Saturday, January 5, 2008

Bookkeeping: 'Rising Tide' Performance Week 22

TweetThis
Week 22 performance of the mutual fund

Comments: Well I started last week's review with "A quiet week overall". Can't say the same this time around. It's been a long week - so long in fact it feels like it's been over a year long (oh cmon now, I've been waiting to use that line for months). No, on a serious note - this was a bad week. I was not keeping track of the fund/index performance week by week during the August swoon, but this week was worse than anything we had in very awful November on the S&P500. I don't track the NASDAQ weekly but Friday alone the NASDAQ lost nearly 4%... bringing back memories of summer and fall of 2001 or just about any week in 2002.

For the S&P500 in November the worst weeks were week 11 (of this fund) at -3.9%, and week 14 at -3.7%. Small potatoes as we start 2008 off with a bang with the S&P 500 down 4.5%, and the Russell 1000 down 4.6%. That is obviously some serious territory. Rising Tide Growth Fund fell this week too but a very manageable -1.00%. I'll take it! In fact, relative to the indexes this is *the* best week the fund has had period; with an out performance of >3.50%. To put that in perspective that annualizes to a yearly out performance vs the indexes of >180% (I wish)

This was actually quite the week. Monday was in line with the markets but during the heavy drop Wednesday, the 'pair trading' set up I have, long certain sectors combined with Ultrashorts against others worked great, so the fund was actually up during a 1.5% type of loss day, and Thursday with the market flat, this continued with sectors I am exposed to such as agriculture and infrastructure ramping very strong, while my top position at the time Ultrashort Real Estate (SRS) went on a 1 day 6%+ tear, as people start buying into the commercial real estate slowdown. (remember this is not a residential real estate short). And then it had another big day Friday. While I don't have an Ultrashort against the NASDAQ my Ultrashort against the Russell 2000 continues to outperform as it is chock full of companies dependent on the US economy - note the Russell 2000 was actually DOWN in 2007 whereas the S&P 500, Dow, and NASDAQ were up. This all plays into my thesis started in August that companies without benefit of exports will get hit the hardest.

Only on Friday did the longs in the portfolio suffer as the market started "baby with bathwater" type of selling, but the decent cash position and remaining Ultrashort exposure helped to buffer the fall to some degree.

From here, we appear to be approaching critical support on the indexes. If S&P 1400 does not hold, its a free fall situation. I would doubt this happens right away without a bounce first, but anything is possible. For the fund, I came into the week as heavily hedged as I go (19% type of Ultrashort position - I try to limit myself to around 20% since this is a long focused fund) and kept that level most of the week until late Thursday and Friday. Now with the market swooning so strongly, I am going back to a more long stance anticipating some bounce, and then once we hit 'resistance' again, will return to this negative stance as we enter earnings season. But the complexion of the portfolio changed quite a bit on Friday as I did the first round of heavy buying I have done in quite a while. Sentiment is starting to get quite poor so I would expect at least some attempt at rebounds next week. How successful it will be, I suppose depends on the market mood and if Fed cuts, government bailouts and the like convince people (for the fourth or fifth time) that those actions are enough to stop the business cycle.

As for the fund, it has been quite a hot streak of late. This sort of pace will not continue so I expect the market to take some gains back soon. She is a wild beast, and likes to humble us often so I expect to get some of that humble pie sooner rather than later. When things are working this well, it does not last. So I am expecting some weeks ahead where things don't go so splendid as they have of late. With 4 weeks left in my 2nd quarter of the fund life, I'm at pace to beat the indexes by over 60% this year (my annual goal is 15%), if the 3rd and 4th quarters match the 1st and 2nd. Even Ken Heebner would be proud? ;)

Price of Rising Tide Growth: $12.374
Lifetime Performance to date (vs Aug 3, 2007): +23.74%

Comparable S&P 500: 1,411.6 (-3.67%)
Comparable Russell 1000: 768.3 (-3.51%)

Fund return vs S&P 500: +27.40%
Fund return vs Russell 1000: +27.25%

Last week's results here.

Since the market cap of the median stock in the Rising Tide Growth fund (median $9.8 Billion as of November 07) is significantly below the SP500 index (median $13.1 Billion as of September 07) but higher than the median market cap in the Russell 1000 (median market cap $5.8 Billion as of September 07), I am measuring the fund against both indexes. Click here to see all fund's holdings as of mid November 2007.

Basis for indexes is 5 day weighted average of closing prices Aug 3-9
SP500 : 1,465.2
Russell 1000 : 796.2

To see why I use the 5 day weighted average of the first 5 trading days to smooth out the volatility of the indexes as the fund launched, see here.

Please click here: fund performance for previous updates

4 comments:

hieucisco said...

Mark, i enjoy your blog everyday, your pick and sector have been dead on. Thank you for doing this. I have this observation and would like to share with you. It look to me like we are very similar to july / aug time frame, in term of the drop and rebounce. The SPX triangle is resolve to the down side break, and it could go along way. Don't you think a better approach now is to increase cash position and lighten up even more with your winners? you know very well top quality stock fall last, but they always fall to create the momentum on the rebound. I would be surprise to see aapl at 160 or Goog at 620. The question is can they hold those numbers?

TraderMark said...

Hi, thanks for your comments. None of us can predict the future. My gut feel is this S&P 1400 will break on one of these tests and we have a more systematic downfall. But if I had gone with that thesis in August or November, I would of missed a lot of return. So my working theory is keep repeating this pattern and eventually I will be wrong, but make enough money until the pattern breaks. My other gut feel is the Fed will be intervening soon enough, or if not soon they will do a lot bigger cut at end of January which will help sentiment. To be honest, retail, financials are very washed out. I am seeing stuff like JCPenney trade as if no one is ever going to go to the store again. It seems a bit overdone to me (for now). I don't have a crystal ball - AAPL could be $160 next week and I will buy more if it goes there. What I know is generally 4.5% down weeks are rare, and generally not followed by another 4.5% down week. That said, I am playing the odds and "one day" a 4.5% down week WILL be followed by another 4.5% week, but that would be atypical and I will take losses those weeks, but the other 90% of the time when that does not occur I will do ok. I have enough gains stored to be willing to sacrifice some in case this is wrong. I don't think the 'powers that be' will let the market go down much more from here without at least a fight (S&P 1400) :)

If you notice I still only have 3% type of positions in the top names - generally my top 3-4 positions will be 5%+ when I am very bullish so if the market continues to tank I still have a lot of building to do in those top names, so I will keep liquifying short exposure and keep pushing it into the AAPLs of the world.

But with all that said, until the market adjusts to the new economic reality we are at great risk of all these top dog stocks breaking even 50 day moving averages. EventuallYy I will be wrong on calling for a rebound - but I had people say the same in August and November (i.e. why are you buying here?) So as long as you can be correct 4-5x before you are wrong, overall you will do ok. This is how I am working it for now. I am hoping for say a 2-4% type of bounce in the indexes and some of these individual names will jump 10%+ and I will lighten up, go back to some cash and Ultrashort exposure and keep repeating... until it either breaks out to the top side (1510+) or downside (1390 or lower). Eventually this pattern must be broken...until then I am going to keep playing it and milk it.

hieucisco said...

Mark, you know triple bottom always failed, that's why i doubt 1400 will hold, any bounce there will be small and hard to swing trade, i don't see more then 2 days up on this trip down. Financial and retailer earning has been mark down, but what about the others sector? are they immune? will we get RIMM, ORCL type earning report??? i don't know. I feel the oil sector have a lot of risk for dwon side adjustment. My feel for the market right now is we will get a new trade range below 1400. Likely 1300 to 1375. I can not verify but i read on some site, commercial is net short, and put call ratio is trend up. In the mean time, i wait for clearer direction.

TraderMark said...

I never use words like always in the investing world. There is no always - i.e. triple bottoms always fail. I think there is a high probability it breaks and in fact am positioned and have been calling for it. But I am also aware the Fed head sat with President Bush on Friday, its an election year and they will pull out all the stops. What if the Fed cuts 50 basis points Monday at 9 AM? I don't consider that a high probability either. But always a possibility. as for earnings I believe the vast majority of stocks in my fund have solid earnings visibility - so I am not that worried. But a waterfall panic selloff won't care about earnings. So its more about sentiment in regards to a further sell off in these names.

Last, keep in mind I am a long based mutual fund here. Not a hedge fund. Hence my bias, my nature, is going to always be long biased. Otherwise when the day comes I can measure against the 3 year track records of the general mutual fund community people will say "well that doesn't count", he was 80% short at so and so time. I am trying to beat domestic based long focused funds, with superior stock picking on the long side and some smaller allocations (20-25% max) on either cash or shorts. So even if I thought SP was going to 1300 tomorrow I would not be doing a 50% allocation to cash/short exposure. That would be reserved for fundmyhedgefund.com ;)

Post a Comment

Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix