Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Just a Quick Update on Portfolio

TweetThis
Rightly or Wrongly, I've reduced cash by about 10% (near 30% to about 20%)

Once the Fed did 25/25 I put about 5% of that into Ultrashorts. Once we broke 1490 yesterday I put the other 5% into more Ultrashorts.

The 2nd purchase above was obviously hurting this morning as we hurtled higher but at this point is not doing so bad. If the markets improve I will cut back that last 5% and take some losses, but for now I just don't see any impetus for buying on the long side. We've had a 7% bounce in past 2 weeks on smoke and mirrors of Fed cuts - the market got those, and the market even got a bonus this AM. And still we are hanging around 1490. Not much progress.

If we break 1490 (on a closing basis), looking for first stop at 1440s, and then we go back to November issues - risk of downside to 1405 level (which if broken would bring many bad bad bad effects), and then any bounce will be met with resistance around 1490. So stuck once again in 1405-1490 Groundhog Day era, if we break down from here. If the equity market were following the economy or bond market it would be markedly lower. Thus far it has resisted. So we shall see if the bond market suddenly improves and says 'we were wrong about this recession risk, credit markets freezing up, and general fear' or if the equity markets begin to falter (again). I am positioned now for either direction but being a long fund (no individual shorts) have to always be weighing long. If I were a hedge fund I'd probably be looking to have almost the reverse of my portfolio at this time *IF* the S&P breaks down under 1480 (below yesterday's lows)... but that's against the rules of the mutual fund :) Hence I am restricted (if the market falters) to simply trying to lose less money than the market, instead of truly benefiting by a falling market by being aggressively short as the technicals break down. So that's what I am going to try to do here with the index short hedges/20% cash.

No reason to do much here until the equity market picks a direction. I'm as negative as I've felt on the US economy for many years... but than again I'm a dismal scientist by nature. It doesn't mean the market needs to go down - that would simply be the logical extension.

Just as an fyi - a few major brokerages economists' have finally begrudgingly began forecasting in the past week a heightened risk of recession in 2008; a position I've advocated since summer. Again, the markets can disassociate from the economy for a while; and who knows, maybe we have a market at all time highs in the middle of recession - anything is possible with all the currency being printed in this world needing a home (real estate and debt is out, why not equities) but if logic would dictate that stock prices follow profits, and profits will be retrenching in 2008, than it would logically dictate a lower market. Logic has no place in the market in the near term though; I am simply speaking of the longer run.

7 comments:

cm202bc said...

Mark, just a question.

Are you truly using 1490 as your indicator or is that your shorthand way of saying the S&P 50 EMA, (which has been in that vicinity for a while)?

I've been using the movement relative to the EMA to determine my action over the last few weeks. Funny, after the slide in the mid-day I expected they would close the market on right on the 50 EMA, then in the last hour when S&P was 15 below it I assumed I was wrong and doubled my DXD. Oops.

TraderMark said...

yes, the 50 day moving average, technically its probably 1487-1488 right now

1490 is just a nice round number that has been the key for the past 6 weeks or so.

Plunge Protection team came out and moved the S&P from 1473 to 1483 in last half hour; the move came literally in about a 45 second time frame...it was 1475 and I literally hit refresh on my watch list and it was 1482. Funny how that always happens at critical junctures. At that time you knew it was (cough) destined to close in 1487-1489 range. Magic!

cm202bc said...

Gotcha

Parker Capital Management said...

I know Macke and the Fast Money guys have been all about 1490 for quite some time and it has worked in the past, but the last few days it really hasn't seemed to matter much. It has whipsawed back and forth through 1490 rather easily in the past two days. It closed below it and looking at the longer term S&P 500 trend, it is extremely tough to be bullish at this point (and this is coming from someone who is generally a bull).

http://parkercapital.blogspot.com

TraderMark said...

yes I always explain to people about technical analysis that it might sound like hocus pocus and nonsense but if something happens out there that thousands (hundreds of thousands) of traders react to, to ignore it is silly. I say the example is... what if someone told you when its 95 in Miami, sweater sales generally jump by 50%. You'd say nonsense! But if you were a sweater salesman you'd have your inventory ready every time it hits 95. Because thats what other people are keying off and its a 'trend'. Thats why TA is crucial (even the most basic version) to have in an investor toolbox. I do nothing sophisticated, but it doesnt need to be sophisticated.

TraderMark said...

re: the past few days it hasn't mattered

#1 no rule works all the time
#2 the Fed has been more important than anything else

when the outside noise is more quiet, the technical levels will be respected more. When you are in a news driven environment, its a little different. For example we broke below 1490 on Fed cut, but then they came out with the intervention... hence why it jumped back above it. Without the intervention my guess is we would of tanked.

Parker Capital Management said...

definitely would have tanked, and probably still will. I agree -- FED news trumped any technicals --- but i guess I'm wondering if we should still place as much importance on the 1490 level since it is not as apparent on a long-term trend anymore, though it probably is still in play psychologically for a lot of people so it can't be ignored.

Post a Comment

Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix