Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Cramer and Under Armour (UA)

TweetThis
Let me preface this post by saying (a) Cramer is a great hedge fund manager and (b) I think Cramer does a good job explaining things that people need to know to get into the market. But sometimes his calls confound me and I think he is the traditional momo trader. And unfortunately people take his calls as gospel, when no trader is perfect or near perfect (although Eric Bolling was freaking good - anyone see him lately?)

Case in point is recent call on Under Armour (UA). Again, I cannot short individual names but on October 30th [Surprised by Strength in Under Armour] I wrote

I am a bit surprised at the strength in Under Armour (UA) this morning off a nice earnings report but mixed guidance. Generally a high valued stock would sell off on this sort of news but thus far it has held up - the stock is right at the 50 day moving average of $60 in fact. It looks like the stock was down 7% in premarket but then bounced to actually be up for the day. Honestly, if I could, if the stock started faltering here, I'd consider it a great short for the near term.

After I wrote that I did some digging and saw the inventory numbers were bloated (much like Crocs (CROX)) but Crocs paid for it and Under Armour should not? In fact Cramer lauded Under Armour for more inventory (more on that later). So after a sham rally the stock broke below its 50 day moving average support (just below $60) where it turns into a wonderful short.
I followed that up this past Friday [Looks like Under Armour is Finally Facing Reality]

At the time I said I might be interested in the stock as it was approaching its 200 day moving average of low $50s but that level provided zero support and the stock sliced right through it (falling knife). Now we can see one of the reasons why - insiders just tossed out nearly 2.5 million shares last week. Ouch!
  1. The chief executive of Under Armour Inc (UA) sold 1.5 million shares last week, according to a filing released on Monday, but still owns nearly 26 percent of the total outstanding shares in the sport apparel company.
  2. Also on Nov. 1, two of the company's senior vice presidents, Kip Fulks and Scott Plank, sold 15,000 shares and 850,000 shares of Class A common stock, respectively.
And yes before I go on, I realize the boilerplate "it's for diversification" and "he still owns a lot" but thats a pretty big swig to take out at once.

Now back to Cramer - I remember his comments struck me on Under Armour (UA) because he got down on Crocs for basically the same issue he was lauding Under Armour. The only difference? One stock was going up, and one down - hence he was applauding the inventory issue at UA, the same issue he was not happy about with former fan favorite Crocs.

I believe on this one he let the price action get ahead of his better judgement; in face he basically said as much. From his Oct 30th entry on UA (as stock was in $60s) he wrote

Under Armour (UA) did it. The apparel maker pulled off one of the most amazing things I have ever seen in this business: an explanation for a 100% jump in inventory.

..on the company's conference call I heard the 100% build-up in inventory, precisely what the bears were counting on and the stock looked like it would reverse hard.

I couldn't believe it. I was appalled. Seemed like Chairman and CEO Kevin Plank totally blew it.

The call, however, was totally compelling. The company has been short on product every fall and this time it wasn't going to let it happen again. Plus, baby, it's cold outside. So whatever inventory it had will blow through in a week or two's time.

So, for once, instead of inventory being an albatross, it became a blessing. Under Armour, amazingly, is going higher, and the big reason is inventory.
More important, go buy. The guys who are short the stock will now be betting that it gets hot again.

Cramer then reiterated that stance on "Stop Trading" segment on CNBC the next day (still in $60s)

Cramer also likes Under Armour (UA), off 3% on worries of rising inventory. "Yes, I would buy it," Cramer said.

Now today with the stock in the upper $40s - down >20% from his buys last week.

Sell Under Armour (UA), Jim Cramer said Tuesday on CNBC's Stop Trading! segment.

Cramer is "sick" of chief Kevin Plank selling his stock, a la Countrywide (CFC) chief Angelo Mozilo. Cramer said he agrees with Morgan Stanley's underweight call on the stock. Cramer said he feels like he got "hosed" by Plank's announcement last night that he sold 1.5 million shares for almost $90 million.

********
So again, there is no way Cramer could of known about the insider selling, but his cheering of a higher inventory number (which he would crucify any other retailer for) only because the stock was up post earnings, is what troubles me. Again, momentum begets momentum - and Cramer has become the king of the momentum investors. This works in today's day and age, more often than not, (see Baidu.com, see First Solar, see Research in Motion) but instead of blaming insider selling, I believe Cramer should say "I was wrong on the inventory issue" - it's never good for any retailer. I remember a similar situation with one of his old favorites, Hansen Natural (HANS) - it was a great stock until it disappointed once and then it was sort of "dead to him" from there. :) So with momentum investing, keep in mind the type of investors who helped push up the stock to unnatural heights, will leave at the first sign of trouble and in most cases never come back. Sort of like locusts. This is why momentum stocks (usually) take a lot of time to heal; a whole new class of investor needs to get interested since the locusts have moved on to the next field to ravage. But in time the good ones will come back, while the bad companies will devolve into a death spiral.

Once again, Cramer made more money than I am sure I'll ever see and is an encyclopedia of stock information, and I'll make many bonehead moves like this as well (which you'll see out in the open on the blog!); just keep in mind there is danger in this style of investing and for those who dismissed the inventory issue due to this call, it did not turn out well. At this point with the insider selling, I find it hard to get interested in Under Armour although there appears to be some support here in the mid $40s... in fact I think today's call to sell, is the correct one - as further downside should be seen in the coming weeks.

Long Crocs in fund and in personal account.


2 comments:

Pankaj said...

One thing I've observed about Cramer is that he flips on a dime! I mean literally! I clearly remember him calling ISRG expensive when it dipped in 80's the last time- it only made new highs after that. Also, I remember him putting DE (Deere) on his sell block when it was at 100. He said Deere story is overdone. He was negative on China for sooo long and have onnly changed his mind about China on a handful of stocks and thats about it.. if a caller asks him about a china equity that's not on his list, China then becomes a communist nation and he says he hates them. :). There are soo many occasions where he just doesn't get it or is biased in a way and then if his call plays out the other way, he stands corrected - so convenient.

He is a good educator and I listen to his ideas and thesis for increasing my general knowledge about companies and thats about it.


BTW, that article on how stocks respond to theie earnings, i.e., CROX vs. BTU/VLO, was very nice!

Here's a great documentary on Phantom shares I found very insightful as well -

http://images.overstock.com/f/102/3117/8h/www.overstock.com/07-0313Bloom_PhantomShares_NSS.wmv


Cheers...
AJ

TraderMark said...

AJ, he does flip on a dime but he was a hedge fund manager for years so thats his psychology. I have been a reader of him since the late 90s and a subscriber to Realmoney all this time. He has a lot of great insights, and is wrong at times like any trader. If you are 70% right in the market you are Joe Montana - the key is to keep losses contained and let winners run. He does flip, but the problem is the audience who follows him chases into and out of things as well, if he says something they run it up 9% in after hours. So that is a large part of the problem. I do have to say I am amazed this man has books, TV show he prepares for every day, he knows about 20x more stocks than I do, writes articles, and has a family. I am single and I am overwhelmed so I don't know how he does it!! Thanks on your note on the CROX vs BTU story - trust me, I used to sit there early in my investing career and say "WHAT THE HECK" when I saw things like that happen. So hopefully by showing "why", others can avoid the same confusion... or if they remain confused can send me money in the future so I can take care of it hah.

Post a Comment

Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix