As safety standards start to hit in China, many coal mines are closing (less supply) - and once more 80% of all Chinese electricity is coal. India is ramping; and even progressive Western countries trying to protect the environment, such as the UK are building coal plants. But again - those are fundamentals. We spoke about these things as coal stocks used to go up 7% every week, and I still speak about them - they have not changed. Only sentiment and hedge funds being blown up have.
Most important for the last 2-3 long term investors left in the world - as we've been writing; this credit contraction and lack of high enough prices is going to cause a lack of investment in the commodity complex - which will mean not enough supply and much higher prices in the future once the global economy just returns to neutral. If the global economy dare return to "growth" someday in the future - look out. For those that can look out past the "immediate" - this should be plainly obvious.
It appears other smart money is jumping in at these absurd valuations in coal.
- Billionaire investor George Soros, Citadel Investment Group LLC and T. Rowe Price Group Inc. are snapping up coal mining shares, taking advantage of the cheapest valuations in five years as demand for electricity rises.
- Soros bought 2.9 million Arch Coal Inc. shares last quarter for a 2 percent stake in the second-largest U.S. coal producer, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission show. Citadel, the Chicago-based hedge fund, and Invesco Ltd. in Atlanta bought 3.5 million shares of Peabody Energy Corp., the biggest miner. T. Rowe reported purchasing stock in Peabody, Arch, Consol Energy Inc. and Indonesia’s PT Bumi Resources.
- Now, investors are betting that Peabody, which traded at 3.7 times projected 2009 earnings as of Nov. 21, and Arch at 2.5 times are cheap because coal use will increase.
- “Coal is the best commodity to get into right now,” said Daniel Rice, manager of BlackRock Advisors Inc.’s $1.5 billion Global Resources Fund in Boston, which is among the largest holders of Peabody and Arch. “It’s a lot less sensitive to downturns because it’s needed for basic power generation, and demand is growing.”
- Crude oil in New York has dropped 43 percent this year compared with a 6.1 percent decline in Australian coal prices.
- Demand for electricity in major economies, where coal is used to generate 52 percent of power, will increase 3.3 percent by 2010, according to a UBS AG report on Nov. 17. Global coal use will rise 2 percent a year through 2030, led by China and India, the Paris-based International Energy Agency said Nov. 6.
- As of Nov. 21, Peabody dropped 79 percent after reaching a record in June and Arch lost 84 percent. Consol, the third- largest U.S. coal producer, slipped 82 percent.
- Analysts say the decline has been overdone. While oil company profits will fall this year after New York crude futures dropped, coal producers have the advantage because mining companies have long-term sales contracts that cushion them from falling prices. “People are dumping all equities and it’s particularly irrational for coal,” said Richard Price, an investment banker at Westminster Securities in St. Louis, who advises coal producers and utilities in the U.S. and China. “Even if contract prices come off next year, they’ve still got the ones signed this year at higher prices.”
- “I wouldn’t say we’re recession-proof, but certainly recession resistant,” Steven Leer, chief executive officer of Arch, said in a Nov. 19 interview. “People will still be turning on their lights. Electricity demand rarely goes down.”
- Profits at Peabody and Arch, both based in St. Louis, will rise next year as less lucrative contracts get replaced with ones signed at this year’s higher prices, analysts forecast. Lower costs for diesel, steel and explosives will help reduce mining expenses, Leer, 56, said.
- India’s government expects imports to double to 40 million tons by 2012 as Asia’s third-largest economy increases coal-based generation capacity by 72 percent. Japanese utilities plan to add 11 percent more coal-fired capacity by 2010, and Indonesia 40 percent by 2011.
- Coal prices “will continue to fall” as economic activity deteriorates “very rapidly,” Francisco Blanch, a London-based Merrill Lynch & Co. analyst, said in a Nov. 14 report.
- “While there is uncertainty in today’s economy, any easing of demand growth is likely to be offset by diminished coal supply,” Peabody President Richard Navarre said on an Oct. 16 earnings conference call. “Tight supply will be further compounded by the global credit freeze because a significant amount of planned production expansions and new mines will be at risk around the world.” (I cannot stress how important this is) Production in Indonesia, the world’s biggest exporter of power-station coal, will slow as the global credit crisis hampers expansion plans (again)









11 comments:
Mark,
With the steel industry in shambles (cutting back production, trying to renegotiate iron ore contracts to spot rates), would you recommend the thermal coal companies over the coal companies levered to met coal?
Rob
Yes, I like thermal better for now
the met coal exposure is going to be more based on economy.
One wrench in that is if the hedge fund community believes every country is going to do the same stimulus (ala China and USA) aka infrastructure they might take up the steel companies - although it would be based on nothing more than thesis. But the safer play is thermal. Next year at this time I think met coal/steel
A lot of this we can see play out - its just a matter of when sentiment shifts from deflation risk to inflation risk. Once it does, I could see the whole commodity complex sing. That could be starting today, in 3 months, 13 months, or 26 months.
depends on Hal 9000 and friends.
Possible gov't/regulatory issues have made me hesitant on coal with the new administration. Obama made some pretty strong comments with regard to coal. But seeing Soros buying coal shares is a good sign as he is probably pretty well plugged into what's going to happen there.
Think as a global citizen, not an American
This is one of the few things America has left that the rest of the world wants - coal, food, Hollywood actors, Apple products - the list is getting thin ;)
You seem to agree with the bullishness outlook on coal, but then I don't understand why yesterday you were selling JRCC. Wrt JRCC in particular - true, it's had a hugh rally in the last few days, but over just a one-month timescale it's still below other coal companies. Wrt coal companies generally - at what point do you switch from day trading and restart some positions in these companies?
Mark,
You have done excellent DD on coals, solars, fertilizers, etc...
I would like to know your view on nuclear energy and its fuels: Uranium oxide...
Uranium plays were hot in 2006, but have been beaten down heavily since spot uranium price peaked in May 2007.
Recently, it seems uranium spot prices have steadily climbed up according to uranium.info
or http://www.uxc.com/
Have a happy Thanksgiving holiday.
Peter
namreleb,
when hedge funds stop, I will stop
part of it is the individual equities, part of it is the market
its not science, just art and I'll be wrong a lot of the times. Its been right to sell any rallies for 3 months. Maybe now its wrong. Until I see a clear change that is no longer right, than I will change. A week ago I bought Baidu, Joy Global, and Potash and people were questioning why I would do such a thing - now I sell some of these and people question why I would do such a thing.
A long term thesis is very different from a trading call. I've been bullish on coal in fall 2007, winter 07-08, spring 08, summer 08, and now. That doesn't mean the market is agreeing all the time.
Peter,
I just like other areas more than uranium. What we've seen is the whole commodity complex trades together - maybe its indexes and ETF trading. When hedge funds sell ETFs every stock component is sold inside of it - so maybe this is why everything trades together. It doesnt make sense to me, but it is what it is. If I was given a choice of 5 commodities, even if they trade all together I'd rather stick to the few I have the most conviction in. Uranium is a very long term play but let's all laugh together as it tracks oil percent for percent.
I was writing many posts this summer how coal = potash = coffee = copper = natural gas = oil = corn = wheat. The dominance of "speculators" has destroyed the non correlations - all trade together in 1 group. One might just want to toss money at the CRB index and not bother with thinking.
Overlay CCJ with a nat gas stock chart and I bet they look similar.
I do think nuclear becomes more of the world energy source in the long run but getting a plant up and running is a long process...
Couple of things to keep in mind;
1) The Appalachian coal producers are under the gun right now if they use open pit mining. The issue is pollution. So far, the Bush administration has over-ridden their concerns. Companies like CNX are shaft miners and will not suffer if the present law suits prevail under the Obama administration.
2) It has been reported in the Asian press that China is buying 'cheap spot' coal from Malaysia. Their use of dirty coal in their power generation has been verified by MIT. If India and China do need coal in the future, a better bet would be BTU, which has coal mines in Australia. BTU's only real competiotn in that neck of the woods if RTP and BHP, who are tied closely with China.
jegan
I think your comment misses the point of a global commodity
if oil consumption increases in China do you ask where say Germany is buying their oil? i.e. do you point to Nigerian oil or Saudi oil or Venezuela oil?
The thesis is coal is turning into a global market very similar to oil - even better if shipping rates are destroyed as they are now. Then as coal demand picks up ANYWHERE, it's a boon for all that have extra capacity to produce.
So for example what has been happening is China has been drawing in imports from countries that usually supply Europe. As that is siphoned off, there is a shortage - the US East coast producers are the best positioned due to "location" and "cheaper" dollar (which has since gotten more expensive but compared to 5 years ago is still cheap)
So I think people need to become less country specific and more global focused. At least under my theory of a global marketplace.
TM.. Actually, I believe very much in Globalization. I've been active in quite a few foreign companies and pay a lot of attention to that aspect of the market. In fact, I spent most of my youth in Europe and Mexico.
My concern right now is how the market is reacting. Even though the Baltic Dry is down 91% (Leveling off though..) who is importing and exporting right now. Until the world gets back on track, China, Korea and Japan are not producing. If they aren't producing then commodity demand is down as is coal. I do agree with you that coal is not only a steel play, it is mainly an energy play. China, India and even England are cranking up coal fired plants. The problem is that England has just found a new source of coal on their own soil (which is good, because the North Sea oil fields are running dry.), and China and India aren't really buying our coal right now. It is expected that there will be a lot of fallout in the shipping business this year; bankruptcies, mergers and scuttling of excess ships. If that happens, then the cost of Dry Bulk will go back up and Australia will once again have an edge due to lower shipping costs and lower production costs. Unless we can drop our prices to compete presently with Malasian coal and later with cheaper Aussie coal, I don't see the big upside for us as far as coal is concerned.
On another topic, though, keep an eye on Tyson (TSN) as they are expanding worldwide. And HOGS is expanding outside China. Both sell meat products worldwide. Lynn Carpenter calls it Global Branding.
jegan
Just had this article pop up. It involves Dry Bulk shippers, and the banks that underwrite them. contrary to the article, I have heard of a couple of Dry Bulkers filing bankruptcy, and there are shippers that not only have canceled new ship contracts, but some are scrapping out their older units. These activities should drive up the Dry Bulk Index next year.
Interesting note about how the banks are handling the defaults, and that one of the things they intend to do is force the shippers to cancel their dividends. As Cramer and just about everyone screams to 'buy dividend paying stocks', lots of investors seems to be looking at the big payers. If I were to buy a dividend paying shipper right now, I'd make sure they have cash, have contracts, are contracted to businesses that are not commodity driven, and will not have to renegotiate their loans. Anyway, as it does affect coal, iron etc, this is the link:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=av4RT0eaenT0&refer=home
jegan
Post a Comment