News of the Day - Inflation
Scouring the globe for news that does not matter to the high and mighty financiers of the world because Uncle Ben is on their side...
....what matters to the bottom 80% aka the proletariat is not of concern. But it's still interesting to read about their tales of woe.... err... I mean their impending rebound during the 2nd half 2008 recovery. And one day stocks may care... but until then may I introduce our official blog mascot and also our future covergirl? (boy?) of the mutual fund prospectus. (you think I'm kidding) ---->
In this round of stories we'll focus on inflation - something every country in the world has but not us. As I keep repeating inflation cannot cross the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean nor the Canadian or Mexican border - therefore it is a problem every other country must deal with but not us. We are so lucky that way. But if inflation were real and not just something bloggers like me make up in our over active imagination what would it look like...
Let's begin with shoes... yes shoes. Not that there is any inflation in the world, but if there was - it appears to have trickled down to even shoes, per the Wall Street Journal. As I have been stating since last fall, we are moving from a global deflation environment to a global inflation environment - and those cheap Chinese goods are going to be incrementally increasing in cost. Until the global multinationals decide China is too expensive and its time to exploit Vietnamese labor.... err, I mean create a new middle class in Vietnam.
- The hottest trend in footwear this season? Inflation. (oooh, my favorite style!) After a decade of declining prices, footwear makers at all levels are raising prices.
- Brown Shoe Co., which makes Via Spiga and Buster Brown footwear and hasn't altered prices in years, plans an increase of 5% to 12% for fall. And the Nine West shoe label plans to boost prices on some styles by 15% next year.
- The moves reflect higher costs in China, which makes about 85% of shoes sold in the U.S., as well as higher fuel costs and the weak U.S. dollar. And they could presage price increases of other goods soon: Handbags, belts and other leather accessories are made in the same region in China.
- For retailers already struggling with a downturn in consumer spending, the higher costs couldn't come at a worse time. They fear the price increases will further damp shopping, forcing them to eventually slash prices to move merchandise and hurting their profit margins in the process. (but don't worry, buy retail stocks - they have been rocking and rolling lately because of the "early cycle recovery" story - that is, the US consumer is going to be rocking and rolling by this fall - don't you worry about facts; the hedge funds say buy retailers so you should buy retailers.)
- ..estimates that shoe makers will raise prices by an average of 10% to 15% in the next year, which would be the largest single-year increase in more than 50 years, according to the BLS. (once we move to "barefoot in the office" day, then we can say there is no inflation in shoes...)
- Americans are feeling a lot more economic pain than the government's official statistics would lead you to believe, according to a growing number of experts. They argue that figures on unemployment and inflation are being understated by the government. (I literally have typed this on a monthly basis as each report comes out; thank you - I now feel less alone)
- Over the past ten years, there have been other changes in the calculations, particularly for big ticket items. Cuts to estimated prices for items like electronics and cars that are thought to have improvements in quality year-after-year have lowered the overall CPI. In addition, changes in the way certain products, such as food, are tracked by the government, have also contributed to lower readings than otherwise expected.
- Bill Gross, the manager of Pimco Total Return, the nation's largest bond fund, refers to the CPI as a "con job" that deliberately understates the price pressures faced by Americans in order to keep Social Security payments and other government costs pegged to the index unduly low.
- Another flaw with the CPI numbers is that the government now assumes that higher prices for one item will lead consumers to buy more of a substitution item. That may be true. But if people buy fewer steaks and more hamburgers, for example, it's unrealistic to say that inflation isn't a problem, skeptics maintain.
- "The government can claim there's no inflation but all they're measuring is a reduced standard of living," argues Peter Schiff, president of Euro Pacific Capital (Booyah!)
- With all this in mind, California economist John Williams argues that CPI is understating inflation by at least 3 percentage points and perhaps as much as 7 percentage points. So instead of an annual inflation rate of 4%, the true number could be between 7% and 11%. (higher - college tuition, food, oil, gas, medical costs - all the things we need in life? higher)
- Even the government's own numbers show there are many unemployed people not showing up in the unemployment rate. The official reading does not include 4.8 million people who want to work but haven't found a job, for example. Many of these people are dropped from the official calculation because they have become so discouraged from looking without success that they haven't looked in the previous four weeks. Simply adding those people to the number of unemployed takes the current unemployment rate to 7.8%.
- Still, the Labor Department's own broadest measure of unemployment, which includes as jobless those working part-time jobs because they can't find full-time positions as well as some discouraged job seekers, puts the unemployment rate at 9.2% in April. [Apr 2: The Underemployment Rate is Rising]
Speaking of which, remember our government leaders and in fact, most trusted bankers, still live in a 1950s world where everything revolves around the United States of Subprime. So when our economic activity slows (which it has since late 2006), inflation must ebb because we are the end all and be all. That's worked out GREAT so far (err, not so much). But since it has not worked so far, that's ok - when things don't work, let's continue down the same path. It will work sooner or later - during each cut by the Federal Reserve we've been assured that inflation will come down in the "2nd half of 2008"... they still cling to thing like a soft blankie.
- Seeking to ease fears that rising oil and food prices will spark an inflation brushfire, San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen argued Tuesday that prices have probably peaked and should be headed lower in coming months
- The key to her forecast of moderate inflation was the tame behavior of wages, Yellen said. Unit labor costs only rose a tepid 0.25% in the first quarter, she noted.
- In her remarks, Yellen said she believes the economy should improve a bit after June as the impact of the Fed's aggressive rate cuts begin to be felt. "I expect the economy's performance will improve somewhat in the second half of the year." (oh my favorite time of year... "6 months from now" - the nirvana time)
- Yellen said that, adjusted for inflation, interest rates are now around zero. (no, adjusted for inflation we are PAYING people to take money, real rates are NEGATIVE - now thats inflationary! Here, we will pay you to take our paper peso)
And to think most companies have been absorbing input costs so far - just wait until they actually begin passing the lion's share onto you. Then you can go to your boss and ask for a 6-9% wage to help you cope - and your boss can say (with hand raised to your face)... talk to the Yellen. (while smirking) So that's whats coming. Right now you are only seeing the leading edge of inflation. No wait, you are not seeing it because there is little inflation. But if there was inflation... you'd be seeing the leading edge. Or something. Whatever - just repeat to yourself - there is no inflation. And buy stocks.
Long the total lack of inflation in the US economy; priceless!









10 comments:
best cartoon ever.
oh no, oh no, oh no, oh yeah!
Consumer prices only went up .2% last month. Does anyone actually believe the stats coming out of the fed anymore?
"You can't afford to eat, yet inflation is near 0%." WTF?
Yes, people believe the stats - this is why futures went from negative to a positive in the span of 30 seconds and we are opening up.
In a related note, Kool Aid was up 13% premarket
My favorite statistic from today's work of fiction was the unchanged energy, led my a 2% decline in gasoline prices.
"The unchanged reading for energy reflected a big 4.8 percent jump in natural gas prices, offset by a 2 percent decline in gasoline costs."
**2 percent decline in gasoline costs.**
Yea, that gasoline sure is getting cheap, aye? I am undecided, should I buy a Hummer H3 or a Mercedes SL600 to celebrate this wonderful development?
I loved your comment about mainstream media "finally clueing in" to the lie that is manipulated statistics. It is amazing to me how few professional journalists are standing up and screaming about these lies. Is it just journalistic laziness, or something more sinister?
TraderMark: I was having a conversation last nite with a friend regarding this very issue: why do so many people believe in such flawed data and just follow the crowd. The answer is that it is just easier. Why buck the system when the system is meant to protect you and your interests?
Luisa, I don't think any conspiracy in the press - journalists are journalists. Financially illiterate in most cases, just as the general population
guy, see previous answer - we don't teach how to balance a checkbook, what a 401k is, or what credit card debt is and how to manage it, or what APR is in our schools - then set these people into society and expect them to figure things out on their own. There is a reason most people either own a money market or their company stock as the majority of whatever they do have in their miniscule 401ks.
That will be the eventual catastrophe in this country - as pensions have been replaced by 401ks, a whole generation is now being told to think out 20-30-40 years in our instant gratification society. On top of that, they dont even save as it is, so even if they had the will and education they can't keep up with the cost of life. Pensions are savings many people in their 50s and 60s and 70s today. They wont be there (except in government of course!) for those in their 20s, 30s, and 40s. That's going to be a crushing blow as this generation moves into retirement in 20-30 years. The median 401k balance (including people in their 50s, 60s) is something like $37,000. That pays for 1 year of post retirement life?
The old days, you used to enter retirement with NO mortgage debt... so you could live on far less income. Now our 40 and 50 somethings have pulled out equity from their homes to consume. So they will be entering retirement with a full home payment.
This is why many people will not be retiring and I truly believe will be Walmart greeters until they keep over.
But lack of education is a sinister thing here - more important to teach CPR to people rather than economics or finance. I haven't saved anyone's life through CPR in my 35 years but I balance a checkbook, invest, got a mortgage, have credit cards on a daily, weekly, monthly, yearly basis.
Priorities.
TM, you hit the nail on the head. What's the first thing somoeone does when they gain power? Enact measures to make sure they do not lose it.
The gov. doesn't want the people to be educated, because educated people wouldn't stand for how the gov. operates. Additionally, keeping people financially dependent on the gov. keeps them under control. Just look at what they've done with the income tax. Imagine if once/month each person was forced to write a check for the income tax instead of it magically never showing up in their paycheck. There would be near instant revolt.
So yeah, the accepted lack of education is the sinister thing.
Mark,
EXCELLENT call on WFMI. Down over 10% on a very weak report and poor guidance. I know you can't short individual names, but consider it a nice moral victory.
thank you
I did a mental cheer yesterday when it was down 9%. The numbers were not that bad really but the market didn't like it, and I think things will degrade over time. They still cater to an audience in the top 10% or so, so that group will be the last to suffer.
One day I hope to have a long-short hedge fund and then I can take advantage on both sides of the ledger. I had a lot of retail and restaurant calls in the fall that would of generated 40-60% gains that I could only type about and not have add to my performance.
But thanks for noticing.
Post a Comment