesis early last fall - see Sept 19: Tough Times for Restaurants?)
  • Vehicle sales, too, would probably continue to tank. (last year we called for 2008 to be the worst auto sales year since the early 80s - so far so good)
  • Nationwide, $200 oil and $7 gasoline would force Americans to take 10 million vehicles off the roads over the next four years, Jeff Rubin, chief economist at CIBC World Markets, wrote in a recent report.
  • As for the state's beleaguered housing market, prices are falling faster in areas requiring long commutes - than in neighborhoods closer to job centers. (we've been highlighting this - how the urban will be the new core, and the suburbs will be either the blighted area or for very well off)
Transportation
  • Workers stuck with long commutes and gas-guzzling cars would look increasingly to public transit, experts say. (problem is most Americans cannot get to public transportation)
  • But a huge influx of riders would strain aspects of the system, MTA says, noting that many buses are overcrowded at rush hour now. (well all you need to do is raise taxes and get more revenue - what's that? Oh never mind)
  • Travelers can also expect much fuller airplanes and much more expensive flights -- when they're available at all. (see April 8: Now on to Airline Inflation)
Trade
  • The fee increases on the ferry would be nothing compared with the added cost of transoceanic shipping if oil goes to $200. Some experts say high energy costs are altering global trade and slowing the pace of globalization. (this is a theme I am working on with some new ideas. If indeed crude does get to $200 within the next 18-36 months and stays there - we have some new investing themes to go after; and lose some others)
  • "To put things in perspective, today's extra shipping cost from East Asia is the equivalent of imposing a 9% tariff on East Asian goods entering North America," said Rubin of CIBC World Markets. "At $200 per barrel, the tariff equivalent rate will rise to 15%."
  • Local distribution patterns could change too. Stephen Gaddis, chief executive of Pacific Cheese Co., a Hayward, Calif., cheese processing and packaging firm, thinks high fuel prices will push restaurants, retailers and food manufacturers to look for suppliers closer to their operations.
  • In the near future, however, consumers can expect to pay for the higher cost of producing food and moving it around the country, say food executives, farmers and economists.
The Workplace
  • Dramatically higher transportation costs would usher in an era of virtual mobility, or zero mobility, for many workers.
  • Videoconferencing, touted as "the next big thing" for years, would finally have its day, thanks to improved technology and a desperation to cut corporate travel budgets. But Gilligan of USC noted that lower-income workers tend to be in jobs that don't favor telecommuting, such as retail and food service.
Upsides
  • It wouldn't all be bad, of course. Some industries could boom, providing jobs and tax dollars. California has seen a jump in drilling activity as oil companies try to extract more crude from the state's fields. Regulators expect a record 4,000 wells to be drilled in the state this year.
  • Tourist attractions may also see an upswing in local business as families look for less-expensive vacation alternatives close to home.
  • And movies, a staple of the local economy, may prosper as Americans seek escapism and a (relatively) cheap night out.
Those are some weak upsides, but hey I need to show both sides of the story...

Monday, June 30, 2008

An Interesting Way to Play Global Warming - Carbon Credits? iPath Global Carbon ETN (GRN)

TweetThis
There has been a literal avalanche of new ETFs and ETNs the past year, and even the past quarter - especially of the commodity kind. Most of which are uninteresting to me, but a few that have piqued my interest - I am probably missing others simply because so many seem to be coming out by the week/month. I have a few I am trying to write longer pieces on but have not had the time to devote to do them justice, but one ETN I wanted to point out is iPath Global Carbon ETN (GRN). And instead of recreating the wheel, I'll lean on a nice summary by Roger Nusbaum who specializes in ETFs/ETNs over at TheStreet.com. Myself? I have no idea how these will trade so I wouldn't touch them with a 10 foot pole, but maybe in a year from now if we see how the market develops and the ETN trades it might be something to revisit.
  • The most interesting might be the iPath Global Carbon ETN(GRN ), a way to access the carbon trading market. GRN tracks something called the Barclays Capital Global Carbon Index Total Return. It will have a 0.75% annual fee and will not pay out any interest.
  • Barclays provides a report on the iPath Web site -- and even if you have no interest in GRN for an investment, learning about the greenhouse gas issue is important.
  • There is an increase in greenhouse gas emissions stemming from greater use of fuels like oil and coal in the running of businesses and other entities around the world. One solution to this problem is to tax (sort of) companies that exceed pollution allowances and reward companies that do not.
  • The rules for this stem from the Kyoto Protocol. Companies must buy carbon credits in the open market to "pay" for the excess pollution, which is pollution beyond specified allowances. Carbon credits can be bought from companies that do not exceed their pollution limits, or from speculators in the open market.
  • GRN strikes me as the first of its kind. As opposed to providing access to a stock market or a commodity, it instead offers exposure to a real world cost of doing business globally. As such, it seems like a real candidate for having a very low correlation to equities.
  • GRN should be expected to be very volatile. Because this is a first-to-market type of product, it makes sense to give GRN some time to let it prove that it can in fact be a proxy for the carbon market.
  • Now to bring in a little politics, people who do believe global warming is a problem might be inclined to view GRN as a one-way trade. The folks who are not concerned about global warming would view this is a poor investment.
  • Even if the skeptics are right about the importance, it would seem that news flow and awareness will only increase, which provides a tailwind -- but not a one-way trade -- for all carbon indices.
  • One last thing: GRN is a debt obligation of Barclays PLC (BCS), the same Barclays whose stock price is down 40% year to date. I think a failure of Barclays is extremely unlikely, but anyone considering one of the iPath ETNs needs to follow the story.
No position

Who Says Indexes are Not Performance Chasers?

TweetThis
This really is beginning to remind me of the late 90s and technology when every index was in a hurry to stuff itself with tech stocks. Fresh off two of our holdings (natural gas and coal) being added to the S&P 500 [Jun 13: Cabot Oil & Gas (COG) and Massey Energy (MEE) Added to S&P 500] the Russell 1000 added "net" 8 energy companies, including 3 of our holdings - Alpha Natural Resources (ANR), Atwood Oceanics (ATW), and newly minted position Encore Acquisition (EAC). Another company Petrohawk Energy (HK) is one of the hottest stocks in the market as well. The Russell 1000, due to median size of companies we own, is what we mostly measure ourself against.
  • Ten companies in the "other energy" sector, which encompasses energy companies not considered integrated oil companies, are being to be added to the Russell 1000 in this year's reconstitution of the large-stock index, while 2 in the sector are being removed.
  • Alpha Natural Resources., Atwood Oceanics Inc., Encore Acquisition Co., Exterran Holdings Inc., Hercules Offshore Inc., Mariner Energy Inc., Oil States International Inc., Petrohawk Energy Corp. and Whiting Petroleum Corp. were added to the Russell 1000, all moving up from the small-stock Russell 2000.
  • Cheniere Energy Inc. and Western Refining Inc. were removed from the large-cap index and moved to the Russell 2000.
  • Tacoma, Wash.-based Russell Investments realigns the Russell 3000 index once per year, tracking what it maintains is 99 percent of the U.S. equity market. That index is then broken down to 26 smaller indexes, including the widely watched Russell 1000 index of large capitalization stocks.
Long Alpha Natural Resources, Atwood Oceanics, Encore Acquisition, Massey Energy, Cabot Oil & Gas in fund; long Alpha Natural Resources in personal account

Listen to the Companies; not the Government Reports - Brunswick Corp (BC) & Smithfield Foods (SFD)

TweetThis
I have no idea what the market will be doing today, this week, this month, or this year. I have been saying the real economy is in serious trouble, and that was stated under an impression oil would be at $90-$110 or so. What we have now is ever more frightful. The market has been and continues to be in denial; I have pointed this out repeatedly even in the face of conventional wisdom as the market raced to new highs in fall 2007. I continue to stress most traders on Wall Street have been conditioned to corporate led recessions - not consumer led. This is the first consumer led recession since the late 70s/early 80s and it appears most market participants are not students of history. We still live in denial - only now in inflation. Inflation is a tax on all things - consumers and producers.

I outlined in mid April a theme I've been repeating since blog inception - avoid the (bottom 80%) U.S. consumer and his discretionary income stream; it is disappearing. Stock tied to said consumer, will sometimes bounce around earnings reports because instead of "putrid" earnings, they report "horrid" numbers. And since horrid is "better than expected" versus putrid - a bunch of shorts get squeezed and the stock rises 20% instantly. And bulls clap gleefully that the American consumer is back, and the "sign of strength" of the stock is a clear signal that the "market knows more than we do". Ignore these pundits. They live in a fantasy world. Once the shorts are chased out of a stock, the spike is (in 95% of cases) over, and the stocks begin a drift down. This will continue. For a long time. Consumer discretionary is going to be the new financials. In fact it has been nearly as bad as financials - but it's being under reported.

I used to write this early in the blog but I should start repeating it: regardless of income strata most surveys show 70% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. That's at $30K, $60K or $120K. They've lived in a relatively low inflationary environment for much of the latter 80s to early 00s. When that changed they had their house ATM as their piggy bank to supplement their paycheck. Now we live in a high inflation world and we're running out of ATMs. That doesn't spell months of pain and then recovery - nor quarters. It's going to be years. It is worth repeating those points for newer readers, and I will post the growing evidence (which is almost contradictory by 180 degrees to the spin in government reports) in the bottom of this post.

I cannot continue to stress enough how wrong analysts are on 2008 estimates and any company with focus on the US consumer is simply going to be blown apart in due time - if not this earnings season - then in the future. We are told daily how "cheap" these stocks are; this is based on the fictional body of work called "analysts 2008 estimates". Don't believe the hype. The subprime nation (us) is in trouble. Consumers make 70% of GDP. Its a consumption culture where the consumer is being drowned in negative wealth effect from housing, inflation from the Federal Reserve/global forces, and underemployment if not outright unemployment. [Apr 2: The Underemployment Rate is Rising] It is bad out there in the bottom 60% and it's creeping up to the formerly immune 20-40 percentile as well. So now it "matters" because that starts cutting into the bottom part of CNBC's audience. It is the perfect storm and I will utter the most dangerous words a financial commentator can ever utter - it *IS* different this time. Or at least it's certainly not like it's been in a long time...

People were asking me for individual names for shorts - I continue to stress the same themes I've stated since last summer - anything consumer related or based on American conspicuous consumption - it will all go. I was looking at a chart of Whole Foods (WFMI) and that's a perfect candidate - its held up "ok" because it relies on the upper middle class who can afford to pay $7.00 for organic milk. Well, when economics start to hit, people are going to have to stop being so "healthy" and buy what they can afford. That's just reality. Hence this looks like the prototypical short. As is Harley Davidson (HOG) [Jan 25: I Can't Believe this Pig...err HOG was up Today] [Sep 7: More Retail Tells? Harley Davidson and Office Depot], as is just about every restaurant in America [Sep 19: Tough Times Ahead? Restaurants] - even magical Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), as if just about every retailer in America ex-Walmart (WMT), etc. These stocks bounce every time the bulls pass their... well bull... that the consumer will be back any moment now and just "trust us" because in 6 months they'll be back in the malls spending like mad. Just. Plain. Wrong. These are going to be shorts for a long time. It won't be so easy as when I first called it out in early fall because we were still in the "no recession at all" camp, and the stocks had just began to weaken from much much higher levels. Now you have to short in smaller time frames, realizing dead cat bounces occur every 3-5 weeks as a "hopeful rally" will ensue. At which point, once it tuckers itself out - you short again. Keep repeating until CNBC finally tells us "we're heading into a deep, long recession" - and then you'll probably want to go long since the bottom will be in.

Simple as that. Next to go on the food chain will be entertainment - think casinos - Wynn (WYNN), Las Vegas Sands (LVS), MGM (MGM) - it is all going to suffer [Nov 1: A Top in Casino Names? Wynn and Las Vegas Sands] - that's an "extra" you don't "need". Disney (DIS) will hold up ok due to our cheap US peso bringing in foreigners but regional amusement parks without that international name recognition are going to suffer the same fate. Sorry to sound alarmist but this is the coming reality of a strapped, indebted US consumer whose real wages have been pummeled for years (this has not suddenly happened 18 months ago; it's just now catching up to us without the house ATM to hide the pain), and now is taking it on the chin with the Fed policy to devalue their currency to the tune of 1:5 ratio. Each dollar they now own becomes even more worthless.

So when you ask for specific names from me - its simple - what can you do without? What would you give up first, second, and third as your budget closes in on you? What will you sacrifice to pay for food, gasoline, heating, and air conditioning? Whatever you will skip on - short that stock each time the "early cycle" proponents run them up for a 5-7 day cycle, on wishful thinking. Even cheap holey shoes that cost half a ticket to a professional ballgame are seeing the pullback. The only people immune and the only products immune are those catering to the top 1% - Porsche yes - Ford (F) no. 60' yacht - yes. 22' Sea Ray powerboat - no. Avoid the "no's" which frankly is almost everything facing the domestic consumer. We're heading into a long, drawn out recession... I've said it since last summer and as each month/week/quarter passes more denial will turn into acceptance and more earning cuts will have to happen across the board. The people in denial rely on government reports, which are for the most part another pile of fiction work.

So in the last paragraph of my April entry, I talked about boats as one example (the smaller ones, not the yachts that the upper 1% enjoy). I stumbled upon Brunswick Corp (BC) which ironically one of our holdings, Cabot Oil & Gas (COG) just replaced in the S&P 500. This is a perfect "pooring of America" play as it hits a 17 year low (that's nothing, General Motors (GM) is at a 53 year low). But just as we had a positive multiplier effect from spending over our heads in a consumer driven economy, so will the opposite happen - as shops/plants close, people are let go, as they are let go, they cannot spend, which leads to more shops/plants closing - it is vicious. Just as it was virtuous on the way up - but much of it the past decade has been based on a fantasy of cheap dollars (printed by the bushel) and "if you have a pulse, you deserve credit". That's changing. Quick. Toss in this "we're in denial that there is no" inflation, and it's even more devastating. Let's see this cycle play out in just this one press release.
  • Brunswick Corporation (NYSE: BC - News) announced today a set of comprehensive actions to resize the company to improve profitability during the current downturn in the U.S. marine market, including actions to reduce its fixed-cost structure by $300 million versus 2007 spending levels.
  • "Retail unit sales of power boats in the United States have been in decline since late 2005; however, the rate of decline has been accelerating," McCoy added. "Industry retail unit sales were down 13 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007 and down 21 percent in the first quarter of 2008 compared with the respective year-ago quarters. Further, these reductions were recorded off of an already low base. Total unit sales of power boats in the United States in 2007 were at their lowest in more than 40 years."
  • "An uncertain economy, high fuel and food prices, slumping home sales and values, rising unemployment and other factors continue to erode U.S. consumers' confidence and are reducing their ability and desire to purchase discretionary items such as boats, and billiards tables and fitness equipment for their homes.
  • Brunswick stated that its $300 million cost savings target will be achieved in part by further shrinking its North American manufacturing footprint. The company plans to have 17 or fewer boat plants by the end of 2009, compared with the 29 it had in 2007. (read: job losses) This will require the closure of four plants in addition to eight plant closures already completed or announced.
  • A reduction in production rates also results, unfortunately, in the need for fewer workers." The company said that it had notified employees today that it would be reducing its hourly and salaried work force at certain of its marine plants by 1,000. Further work force reductions of approximately 1,000 hourly and 700 salaried employees across the company's marine business units and staff functions are contemplated as additional plant closures and consolidations and other cost-cutting measures are completed. (that's 1000 newly minted Walmart/Costco/Big Lots workers, with another 1700 coming)
So in our government reports these people will magically appear in new healthcare jobs, new government jobs, and new "we cannot measure it, but we will create a new category called birth/death model" jobs. And we'll smile at our mid 5% (up from 5%) unemployment rate, and ask what all the fuss is about - this is still low by historical rates. Listen to the companies, not the government reports.

On we go to completely unrelated Smithfield Foods (SFD), a company (and sector) I've followed since fund inception since its an agriculture tell. They produce a lot of hogs - that require feed. Feed that is skyrocketing. [Feb 28: Smithfield Foods Continues to Struggle with Input Costs] Friday? Down 20%. Inflation - tax on all things producer and consumer. Keep repeating it to yourself while Uncle Ben tells you that inflation will dissipate as the economy slows. He has been browbeating that into us for 9 months now. He is going to be right eventually - after a full scale global slowdown.
  • Shares of Smithfield Foods Inc. hit a five-year low on Friday, as an analyst downgraded the company and Standard & Poor's cut its ratings amid a difficult environment. Shares fell $4.34, or 17.6 percent, to $20.31, during late-day trading, after earlier reaching a low of $20.12. The last time the stock traded that low was January 2003.
  • D.A. Davidson analyst Tim Ramey wrote in a note to investors that record-high corn prices make it difficult to predict when Smithfield's hog farming losses will end.
  • Grain prices have soared in the past year, driven by world demand for wheat, corn, oats and soybeans to feed people and livestock. Furthermore, crops have also been battered by bad weather around the globe.
  • "The combination of reduced earnings, deteriorating credit quality, surging working capital and no foreseeable peak in corn prices points to share price risk to the $14 level," Ramey wrote. (but other than that, things are going well)
  • Meanwhile, S&P lowered its ratings on the Smithfield, Va.-based company, including lowering its corporate credit rating two notches to 'BB-' from 'BB+'. S&P said it expects the company will face a "challenging" operating environment in its hog production segment through most of fiscal 2009 due to higher feed costs and soft hog prices.
Or we can check on near peer Sanderson Farms (SAFM), another company we like to watch for the same reasons as Smithfield. Nothing major here except a planned plant will not be going into operation because of same inflationary costs. That's 1500 future jobs NOT created (hey perhaps they could of used the former boat employees) Tyson Foods (TSN)? Same problem.
  • Sanderson Farms Inc. late Thursday indefinitely delayed construction of a new chicken-processing plant, underscoring the repercussions of skyrocketing corn and soybean costs on the chicken and meat industries. Sanderson had planned to break ground on the $126.5 million plant this summer. When running at full capacity, the plant was expected to boost the company's current supply of chickens to the retail market by 1.25 million birds per week, or 6.7 million pounds.
  • Sanderson's decision comes a day after Tyson Foods Inc. pulled the plug on its meat-processing business in Canada.
  • The Kinston, N.C. site is also to include a feed mill and hatchery, employing 1,500 workers and contract deals with 130 regional chicken growers.
  • Sanderson, which doesn't hedge its feed grain costs, will likely being paying more for corn to feed its chicken flocks. It bought 90% of its corn for prices between $5.50 and $6 a bushel; those supplies run out at end of July. Corn for July delivery is trading around $7.54.
So you see, when the inflation reports, already massively incorrect, go another step forward and say, exclude food and energy as well... because really what effect do those have on the real economy... you can see why their "predictions" have been so completely wrong, time after time. When you live in the Twilight Zone - your predictions are just as zany.

This is just the consumer story - the next layer will be the local government story - those zany high prices in steel and petrol... combined with sagging government revenues from both real estate price deflation and lowered sales tax receipts are going to mean a lot of very bad things for state budgets. And cutbacks. Lots of cutbacks (forced) by legislatures that did not save for a rainy day. Because that is so unAmerican. Because as 70% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, I could guess 98% of governments do. And a new fiscal year begins in 24 hours. But that story that won't be hitting the mainstream until later in the year... probably by the time public schools start panicking.

It's going to be a very tough economy, and a stock pickers market for years to come. The days of throwing a dart and making money (I miss you 80s and 90s) are off to hibernation. Unfortunately the bubble allowed to form by Uncle Al in the housing market is going to make the NASDAQ tech bubble look like child's play. The reaches of this bubble are so much more pervasive.

If you want to know what is happening in the "real economy", listen to the companies; ignore the wizardry coming from behind the velvet curtain in Washington D.C.

Long iPath DJ Livestock ETN in fund, no personal position

Sunday, June 29, 2008

NYTimes: Hording Nations Drive Food Costs Ever Higher

TweetThis
The NYTimes to its credit is one of the few media outlets where the food crisis is even mentioned. They are doing a quality series on the subject dating back to the beginning of the year - if you are interested the articles can all be found here. As with all things (most) media has conveniently forgotten the crisis to move onto new subjects - after all, much like Iraq (which is barely mentioned on nightly news anymore - I mean all it is, is a war) - and New Orleans (hello, still a broken town once you leave the tourist areas), Americans cannot be bothered with the same old news and need new and exciting stimuli. We'll keep it on the front burner - so when the mainstream media find it interesting again you won't be surprised... we've been among the first on this beat [Jan 18: One Lonely Voice Agrees with me on Food Inflation]

Remember our long term thesis here - especially related to food: agflation, food protectionism (countries hording their own supplies to feed their own people), and then social unrest. The latest in the NYTimes series demonstrates the 2nd part of this chain is now playing out. I cannot stress enough how in many parts of the world, the % of income devoted to food is akin to your mortgage (rent) + car payment + energy costs... all combined into 1. Now imagine if those payments doubled/tripled. And then imagine how desperate you become since it's not about fueling your car but about feeding yourself and family. This is the reality for many on the globe. While we worry about "hording of Asian rice" at Costco. It's all relative.

