- Ctrip.com (CTRP) - Chinese travel; hedge funds have informed me that China just fell off the map and as the rest of the world turns into chaos (as the US markets, of course, rally for the next year) there will be no need for such a stock ;) On a serious note - it's expensive and the chart, while it should have a near term bounce is now below both the 50 and 200 day moving averages. We started this on day 2 of the fund and leave with a $1800 gain.
- Mastercard (MA) - Zach will cheer this; I like the business model for the long run but I've come upon some data and just doing a lot of reading which says that the US credit business model might have some near term issues as credit card companies retract credit limits. In our "develeraging world" this could cause some issues. I still think this is a "rest of the world play" so going back to point #1, hedge funds have told us the rest of the world is imploding so there is no need to own a stock that relies on the rest of the world anymore. The chart is now officially trouble and "a short" from my point of view (not that I can) but I think $165 is a nice target range now. I'd short with a tight stop over $232 or so (current $220) if our fund was up and running. This is one of our original holdings, started on Aug 6, 2007 - we leave with a $9000 gain.
- Kinross Gold (KGC) - who needs gold? I am torn on gold - if we go into deflationary spiral it's not a good investment. If we go into a chaotic world it would be a good investment. Since I have no stated thesis with it anymore I am just going to take my ball and go home. Cash seems easier at this point. I'm taking a $3000 loss here and have owned this twice (in and out) of the fund.
- Jacobs Engineering (JEC) - my jaw in on the floor when I see what "they've" done to McDermott (MDR). The news is not much better with my other remaining global infrastructure names - I still think these are vastly undervalued and over the next 3-7 years will have great stories to tell, but they are all now treated as "crude oil" so this is just a case of overlap - owning 1 is really no different than owning 4. I would not be surprised to see some consolidation in this sector if valuations stay this depressed. It was either this name or Fluor (FLR) and I like the Fluor business a bit more - both have similar valuation. We continue in a market that is NOT about individual stock selection but ALL about sector allocation. So owning 3-4 stocks in this particular sector does not make sense "today". I'll be back into this quality company in the future and actually think this stock is ready for an oversold bounce but I don't own enough for it to matter, and I can buy more Fluor for the same "bounce". This is another original holding - we started this position on day 1 and leave with a $4900 gain.
Long Fluor in fund; no personal position











2 comments:
yea i got stopped out of MA in my longer term portfolio. 220 is the line in the sand for me. knee jerk reflex rally in the name right now but we'll see if that level holds. MA was one of Atticus' main holdings (along with obviously tons of other macro & commodity funds). so we'll see if the "beat down other funds top holdings" trade is over or not. doubt it though
Is Atticus one of the ones you broke down on your blog?
Remember I told you 3-4 weeks ago not to fawn over hedge funds - when you were showing their holdings and then saying "I'm pretty sure they must be out of these commodities - I mean thats what hedge funds do"
Now you are seeing just how schrewd they are ;) I mean some.
My open question - how does a "HEDGE" fund WITHOUT much leverage (as Atticus) claim go down 28-33% in 8 months? I mean most lowly mutual funds beat that by a country mile WITHOUT any hedging - long only.
My only guess without looking at their short holdings is they were short financials at that July bottom.
Again, there are brilliant hedge fund managers and I would like to be a not so brilliant hedge fund manager some day... but people attach the term "hedge fund" to "brilliance" far too easily. It became way too easy to get one, as people jump and give money based on PEDIGREE in my opinion.
You can see now how much leverage led to many people's gains, not actual talent.
Maybe less stars in your eyes now? ;)
Post a Comment