Here is a general trend of what costs have been for things we import
November 07, the year over year import price increase was 11.4% [Dec 12: Real Inflation Showing in Reports not Called PPI/CPI]
January 08, the year over year import price increase was 13.7% [Feb 15: Today's Import Report Continues to Support my Stagflation Thesis]
March 08, the year over year import price increase was 15% [Apr 11: GE Warning and Import Prices Show us Real Inflation]
April 08, the year over year import price increase was 15.4% [May 13: Import Prices Continue to be a Disaster]
Notice a trend? And what just came out this morning for May 08? Try 17.8% on for size. Even excluding petroleum (which none of us use, so therefore should not count in inflation) we are approaching 7% imported prices. But don't worry, inflation is benign, contained and somewhere around 3%. (even though the rest of the world is around 8%)
- Import prices soared 2.3% on a monthly basis in May, the Labor Department said Thursday, compared to April's 2.4% increase, which was revised up.
- Import prices swelled 17.8% from May 2007, the largest annual rise since the data were first published in September 1982.
- Petroleum import prices rose 7.8% last month compared to April and were up 68.8% on the year. Natural gas prices were up 5.4%, the eight-straight monthly increase.
- Excluding petroleum, import prices rose 0.5% and were up 6.6% on the year. Even excluding all fuels, prices rose 0.5% on a monthly basis and 6.1% on the year, the sharpest gain on record.
- Food prices rose 1% and were up almost 14% from last year, the biggest rise in 13 years.
- Prices of goods from China spiked 0.6% compared to April and rose 4.6% from a year ago, a fresh record, suggesting imports from China are no longer an offset to domestic price pressures and are even adding to them.
To close this entry let me get to today's great news, the "booming" retail sales. Just a week ago we saw the sorry state of retail - remember that huge Thursday rally because Walmart and Costco were doing good? Well we are rallying off the same news... retail sales increased 1.0%, as opposed to expectations of 0.5%. Hmm, I wonder why we even got that number. Could it be that when we borrow from our grandchildren (more debt), sending Treasuries to China in return for dollars, which we then send to the people, we can goose the numbers? Nah. :)
- The healthy increase in May sales suggested consumers were putting to work some money the government kicked back to them in a plan to stimulate the foundering economy.
- About $48 billion in payments were cut in May, Treasury Department numbers indicate.
- "I've noted for weeks that with retail sales running at a pace of $385 billion per month, it takes an increase of just $3.85 billion to push retail sales up a percentage point. That's a small sum in comparison to the $120 billion in tax rebate checks that the government has issued," said Tony Crescenzi of Miller Tabak & Co. "It's no wonder, then, that retail sales increased 1.0% in May overall and 1.2% excluding automobile sales."
One more point I always make everytime we cheer a retail number. If inflation is rising 5% year
over year, and sales are rising anything less than 5% year over year, you actually are going backwards on unit sales. Plug in any number you wish for inflation, but simply to keep up with the inflation rate, sales need to be higher than inflation for true "growth" to be occuring. Just as I said last Thursday, we cannot be bothered with small details like that on Wall Street, but for those living in the real world, it's the reality. The blog mascot chimed in on what he thinks of today's rally....










9 comments:
TM: Your comments about the monthly numbers and in particular, the retail sales numbers, reminds me of how a buddy of mine describes the cycle of prices on Wall Street: it's "rinse, lather, repeat".
three comments
1) France is interviening to retain French ownership in a shipyard operation [nationalism, protectionism]
2) international coal prices are forecasted to go up [affecting steel making]
3) rationing of electricity to ore miners [coal, alumina, iron, uranium, etal] in So. Africa
all things related to cost of imported and manufactured goods and barriers to international trade
[and the US policy makers are banking on international trade, exports, to maintain domestic economic activity?]
- more koolaid please
TM,
AAPL touched 50ma. Are you waiting to add on further pullback.(mid 160s)?
Guy, it starts getting so predictable doesn't it?
Now tomorrow if its a good CPI number "better than expected" all the evidence to the contrary is thrown to the window, all the Fed governors FINALLY admitting inflation is a threat is dismissed and the 5000 pt rally begins? :)
Lemmings.
hrs,
some talk of Abu Dhabi buying Chrysler building this morning in NYC
Much like the 80s when Japan bought many assets this will now repeat - only this time we are much more broke as a nation and the type of money China (from trade) and the Middle East/Russia (from petrol) is making is many times what Japan ever had.
We will slowly but surely waste away our assets to keep consuming over our head.
Reverse colonization I grabbed from another website - love the term.
I use exponential usually so low 170s, but its getting closer. Probably won't add in scale until lower. If this selloff plays out - as it almost to the textbook has - we probably bottom in financials next week on MS/GS earnings - then rally hard in those areas along with homebuilders retailers, while the rest of market suffers. Especially commodities
We shall see, its been almost too perfect so far. Everything sell off, commodities hold up, now this reversal. This looks more like plain short covering - need to see something more sustained to get too excited.
You guys are always in a rush to buy ;) remind me of myself about 3-5 years ago. If Apple reverses and goes you can always jump in and pay up a bit... no big hurry on this side. If I miss Apple there are many other trains leaving the station each day/week/month.
yea AAPL so far has held the 50day but its really not looking too great, all signals rolling over in that name. i expect downside to about 162 if it breaks the 50day.
re: Apple
Me two. Could even do low to mid $150s. Depending on how bad the market is. But low $160s seems "in the bag".
Any thoughts on why MTL is falling?
As I've been typing the past month; commodities are due to correct
metals look like they are going first, see RIO for another example
coal, fertilizer and nat gas will probably be the last to go
If you are new to these groups I strongly urge you to review January and March performance. many of these names can correct 30% in the span of 2 weeks. Nothing can go straight up. AFter something increases 50-70% you should expect a material pullback at some point.
This is why I am not piling into that name or really any commodities after what I consider mild pullbacks.
When people start cursing fertilizer or coal and declaring commodities are dead because the strong dollar is here - thats when you want to be adding in larger scale. So its just a sector rotation in my book... nothing MTL or RIO or any other name specific.
Look at DRYS for a great example as well. They carry a lot of the stuff that I think is about to get "corrected"
Post a Comment