**** WE'VE MOVED TO A NEW HOME ****

Sunday, June 1, 2008

AP: Heating Oil Sticker Shock to Hit New England

TweetThis
We've been discussing for quite a while the lag effects of inflation on the consumer - while many are complaining about their costs today, much of it has yet to really hit the consumer. This is part of the reason why I find any second half recovery almost criminal in nature to sell to the public - that said the stock market MIGHT go up, we never know - but it won't be an economic recovery in the 2nd half. One area that inflation has not even begun to be seen is home heating - for those of you following along we've been heavily into coal (since early last fall) and natural gas (since late in the winter). As we've explained in the past, air conditioning rates will go up this summer but due to long term contracts the real hit will be NEXT summer. Same goes for winter - we didn't feel almost any of the pass through costs this winter. Those of you in the north, start budgeting - your next winter's bills are going to begin to show "inflation" (and they won't fully discount the increase either because of the regulation in the industry).

Now, the company line is, and has been "inflation will abate in the 2nd half as the economy slows" - almost every pundit and Federal Reserve official whispers these sweet nothings in our ears. I'm going to take the other side of that trade (as I have since blog inception) and say, inflation is going to whack you along the head in the 2nd half and 1st half 2009 (except there will be no inflation in houses, iPods and flat panel TVs - none of which you can eat or use for energy; ok maybe you can burn them for some short term heating) So therefore the government reports will show only minor inflation. [News of the Day - Inflation]

So we can look forward to another year of government statistics telling us, since home prices are going down, and electronics continue to hold steady - inflation is steady as she goes. Meanwhile the few of you out there who are forced to buy non essentials like "food", "toilet paper" or "home heating" are going to see a different story. But don't you worry, you can buy a SUV for 8% less than last year. I'll be officially striking all government reports for the next year (err, decade), including this Friday's jobs report - for a truth check have some fun with [Employment Reports and More Fed Actions] - keep in mind, this is a government that somehow told us that the economy added 45,000 construction jobs last month in their "estimation" :) Nice! Nothing like a nice steamed brew of Kool Aid on a Friday morning. But let's get back to those poor suckers in the northern 2/3rds of America. And readers, let's count down the days until Congress trots out those utility CEO's so they can berate them publicly in the "Congressional Oversight Meeting into Predatory Pricing of Utilities". Instead of said Congressmen/women looking into the mirror to see the major culprit.
  • While people in most of the country may be worried about their summer air conditioning bills, many residents in the Northeast are way beyond that: They're already thinking ahead to next winter's heating bills. And what those who heat their houses with oil are seeing is giving them sticker shock.
  • Retail heating oil prices have risen to more than $4.50 a gallon, nearly double what they were last year at this time.
  • Consumers -- already on edge with rising gasoline and food prices -- will probably be outraged when they calculate their oil bills for next winter, said Jamie Py, president of the Maine Oil Dealers Association. (oh they will be so outraged, thankfully the 2nd half recovery will make them a bit less outraged)
  • The angst over heating oil prices is particularly acute in New England, where a higher proportion of people use oil as their primary heating source than any other region, ranging from more than 75 percent in Maine to about 40 percent in Massachusetts.
  • "If prices still keep going up, they're going to find people frozen to death next winter because they won't have the money to buy oil," Foss said.
  • Bangor-based Webber Energy Fuels, which operates across Maine and parts of New Hampshire, has been selling fixed-price programs at $4.70 to $4.80 a gallon for next winter, said President Mike Shea. Last year at this time, the price was $2.50 to $2.60.
  • The residential price of heating oil rose 59 percent from the first quarter of 2007 to the same period this year. (thats a tad higher than the government inflation but not to worry, you can buy Tshirts for 1% higher than last year - buy Tshirts, burn them to heat your home and hence you have no inflation)
Again this is just home heating oil - the pass through effects of coal and natural gas will take much longer to filter through the system due to contracts and regulation. But we can look forward to years... and years... of higher energy costs. Let's all cheer for that global recession so we can save a few bucks this winter. And let's keep voting down solar, wind, and any other alternatives - go team Congress!

6 comments:

rosesryellow2 said...

TM,

I just wanted to post a comment regarding a previous post on the SMA vs. EMA. I really have enjoyed reading your blog and I think that you are a very bright guy. I am not full time trader nor an economist and in fact have a background in chemistry from UCLA. I got into the markets primarily by following science companies I understood and looking at fundamentals.

In this market however I realized that technicals are also very very important. If you are serious about becoming a mutual fund manager (and it seems like you are) it may really pay to shore up the technicals as well so that you really know them cold. I have been getting my hands on the best texts I could find and they are very informative. Chart the SPX on stockcharts with the 50 and 200 day SMA and you will see how it almost "perfectly" bounced off of these two recently. Does this mean that EMAs are invalid? Not at all. Victor Sperandeo (one of the more successful traders of all time and a consultant to Soros and others) writes that different indicators work differently in different stocks and different markets. That is to say in this case the EMA works until it doesn't, then other indicators need to be tried to see if the big boys (and computer trading as well) are using something else. In the case of the SPX it seems that right now at least the SMAs are the way to play...

Just my thoughts. I really do wish you well and I appreciate the insight you have provided on this blog.

Best to you Mark,
J

TraderMark said...

That's a point. But another point is many fund managers don't follow TA at all. I doubt Heebner does for example. (I could be wrong) So it is all incremental. Having some TA is more than none. And some TA contradicts other TA - you will also see that - the more indicators you use, the more 1 comes into conflict with another. So which do you use?

It's all an "art" not a science. I concur on the SMA vs EMA on this pullback but it does not explain the mid April pullback - where both were broken but the market broken. So all TA failed on that one. Nothing works fully in the market - you just try to get as many forces working in your direction at the same time. Key #1 for me is owning the best companies - even if your TA stinks you will do well if you identify the big trends earlier than the pack.

yayankee said...

So what's the next trend? With inflation raging in other parts of the world (this has been under reported)the US equity market looks cheap. Not all but some equity areas. Multinationals would appear to be the biggest beneficiaries. Because of the tremendous transfer of wealth to dictatorial countries the inflation rate may not be that important to those governments. Hence mining and metals companies would appear to be winners also. Your thoughts?

TraderMark said...

Don't think US multinationals would be considered a new trend. That's been the main trend the past year +.

Raging inflation has a good chance to cause global recession; you have to ask at what price do some of these foreign entities, namely China, stop subsidizing everything and bending. It's already happening in smaller Asian countries. The best thing for the "global growth" story to continue would be crude dropping back to $100-$110 and staying there. The longer it stays up here, and or higher it goes - the more risk to the entire growth story. You are shouldering more and more simply on the back of China and asking them to subsidize just about every bull market. So far it's been working, but at some price point in oil they will have to falter.

Right now they have an entire province pissed off like hell that all their kids died because the schools in poorer parts of the province (or even within the same cities) collapsed under shoddy material, building whereas the richer kids school stood. So social unrest is something they have to deal with as well, so its a flammable situation.

Unfortunately right now, much of the world's growth is either China or high energy prices allowing said dictatorial countries (and Brazil) to continue to prosper. We'll see how it goes, too many moving parts to simplify things to "oil up = good" or "oil down = good". I don't think the credit crisis is near to being over either - we have a whole slew of Alt A and prime mortgages going default the next 12 months, along with credit card debt, personal loan debt and the like. It's just been pushed to the backburner.

madhatter said...

ya it seems more investors these days are using a hybrid of fundamentals and technicals to make decisions. personally, i use the technicals for entry/exits for investments or for some shorter term trades. traders rely much more heavily on technicals obviously. and, after all, mark is running a mutual fund. i think he is using technicals more often now just due to the type of market we are in . and this type of market requires more activity/trading until it picks one direction or the other. if he focused too much on technicals, then he'd be a trader and would have a much higher level of turnover

rosesryellow2 said...

I guess the point I was trying to make is that it pays to know TA well as a supplement to fundamentals. It's true that TA can conflict just like it's true that companies with terrible fundamentals can, for longer than you think, perform very well.

It's all about making the trading/investing arsenal as thorough and flexible as possible while never forgetting to Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS). That's my entire point. If you don't agree with it that's fine... We all of course must chart our own path and do what works well for us. Even when good we can always get better.

No mas... I have to get back to work...

Best,
Jon

Post a Comment

*

*
Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix