**** WE'VE MOVED TO A NEW HOME ****

Friday, May 23, 2008

Smaller Asian Countries Begin to Buckle Under Oil - I'm Closing iShares Signapore (EWS)

TweetThis
And so it begins... I've been writing how this price of oil will put us on path of global recession if it continues. Further, the true market price is being surpressed in many countries, especially Asian and Middle East so true supply/demand dynamics are not playing out like they are in the US where the embattled consumer is shriveling quickly into his home (until he is foreclosed upon).

First, some bookkeeping - I'm CLOSING iShares Singapore (EWS) on the deteriorating outlook for Asian economies as global commodity prices begin to seriously cause issues. No need to take the risk here. I like Signapore for the long run but we have some major issues encroaching the region. I sold earlier today the last of my 0.6% stake in the $13.30s. I took some profit in early April [Locking in Some Profits in iShares Singapore] in the $13.20s just 2 weeks after restarting the position in the $11.70s in mid March, so I missed the top here in the $14.00s+ but good enough. I don't know if Signapore itself subsidizes energy to its citizens but its the financial hub for the region - and since I am now concerned about the region, it's a regional call.



Now on to the fun stuff....

While I'm a near term energy/commodities bear [Oil Looks Toppy to Me - Starting Ultrashort Oil & Gas (DUG)] my comments are more longer term in basis. Essentially we are going to go through years of "World of Shortages" in which commodities trail upward on a long wide slope, punctuated by some dramatic selloffs and bubble like runs up. (of which we have just seen one). But at some point as we've been pointing out, it stops making sense to build things due to commodity costs - either steel [Fast Rising Steel Prices Set Back Big Projects] or energy. Only "not truly free markets" are in fact holding us up - Asian and Middle Easterners willing to pay almost any price to keep their growth going. This cannot continue forever or at any price. This is a major distortion and few countries can keep this up or their budgets will be blown up (we don't mind that in the United States of Subprime; we just will print more money to "fix things" when we have massive deficits) - however not every country is so irresponsible so we now are beginning to see the first signs of economics trumping the distortions in the smaller Asian economies. Now if China/India follow suit a lot of things will be changing in this world.

I wrote in [May 21: American Airlines Cutting Jobs and Routes]

The only reason we are not seeing major slowdowns (yet) globally are many countries subsidize the true cost of energy to their consumers... namely China and India. At some point this will subside or reverse. The true forces of the market are not allowed to play out in these countries - since their consumers are not feeling the pinch - so they have no reason to restrict demand.

And now the first dominoes begin to fall....
  • Asian governments are split on ways to cope with record oil prices, with some subsidizing costs for consumers to contain inflation and others raising energy prices to lower the effect on their budgets.
  • Indonesia and Taiwan have both pledged payments to low-income families to help them cope with planned fuel-price increases and Finance Minister Michael Cullen of New Zealand announced tax cuts designed to help workers struggling with living costs.
  • Malaysia said it plans to announce cuts to a 53 billion ringgit, or $16.5 billion, fuel subsidy in a couple of months, a move that may raise costs and fan accelerating inflation.
  • On Friday, the South Korean energy ministry is considering boosting nuclear power output and raising electricity costs in the second half of the year to cope with soaring oil prices and other costs of producing energy, Reuters reported.
  • China, suffering the deadliest earthquake in 32 years, said this week that it has no plans to remove fuel-price caps.
  • "We see fiscal positions deteriorating in countries that subsidize the local cost of oil," said Robert Subbaraman, chief economist at Lehman Brothers Asia in Hong Kong. "If oil prices stay persistently high at these levels, these kinds of measures can do more damage than good."
  • Oil has more than doubled in the past year, and prices of grains such as rice, corn, wheat and soybean reached unprecedented levels in 2008. The increases have stoked social tensions and led to wider fiscal deficits as governments subsidize food and energy expenses for their people. (US solution? Print more money - try it guys; oh wait that creates MORE inflation. No it does not... if you have the correct government reporting which makes inflation disappear like magic)
  • Indonesia's president, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, facing elections in 2009, is raising fuel prices for the first time in almost three years to reduce subsidies. The government would have to spend 190 trillion rupiah, or $20 billion, on subsidies if fuel prices were not increased
  • Taiwan, which plans to increase fuel prices on June 2, will distribute 20 billion Taiwan dollars, or $659 million, in subsidies to middle and low-income families to offset higher energy costs.
  • In China, the government said Thursday that speculation that it may remove curbs on fuel prices as early as next month is "baseless." China caps fuel prices to limit their impact on inflation in the world's most-populous nation.
  • Chinese consumer prices rose 8.5 percent last month, close to the fastest pace since 1996. Inflation rates in Sri Lanka and Vietnam have exceeded 20 percent, while Singapore's consumer price gains have reached levels not seen since 1982.
  • Rising oil prices are giving a "big shock" to Japan's economy.
Conclusion: Ok folks let's review. Almost every country has soaring inflation, but us (and Canada). As long as you don't eat, drive, or have a home that requires heating or cooling. Fantastic. Therefore we can cut rates from 5.25% to 2% to save our lightly regulated, banking system which is out of control. (Free markets solve everything after all)

Further, our stock market LOVES high oil prices because well... it's just good. Meanwhile the world's consumers and producers will suffer. But that's ok - somehow that is good too, I just need to figure out how. Hopefully a hedge fund computer or NYC trader can email me with the details (I'd prefer a hedge fund computer please)

But on a serious note as I keep saying, inflation is a tax on all things, and on all consumers and producers. Only in our stock market do we think it's not an issue ... because most believe in government statistics that show it's not an issue. Only normal Americans living normal lives are seeing inflation - not anyone trading stocks I guess. I do believe we are going to see a serious correction here in commodity/energy prices - in the end, higher prices are the best solution to higher prices. It will lead to a major slowdown - except in the US as we will somehow skirt recession (if you use government figures of course). In fact here in the US, we are headed for a 2nd half recovery. (mmmm, Kool Aid).

As predicted government subsidies will have to begin to slow/stop in many smaller countries or they will be going bankrupt. China will hold out; we'll see how long (post Olympics). If they have to pass along those prices to their consumers - you're going to see a major shock to the system there. Social unrest is their #1 concern - so they might be backed into a corner. But either way it is all shaping up (if energy/commodities hold these prices or even stay anywhere near i.e. within 10-15%) for a very nice global recession of 2009 (except in the US which is not allowed to have a recession, per government rules). So we'll be fine in the US - no worries. Buy stocks.

As well all know this scenario is completely priced into stocks. Frankly I am surprised the market is not 20-30% higher from here, now that we know everything will be ok. Further, July 1, 2008 - the 2nd half recovery begins. Getting closer by the week.

Long Ultrashort Oil & Gas in fund and personal account

13 comments:

Pankaj said...

Mark, I see that you are still holding GS. Any major reason why you didn't take profits when it struggled to cross 200?

Cheers.. Pankaj

TraderMark said...

I had it up to 3% or so at 1 point - why do you think I didn't take profits? :)
I'll probably be buying more next week as a matter of fact. Since at that point the commodities should sell off and the hedge fund computers will run to financials, and retailers. No? That's how it always goes.

TraderMark said...

Actually it looks headed for lower $160s, probably start adding there.

shaxmatist said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
shaxmatist said...

Yea, longer term, lack of resources is a weakness of asian economies.

Starting this year, I am expecting "BR" to start outperforming the rest of BRIC. Brazil and Russia can supply their own fuel and food, and export leftovers, China and India cannot.

HongH said...

SO Mark, did you add back to those short positions?

TraderMark said...

yes I did.

I usually dont announce transactions for the Ultrashorts since I'm constantly adjusting them here or there (it would dominate the blog with all the transactions), but since today was a major change from 27% of the portfolio back down to 20% I did say something about it. I added in a few layers during the afternoon as the buyers did not seem too interested. Back to 27%ish I believe.

gpwr9k95 said...

I've read your writing "Smaller Asian countries begin ..." and found it very pessimistic in terms of the stock market returns on the long side. Indeed, the high oil prices cause global inflation. But, they also force nations to look harder for new oil reserves and to explore alternative energy sources (solar, wind, nuclear), which in the long run should reduce the world dependence of fossil fuels. I see opportunities here.

First, the high oil prices make unconventional oil sources (oil sands, deep water oil, oil shales) more attractive and encourage their rapid exploration. Deep-sea drillers are among companies to benefit from this unconventional oil exploration and production. So, why not to buy the stocks of these companies. You already have ATW and PDE. Consider NE, RIG, DO, CAM, FTI and NOV.

Second, why not buy stocks of oil E&P companies. If the high oil prices are here to stay, one should not be shy to profit from that by buying PBR (you already have it), OXY, APA, MUR and the likes. You can also consider this investment as a hedge against inflation.

Third, nobody is stopping developed nations from moving away from oil towards the nuclear energy. Our technical revolution has led to a discovery of an enormous source of energy and yet, because of unbiased fears of accidents, many developed nations stopped using this source. If developed nations start building nuclear plants again, that would increase the oil supply for developing countries with no nuclear expertise. So, why not to invest into nuclear energy infrustructure such as ABB, SGR and GE (ABB is my favorite) and into uranium suppliers such as MOS.

Fourth, high oil prices drive carmakers towards seeking ways to increase the fuel efficiency of vehicles. We are talking about hybrid vehicles here, batteries for them and light composite materials (HXL). It would be nice to find a company specializing in car batteries.

Finally, your portfolio lacks wind power plays. Consider VWDRY and GCTAF.

I am actually glad to high oil prices because they act as a wake up call to humanity to find longer lasting and environmentally friendly alternatives. It is time to stop depending on the fossil fuels and start using our brains to find those alternatives.

TraderMark said...

I agree on most of your comments - the problem is lag time. Most alternative solutions, in scale, will take a long time to ramp up and take true supply of old school fuel off line. Electric cars are going to come in 2010, the first small wave. One example. Solar is still a tiny sliver of world energy. Wind is still a tiny sliver. Nuclear plants take years of planting and building. Between "this era" and "that era" will be many serious dislocations that will hurt economics.

On the flip side, we have the equivalent of the population of US moving from rural to city every 10-15 years - all wanting energy.

I dont like most of the stand alone wind plays - aside from Vestas most of the names touted are hype Cramer plays at this time. I've followed some for many years - I know the HXLs I know the ZOLTs etc etc. Unfortunately companies like GE and Siemens have a lot of the true wind plays but unless they plan to spin them off as separate IPOs (which they should) its like buying Microsoft for video games or Sony for Playstation... you get lost inside the conglomerate.

Anyhow, its a matter of timing. The world is not "ready" for sustained $120-$150 oil. And for every American or German conserving are 20 Chinese moving from rural to city.

Many Indians are dirt poor and do not even have electricity. Etc. A lot of these solutions by the West are going to be plugging a hole in a dam, that is about to burst. And most of the West is not even seriously considering solutions at this time, certainly not the country that uses 25% of the world's needs.

Again its timing and scale/scope. Most of the solutions are drop in the buckets versus coal, and crude. Thats just how the entire system has been set up on. And when China wants to quickly ramp up something they are not going to be turning to wind for solutions they need in 3 months, they are going to get more coal. Etc.

sharron said...

As per your comment regarding Singapore: They do not subsidize their energy cost(gasoline or electricity) for their popuation. They also have an comprehesive mass transit system of rail and bus that is affordable for the masses. A ticket to traverse the island costs about $1.10 usd one way. They have generally discouraged private car usage with hefty ownership fees and tolls to reduce downtown congestion.

They are at a disadvantage when it comes to natural resources. They have to import most of their food and other commodities. On the other hand they have educated their people and tried to diversify their economy so they do participate in the energy complex by manufacturing many oil and gas related mechanical parts, along with biomedical, banking and shipping sectors.

The Singaporean government is debt free and the individual Singaporean is required to pay 20% of their income into a retirement fund(similar to our 401K) and they get a 10% match from their employer and a smaller match from the government so they will be pretty well taken care of as they age. During the last downturn the Singporean government paid an special dividend(from one of their sovergn wealth funds) to soften the affects of slower economy.

Hopefully the wise planning of the government and generally frugal ways of the Singaporean people will help them in the coming challenges we all face.

I can't help but think they may fare better than we will here in the US.

I always enjoy your site and try to read it daily.

TraderMark said...

sharron,

thanks for that information - it sounds like you have first hand experience, are you from there? This has always been an interesting country for me because despite lack of natural resources they have positioned themselves to be very progressive, dare I say Western (without the lack of regulation) in their financial system and are becoming to Asia what London is to Europe or NYC is for the region.

If you are familiar with Jim Rogers who is a famous hedge fund manager - he chose to move to Signapore even though he thinks China will be the next superpower due to its economic climate.

From what you described it sounds very progressive from a government level. Frankly, I am jealous. Just imagine what we could do if we overlaid such vision on top of our natural advantages here.

Thanks for your comments

semuren said...

Greetings Mark:

You should also note that despite the good economic planning of the Singapore government, there is dark side to the place. The government does not take kindly to criticism and uses slander and libel laws to bankrupt opposition politicians. Once legal judgments make said politicians bankrupt they can no longer hold public office. LI Guangyu's culture related programs, the "Speak Mandarin Campaign" and such like are also at least a little menacing in that they create a big role for the government in regulating the nature of a good or desirable citizenry.

shaxmatist said...

Singapore is basically a money laundering center for south east asia. An asian version of Dubai.

It's a good place to setup investment and holding companies, taxes and regulations are relatively low.

Post a Comment

*

*
Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix