Supporting my view of a REGIONAL US recession, I found this random article from an Indianapolis newspaper.
- Jon Castongia can't keep enough farm equipment in his John Deere dealership. "I've got nothing that's not sold," he says. "Across the board, new and used, everything's popular right now." Castongia's business boom is evidence of a new golden era for farmers.
- All-time high prices for soybeans and wheat and near-record high prices for corn and other farm goods have pumped up farm incomes by 50 percent since 2006 in Indiana and other Farm Belt states.
- The value of Indiana farmland has soared from an average of $3,500 an acre to more than $4,000 in the past two years.
- The boom is expected to plow billions of dollars of extra income into Indiana's economy in the next few years. Big beneficiaries range from co-ops and ag suppliers to rural restaurants and retailers. (this is the multiplier effect I talk about so often; the rest of the country was enjoying it from overpriced homes and house ATMs over the past half decade; but this version in the Heartland is a genuine thing unlike the credit mirage)
- But consumers could have something to lose -- disposable income as they face higher costs for food staples such as flour, poultry, milk and beef, all increasing because of the rising cost of grain.
- Still, Indiana has much to gain from the grain boom because it's the nation's fifth-largest producer of corn and fourth-largest soybean grower.
- The higher grain prices, if they last, should firm up the state's rural property tax base, adding to the tax revenue streams of local governments and schools. At the same time, prices are so high that crop farmers don't require the heavy federal commodity subsidies they collected in the past, saving the nation's taxpayers about $6 billion a year.
- Exports of grain and other agricultural products will hit a record $79 billion this year, much of it going to the developing economies of China and India. Adding to the demand are dozens of new ethanol plants that this year will convert 25 percent of the U.S. corn crop into fuel.
- "This is one of the biggest opportunities for Indiana agriculture and U.S. agriculture for maybe a century," says Andy Miller, Indiana agriculture director.
- The boom isn't happening without some pain -- for both farmers and consumers. Though grain prices make up just a fraction of the overall cost of processed foods, they helped fuel a 5 percent inflation rate on food last year that hit everything from bread and cereal to soft drinks and cookies.
- Farmers, with more cash to spend, are facing inflated costs for many of the materials they need to farm. In the past two years, prices of nitrogen, potash and phosphate fertilizers have roughly doubled. Values of farmland last year jumped about 17 percent, the largest annual increase since 1977, according to Purdue University. And land rents have shot up as well.
- "It's all about yield now," says Allen Baird, who farms several thousand acres with a brother and two nephews in Tipton County. He marvels at how much his crops are worth. "I've never seen it in my lifetime, never seen anything like it," says Baird, who has farmed since 1964.
- Long mired at less than $2 a bushel, corn now trades at more than $5. Soybeans have jumped from less than $6 a bushel to more than $15, while wheat has spiked from under $4 to more than $10. The last time grain prices jumped across the board so dramatically was in the early 1970s when the former Soviet Union began massive grain purchases on the world market.
- Demand for grain is running so strong that the nation's wheat supply is almost gone, while soybean and corn inventories by August should hit their lowest levels since 1973-75, says Chris Hurt, a Purdue ag economist. "The cupboard is almost bare. It's too tight for comfort. It'll be until (the) 2010 crop before we can catch up and rebuild these inventories."
- The upshot: grain markets in the next two years could see "enormous volatility in prices," Hurt said, as traders react to weather scares, droughts and scarcity. Adding to the uncertainty is the low value of the dollar relative to the euro, which makes U.S. grains cheaper for foreign buyers.
- Ronnie Mohr, a Hancock County crop farmer who is a director of the 50-state farm co-op Land O'Lakes Inc., says although he reaps the benefit of high grain prices, he worries they'll cripple his main customers: hog farmers and other livestock operators who buy more than half of each year's U.S. corn harvest to feed to their animals.
Long fertilizer and crops









4 comments:
Something looks wrong with the Ag's and Infrastructure stocks.
The momentum looks to be getting out and turning short on these groups. I am not liking the action and volume in these two favorites of mine and yours.
Seems that one by one high beta or the big winners are undergoing distribution which I think is a tell that the next leg of the bear is about to begin.
Your thoughts?
Many of these stocks are up 50% from January lows. It is too much to ask them to just go up every week. They are ripe for a pullback and I've cut back the past 2 weeks, anticipating one. In fact hoping for one. Mosaic is usually a 5-7% position, I now have it closer to 2%. Fertilizer as a group is usually closer to 11-14%; I have it down to about 5%. The stocks don't exist in a vacuum.
I am now positioned very similar to how I was late last week. I got lucky in that my short exposure was cut in half Monday due to the severe fall in the market, anticipating a rebound. But now I am back in the same position. If we test 1270 that will be the 3rd test, and triple bottoms almost never hold. I bet against that theory in early January and got spanked, so this time I will be positioned better, and assuming it will break. If 1270 goes, we go off the abyss - exactly where we were about to go before the Invisible Hand started it magic Friday and Tuesday.
I remain very bearish overall.
The Ag, infra stocks and the momentum lot with good fundies, dont directly benefit from the Feb moves. To me, it looks like it's playing out alot like it did in Jan, where initially the move was in financials and retail. Ag/infra lagged initially, but outperformed as the bounce in Jan leveled off. We could see a test of the highs in these sectors as the rest of the market consolidates. But I agree with Mark, that there's alot of hot money in there, and isnt worth a big bet until we see some real selling pressure.
I also remain bearish, overall.
Jeff it feels identical. I remember starkly because we tested a low (in this case a triple bottom), bounced - and I thought perhaps we'd break the "triple bottoms always break" curse so I dropped most short exposure and went heavily long. I went on to have the 2 worst weeks in the fund life since I had very little insurance in the face of the worst correction we've had in half a decade. (in terms of how far it fell in such a short time)
I dont consider infrastructure right now to be a leading sector - but coal is breaking down... ag and natural gas and coal and gold are really whats been leading the market. They started to break down but the "Invisible Hand" could not allow the natural order of things to play out. We only had 1 real day of selling in agriculture stocks.
Anyhow even if we are wrong and the market bounds higher, no reason to rush in... it is easy to get stuck in the day to day, but the medium term outlook is not bullish. If that means straight down or eventually, I think it makes sense to hold hedges (or at least cash) no matter what in this environment.
With that said, I've been thinking the past week this feels a lot like early January...
I hope to buy my favorite names much lower... the constant "interventions" just slow us down from getting to the ultimate destination. Anything to kick the can down the road - the government way.
Post a Comment