Thursday, December 18, 2008

Luck Smiles Down

TweetThis
Well if this mutual fund thing doesn't work out, perhaps a swing trading newsletter will be the future.

Yesterday's purchase of Ultrashort Real Estate (SRS) in the mid $53s [Bookkeeping: Wish Me Luck], is now up 25% in 24 hours. I think we actually got the exact bottom but man, it's a hard way to make a buck (ulcer city). I'm going to take a bit off this position which has grown from 3.5%ish to 4.3%ish of portfolio in a day. It is one crazy animal and unless the market is in free fall it is hard to feel any confidence. I still love it as a hedge but until the retail bankruptcies start hitting the headlines people will apparently whistle past the REIT graveyard.

I'd like to stress to newer readers, I normally employ a core and edge strategy - hold core positions for a long time and trade around the edge - usually those trades are weeks or months in the making; something goes up 20% - you take a partial position off. But this crazy market has smashed timelines down to hours or at most days. We have done a lot of selling this week on the long side as many of our stocks have made gains in a few days (+20-30%+) that normally take 4-6 weeks, and cash is now up to roughly 48%. One day I hope to return to actual "investing" but in the interim we're morphing into much shorter term trading philosophies, and we'll try to make some sheckles while we keep much of our capital protected to the side and out of what has turned into a full blown (government back stopped) casino of nonsense.

As always, S&P 870, 840, and 820 are our lines in the sand. The only reason to be long is "all the cool kids are doing it" and "the fat guy in a red suit with the sack is showing up soon" and "Obama shall save us"

Next week (Christmas) and the week after (New Years) will be full of retail trading nonsense so I don't plan to read too much into anything, as volume will be light as the professionals are busy refinancing their $5.4 million apartments at 4.8% rates. (they always win don't they?) We'll stick heavily to the sideline with cash horde.

Below S&P 820 we are back to carnivorous bears - frankly based on what I'm thinking for 2009 for S&P 500 earnings, 900 is going to be very expensive based on PE multiple. Again, it's all about sentiment; the economic news shall be dreadful for many days to come. Bulls want to see a clearance over the 50 day moving average (S&P 940 and falling fast) These bulls, once they put down their Kool Aid, should be asking Santa (and Obama) why copper and oil are in free fall - despite a falling dollar, despite all the world's governments stimulating with billions/trillions of infrastructure plans - if the economy shall be recovering "in 6 months". Food for thought - if you are not a PhD designed computer algorithm.

Long Ultrashort Real Estate in fund and personal account

7 comments:

billman101289 said...

nice scalp mark!

billman101289 said...

BTW: what are your earnings for 2009 if you think S&P 900 is expensive?

I mean aren't earnings for 2008 in the 60s....by those alone 900 is expensive.

TraderMark said...

that should be easy to answer
almost all those S&P models are based on "better than what I think" 1st half and "2nd half recovery"

I don't have a number for each of the 500 companies so I have no idea what my number is. I know what the punditry thinks and I know what their numbers are, so if that is what they model, and I believe things are substantially worse than they do - obviously my earnings would be substantially worse. I don't have some spreadsheet where I modeled 500 companies of earnings.

billman101289 said...

Makes sense.

Look at retail, it was holding us up today IMO

I am waiting for retail to break down before we move lower.

The estimates are way too optimistic for retailers (as you mention)...especially with increased state taxes coming soon and credit cut off (the horror)

I remember the models said near $100 earnings for the S&P in 2009..lol it should be in the $50 maximum

ianmud said...

Earnings ... those are so old school. Many S&P companies won't have them for the year '09.

Guy M. Lerner said...

This is very true regarding copper and oil...they remain in a free fall....you would think that lower oil would be bullish for stocks but it isn't; you would think copper would be up if growth is going to be up but it isn't; then again we don't make anything in this country (except debt) that requires oil and copper. Got it!

billman101289 said...

Mark

I hope you know about this already, because you will be very angry if you didn't

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Goldman_Sachs_tax_rate_drops_to_1218.html

GS is avoiding taxes, yet gets TARP money...WTF

Post a Comment

Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix