Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Tyson Foods (TSN) warns

TweetThis
I don't know when I suddenly became a beef/poultry analyst - until a month ago I never looked at these names, but they are interesting now for various reasons, especially the inflation angle and potential for exports into developing nations as those countries develop wealth and demand better food. Previous comments on both these topics can be found here.

Tyson Foods (TSN) results/guidance today leads us to the troubling question - what happens when you cannot pass on raw input costs to the consumer.... ? What happens to corporate profits? Well you get a Tyson Foods result.

Tyson Lowers 2007 Profit Forecast, Citing 4Q Costs, South Korean Beef Disruption SPRINGDALE, Ark. (AP) -- Tyson Foods Inc., the world's largest meat processor, lowered its profit forecast Wednesday for this fiscal year, citing rising costs and disruption of beef exports to South Korea.

"The fourth quarter is turning out to be more challenging than expected," said Tyson President and Chief Executive Officer Richard L. Bond. "Our beef business has been affected by higher than expected live cattle costs and a decline in beef revenues due to a disruption in South Korean beef trade."

"In chicken, we successfully implemented price increases earlier in the year, but gave up some sales volume as a result," Bond said.

*****
So what are some takeaways? First, while they were able to pass along the increased costs in chicken to consumers, it did affect sales. While 'eating' is inelastic; what you eat is elastic - you can move to cheaper foods (not happily) - but I think this is what is happening for the lower and increasingly, middle class consumer. If you are making $140K a year you don't really care much about this, but if you are making $55K all these added costs of life, to go along with your measly 3% annual wage hikes start to add up (but wait, the government tells us CPI is 2%, nevermind, not a problem - if only the grocery store would listen to the gov't CPI statistics!)

Second, inputs for feeding these animals, which we've discussed in earlier blog entries, are just skyrocketing... and when you cannot pass this all on to consumers, your profit margins get squeezed. Just like with housing, we have the parallel - the consumer can only take so much increase before they cut back severely due to wages not increasing at the rate of these goods. If one now buys beef 6x a month instead of 8x, or people on the lower end stop almost completely - that all adds up.

This grandiose push to ethanol is a classic case of unintended consequences. We are all paying for it at the grocery checkout aisle.

Why should you care? These are all incremental negatives to the retail class - when the house ATM was open these things could just be explained away - short on cash? cards maxxed out? Pull $10k out of the house to pay for that gas, energy, grocery,tuition, medical bill! No problemo. Now? Problemo.

No positions

3 comments:

msb said...

The Fed's comments today:

"Outside of real estate, reports that the turmoil in financial markets had affected economic activity during the survey period were limited."

jimidean said...

The CPI stats are a joke. In light of SARBOX it is insane the government can put numbers out like that. Makes me want to buy gold and silver.

TraderMark said...

Jimidean, by working in corporate America and seeing how much work (i.e. little) is done on compiling truly accurate data to give to the gov't - when you add all these little pieces of inaccurate data together, what do you think the big picture reveals? Generally in most corporate offices, giving data to the gov't by filling out these darn surveys is drudgery work ... given to someone low on the totem pole. So that goes to all gov't reports.

As for CPI, I realize energy/food are volatile in nature but you can do 3 month or 6 month moving averages to smooth out the month to month volatility .... so by heralding this index WITHOUT 2 of the most important components is silly. Aside from housing and auto food and energy would generally be the 3rd and 4th largest expenditures in a person's budget. Hence tossing around inflation figures without them, to claim it's benign (or not benign) is foolish. That said, when I think about tuition costs, medical costs, energy, food, et al - I don't know where this 2% figure is coming from even for the core. There is a reason most Americans feel insecure - there buying power is falling - which means prices are going up more than wages - most people have made zero progress since 2000 on buying power. How is that possible with 1.5-2.5% inflation and 3-4% wage growth? It's not.

Post a Comment

Disclaimer: The opinions listed on this blog are for educational purpose only. You should do your own research before making any decisions.
This blog, its affiliates, partners or authors are not responsible or liable for any misstatements and/or losses you might sustain from the content provided.


Site by codeeo
Original WP Premium theme by WP Remix