- More than half of all homeowners who had their loans modified to make the payments more affordable in the first half of the year are already in default again, banking regulators said Monday.
- The new data raise questions about whether government money may be better spent on creating jobs, rather than averting foreclosures, said John Reich, director of the federal Office of Thrift Supervision office at a housing industry forum sponsored by his agency. "I do have concerns about allocating federal resources" Reich said.
- Nearly 36% of borrowers were more than 30 days past due on the loan payment three months after their loan was modified and nearly 53% were more than 30 days late after six months, according to the OCC.
- "The results, I confess, were somewhat surprising, and not in a good way," Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan said in a speech in Washington, D.C. on Monday. Mr. Dugan said it wasn't clear whether the low success rate reflected the fact that the modifications weren't reducing monthly loan payments enough to be truly affordable, whether the mortgages were so badly underwritten that they weren't affordable, even with lower payments, or if both factors were at work.
The next round of modifications will be Fannie/Freddie led and be far more draconian - if you owe $250K on your mortgage, put nothing down and the house is now worth $170K, are late on your payments... POOF! MAGIC! The government will say you own $150K. The government will take the loss but not call it a loss (remember it's an investment that we'll all make money in the long run) and say you will be forced to share the profit on when you sell the house as "things return to normal in a few years" (what a dream). So in return for government generosity you have to give up some of the huge winnings you will make when you sell the home. So when you can sell the house for $200K in 2012, the government gets half the $50K gain and so do you! We all WIN in socialism!
Then when the house falls to $140K in 2010 we'll all look around and say that was a waste of money. But it's time to do a new program to help the homeowner in 2010! This time it will work - we'll move principal down to $100K! So you took the mortgage down out at $250K and put nothing in the house but the government essentially just gave you $150K since they have now valued the mortgage at $100K. Beautiful. But that's ok - our government pockets are endless. The message this sends to people who are playing by the rules is pathetic. Unless these new intiatives coming from Obama's team are air tight it's going to lead to many people who had been paying their mortgage to default as well so they too can be part of the government largess. Which is the irony of it all. The sucker who has been paying their mortgages? Nothing for them in this Ponzi scheme.
This is why it will be difficult to short the market effectively until the Obama news flow fades and the honeymoon is over. The level of government interference coming in the housing market is the next few months should be awe inspiring - interest rate buydowns, principal reductions, outright purchases of mortgages - it's all going to be on the table. I still think there is an outside chance of outright purchases of homes (to reduce supply on market) via federal funding to states. And Wall Street will cheer and whoop every moment of it - the nanny state has come to clean their mess. This will be socialism of the highest order that causes some of our European friends to drop their jaws at the things we are going to do.









3 comments:
Thought an intersting article about home loan reset in 2009.
http://tinyurl.com/4hoohu
I do not know why he was so surprised. The govt is trying to keep people in homes that they cannot possibly afford. These people need to be renters, not homeowners. The money saved from the difference between a house payment and a rent payment could be used more effectively, perhaps to (gasp) pay back debt!
nos,
thats the sick thing of it all - while it sucks for current homeowners (i'm one) to see values go down, it would be better for the society. Lower housing costs for all would allow more money to be spent elsewhere, or gasp "saved".
Propping up home prices is a bad idea - it should go where it should go, and it would allow to have a much lower cost for rent over their head. If in theory all prices in homes dropped 30% it would be a terrible 1x adjustment and then it would be a benefit for everyone.
We seem to have a policy the past 20 years or since Greenspan came on the scene where economic cycles are not allowed to happen anymore. Which leads to bigger fires.
It's as if the American people cannot be told the truth anymore (government statistics) nor allowed to suffer consequences of the business cycle. However, they can foot the bill for excesses.
PAssionate, I put a lot of posts like that last year and this last winter and spring - you can click on the "housing bust" label to see a bevy of warnings back in the day. It's old news. Plus, the government will stop it all and make all mortgage 4.5% fixed so please don't worry - the government is here to save you.
Post a Comment