Thursday, June 5, 2008

NYTimes: Food is Gold, So Billions Invested in Farming

TweetThis
Thanks to the multiple (5!) readers who sent me this same article - most have been with me for a long while so they know one theme I proposed starting in the winter - the value of farmland and hard assets in the agriculture industry.

I first wrote about it on the blog on Feb 1 [Starting Position in Powershares DB Agriculture Fund]

If I had a way to buy futures contracts on farmland I'd be buying that too. And yes I am very serious. I think values for farmland across the world are going to rocket in the next decade.

Then on Feb 8 [Wheat is the New Corn]

This is part of the very awful cycle I've been talking about since last summer. Take out all the issues about weather, droughts, climate change, whatever. The simple fact is new farmland is not being brought online at a very quick pace. Crop yields are increasing but not nearly enough to support demand.

The way things are going, within a decade farmland is going to have more value than ocean front property.

Then on Mar 12 [Grain Boom May Spark Rural Revival]

I've said in the past if there was an easy instrument to purchase farmland, I'd like to be in it. Even more so in the former Soviet satellite nations where farmland is much cheaper than the American heartland.

Etc. Quite a few other posts touched on this topic, and today in the NYTimes we have a great story outlining that "smart money" is following my game plan. If only I had the funds to follow up on my own ideas. Notice who is in the middle of this all - Blackrock (BLK) who else. [May 8: Blackrock is Fix it Firm to Manage Risky Assets of Others in Distress]
  • Huge investment funds have already poured hundreds of billions of dollars into booming financial markets for commodities like wheat, corn and soybeans.
  • But a few big private investors are starting to make bolder and longer-term bets that the world’s need for food will greatly increase — by buying farmland, fertilizer, grain elevators and shipping equipment.
  • One has bought several ethanol plants, Canadian farmland and enough storage space in the Midwest to hold millions of bushels of grain.
  • Another is buying more than five dozen grain elevators, nearly that many fertilizer distribution outlets and a fleet of barges and ships.
  • And three institutional investors, including the giant BlackRock fund group in New York, are separately planning to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in agriculture, chiefly farmland, from sub-Saharan Africa to the English countryside.
  • “It’s going on big time,” said Brad Cole, president of Cole Partners Asset Management in Chicago, which runs a fund of hedge funds focused on natural resources. “There is considerable interest in what we call ‘owning structure’ — like United States farmland, Argentine farmland, English farmland — wherever the profit picture is improving.”.
  • The investors plan to consolidate small plots of land into more productive large ones, to introduce new technology and to provide capital to modernize and maintain grain elevators and fertilizer supply depots.
  • But the long-term implications are less clear. Some traditional players in the farm economy, and others who study and shape agriculture policy, say they are concerned these newcomers will focus on profits above all else, and not share the industry’s commitment to farming through good times and bad.
  • Grain elevators, especially, could give these investors new ways to make money, because they can buy or sell the actual bushels of corn or soybeans, rather than buying and selling financial derivatives that are linked to those commodities. When crop prices are climbing, holding inventory for future sale can yield higher profits than selling to meet current demand, for example. Or if prices diverge in different parts of the world, inventory can be shipped to the more profitable market.
  • Perhaps the most ambitious plans are those of Susan Payne, founder and chief executive of Emergent Asset Management, based near London. Emergent is raising $450 million to $750 million to invest in farmland in sub-Saharan Africa, where it plans to consolidate small plots into more productive holdings and introduce better equipment. Emergent also plans to provide clinics and schools for local labor.
  • We are getting strong response from institutional investors — pensions, insurance companies, endowments, some sovereign wealth funds,” she said.
  • The fund chose Africa because “land values are very, very inexpensive, compared to other agriculture-based economies,” she said. “Its microclimates are enticing, allowing a range of different crops. There’s accessible labor. And there’s good logistics — wide open roads, good truck transport, sea transport.”
  • Last October, the London branch of BlackRock introduced the BlackRock Agriculture Fund, aiming to raise $200 million to invest in fertilizer production, timberland and biofuels. The fund currently stands at more than $450 million.
Conclusion: Can only hope one day to have the money to invest in the early ideas, and not just blog about them.

Long Blackrock in fund; no personal position

8 comments:

piazzi said...

Next place to move the corporations is AFRICA

HongH said...

Hey mark,

When you start your fund, and I invest in your fund, are you still going to let us see your sweet blog?

Good call on POT, looks like broke out.

