But this is just another step towards the acrimony that will grow not only within countries but between countries as priorities on how to use limited resources are debated. See the Indian Finance Minister's quote below. And just imagine the "mood on the street" in these countries - the inability to feed your family leads to desperate measures. If you think it's bad now, give it half a decade. "Food protectionism" will be a growing issue.
- Asia faces a sharp rise in food costs, due partly to surging demand for crops used in biofuels, and governments should do more to shield the region's poor from economic shocks, a U.N. commission said Thursday.
- Economic growth in the region will slow as the U.S. credit crisis hurts demand for exports, but a robust expansion in China and India should help Asia avoid a major slump, the U.N. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific said in a report.
- "Rapidly rising food prices will be the key challenge in the coming year," Shuvojit Banerjee, an economist for the commission, said at a Beijing news conference. "With the march towards biofuels apparently unstoppable, the region has to prepare for sustained inflation through higher food prices."
- In China, food costs in February were up 23.3 percent from the same month last year, driven by a 63.4 percent jump in the price of pork and a 46 percent rise for vegetables. China has banned use of food crops for fuel and has imposed curbs on grain exports to increase domestic supplies and cool inflation.
- Across the region, price rises are driven in part by surging demand for food crops to make biofuels, such as sugarcane used for ethanol, the commission said. "We do view biofuels as quite a worry for food production in the region," Banerjee said.
- On Wednesday, Indian Finance Minister P. Chidambaram said the use of food crops for biofuels is hurting the poor and called it "a sign of lopsided priorities of certain countries." "It is outrageous and it must be condemned," he said in a lecture in Singapore.
- The U.N. report said rising food costs hurt the poor much more than higher oil prices because they spend a much bigger share of their incomes to feed their families. In the Philippines, for example, 50 percent of consumer spending is for food versus 7 percent for energy.
- "We find persistent poverty and widening economic inequalities due to the neglect of agriculture," Banerjee said. "Improving agricultural productivity would have a profound impact on poverty."









4 comments:
OT, and aren't I always OT, but what do you think of 1320 on the SP500 from a TA standpoint? The way we blew thru it going down and up last time makes me think it is meaningless as support now as we approach again. Haven't been doing this long tho, so do you think did it's lack of strength either way last time signifies anything?
Don't worry, I am always OT even on my own blog
I am not really focused on 1320 at this point; I am looking at the wide range of 50 day moving average on the top (1353 and falling by the day) and 1270 or PPT supported 1260 on the bottom
The only numbers in between that matter to me are 1330 as that is the 20 day moving average which the index bounced off smartly an hour ago and 1300 just because its a psychological tag.
Until we make a breakout from above the 50 day or below 1260/1270 it's going to be a lot of range bound white noise IMO.
Fundamentals degrading on 1 hand vs government intervention on the other - a Mexican standoff.
MOS announced it has signed that vaunted yearly potash contract with India...how does this compare to the estimated increase?
MOS Mosaic announces canpotex potash contracts with Indian customers (104.67 +1.72)
The co announces that Canpotex Limited, the export association of Saskatchewan potash producers, has reached an agreement to supply 1.3 million metric tonnes of potash to its key Indian customers at $625 per metric tonne CFR. This represents a volume increase of 350,000 metric tonnes and a price increase of $355 per metric tonne from the prior year contract. Shipments will occur during the period between May 2008 and March 2009. The contract includes credit terms of 180 days
Thanks for the heads up! Same price as the Russians - see earlier post this week on that subject - not a surpriset
30% increase in tonnage - fantastic. Less for the Chinese - more pressure on them to pay up! I am hoping for $500 at least from them.
And very little of this is in future estimates (09) which are already double 2008. Just sick what is going on with these potash producers.
GReat for POT, MOS, AGU.
Post a Comment