What does a rational human do when said rational human believes higher prices (inflation) are ahead? One hordes.
  • At least 29 countries have sharply curbed food exports in recent months, to ensure that their own people have enough to eat, at affordable prices.
  • When it comes to rice, India, Vietnam, China and 11 other countries have limited or banned exports.
  • Fifteen countries, including Pakistan and Bolivia, have capped or halted wheat exports.
  • More than a dozen have limited corn exports.
  • The restrictions are making it harder for impoverished importing countries to afford the food they need. The export limits are forcing some of the most vulnerable people, those who rely on relief agencies, to go hungry.
  • And by increasing perceptions of shortages, the restrictions have led to hoarding around the world, by farmers, traders and consumers.
  • People are in a panic, so they are buying more and more — at least, those who have money are buying,” said Conching Vasquez, a 56-year-old rice vendor who sat one recent morning among piles of rice at her large stall in Los Baños, in the Philippines, the world’s largest rice importer.
  • Now, with Australia’s farm sector crippled by drought and Argentina suffering a series of strikes and other disruptions, the world is increasingly dependent on a handful of countries like Thailand, Brazil, Canada and the United States that are still exporting large quantities of food.
  • Powerful lobbies in affluent countries across the northern hemisphere, from Japan to Western Europe to the United States, have long protected farmers in ways factory workers in Detroit could only dream of.
  • Raises age old questions - Is it best to specialize in whatever food grows best in a country’s soil, and trade it for all other food needs — or even, perhaps, specialize in services or manufacturing, and trade those for food?
  • Or is it best to seek self-sufficiency in every type of food that will, weather permitting, grow within a country’s borders?
  • “If every country in the world decided it wanted to produce its own food for consumption,” Ms. Schwab said, “there would be less food in the world, and more people would be hungry.”
  • From Indonesia to West Africa to the Caribbean and Central America, have frequently cut farm assistance programs and lowered tariffs to balance budgets and avoid charging high prices to urban consumers. But they poor countrieshave found that their farmers cannot compete with imports from rich countries — imports that are heavily subsidized.
  • As a result, steps that could have taken place decades ago, resulting in more food for the world today, were abandoned. These included changes like irrigation schemes and new crop varieties.
  • India and other countries, as well as some nonprofit groups, are quick to point out that economic arguments — that countries specialize in the production of whatever they can make most efficiently — are unconvincing, as long as rich countries heavily subsidize their farmers.
[Apr 14: WSJ - Food Inflation, Riots Spark Worries for World Leaders]
[Mar 31: Reuters - Tensions Rise as World Faces Short Rations]
[Apr 21: The Economist - The New Face of Hunger]

Bookkeeping: Weekly Changes to Fund Positions Week 47

TweetThis
Week 47 Major Position Changes

Fund positions of 1.0% or greater can be found each week in the right margin of the blog, under the label cloud and recent comments areas; I highlight weekly the larger position changes.

Being a long only fund, via Marketocracy rules, the only hedges to the downside I have are cash or buying short ETFs. I cannot short individual equities.

To see historic weekly fund changes click here OR the label at the bottom of this entry entitled 'fund positions'.

Cash: 20.2% (vs 24.0% last week)
53 long bias: 64.6% (vs 54.7% last week)
9 short bias: 15.2% (vs 21.3% last week)

62 positions (vs 60 last week)
Additions: Encore Acquisition (EAC), A-Power Energy Generation Systems (APWR)
Removals: N/A

Top 10 positions = 23.7% of fund (vs 28.3% last week)
42 of the 62 positions are at least 1% of the fund's overall holdings (67%)

Major changes and weekly thoughts
It's been a very rough 2 weeks and a very rough June for the markets. Directionally, we stand at a make or break point, with the major indexes at January/March 2008 lows. We've now had 5 substantial selloffs since summer 2007, and the question is, will this selloff mimic the more conventional selloffs, or be more of a January 2008 event where huge drops were simply followed by further losses. No one has the answer, so we'll assess as we go - but January 2008 was a bit of an outlier event in the severity of the selloff without any bounce so probability says we go with a more typical sell off which would indicate some near term bounce in the offing. I've increased long exposure to the largest in quite a few weeks with that in mind. However, if these support levels from earlier in the year fail, we have to throw that thinking out the door and be flexible and ready to increase short exposure, and try to limit the damage.

Even if we do bounce the question is who bounces the most? Will be we get a rotational/short covering type of rally where the 'worst of breed' jumps the most? Or will people simply keep clinging to the same (tired) groups who are unrelenting in their move up. I don't have any idea and this is a tricky period so instead of guessing I've spread out my dollars into many different positions in various parts of the market (sectors) not knowing what the hedge fund computers will decide are the flavor of the day - old favorites or beaten down sludge. I could make a case for either. With that said, I've moved our short exposure from the typical "junk sectors" (retail/financial/real estate) more into favored sons and general indexes. If oil continues it's relentless move up, all bets are off. One mainstream indicator I do like to see and makes me a bit bullish is a lot of stock market news on the national evening news programs - by the time things hit Main Street we are generally ready for a bounce. That said, these are not normal times, and we have to be open for anything. People ask about a crash... well these do happen but it is hard to build a model around them since they are so infrequent - and it seems doubtful one could happen when so many people are now talking about it. Generally things (positive or negative) happen when the least amount of people are expecting it.

We have a short week ahead of us, with a lot of real money heading to the Hamptons early so we could have some volatile sessions ahead. Key above all else for market mood will be Thursday's unemployment report, which we ignore since it is so useless, but the market clings to like a blankie as incredibly important. Just walk around and see parking lots emptying, retail outlets struggling, auto/airline pummeled, housing in multi year depression and tell me in the face of that unemployment has risen by a measly half a percent. All based on the "export economy" (most of which we've outsourced the past 20 years), government jobs and healthcare jobs? Right. But since there is religious like zealotry to the government's numbers by the NYC traders we have to realize it moves markets. Since last month was such a big jump upward (5.0% to 5.5%) in the unemployment rate I would not be surprised to see if fall backwards to a lower rate as "adjustments" are made for "seasonal workers" and then we can clap like seals and drive the market back up as we head into our BBQ weekend. Last week was extremely tiring, at least on this end, so the short week will be appreciated to recharge from what has been a miserable month where every ounce of energy is expanded to try to lose "less" than average - and consider that a victory.

Below are the fund changes this week - the specific rationale for each of these major moves is explained in the weekly posts which can be accessed in the left margin of the blog under archives.

Some of the larger changes (chronologically) to the fund below:
  1. Monday we did little waiting for more fear to encroach on the market.
  2. Tuesday, we added a touch of Baidu.com (BIDU) as it fell to $305; the stock immediately bounces but faltered as the week wore on and the market degraded. One look at the Google (GOOG) chart and I feel very ominous about tech in general. I'd like to buy Baidu.com in scale at lower prices as indicated in the post.
  3. Also bought some Apple (AAPL) ahead of Research in Motion (RIMM) earnings as the safer way to play an earnings bounce - of course that bounce never came. Much like Baidu.com I'd like to add Apple in scale lower. This was a relatively incremental buy to replace some shares I had let go higher.
  4. Wednesday (and Tuesday) I was cutting WuXi Pharmatech (WX) after a huge 2 day spike. But the chart is holding up very well and if this market holds up this one could run and I might need to rebuy my stake. $19.50 is the 50 day moving average which it appears to be holding and a move to the mid $23s would seem in order if the general markets firm. We like to see such strength in the face of a horrid market.
  5. We added a 4th natural gas stake in Encore Acquisition (EAC) - aside from the kicker of a management willing to sell itself out, the stock is cheaper than the other 3 we have owned in this space. Our purchase was in the $70s and the stock was up nearly 10% from that point for the week.
  6. After I cut back some of our "global growth" stories, I was horrified to find homebuilder DR Horton (DHI) as the top long holding - thankfully the stock got some "rotational" love and we had a nice 2 day spike, into which I sold a portion as the stock ran into resistance - within 24 hours the stock had dropped 10%, so lo and behold we got those shares back.
  7. After our favorite uncle Ben refused to give the middle class a break by even making a cursory attempt to stop inflation (that does not exist in the US) and defend the dollar - we had to reverse our earlier call for a rotational move and get a bit more constructive on the same old commodity groups that continue to levitate. We lowered our exposure to the Ultrashorts in Oil-Gas and Basic Materials and lightened up some metals stocks that were approaching resistance, while adding a bit to agriculture commodities, fertilizer, and oil. By Friday this looked like a good move at least in the near term. I guess if there is no inflation, there is no reason to attempt to fight it. Thanks again Ben.
  8. Thursday morning, Perfect World (PWRD) was showing inordinate strength in a terrible market - holding up key resistance levels - I bought some but voiced doubts it could retain it's standing in such a bad market since nowhere in Perfect or World are the terms natural, gas, oil, coal, or fertilizer. This did show to be the case later in the day and we quickly reversed course. I'll be happy to add exposure on either strength ( a move over $26) or weakness (a move to lower $20s). We are in no man's land in the $25.
  9. Into the thick of Thursday's tremendous sell off I did begin layering in some buys, mostly in stocks I've cut back severely (0.5% or smaller stakes) on previous run ups.
  10. I did cut Ultrashort Financial (SKF) back to almost nil Thursday - we've had tremendous gains in this name and at some point this trade will reverse, if for nothing else than short covering and we'll want to steer clear of it. Financials have years of rough patch ahead of them (think technology in fall/winter 2000 - it was just getting started into its nuclear winter), but there will be vicious rallies along the way. If we do get an "Armageddon" sell off I am sure this instrument will appreciate but frankly so will just about any short instrument so we moved short exposure from this name to others.
  11. We did a few smaller transactions Friday morning. Almost added 2 solar names, but just am very antsy about this sector in which retail investors panic and drive the names 10% down in a heartbeat. But might be missing some quick upside as these stocks reverse on a dime and scream upward as well.
  12. We did add to the Atwood Oceanics (ATW) Friday on strength, after mentioning it earlier in the week.
  13. Last, we started a new position in Chinese energy play A-Power Energy Generation Systems (APWR), after a sizeable pullback in the past week, along with adding a bit to American Superconductor (AMSC). Much like the solar stocks I expect tremendous volatility in these names, as they are mostly the playground of the retail investor.
The above do not include the majority of my trades in my Ultrashorts which I am trading quite often as the market ebbs and flows.

CNBC: Merrill Lynch (MER) May Unload Blackrock (BLK) Stake to Raise Capital

TweetThis
Blackrock (BLK) broke down badly this week, with closes below its 200 day moving average for the first time since the worst of the March 08 selloff. I thought it was simply getting caught up in the "all things financial are evil" thinking, but with the huge volume spike Friday it appears the culprit is the fact Merrill Lynch (MER) is so desperate for cash it could be forced to sell off its Blackrock stake for capital. Keep in mind Merrill Lynch has been denying for months it needs anymore capital. (thanks to a reader for alerting me to this story)

Frankly this is going to create (is creating) one heck of a buying opportunity in a great franchise; and to boot Blackrock has first dibs at buying the portion Merrill will choose (if they do) to sell off. This is not something that signals a change in operations or opportunity for Blackrock, simply a unique exogenous event.
  • With his options limited, and time running out, Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain is now seriously considering selling all or part of the firm's 49 percent stake in money-management powerhouse BlackRock as a way to raise new capital, CNBC has learned.
  • People close to both say that Thain’s decision is just weeks away and is prompted, at least in part, by a recent chilly reception he received from another firm that Merrill holds a stake in, Bloomberg LP.
  • Like Bloomberg, Blackrock has first dibs on any sale of Merrill’s stake in the firm. As of now, Blackrock has received no formal offer by Thain to sell, nor is there a board meeting scheduled for a deal, according to people close to the firms.
  • But executives close to both firms say people at Blackrock believe Thain is inching closer to a sale of all or part of its stake, currently valued at around $10.5 billion, if Thain decides he needs to raise added capital. These same executives say the situation is fluid, and Thain’s plan could change.
  • Although no final decision has been made by Thain, he has told senior executives inside Merrill that if the company needs capital, he will try to sell assets like its Bloomberg and BlackRock stakes first, before selling shares and diluting stockholders even more.
  • Sources close to Merrill say Thain may not sell the entire chunk and even if he does, the two firms may still do business. Blackrock manages Merrill’s asset management business, and that relationship may stay in tact through some sort of partnership.
Long Blackrock in fund; no personal position