Thanks.

mike said...

Mark, have enjoyed reading your blog, moreso than CNBC stuff (Fast/Mad Money). I am an investor of maybe 2 years, learning and loving this stuff. However with a hectic job and kids, its blogs like yours that tip me off to the bigger picture and trends that, by the time its on TV, its too late. I have small positions in AGU and MON already, and might add IPI as well.

Your work is appreciated.

TraderMark said...

Hong, I answered that in the upper right margin in the frequently asked questions

I'm going to close the blog (it won't be this one) just to investors at that time.

Mike, thanks. Usually by the time you see it on TV its about 2 months after the fact.

Too bad I was hedged today because all our long sectors were flying in a very shameless manner (up) ;)

I am here to take care of your money while you deal with your job and kids ;)

Dr. Baugus said...

Mark
Loved your article about the grain elevators...conagra...I emailed you that earlier..GOt it on cnbc. Just type in monsanto.
Hey, please write me re: commodities.
I own clf, mee, anr, and now bucy *Cramer talked about it tonight big time and had on CEO
Do you think that these are safe with the "rising " dollar?
I am so glad that you do this for us. YOure service is so much appreciated,however, you do scare me with your insights. I am watching my coals constant. Scared of the executioner. Do you think they are safe? Is it time to get back into oil companies? why do they go down so fast when oil corrects/
cramer said oil going to 150. I hate it, but it helps our stocks. YOu did great call on pot and ipi. I emailed you on that too, stating its in a bubble. Guess I was wrong.
IT is toppy, but broke through.
So did MON
I thought those would be good shorts for summer.

thanks!
MO

TraderMark said...

Its difficult to really predict when stocks will go or reverse. I bought coal thinking it was a 2nd half 08 or early 09 period when the market would recognize it, but it launched immediately. (actually been doing coal since last September, but increased the weight of late)

Every sector I own (except housing) I like for the long run - they just go through cycles when they go up and down. The dollar story is overblown - its an excuse for hedge funds to sell down commodities. Our dollar wont be recovering in any real manner until government decides it wont finance everything through debt and our entitlement programs are addressed. That said its been so devastated its due for some rally here in next 6 months at least 5% - maybe 10%. But to selloff commodities on that is a bit silly. But thats what the hedge funds do so you have to respect all those billions of dollar sloshing from 1 sector to another.

Fertilizer and coal is not even close to being overvalued on 09 and 10.

But that doesnt mean straight up (or down) in anything.

Last, I write a lot about the ECONOMY - the economy is very different for long times from the stock market. Further our ECONOMY is broken into pieces - certain segments doing great, certain very poorly - so even when I talk about the economy its "portions of it" that have the great risk.

Unfortunately the major portion at risk is the bottom half of our society

Dr. Baugus said...

wow, not even close to being overvalued. watch your ipi, tho, double top. I will tell you when it breaks through
bought some uso today. hope over weekend, the war finally erupts in middle east..to get it going.
we are studying to become missionaries, so my fund is to help us get going in that direction. hopefully, Costa Rica, is where we will end up. I was professor of counseling until I broke neck, then a quad. SO my hobby/job is market. I spend all day here. I can walk and talk, and our goal is to get Brian through Liberty University *we are almost done! so we can move. but i lost a ton of money listening to someone..stockmarkettradealerts.com
I actually shorted POT lost alot!
He assumed it wll come down in summer for the election..lower food prices,e tc.
I don't see that happening now.
I am preparing for the Iran / Israel war. They are really threatening.
Why no gold in your portfolio?
Cramer says 1200 minimum.
I bought uso instead of gold as hedge.
I see you got smn.
Is that working?
That's so counterintuitive. It's your hedge, I suppose, but waste.
Maybe get into gold or abx.
with dividend.
Just thinking outloud.
Thanks for responding.
Dr. B

TraderMark said...

Oh ok, so since Cramer says 1200 then it must be.
lol

I sold gold (you can see the posts on Kinross Gold) and decided I'd rather use that money in hard assets that are absolutely necessary such as coal and fertilizer

so far thats been a perfect trade

SMN is a hedge yes. If it goes down that means the longs I have go up. Then at some point when commodities fall, it will provide some protection - its an insurance policy. Maybe it doesnt make sense to you but Im not really in the camp that oil goes to $200 without breaking the back of the world economy, so there will be reversals along the way. In fact, one could be coming within 1-3 weeks if past patterns are any indication.

Post a Comment

Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix