Now I did step on a mine as I took Foster Wheeler up from 1.8% to 3.5% allocation in the past week; and broke one of my own rules - don't build up a position going into earnings because the Street acts like a 3 year old brat if they don't get everything as they wish, but what's done is done. I am in fact adding another 100 shares this morning on the 8%+ selloff. I wasn't online this morning so I missed the low below $70, but I am adding in the $72s. This $72 level is also the 50 day moving average so I see it as a sign of strength that the stock already rebounded back above this level. I could certainly be wrong and this is part of a bigger trend, but I heard the same doom and gloom the last time Foster Wheeler missed, and the stock went on to more than double from those oversold levels within a few months. I continue to watch this bursting backlog, and that is key #1 to my eyes. $4.6 BILLION in NEW ORDERS Booked this quarter alone - wow. That is almost equal to the entire amount of business they did in year 2007. Staggering.
This remains a company which grew 50% last year, and trades at roughly 20x forward earnings. While 50% won't continue, 25-30% future growth (over 2-4 years) seems very plausible.
- Foster Wheeler Ltd. said Tuesday fourth-quarter profit rose, but missed expectations due to the repeal of a tariff in Italy, contract issues with a client and fewer bonuses and incentives.
- The engineering and construction services company's profit rose nearly 24 percent to $78.1 million, or 54 cents per share, from $63.1 million, or 44 cents per share, a year earlier. Revenue jumped to $1.47 billion from $1.19 billion.
- Analysts expected profit of 76 cents per share on revenue of $1.42 billion, on average, according to a Thomson Financial poll.
- Full-year profit rose 50 percent to $393.9 million, or $2.72 per share, from $262 million, or $1.72 per share. Revenue climbed 46.1 percent to $5.11 billion from $3.5 billion.
- Milchovich noted, “We reported solid results for the fourth quarter of 2007. However, EBITDA was below the average of the first three quarters of the year because of reduced EBITDA in our Global Engineering and Construction (E&C) Group due to three factors. First, E&C experienced an $8.3 million negative impact due to the repeal of an Italian power price tariff, which had been enacted in the third quarter of 2007, as a result of a court ruling in the country. Second, we experienced fewer profit-enhancing opportunities such as bonuses and incentives during the quarter as compared to the early part of the year due to portfolio mix and contract timing. Finally, E&C took a $5 million reserve on one reimbursable contract due to issues with the client over project scope growth. We’re hopeful that this matter will be favorably resolved in future periods but felt that it was appropriate to reserve for it at this time.”
- Milchovich added, “As we look at 2008, we continue to be very positive about the markets that both our businesses serve and about our position as we enter the year. In our E&C Group, consistent with what we’ve been saying for months, we expect meaningful organic growth and sustainable margins. We’re hopeful that this can be complemented by growth through strategic acquisitions during the year as well. In our Global Power Group, as we’ve previously stated, we remain confident that we will enjoy a material level of margin improvement and revenue growth during the year given our position and momentum entering 2008.”
Long Foster Wheeler in fund and personal account










3 comments:
Common now, aren't these rules more like "guidelines"? Since they seem so flexible depending on the situation ;)
Speaking of which, have you ever made a dedicated post toward your trading guidelines (entries, exits)? We all know about your investing thesis, but the short term moves (trades) are slightly ambiguous. From reading your postings I've kind of gotten of an idea what they are; buy on pull backs to 50, *cough* don't buy ahead of earnings *cough*, > 200 MA, etc, etc. That is of course until you make random exceptions and rant about making breaking them afterwards :)
Actually, you used a far better word, guidelines, than the one I've been using rules.
Or maybe rules is correct and I need to use the caveat that rules are meant to be broken!
I do have a general framework and patterns... but I think investing is more art than science. Anyone who sticks to things 100% is very rigid and I think destined to underperform. But I'd say for 80% of the time I do try to stick to some general guidelines which you picked out, but then bend those at time. Such in theory now that FWLT is below 50 day I should be selling, but in fact I bought more in the $66s. So I could just be a sucker for punishment, or like to break rules.
One more thing I remembered about the post on DBA - one great thing I like about DBA Is there is no earnings report! Heaven!
Thats too bad... I was hoping they would miss so I can buy it at a lower price!!
Post a Comment